Discovery Logo
Sign In
Search
Paper
Search Paper
R Discovery for Libraries Pricing Sign In
  • Home iconHome
  • My Feed iconMy Feed
  • Search Papers iconSearch Papers
  • Library iconLibrary
  • Explore iconExplore
  • Ask R Discovery iconAsk R Discovery Star Left icon
  • Literature Review iconLiterature Review NEW
  • Chat PDF iconChat PDF Star Left icon
  • Citation Generator iconCitation Generator
  • Chrome Extension iconChrome Extension
    External link
  • Use on ChatGPT iconUse on ChatGPT
    External link
  • iOS App iconiOS App
    External link
  • Android App iconAndroid App
    External link
  • Contact Us iconContact Us
    External link
  • Paperpal iconPaperpal
    External link
  • Mind the Graph iconMind the Graph
    External link
  • Journal Finder iconJournal Finder
    External link
Discovery Logo menuClose menu
  • Home iconHome
  • My Feed iconMy Feed
  • Search Papers iconSearch Papers
  • Library iconLibrary
  • Explore iconExplore
  • Ask R Discovery iconAsk R Discovery Star Left icon
  • Literature Review iconLiterature Review NEW
  • Chat PDF iconChat PDF Star Left icon
  • Citation Generator iconCitation Generator
  • Chrome Extension iconChrome Extension
    External link
  • Use on ChatGPT iconUse on ChatGPT
    External link
  • iOS App iconiOS App
    External link
  • Android App iconAndroid App
    External link
  • Contact Us iconContact Us
    External link
  • Paperpal iconPaperpal
    External link
  • Mind the Graph iconMind the Graph
    External link
  • Journal Finder iconJournal Finder
    External link
features
  • Audio Papers iconAudio Papers
  • Paper Translation iconPaper Translation
  • Chrome Extension iconChrome Extension
Content Type
  • Journal Articles iconJournal Articles
  • Conference Papers iconConference Papers
  • Preprints iconPreprints
  • Seminars by Cassyni iconSeminars by Cassyni
More
  • R Discovery for Libraries iconR Discovery for Libraries
  • Research Areas iconResearch Areas
  • Topics iconTopics
  • Resources iconResources

Articles published on mL Of Levobupivacaine

Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
74 Search results
Sort by
Recency
  • Research Article
Thoracic Intervertebral Foramen Blocks Compared to Midpoint-to-Pleura Transverse Process Blocks for the Management of Acute Rib Fracture Pain.
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • Pain physician
  • Barbara Pizzi + 4 more

Rib fractures can lead to intense acute pain, chest wall instability, and pulmonary complications in trauma patients, necessitating their admission to critical care units. Furthermore, these lesions represent a source of neuropathic disturbances. The goal was to compare continuous thoracic intervertebral foramen blocks (CTIFBs) to continuous midpoint-to-pleura transverse process blocks (CMTPBs), both guided by ultrasound, for their efficacy in managing acute pain caused by rib fractures. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. This research was conducted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of San Salvatore Academic Hospital (L'Aquila, Italy) from December 2022 to November 2024. Ninety-six adult trauma patients with rib fractures were randomized to receive either the CTIFB (experimental group; n = 48) or the CMPTB (control group; n = 48). The former block was performed by placing the tip of the needle over and behind the transverse process of the vertebra. In the latter block, the needle tip involved the midpoint between the pleura and transverse process. All patients received an initial bolus of 5 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% with 4 mg of dexamethasone at each fracture level, followed by a continuous infusion (5 mL/h of levobupivacaine 0.25% with 16 mg of dexamethasone). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved pain control (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] score <= 3) by 2 hours after the block. The secondary outcomes included neuropathic disturbances (assessed by von Frey hair and Lindblom tests), respiratory parameters (P/F ratio, spirometry, and diaphragmatic motion), and daily morphine consumption. Success (NRS score <= 3) was achieved in 21/48 patients (44%) in the experimental group and 3/48 patients (6%) in the control group (P < 0.001). Patients in the experimental group showed significant reductions in neuropathic disturbances (F(5,470) = 18.5, P < 0.001) and required less daily morphine (10.1 ± 3.9 mg versus 20.8 ± 4.5 mg, P < 0.001). Both groups demonstrated improved respiratory parameters, but patients in the experimental group showed superior airflow rates by 48 hours (P = 0.004) after the block. The anesthetic procedures were performed under ultrasound rather than fluoroscopic guidance. These techniques may have utility in chronic pain management, requiring fluoroscopy rather than ultrasound. This aspect of our research is not generalizable to chronic pain practice. Additionally, this study had a single-center design, and patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy, an important subgroup of trauma care, were excluded. Those factors might have limited generalizability to other clinical settings. Third, the follow-up period was relatively short, precluding the assessment of long-term outcomes such as chronic pain development or functional recovery. Finally, although improved respiratory parameters were observed, the study was not equipped to detect differences in clinical outcomes such as pneumonia rates or mortality. For patients with rib fractures, the CTIFB offered superior pain management, fewer requests for opioids, and better respiratory function than did the CMTPB. Rib fractures, acute pain, neuropathic disturbances, paravertebral catheters, midpoint transverse process to the pleura, intervertebral foramen, respiratory function, opioid-sparing techniques.

