BackgroundBoth bicanalicular stent intubation and mono-canalicular stent intubation have been developed for post-oncological lacrimal duct reconstruction, although comparative analysis between the two surgical modalities is lacking. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of two types of stents at a single institution. Materials and methods75 eyes of 75 patients who underwent lacrimal reconstruction combined with lacrimal stent intubation were enrolled in this study, and divided into bicanalicular stent intubation and mono-canalicular stent intubation.The clinical characteristics, follow-up, and prognosis were compared between the two groups. ResultsBicanalicular stent intubation and mono-canalicular stent intubation were performed in 36 eyes (36 patients; Group A) and 39 eyes (39 patients; Group B), respectively. The difference in stent duration between Group A and B was statistically significant. Three eyes in Group A and one eye in Group B experienced postoperative stent prolapse. Two eyes in Group B showed punctum stenosis and one eye had punctal ectropion. Seven eyes in Group A had canalicular slitting. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean preoperative Munk scores between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean Munk scores and the mean VAS scores at 1 week postoperatively, before stent removal, and 3 months after stent removal between the two groups. ConclusionBoth of bicanalicular stent intubation and mono-canalicular stent intubation were equally effective in ensuring lacrimal duct patency and in preventing postoperative epiphora. Appropriate cases and stent selection can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
Read full abstract