Previous studies of southern textiles have emphasized acquiescence in the face of mill power or integration through paternalism as the basis of worker attitudes. Factor and regression analyses of data on textile workers in one mill town reveal little to support these assumptions. Approval of the company or the union, of managerial capitalism or large-scale change reflects perceived self-interest rather than deference or acquiescence. White, better paid, and older workers support the company rather than the union. Black and less well-paid workers see the social structure as rewarding merit with substantial opportunity. The findings augur poorly for effective union pressure on the company because: union support is concentrated among those easiest to replace and with fewvest good employment alternatives; and those whose loyalty to the town uvould lead them to fight for change rather than seek a job elsewhere have no special tendency to support the union. This paper examines the attitudes of objectively disadvantaged industrial workers to learn how they make sense of, adjust to, and possibly act on their circumstances. Using data on textile workers, the analysis summarizes the relationships among attitudes toward opportunity, inequality, employer, union, job, town, and politics; and it attempts to uncover the social bases of these attitudes. Observers have long asked why southern textile workers for the most part have failed to respond to the low status, poor wages, unsafe conditions, and monotony of their jobs by any substantial efforts to better themselves individually or collectively (Simpson). While the last two de*An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1983 Southem Sociological Society meetings. I appreciate the helpful comments of L. Richard Della Fave, Virginia Hiday, Nelson Reid, Linda Reif, Joel Rosch, Michael Schulman, Mary Scheuer Senter, Donald TomaskovicDevey, Rhonda Zingraff, and anonymous referees on earlier drafts. The data were collected in cooperation with Michael Schulman, Rhonda Zingraff, Carrie Knowles, and Joel Rosch with funds from a Faculty Research and Professional Development grant at North Carolina State University. Address correspondence to the author, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8107. ? 1986 The University of North Carolina Press
Read full abstract