  • Research Article
  • 10.7860/jcdr/2025/77603.21284
Comparison of Levobupivacaine 0.5% versus Ropivacaine 0.75% with Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Clinical Study
  • Aug 1, 2025
  • JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
  • Dinesh Kumar Sahu + 4 more

Introduction: Peripheral nerve blocks not only provide surgical anaesthesia but also minimise the stress response, in addition to providing postoperative analgesia. The addition of adjuvants augments the anaesthetic action of the drug and reduces the dose required, thus improving the safety margin. However, no single drug can be considered the optimum local anaesthetic or adjuvant at this time. In the quest to find a better local anaesthetic and adjuvant combination, dexmedetomidine has recently emerged as a promising adjuvant to local anaesthetics during regional anaesthesia procedures. Aim: To study the efficacy of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant using ultrasound in the Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block (SCPB). Materials and Methods: A randomised, double-blinded clinical study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, Jagjivan Ram Railway Hospital, Mumbai Central, Maharashtra, India from November 2019 to April 2021 on 60 adults aged 21-65 years with American Soceity of Anaesthesiology (ASA) class I and II, scheduled for upper limb surgery. Patients were randomised into two groups, each containing 30 patients. Group A received 20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% with 50 mcg of dexmedetomidine, while Group B received 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% with 50 mcg of dexmedetomidine. A comparison was made regarding the efficacy in terms of the onset of sensory and motor blockade, duration of sensory and motor blockade, haemodynamics, any adverse effects, and postoperative analgesia. Categorical covariates were compared using the Chi-square test, and continuous covariates were compared using the unpaired t-test. Results: The groups were comparable concerning demographic data and baseline haemodynamic parameters. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the mean Heart Rate (HR), mean blood pressures, and mean oxygen saturations at different time intervals between the groups. The mean time±Standard Deviation (SD) for the onset of sensory block and motor block in the levobupivacaine group was 19.13±1.87 min and 29.53±2.86 min, respectively; this was statistically faster at 11.26±1.92 min and 7.53±1.35 min in the ropivacaine group (p-value &lt;0.05). The mean duration of sensory and motor block in the levobupivacaine group was 459.83±26.40 min and 539.33±23.77 min, respectively, while it was longer at 878.66±17.46 min and 786.16±17.50 min in the ropivacaine group (p-value &lt;0.05). Conclusion: The use of dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine for SCPB results in a quicker onset and longer anaesthetic effect compared to levobupivacaine. Dexmedetomidine should be utilised as an adjuvant to reduce anaesthesia induction time in SCPB.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 2
  • 10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.047
Pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation for prolonged infusion of levobupivacaine with or without epinephrine in transversus abdominis plane and erector spinae plane blocks: a randomised controlled trial and analysis of pooled data.
  • Jul 1, 2025
  • British journal of anaesthesia
  • Andrea Araneda + 8 more

Pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation for prolonged infusion of levobupivacaine with or without epinephrine in transversus abdominis plane and erector spinae plane blocks: a randomised controlled trial and analysis of pooled data.

  • Research Article
  • 10.25258/ijpqa.16.3.12
Comparison of Clonidine and Butorphanol as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance
  • Sivasamy S + 3 more

Background: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block provides safe, effective and low-cost anesthesia. There are always efforts to find better and safer local anesthesia along with adjuvant for supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Levobupivacaine has strongly emerged as a safer alternative for regional anesthesia than its racemic sibling bupivacaine. We conducted the study to compare levobupivacaine with clonidine or butorphanol for sensory block, motor block, duration of analgesia, sedation and adverse effects Aims and Objectives: (1) To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of clonidine and butorphanol as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine. (2) To assess the onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of postoperative analgesia, visual analog score (VAS) scoring and the requirements of rescue analgesia. Methodology: A prospective randomized study was carried out which included 60 adult patients between the ages of 18-65 years of ASA 1 and 2 who underwent upper limb surgeries. Group A received 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 40mcg clonidine and group B received 30 ml of levobupivacaine with 2 mg of butorphanol via supraclavicular approach. Onset, duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia was observed. All patients were observed in post anesthesia care unit and received tramadol injection 100mg IV in 100ml normal saline as soon as they compared of pain as rescue analgesic. Duration of analgesia was taken as the time from placement of block till the injection of rescue analgesic. Result: Duration of block and analgesia was prolonged in group A compared to group B and it is statistically highly significant. Conclusion: Clonidine as an adjuvant with 0.5% levobupivacaine is more effective in prolonging the duration of sensory and motor block and the duration of analgesia when compared to butorphanol as an adjuvant to 0.5% levobupivacaine.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 2
  • 10.4103/ija.ija_279_24
Intraoperative thoracic interfascial plane block with levobupivacaine versus levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia after modified radical mastectomy: A randomised controlled double-blinded trial.
  • Jul 2, 2024
  • Indian journal of anaesthesia
  • Nidhi Arun + 2 more

