This study explored the associations between a student-perceived classroom motivational climate, as defined by the Task, Authority, Recognition, Grouping, Evaluation, and Time (TARGET) framework, and reading motivation among Chinese students. This study selected 375 participants from the top 25% and 375 participants from the bottom 25% in reading performance out of a total of 1500 secondary students in Beijing. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) analyses revealed that high-achieving students had significantly greater perceptions of mastery-oriented tasks, mastery-oriented autonomy/time, mastery-oriented group activities, and mastery-oriented rewards/evaluations and lower perceptions of performance-oriented autonomy/time, performance-oriented group activities, and performance-oriented rewards/evaluations than did low-achieving students in reading classrooms. High-achieving students presented greater intrinsic motivation and reading efficacy than low-achieving students did. Using two-group structural equation modeling, the study demonstrated that mastery-oriented tasks predicted adaptive motivation in both high-achieving and low-achieving students, whereas performance-oriented rewards/evaluations predicted avoidance goals. Additionally, mastery-oriented group activities were negatively correlated with adaptive motivation among low-achieving students but positively correlated with adaptive motivation among high-achieving students. Performance-oriented group activities were positively correlated with intrinsic motivation only among high-achieving students. This study suggests that reading teachers should provide individualized support to ensure a positive learning process for all students rather than focusing solely on performance.
Read full abstract