Midface Lift Research Articles

An Assessment and Comparison of Adverse Effect Rates in Differing Absorbable Thread Lift Suture Materials.

Thread lifting, a minimally invasive alternative to facial rhytidectomy, has shifted from using nonabsorbable to absorbable sutures. Although many thread lift options exist, the impact of these different properties on complication rates remains unclear. To systematically compare thread lift complication rates across different suture materials, textures, fixation methods, and lift locations. A systematic review was conducted through February 2024, following PRISMA guidelines, using multiple databases. The study focused on absorbable sutures, excluding nonabsorbable materials. Statistical analysis used Chi-Square tests with Bonferroni correction. Nineteen studies, encompassing 1,406 patients, met inclusion criteria. A total of 876 complications were reported. Ecchymosis (19.49%), swelling (16.79%), and tenderness (9.96%) were the most frequent complications, while hematoma (0.64%), paresthesia (1.14%), and infection (2.49%) were least frequent. Complications varied significantly among the studied factors. Swelling and ecchymosis were more associated with polycaprolactone sutures, barbed threads, and midface lifts. Barbed threads were associated with more complications than smooth or coned threads, as were floating threads compared with fixed threads. Variations in thread lift suture materials and fixation technique were associated with different complication rates. Thread lifts using absorbable sutures exhibited complication rates under 5%, suggesting a generally favorable safety profile.

Reconstructed Mid-Face Lifting After Tissue Expansion by Suspending the Expander Capsule.

An obvious saggy tendency was observed in the expanded flaps from mid-facial reconstruction and resulted in an unsatisfactory postoperative cosmetic outcome. At the time of this writing, the authors introduced a novel technique of mid-face lifting to correct the phenomenon by suspending the expander capsule. From September 2018 to August 2023, 11 patients who had undergone our mid-face lifting technique were enrolled in our study. The expanded flap was divided into 2 layers during the surgical procedure. The upper layer, which consists of the skin and the subcutaneous layer, was lifted, and the lower layer, consisting of the expander capsule and SMAS system, was left at the base. Then a capsular flap was lifted from the base and folded upward to lift the reconstructed mid-face. The capsular flap was fixed in the temporal or mastoid region when the saggy tendency was corrected, and the mid-facial contour became symmetric. Finally, the upper layer was trimmed and fixed at the base. Facial movements were restricted after the surgery. The saggy tendency of all the expanded flaps was corrected, and the mid-facial symmetry was rebuilt immediately after the surgery. The effect were long-lasting at 3 months to 2 years of follow-ups. No serious postoperative complications occurred. The patients or their legal guardians were satisfied with the esthetic improvement. Reconstructed mid-face lifting with capsular flap was an effective and reliable way to correct the saggy tendency of a mid-facial expanded flap and rebuilt the mid-facial symmetry.

Advanced Facial Rejuvenation: Synergistic Effects of Lower Blepharoplasty and Ultrasound Guided Mid-Face Lift Using Polydioxanone (PDO) Threads

BackgroundTraditional facial aging surgeries have risks and extended recovery times, leading to a demand for minimally invasive alternatives. PDO (polydioxanone) threads, which are absorbable sutures that stimulate collagen production and tissue contraction, offer improved aesthetic outcomes. This paper evaluates the combined use of PDO thread mid-cheek lift and lower blepharoplasty for facial rejuvenation.MethodsThis retrospective study compared outcomes in patients undergoing lower blepharoplasty combined with a mid-face lift using PDO threads versus those undergoing only lower blepharoplasty. Focused on individuals with baggy lower eyelids and pronounced nasolabial folds, outcome measures included the Modified Fitzpatrick wrinkle scale, Allergan® midface volume deficit scale, Width of inter zygomatic distance, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and patient satisfaction questionnaires, assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively.ResultsThe combined procedure demonstrated superior aesthetic outcomes and higher patient satisfaction compared to lower blepharoplasty alone. Improvements were more significant in wrinkle reduction, midface volume, and inter-zygomatic distance in the combined procedure group. Although the combined procedure had a longer mean operation time, scar assessment scores were similar between both groups, with no complications reported.ConclusionThe combination of lower blepharoplasty and mid-face lift using PDO threads is a comprehensive and effective approach for facial rejuvenation. It significantly enhances wrinkle reduction, mid-face lifting, and patient satisfaction. Ultrasound-guided thread lifting, a method of assessing and performing mid-face lifting, proves to be safe and efficient. This approach holds promise as a future option in cosmetic anti-aging surgery, presenting a minimally invasive alternative with natural-looking results and reduced downtime.Level of Evidence IIThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://link.springer.com/journal/00266.