Nearly half of the patients following breast cancer surgery experience postoperative pain. The interfascial plane for the pectoral nerve (PECS) block, along with dexmedetomidine, can alleviate this pain. After institutional ethics committee clearance and written informed consent, this randomised, double-blind study was conducted on 60, 18-60 years female patients, who were scheduled for modified radical mastectomy (MRM) under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomised into Group L (20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine) and Group DL (20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine with 0.5 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine). After resection of the tumour and securing haemostasis, under strict aseptic precaution, 10 ml of the study drug was injected under direct vision between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor and 10 ml between pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles by the operating surgeon (direct PECS block). The primary outcome was to compare the duration of analgesia. Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's t-test, and non-normally distributed variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Qualitative data were analysed using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was kept at P < 0.05. The median time of the first analgesic requirement was 8 [inter-quartile range (IQR): 6-8] h in Group L and 18 (IQR: 16-20) h in Group DL (W = 17.000, P < 0.001). The mean total opioid consumption of Group L was 12.53 [standard deviation (SD): 2.29] mg in the first 24 h and 6.93 (SD: 1.89) mg in Group DL. Adding 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine to 20 ml of levobupivacaine enhances the duration of analgesia of direct PECS block in patients undergoing MRM.

  • Research Article
  • 10.4103/joacp.joacp_14_24
Postoperative analgesic effect of adding neostigmine to levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided spermatic cord block for testicular sperm extraction surgery.
  • Jun 27, 2024
  • Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
  • Amr Samir Wahdan + 4 more

Providing postoperative pain management in patients who underwent scrotal surgeries is achieved using several methods, one of which is the ultrasound-guided spermatic cord block (US-SCB). To enhance anesthesia quality and extend analgesia postoperatively, several agents have been added in conjunction with local agents. This study targeted assessing the results of combining neostigmine with levobupivacaine in US-SCB for providing perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing testicular sperm extraction (TESE) surgery. This double-blind, randomized controlled study was performed for 112 subjects undergoing TESE operation using general anesthesia. They were randomly and equally divided into two groups. All participants received bilateral US-SCB after induction of general anesthesia by 19 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% combined with 1 mL of neostigmine 500 μg in (group N) or 1 mL of normal saline in (group C). The first analgesic dose request time and the amount of analgesic consumed in the first 24 h were the main points of comparison in both groups. The mean postoperative analgesia duration was noticeably increased in the N group compared to the C group, with a value of 480 ± 41.34 min versus 404 ± 34.14 min, independently (P < 0.001). Moreover, the total amount of postoperative analgesic consumption was remarkably decreased in group N when compared to group C without statistically remarkable divergence concerning complications between both groups. Adding neostigmine to a local anesthetic solution in US-SCB proved to detain the first analgesic request postoperatively with reduced perioperative analgesia consumption, without significant side effects.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 12
  • 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001106
Ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block vs continuous thoracic epidural analgesia for the management of acute and chronic postthoracotomy pain: a randomized, controlled,double-blind trial.
  • Dec 1, 2023
  • PAIN Reports
  • Ehab Hanafy Shaker + 8 more

Postthoracotomy pain (PTP) is a severe pain complicating thoracic surgeries and its good management decreases the risk of PTP syndrome (PTPS). This randomized controlled study evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with or without dexmedetomidine compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in managing acute postoperative pain and the possible emergence of PTPS. Ninety patients with chest malignancies planned for thoracotomy were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups. Group 1: TEA (20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% bolus, then 0.1 mL/kg/h of levobupivacaine 0.1%), group 2: ESPB (20 mL of levobupivacaine only 0.1% bolus every 6 hours), and group 3: ESPB (20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% and 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine Hcl bolus every 6 hours). Resting and dynamic visual analog scales were higher in group 2 compared with groups 1 and 3 at 6, 24, and 36 hours and at 8 and 12 weeks. Postthoracotomy pain syndrome incidence was higher in group 2 compared with groups 1 and 3 at 8 and 12 weeks, whereas it was indifferent between groups 1 and 3. The grading system for neuropathic pain score was higher in group 2 compared with groups 1 and 3 at 8 and 12 weeks, whereas it was indifferent between groups 1 and 3. Itching, pruritis, and urine retention were higher in group 1 than in ESPB groups. Ultrasound-guided ESPB with dexmedetomidine is as potent as TEA in relieving acute PTP and reducing the possible emergence of chronic PTPS. However, the 2 techniques were superior to ESPB without dexmedetomidine. Erector spinae plane block has fewer side effects compared with TEA.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.35975/apic.v27i4.2256
Intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl compared to levobupivacaine with fentanyl for painless labor: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
  • Jun 7, 2023
  • Anaesthesia, Pain &amp; Intensive Care
  • Wesam Nashat Ali + 5 more

