ObjectiveRapid EEG devices (REDs) have demonstrated substantial benefit regarding reduced time to performance of study and diagnosis in cases where urgent EEG is needed to evaluate patients for potentially revealing nonconvulsive status epilepticus and seizures. However, urgent EEG is also important in identifying cases regarding the need for initiation of antiseizure medication as well as triaging the use of continuous EEG monitoring. Some forms of REDs have a reduced montage (RRME) with electrode derivations that are one-half of standard recordings. This could impact spatial resolution and therefore potentially limit recovery of epileptiform abnormalities. MethodsIn this study we evaluated the use of the Ceribell® rapid response EEG system and compared it to conventional video EEG (CvEEG). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 20 subjects were included in our analysis. ResultsRRME was highly sensitive in detecting abundant and periodic discharges (p = 0.013) as well as discharges with a broad spatial distribution on CvEEG (p = 0.039). Sensitivity for detecting less prevalent discharges or those with more restricted spatial distribution was lower. SignificanceGiven the possibility of less frequent and more restricted epileptiform discharges eluding detection on RRME, we propose a protocol for the approach of using RRME and when to consider CvEEG when RRME is negative for epileptiform activity and highlight that urgent CvEEG may still be warranted following RRME.
Read full abstract