The Maghreb Review, Vol. 43, 2, 2018 © The Maghreb Review 2018 This publication is printed on FSC Mix paper from responsible sources FREEDOM, COMPULSION, AND ‘ESOTERIC RELIGION’: MULLĀ ṢADRĀ’S EXEGESIS ON THE PHRASE LĀ IKRĀHA FĪ AL-DĪN SAJJAD RIZVI* One of the mainstays of modernist Muslim discourse is the accommodation of a broadly liberal notion of religious freedom, the freedom to choose one’s religion and to leave one’s religion if necessary, including, of course, Islam.1 The universal declaration of human rights and various other liberal modern documents of a rights-based approach to ethics have bundled together a number of liberties as essential social goods to which the modernist Muslim intellectual has acquiesced, sometimes understanding and engaging in the debates and embracing the notions enthusiastically, and at other times seemingly oblivious to the contexts and quasi-religious concerns that arise out of the history of Christendom and the desire to defang religious violence and prejudice inherited since the early modern period.2 The twin incoherences of liberalism pose problems for such reconciliations of the Muslim with modernity and liberalism. First, the dissonance between the metaphysics and hermeneutics of liberalism that seeks to universalize their own principles and hence leave no space for dissent and its alternative reading that proposes modus vivendi that allow pluralistic conceptions of reality and the good to flourish makes it difficult to embrace liberalism unequivocally.3 Second, liberalism may be a force for the good in which violence is overcome and dethroned for peace, but it is often equally a colonial (and neo-colonial) * University of Exeter This paper was originally presented as a lecture at the Pontifical Institute for the Study of Arabic and Islam in Rome on 25 February 2016. I am grateful to Fathers Valentino Cottini and Christopher Clohessy for their generous hospitality and invitation, and to the participants for their incisive and useful contributions. 1 Although it is worth pointing out that the question of apostasy is more complicated than that despite some moratoria or casuistic thinking on this associated with intellectuals affiliated or loosely associated with the Muslim Brotherhood such as Tariq Ramadan – see http://religionresearch.org/closer/2005/03/31/tariq-ramadan-an-international-call-formoratorium -on-corporal-punishment-stoning-and-the-death-penalty-in-the-islamic-world/ accessed 23 October 2017. Ramadan specifically dealt with apostasy in his interview with Der Speigel in 2005 given here http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/spiegel-interview-withtariq -ramadan-they-live-in-a-bleak-devastated-universe-a-384900-2.html accessed 23 October 2017. The approach posited here juxtaposes the letter against the ‘spirit’ of the law and is an example of the purposive nature of the law (maqāṣid al-sharīʿa) approach that Ramadan and others propose for the modern articulation of ethics in Islam – see Tariq Ramadan, Radical Reform: Islamic Ethics and Liberation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 2 For two important intellectual histories of human rights, one focused on the Christian roots, and the other on the Enlightenment legacies, see Samuel Moyn, Christian Human Rights, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015, and idem, The Last Utopia, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012, and Lynn Hunt, Inventing Human Rights: A History, New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2008. 3 John Gray, Two Faces of Liberalism, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000. FREEDOM, COMPULSION, AND ‘ESOTERIC RELIGION’ 155 enterprise that privileges a certain praxis of power and violence over others in hegemonic relationships.4 One need not be a Foucauldian or understand the cultural critique of Gramsci to see these tensions, incommensurabilities that seem to have passed the modernist’s attention. The aim of this paper is to set aside liberal and modernist discourses in favour of esotericism as method drawing upon the Safavid thinker Mullā Ṣadrā Shīrāzī (d. 1045/1636). But let us take first the critique of the former two approaches to hermeneutics. Three further problems plague our encounter with the liberal. The language of violence, religion and politics in our contemporary world is located within the bracketed set of three critical (and inter-connected) questions that affect and interrogate us. First, in our secular public spaces (leaving aside the niceties of...
Read full abstract