Background &amp; Objective: Labor pain relief has been a challenge for the clinicians for centuries. A lot many regimes and therapeutic interventions, including spinal and epidural injections, have been tried with variable effect. We aimed to compare the duration of analgesia and potency of bupivacaine plus fentanyl vs. levobupivacaine plus fentanyl for painless labor.&#x0D; Methodology: We enrolled 70 parturients who requested spinal analgesia in active labor, and randomly divided them into two groups; Group B (35 women) received 2.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl 25 µg, and Group L (35 women) received 2.5 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5% plus fentanyl 25 µg. We assessed motor and sensory block, the efficacy of analgesia, pain scores, adverse effects, and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of both groups.&#x0D; Results: Time to reach maximum sensory block was significantly longer in Group L than in Group B (P = 0.002*). There was a statistically significant increase in the duration of motor blocks in Group B than in Group L (P &lt; 0.05). The median VAS scores were significantly lower in Group L than in Group B after 2 and 3 h after injection. The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in Group L than in Group B (P &lt; 0.05). The two study groups had no differences in the measured obstetric and neonatal outcomes.&#x0D; Conclusion: Levobupivacaine with fentanyl was superior to bupivacaine with fentanyl regarding the duration and potency of analgesia with lower pain scores, high maternal satisfaction, and no adverse obstetric or neonatal outcomes. Therefore, spinal levobupivacaine plus fentanyl was a reasonable choice for labor analgesia and can be used without jeopardizing the safety of the mother and fetus.&#x0D; Key words: Bupivacaine; Fentanyl; Levobupivacaine; Labor pain; Spinal Analgesia&#x0D; Citation: Ali WN, Youssef HA, Abbas AM, Roshdy PE, ImbabyASS. Intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl compared to levobupivacaine with fentanyl for painless labor: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2023;27(4):478−484; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v27i4.2256&#x0D; Received: July 29, 2022; Reviewed: April 19, 2023; Accepted: April 21, 2023

  • PDF Download Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 3
  • 10.7759/cureus.38534
Cost Analysis of Low-Volume Versus Standard-Volume Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery.
  • May 4, 2023
  • Cureus
  • Pablo Oliver-Fornies + 8 more

Background Economic evaluation has become an essential decision-making tool for health systems worldwide. This study was aimed at estimating the difference in the use of healthcare resources, days on sick leave, and costs between patients undergoing a standard-volume versus a low-volume ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Methods This is a post-hoc cost analysis of a double-blind, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Forty-eight patients undergoing ultrasound-guided interscalene block received either 10 ml or 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Analyses involved the public healthcare payer perspective (including visits to general practitioners, nursing staff, physiotherapy facilities, hospital admissions, outpatient diagnostic tests, etc.) and the limited societal perspective, including productivity losses (days on sick leave). Measurements were made at one-month and one-year follow-ups post-intervention. Differences in costs were estimated using two-part models adjusted by the costs incurred in the previous year. Results Subjects in the 10 ml group made greater use of general practitioner visits (mean difference [95% CI]: 3.35 [0.219 to 6.49]; p=0.036) and diagnostic tests (2.43 [0.601 to 4.26]; p=0.009), but less use of physical therapy (-12.9 [-21.7 to -4.06]; p=0.004). Mean (SD) cost differences from the public healthcare payer's perspective were 1,461.34 $ (1,541.62) and 1,024.08$ (943.83) for the 10 ml and 20 ml groups, respectively (p=0.293). From the limited societal perspective, the differences were as follows: 7,036.53$ (8,077.58) and 8,666.56$ (9,841.10), respectively (p=0.937). While there were no differences in the above parameters at the one-month follow-up. Conclusion The volume reduction proposed following interscalene block resulted in meaningful, albeit not statistically significant, clinical benefits and lower costs from a limited societal perspective for shoulder surgery. Thus, healthcare use and days on sick leave are variables to be taken into consideration when calculating the economic impact of surgical procedures.

