ABSTRACT This article explores how British perceptions of Sikh martial character evolved in the years surrounding the First and Second Anglo-Sikh Wars. Although British observers in previous decades recognised the Sikh Empire’s expanding military capabilities, they tended to reduce these developments to the presence of European mercenaries or the unique martial genius of Ranjit Singh, rather than the inherent character of Sikhs themselves. The experience of the two Anglo-Sikh wars upended these views. Not only did the Sikh army fight hard in both conflicts, it also fought using tools and tactics that were legible to British observers. The wars thus came to be seen as noble last stands undertaken by an armed and unified people, a tragic tale that resonated with mid-Victorian audiences. This narrative was further strengthened and transformed in late-Victorian and Edwardian retellings. The Anglo-Sikh wars came to be seen as a military crucible that forged two nations together in a common destiny. These latter works seemed to provide historical support for official claims that the Sikhs constituted a ‘martial race’, one whose masculine virtues could be unlocked under the paternalistic supervision of British officers.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Journal finder
AI-powered journal recommender
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
1933 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Military Capabilities
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
1931 Search results
Sort by Recency