Cheeklift With and Without Posterior Lamellar Spacer Grafts for Treatment of Lower Eyelid Retraction

BackgroundTo compare outcomes of lower eyelid retraction repair using a subperiosteal midface lifting technique with and without posterior lamellar grafts.MethodsCharts of patients undergoing a sub-periosteal midface lift for treatment of lower eyelid retraction using 4 techniques for posterior lamellar reconstruction were reviewed. Thirty patients were included in each of the groups: midface with hard palate graft (HPG), midface lift with acellular cadaveric graft (ADG), midface lift with retractor disinsertion (RD) and midface lift alone (NG). Measurements of distance from pupil center to lower lid margin (MRD2) and from lateral limbus to lower lid margin (MRD2limbus) were taken from pre- and postoperative photographs and compared. Secondary outcomes included rates of reoperation, major and minor complications, resolution of symptoms and keratopathy.ResultsOne hundred twenty operations were assessed (n = 30 for each surgical group). The average follow-up time was 20 weeks. The median MRD2 elevation was 0.95 mm (NG), 0.85 mm (HPG), 1.59 mm (ADG) and 1.02 mm (RD). The median MRD2limbus elevation was 1.06 mm (NG), 0.92 mm (HPG), 1.45 mm (ADG) and 1.12 mm (RD). There were no significant differences in MRD2 or MRD2limbus between the 4 groups (p = 0.06 and 0.29, respectively). Reoperation rates were highest with in the hard palate graft group (33%) compared to other techniques (p = 0.0006).ConclusionsSimilar degrees of lower eyelid elevation were achieved with all the midface lifting techniques, and complication rates did not significantly differ between techniques. However, the higher reoperation rates with the use of spacer grafts suggest that a no-graft technique may be preferable.Level of Evidence IIIThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Supraperiosteal fat repositioning with midface lift in lower eyelid blepharoplasty: an 18-year experience.

To assess the clinical outcomes of fat repositioning via supraperiosteal dissection with midface lift for correction of tear trough deformity in a large Asian patient population. Retrospectively review 1152 Asian patients who underwent fat repositioning to the supraperiosteal plane with a midface lift between 2005 and 2022. Surgical technique, postoperative course, and complications were recorded. At the 6-month postoperative follow-up, the degree of patient satisfaction was assessed. A total of 2304 eyes from 1152 patients with an average follow-up of 10 months. These procedures were performed using a transforniceal approach in 185 patients (16%) or a transcutaneous skin excision approach in 967 patients (84%). Among the patients who underwent the transcutaneous technique, seven individuals (0.6%) experienced effective treatment of lower lid ectropion through lateral tarsal strip procedures. Nine patients (0.7%) required revision surgery to address the remaining lateral fat pad due to inadequate lateral orbital fat excision during the initial procedure. At the 6-month follow-up, most patients reported a high level of satisfaction, with 800 patients (78%) expressing extreme satisfaction and 196 patients (19.1%) reporting satisfaction with the improvement in their appearance. No one reported facial numbness, lower eyelid or cheek paralysis, newly developed diplopia or granuloma formation. The procedure of fat repositioning involving supraperiosteal dissection and a midface lift, whether performed using a transforniceal approach or a transcutaneous skin excision approach, in lower eyelid blepharoplasty proves to be a secure and auspicious surgical technique for rectifying tear trough deformity and attaining a pleasing aesthetic outcome.

Customized Reconstruction of Lower Eyelid Defects.

A lower eyelid defect is a loss of skin, muscle, and underlying structures that can occur due to trauma, malignant or benign tumors, burns, or other causes. The conventional surgical treatment of lower lid defects has several limitations, including visible scarring, narrowing of the eye, and ectropion. Here, we combined the use of a customized mid-face lift with a free mucochondral graft to overcome the disadvantages of existing methods. Forty patients underwent reconstructive surgery using a customized mid-face lift with or without a free mucochondral graft for a lower lid defect between April 2013 and October 2020. Patients were discharged shortly after surgery and were expected to visit the outpatient clinic periodically for 12 months. The causes of lower eyelid defects were malignancy, trauma, foreign body granuloma, and other causes. Four patients reported complications, including 2 cases of chemosis, 1 case of a hematoma, and 1 case of corneal abrasion, who reportedly performed well after 2 weeks of conservative therapy. No patient required revision during the average follow-up period. Customized reconstruction demonstrated a better aesthetic reconstruction of the lower eyelid. This method represents a good option for reconstructing lower lid defects.

