Title IX helped to increase sporting opportunities for many girls and women. Since its implementation in 1972, millions of girls have benefited from increased access to sport as well as changing beliefs regarding females who participate in sport. Common beliefs regarding race, religion, socio-economic status, sexual orientation, ability/disability, and body type, however, continue to inform rules and practices that restrict access for many potential female athletes. During the session, we reviewed photographs of women athletes from three major Division I universities. The photographs depicted cross country runners and track and field sprinters in competition, golfers walking the course, swimmers and divers posing for a photo at a meet, basketball and soccer players celebrating wins, softball players huddled in a circle, volleyball players during pre-game announcements, and tennis players on senior day. As indicated by the session participants, these photos illustrated the lack of racial diversity that exists in women's sports on the collegiate level. We then discussed discriminatory racial beliefs and social practices that may contribute to this lack of diversity. We discussed the lack of cultural competence and consideration of minority religious groups in the design and implementation of sports. The following quote was presented as an example, FIFA will discuss the decision to bar an 11-year-old Muslim girl from playing in a soccer tournament in Canada last weekend because she was wearing a head scarf' (NBC Sports, 2007). We also discussed scheduling competitions on the Jewish Sabbath while refusing to schedule competitions on the Christian Sabbath. To demonstrate the existence of beliefs, practices, and rules that continue to restrict access to members of economically disadvantaged families, we read an ad promoting a local volleyball camp. The camp costs $250.00; session attendees acknowledged both the prevalence of such high-priced athletic services as well as the lack of access for girls who can't afford to pay. Finally, we read points from the Women's Sports Foundation position on negative recruiting (Women's Sports Foundation, www.womenssportsfoundation.org). The published recommendations that, A coach or athlete's sexual orientation should not be a factor in determining their eligibility for teams, coaching positions, or athletic or academic honors or awards and that Lesbian and bisexual athletes and coaches should be able to identify themselves if they choose to without fear of negative consequences demonstrate that sports environments are still unwelcoming and unfair to sexual minorities. Images and quotes were presented demonstrating that following the implementation and relative success of Title IX, beliefs, rules, and practices continue to lead to an underrepresentation of certain groups in sports. For the remainder of the session, session attendees met in small groups to answer the following questions: 1. Is your team diverse? If so, what type of diversity is evident? 2. What characteristics make up your athletes? Who is left out? Why? 3. …