  • PDF Download Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.4038/slja.v31i1.9000
Comparative Study of The Effects of Three Different Volumes and Concentrations of Levobupivacaine on The Block Characteristics in Upper Limb Surgeries Using Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block
  • May 2, 2023
  • Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology
  • Aruna Manaswini Murugesan + 1 more

Backgrounds and objectives: This an attempt to compare the effects of 15ml of levobupivacaine 0.75%, 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.375% and 30ml of levobupivacaine 0.25% with fixed dosage (75mg) on block characteristics in upper limb surgeries using ultrasound guided supraclavicular block. Materials and methods: Titled “Comparative study of the effects of three different volumes and concentrations of Levobupivacaine on the block characteristics in upper limb surgeries using ultrasound guided supraclavicular block” performed in Department of Anaesthesiology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute from March 2020 to April 2021. Group A – 15mL of Levobupivacaine 0.5%, Group B – 20mL of Levobupivacaine 0.375% Group C – 30mL of Levobupivacaine 0.25% Results: Onset of Sensory block: This study observed that mean onset of sensory block was earlier in 15mL was 22±5.25 minutes in comparison 20mL was 29±6.42 minutes and 30mL 37.5±6.17 minutes which is significant. Onset of Motor block: It was observed that mean onset of motor block was earlier in 15mL was 33±6.57 minutes when compared to 20mL was 36±6.87 minutes and 30mL 44±7.67 minutes which is significant. Duration of Analgesia: This study observed the mean Duration of analgesia was longer in 15mL 19.25±2.52 hours when compared to 20mL and 30mL Group having 15.5±1.88 hours and 12±1.94 hours respectively, which is significant. Diaphragmatic involvement: This study observed that the mean diaphragmatic involvement was longer in 15mL 25.6±13.291% when compared to 20 mL and 30mL having 33.76±9.76% and 52.435±12.6% respectively, which is significant. Conclusion:15mL Levobupivacaine of 75mg has an early onset of Sensory and Motor blockade and Prolonged Duration of Analgesia and lesser diaphragmatic involvement compared to 20mL and 30mL.

  • Research Article
  • 10.21275/sr221104161325
Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia after Breast Cancer Surgery
  • Nov 5, 2022
  • International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
  • Mudhanuru Bhargava Mallesh Yadav + 3 more

Introduction: Currently regional technique-thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery is gaining popularity. Aim of the study is to find out the safety and the analgesic efficacy of 1 ?g/kg dexmedetomidine when added to levobupivacaine 0.25% in paravertebral blocks (PVB) in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Methods: Sixty American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical statusI/II patients posted for breast cancer surgery were randomly assigned into two groups of 30 each. Group L received thoracic PVB with 20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Group LD received thoracic PVB with 20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% + 1 ?g/kg dexmedetomidine. Time of first analgesics request, total analgesic consumption, VAS score, hemodynamic, sedation score and side effects in the first 24 hours were recorded. Results: The time of the first rescue analgesic requirement was significantly prolonged in the group LD (8.15 ? 2.21 hours) in comparison to group L (6.34 ? 2.83 hours). The mean total consumption of intravenous tramadol as rescue analgesia in the post-anaesthesia care unit in the first 24 hours postoperatively was significantly decreased in group Levobupivacaine + Dexmeditomidine compared to group Levobupivacaine. Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine 1 ?g/kg to levobupivacaine 0.25% in PVB in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery improves the quality and the duration of analgesia postoperatively.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 6
  • 10.1213/xaa.0000000000001618
Ultrasound-Guided Scalp Blocks for an Awake Craniotomy: A Case Report
  • Sep 20, 2022
  • A&amp;A Practice
  • Samuel Ern Hung Tsan + 2 more

Ultrasound-guided scalp blocks may revolutionize regional anesthesia for neurosurgery. In this report, we demonstrate that ultrasound-guided scalp blocks can be used effectively for a craniotomy. A 48-year-old patient with a brain tumor at the motor cortex was scheduled for an awake craniotomy. Ultrasound-guided scalp blocks targeting the bilateral supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, greater auricular, lesser occipital, greater occipital, and third occipital nerves were performed. A total of 29 mL of levobupivacaine 0.3% was used. No additional local anesthetic agent was given for skull pinning, skin incision, or the craniotomy. Postoperatively, the patient remained pain-free, and she was discharged without complications.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 4
  • 10.5812/aapm.121647
Anesthetic Conversion of Preexisting Labor Epidural Analgesia for Emergency Cesarean Section and Efficacy of Levobupivacaine with or Without Magnesium Sulphate: A Prospective Randomized Study.
  • Mar 11, 2022
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Mona Raafat Elghamry + 2 more

BackgroundFor pregnant women who require an emergency cesarean section (CS), extending labor epidural analgesia as quickly as feasible to good quality anesthesia is a critical issue. This indicates the presence of functional labor epidural analgesia and reduces the need for general anesthesia. Addition of magnesium increases anesthetic and analgesic qualities of epidural anesthesia.ObjectivesThe purpose of this trial was to assess the role of adding magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) with levobupivacaine to speed up the conversion of labor epidural analgesia into enough anesthesia for emergency CS.MethodsFifty parturients were randomly assigned to receive 19.5 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% with either 0.5 mL of normal saline 0.9% (Group I) or 0.5 mL of MgSO4 10% (Group II) after receiving labor epidural analgesia. We documented the onset of block (loss of pinprick to T6), number of patients needing additional analgesia, the time needed for sensory and motor blockade to recover, and the adverse effects.ResultsThe frequency of patients receiving intraoperative supplements was comparable in the study groups (P = 0.491), although the onset of the block was faster in Group II than in Group I (P = 0.000*). Group II took substantially longer to recover from sensory and motor blockade than Group I (P = 0.001* and P = 0.001*, respectively). In both groups, the occurrence of adverse events was similar.ConclusionsAdding 50 mg of MgSO4 to levobupivacaine 0.5% accelerated the epidural top, and both sensory onset and motor blocks period were prolonged as compared to levobupivacaine alone when extending epidural analgesia for emergency CS.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.37275/amcr.v2i3.24
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under Segmental Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • Archives of The Medicine and Case Reports
  • Aidyl Fitrisyah + 2 more

