Fuel Cell are energy generation alternatives to the traditional fossil fuel dependant transport and energy sectors. A typical polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) generates power from the electrochemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen which forms water. While PEMFC have become increasingly commercialised in the last decade there needs to be a significant cost reduction before the technology sees a much wider uptake. One of the key methods to reduce costs of PEMFCs is to reduce the platinum loading. Significant research has investigated non-platinum groups metals or ultra-low Pt loadings, however these have other technological barriers that need to be surpassed before they are widely commercialised. Increasing the lifetimes of fuel cell stacks is one other method to make costs competitive with traditional power generation. Carbon support corrosion is one of the key decomposition pathways of a fuel cell, this entails degradation and loss of the carbon support with use leading to loss of Pt catalyst, ionomer and reduction of proton and electron conduction.Highly graphitised carbon supports have been reported to be have superior carbon corrosion resistance compared to commercial carbon black. This has often been attributed to the sp2 carbon framework being more resilient to oxidation. Graphene and few layer graphite (FLG) are composed of sheets of sp2 carbon, high surface areas graphene has been developed. However when deposited as a catalyst layer the sheets restack during drying, forming a dense, low porosity electrode with low current densities. The potential carbon corrosion benefits of graphene cannot be observed reliably when operated at low current densities, it is therefore imperative to develop methods to control the morphology and layering of graphene based electrodes to mitigate this performance loss. In this work we report a series of method that utilises sacrificial additives and spacers to scalably control the morphology of graphene based electrodes. We show significant increases in current density, porosity and Pt utilisation via this method. In addition we discuss the effect of graphene size, source and treatment on performance of PEMFC cathodes. Figure 1