Introduction: Cholelithiasis or gallstones are hardened deposits of digestive fluid that can form in gallbladder. The treatment of gallstones depends upon the stage of disease. Once gallstones become symptomatic, definitive surgical intervention with cholecystectomy is usually indicated (typically, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the first-line therapy). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy removes the gallbladder and gallstones through several small incisions in the abdomen. This case report aims to discuss the managent of segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.&#x0D; Case: We report on the cases of 2 patients who undego elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Female, 53 years old, will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, performed anesthesia with segmental thoracic spinal anesthesiatechnique using the anesthetic agent 3 ml of Levobupivacaine 0,5% + 25 mcg of Fentanyl, requiring a sensory block to at least T10-T11 dermatom. Patients received a 1,2 mcg target control infusion (TCI) propofol intravenous is administered as intermittent boluses to achieve deep sedation. The operation lasts 1 hour, with a bleeding 15 cc and urine output 100 cc, hemodynamically stable. Female, 42 years old, will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, performed anesthesia with segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia technique using the anesthetic agent 3 ml of Levobupivacaine 0,5% + 25 mcg of Fentanyl, requiring a sensory block to at least T10-T11 dermatom. Patients received a 3 mg of midazolam intravenous is administered as intermittent boluses to achieve deep sedation. The operation lasts 1 hour, with a bleeding 15 cc and urine output 150 cc, hemodynamically stable. The level and duration of sensory block, intensity and duration of motor block were recorded. A 20 % or more decrease in MAP compared to baseline was considered as hypotension, iv ephedrine 5 mgr bolus administreted.&#x0D; Conclusion: Laparoscopy is a surgical procedure that uses minimally invasive surgical techniques (minimally invasive surgery) where the doctor uses a small telescope / camera that is inserted into the stomach and surgical instruments in mini form. This procedure has many advantages because it is not invasive, the amount of bleeding can be reduced, postoperative pain can be minimized. Regional anesthesia procedure in laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on several studies and case reports can be performed and is a safe procedure.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_245_20
Dexamethasone 5 mg Versus Dexmedetomidine 20 μg as Adjuvants to 0.5% Levobupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine for Peribulbar Block Anesthesia
  • Jul 1, 2021
  • Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
  • Ady Asmar + 6 more

Abstract Background: The addition of adjuvants to local anesthetics in the peribulbar block might be a method to elevate block quality. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of peribulbar local anesthesia adjuvants using dexmedetomidine 20 mcg and dexamethasone 5 mg. Patients and Methods: This study was a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients were divided into three groups who received peribulbar group: Group C (4 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5% and 4 ml of 2% lidocaine added with 1 ml of normal saline), Group D (4 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5% and 4 ml of 2% lidocaine added with 1 ml of dexamethasone 5 mg), and Group M (received 4 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5% and 4 ml of 2% lidocaine added with 1 ml of dexmedetomidine 20 mcg). Sensory and motor block onsets and durations were assessed. Results: There were 42 patients included. The sensory block onset was 70.7 s in Group M and the slowest in Group C (152.1 s). The longest sensory block duration was found in Group D (259.3 min) and the shortest in Group C (143.2 min). Conclusion: Dexamethasone 5 mg adjuvant affected sensory block onset, sensory, and motor block duration but did not affect motor block onset, while dexmedetomidine 20 mcg adjuvant affected sensory and motor block onsets as well as sensory and motor block durations.

  • Research Article
  • 10.37275/amcr.v2i2.492
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under Segmental Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia
  • Mar 22, 2021
  • Archives of The Medicine and Case Reports
  • Aidyl Fitrisyah + 2 more

Introduction: Cholelithiasis or gallstones are hardened deposits of digestive fluid that can form in gallbladder. The treatment of gallstones depends upon the stage of disease. Once gallstones become symptomatic, definitive surgical intervention with cholecystectomy is usually indicated (typically, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the first-line therapy). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy removes the gallbladder and gallstones through several small incisions in the abdomen. This case report aims to discuss the managent of segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.&#x0D; Case: We report on the cases of 2 patients who undego elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Female, 53 years old, will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, performed anesthesia with segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia technique using the anesthetic agent 3 ml of Levobupivacaine 0,5% + 25 mcg of Fentanyl, requiring a sensory block to at least T10-T11 dermatom. Patients received a 1,2 mcg target control infusion (TCI) propofol intravenous is administered as intermittent boluses to achieve deep sedation. The operation lasts 1 hour, with a bleeding 15 cc and urine output 100 cc, hemodynamically stable. Female, 42 years old, will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, performed anesthesia with segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia technique using the anesthetic agent 3 ml of Levobupivacaine 0,5% + 25 mcg of Fentanyl, requiring a sensory block to at least T10-T11 dermatom. Patients received a 3 mg of midazolam intravenous is administered as intermittent boluses to achieve deep sedation. The operation lasts 1 hour, with a bleeding 15 cc and urine output 150 cc, hemodynamically stable. The level and duration of sensory block, intensity and duration of motor block were recorded. A 20 % or more decrease in MAP compared to baseline was considered as hypotension, iv ephedrine 5 mgr bolus administreted.&#x0D; Conclusion: Laparoscopy is a surgical procedure that uses minimally invasive surgical techniques (minimally invasive surgery) where the doctor uses a small telescope / camera that is inserted into the stomach and surgical instruments in mini form. This procedure has many advantages because it is not invasive, the amount of bleeding can be reduced, postoperative pain can be minimized. Regional anesthesia procedure in laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on several studies and case reports can be performed and is a safe procedure.

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.37275/amcr.v2i1.28
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under Segmental Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia
  • Mar 22, 2021
  • Archives of The Medicine and Case Reports
  • Aidyl Fitrisyah + 2 more

Introduction: Cholelithiasis or gallstones are hardened deposits of digestive fluid that can form in gallbladder. The treatment of gallstones depends upon the stage of disease. Once gallstones become symptomatic, definitive surgical intervention with cholecystectomy is usually indicated (typically, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the first-line therapy). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy removes the gallbladder and gallstones through several small incisions in the abdomen. This case report aims to discuss the managent of segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.&#x0D; Case: We report on the cases of 2 patients who undego elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Female, 53 years old, will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, performed anesthesia with segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia technique using the anesthetic agent 3 ml of Levobupivacaine 0,5% + 25 mcg of Fentanyl, requiring a sensory block to at least T10-T11 dermatom. Patients received a 1,2 mcg target control infusion (TCI) propofol intravenous is administered as intermittent boluses to achieve deep sedation. The operation lasts 1 hour, with a bleeding 15 cc and urine output 100 cc, hemodynamically stable. Female, 42 years old, will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, performed anesthesia with segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia technique using the anesthetic agent 3 ml of Levobupivacaine 0,5% + 25 mcg of Fentanyl, requiring a sensory block to at least T10-T11 dermatom. Patients received a 3 mg of midazolam intravenous is administered as intermittent boluses to achieve deep sedation. The operation lasts 1 hour, with a bleeding 15 cc and urine output 150 cc, hemodynamically stable. The level and duration of sensory block, intensity and duration of motor block were recorded. A 20 % or more decrease in MAP compared to baseline was considered as hypotension, iv ephedrine 5 mgr bolus administreted.&#x0D; Conclusion: Laparoscopy is a surgical procedure that uses minimally invasive surgical techniques (minimally invasive surgery) where the doctor uses a small telescope / camera that is inserted into the stomach and surgical instruments in mini form. This procedure has many advantages because it is not invasive, the amount of bleeding can be reduced, postoperative pain can be minimized. Regional anesthesia procedure in laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on several studies and case reports can be performed and is a safe procedure.

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 6
  • 10.4103/aer.aer_69_21
Comparison of Perineural and Intravenous Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A prospective Randomized Trial
  • Jan 1, 2021
  • Anesthesia, Essays and Researches
  • G Veena + 5 more

Background:The effect of perineural versus intravenous (i.v.) dexamethasone (4 mg) when added to levobupivacaine as an adjuvant has not been well studied.Aims:This study was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of perineural and i.v. dexamethasone as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus (ICBP) block.Settings and Design:This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.Materials and Methods:This study was conducted on 68 patients with the ultrasound-guided ICBP block, randomly allocated into two groups (34 each). Four patients had failed block (2 in each group) that was excluded from the study. Group A received 25 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% and 1 mL of normal saline for the block and i.v. dexamethasone 4 mg. Group B received 25 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% with 4 mg of perineural dexamethasone for the block. Postoperative vitals and different block characteristics were assessed.Statistical Analysis Used:Student's independent sample t-test and Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.Results:The duration of motor block and analgesia in Group A was 1245.94 ± 153.22 min and 1310.16 ± 151.68 min, respectively. However, in Group B, the duration of motor block and analgesia was 1768.13 ± 309.86 min and 1743.59 ± 231.39 min, respectively, which was more when compared to Group A (P < 0.001). The Visual Analog Scale score of ≥3 in Group A was 37% and in Group B was 9% (P = 0.008). Four cases had delayed regression of motor block in the perineural group.Conclusions:Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged the duration of motor block promoted by levobupivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus block, reduced pain intensity and rescue analgesia needs in the postoperative period when compared with the intravenous dexamethasone.

  • PDF Download Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 17
  • 10.1080/11101849.2021.1893984
Effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae blocks on postoperative pain and opioid use after lumbar spine surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial
  • Jan 1, 2021
  • Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
  • Amr Samir Wahdan + 4 more

ABSTRACT Background: The control of postoperative pain following major lumbar spine surgeries remains a major challenge for anesthesiologists, and many new strategies and methods have been developed for pain control. This study’s main objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (US-ESPB) as a method for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries. Methods: This double-blinded prospective randomised controlled study was conducted on 140 patients aged between 18 and 65 years; all were scheduled for elective lumbar spine surgeries. Patients were randomly allocated into one of the two groups: the ESPB group (n = 70) or the control group (n = 70). All patients received bilateral US-ESPB after induction of general anaesthesia, in the ESPB group; 20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% were used, while 20 mL normal saline was given to the control group instead. The primary endpoint was the total amount of morphine consumed during the intraoperative and the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary endpoints included, time to first request of rescue analgesia as well as incidence of adverse effects. Results: The total amount of morphine consumed during the intraoperative and the first 24 postoperative hours was found to be significantly lower in the ESPB group compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Moreover, the time to first analgesic request was significantly longer in patients receiving ESPB as analgesia (P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding complications. Conclusion: Bilateral US-ESPB is useful intervention for providing adequate pain management in lumbar spine surgeries.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 69
  • 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109907
Lumbar plexus block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty: A single-blinded, randomized trial
  • Jun 2, 2020
  • Journal of clinical anesthesia
  • Daniela Bravo + 9 more

Lumbar plexus block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty: A single-blinded, randomized trial

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Popular topics

  • Latest Artificial Intelligence papers
  • Latest Nursing papers
  • Latest Psychology Research papers
  • Latest Sociology Research papers
  • Latest Business Research papers
  • Latest Marketing Research papers
  • Latest Social Research papers
  • Latest Education Research papers
  • Latest Accounting Research papers
  • Latest Mental Health papers
  • Latest Economics papers
  • Latest Education Research papers
  • Latest Climate Change Research papers
  • Latest Mathematics Research papers

Most cited papers

  • Most cited Artificial Intelligence papers
  • Most cited Nursing papers
  • Most cited Psychology Research papers
  • Most cited Sociology Research papers
  • Most cited Business Research papers
  • Most cited Marketing Research papers
  • Most cited Social Research papers
  • Most cited Education Research papers
  • Most cited Accounting Research papers
  • Most cited Mental Health papers
  • Most cited Economics papers
  • Most cited Education Research papers
  • Most cited Climate Change Research papers
  • Most cited Mathematics Research papers

Latest papers from journals

  • Scientific Reports latest papers
  • PLOS ONE latest papers
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology latest papers
  • Nature Communications latest papers
  • BMC Geriatrics latest papers
  • Science of The Total Environment latest papers
  • Medical Physics latest papers
  • Cureus latest papers
  • Cancer Research latest papers
  • Chemosphere latest papers
  • International Journal of Advanced Research in Science latest papers
  • Communication and Technology latest papers

Latest papers from institutions

  • Latest research from French National Centre for Scientific Research
  • Latest research from Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Latest research from Harvard University
  • Latest research from University of Toronto
  • Latest research from University of Michigan
  • Latest research from University College London
  • Latest research from Stanford University
  • Latest research from The University of Tokyo
  • Latest research from Johns Hopkins University
  • Latest research from University of Washington
  • Latest research from University of Oxford
  • Latest research from University of Cambridge

Popular Collections

  • Research on Reduced Inequalities
  • Research on No Poverty
  • Research on Gender Equality
  • Research on Peace Justice & Strong Institutions
  • Research on Affordable & Clean Energy
  • Research on Quality Education
  • Research on Clean Water & Sanitation
  • Research on COVID-19
  • Research on Monkeypox
  • Research on Medical Specialties
  • Research on Climate Justice
Discovery logo
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram

Download the FREE App

  • Play store Link
  • App store Link
  • Scan QR code to download FREE App

    Scan to download FREE App

  • Google PlayApp Store
FacebookTwitterTwitterInstagram
  • Universities & Institutions
  • Publishers
  • R Discovery PrimeNew
  • Ask R Discovery
  • Blog
  • Accessibility
  • Topics
  • Journals
  • Open Access Papers
  • Year-wise Publications
  • Recently published papers
  • Pre prints
  • Questions
  • FAQs
  • Contact us
Lead the way for us

Your insights are needed to transform us into a better research content provider for researchers.

Share your feedback here.

FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyCookies PolicyTerms of UseCareers