A CASE REPORT: ENHANCING TARSAL AND MUSCULAR SUPPORT FOR ECTROPION CORRECTION IN TESSIER 3 AND 5 FACIAL CLEFT

Highlights: The oblique facial cleft is an uncommon and intricate craniofacial anomaly characterized by a low occurrence rate and significant variability. The treatment is intricate and relies on the surgeon's expertise and discernment. Utilizing a combination of Tarsal Strip and Midface Lifting techniques could serve as an alternative approach to address ectropion by enhancing both tarsal and muscular support. Abstract: Introduction: Facial cleft is a rare and challenging craniofacial malformation with a low incidence ranging from 0.75 to 5.4 per 1000 common cleft. Due to the high variance in its occurrence, good techniques have not been established yet. Case Illustration: In this case study, we present the medical history of a 45-year-old woman who previously underwent multiple surgeries for the reconstruction of her lower eyelid. The initial surgeries were performed to address a unilateral facial cleft classified as Tessier 3 and 5, utilizing ear cartilage grafts for the tarsal plate. However, she subsequently experienced complications, including ectropion, epiphora, and soft tissue deformities around her left eye. The goal of the current surgical intervention is to rectify the ectropion and enhance overall facial aesthetics for improved outcomes. Discussion: The primary objectives of this surgical techniques are to enhance the tarsal support through the tarsal strip technique and to provide muscle support using the mid-face lifting technique. Additionally, we removed the scar and excess tissue from the lower lid to adjust the tarsal's proper length. These methods aim to address the ectropion and prevent its recurrence. Conclusion: This combination of techniques can be a potential alternative for rectifying ectropion by reinforcing both tarsal and muscular support structures.

Cutaneous Layer and SMAS Suspension (CaSS) Lift as a Minimally Invasive Lateral Midface Lift.

In our prior study, the authors determined that pulling on the superficial adipose layer is more effective in lifting the skin than pulling on the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS). Applying this concept of using the superficial adipose layer to transmit the lifting force to the skin, this study examined improvements in patients who underwent lateral midface lifting using our minimally invasive multilayer lifting technique and measured the duration of those improvements. Along the hairline in front of the sideburns, a W-shaped zigzag incision of 3 to 8mm in width and 3 to 4cm in length was made. On the temporal scalp, 3 to 4cm away from the first incision, a second incision was made more lateral/posterior to the first incision, and an elliptical excision of 3 to 5mm in width and 3 to 4cm in length was made. From the medial cut margin of the anterior first incision, the superficial temporal fascia/SMAS (the deep layer), and the superficial adipose layer (the superficial layer) were purchased with 3-0 polyester sutures, tunneled under the soft tissue, and fixed to the deep temporal fascia of the second posterior temporal incision. Prior to the excised temporal scalp closure, the dermis in the medial cut margin of the second incision was pulled to the rear as much as possible and fixed to the deep temporal fascia. The effects of surgery were monitored for 6 to 42 months after surgery. The nasolabial folds were improved. Skin elasticity also showed significant improvements, which lasted throughout the follow-up period (up to 42mo). Unlike traditional wide dissection SMAS facelift, our method requires minimal incisions and does not require skin undermining. Therefore, the operating time is shorter, and postoperative swelling is minimized. In our technique, the superficial adipose layer, the superficial temporal fascia/SMAS, and the dermis were pulled individually to lift all layers of the lateral midface soft tissues. This results in a significant and long-lasting lateral midface rejuvenation.

Video Demonstration Three-Dimensional Analysis of Tear Trough Volume After Lower Blepharoplasty with Midface Lift

Video Demonstration Three-Dimensional Analysis of Tear Trough Volume After Lower Blepharoplasty with Midface Lift

Temporal Facelift: A New Method for Temporal and Mid-face Lifting.

Lifting the temporal and mid-face areas creates a very dynamic change in the facial appearance and different planes of dissection were described before. In this article, a new plane of dissection is described which allows the surgeon to perform a very quick and safe dissection in both the temporal and mid-face regions. Patients were operated on using the presented technique and brow lift, cantopexy, and mid-facelift were performed. The outcome of the surgery was analyzed by the authors from standardized photos before and 6 months after the surgery with measurements of the brow and lateral canthus. The plane of dissection is just over the subgaleal fascia which is actually the sub-superficial musculoaponeurotic system layer in the mid-face. This plane of dissection is easy and quick and creates a very mobile mid-face and temporal flap. Forty female patients were operated using the presented technique with a mean follow-up period of 15 months, the longest follow-up was 26 months. No major complication was encountered in these patients. In 5 patients, transient unilateral frontal branch palsy was encountered. In 1 patient, bilateral temporal area depression was observed 8 months after the surgery and treated with a fat injection under local anesthesia. One patient had alopecia in the temporal suture line which can be covered with hair. Temporal facelift is a versatile method with long-lasting results due to its important features; creating a very mobile flap for suspension dissection area, a large surface for adherence, and numerous sutures sharing the tension on the key sutures. Despite its slightly difficult early healing period, the technique should be kept in mind for the rejuvenation of the periorbital area and mid-face. Level of Evidence: Level I.

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Malar Mounds and Festoons.

Malar mounds (congenital) and festoons (acquired) are persistent puffiness in the prezygomatic space between the orbicularis retaining ligament (ORL) and zygomatico-cutaneous ligament (ZCL). Non-surgical treatments often yield unsatisfactory results. This paper aims to demonstrate a surgical approach for the treatment of malar bags by outlining the author's surgical technique of treating malar mounds and festoons and reviewing outcomes in 89 cases. Correction of malar mounds and festoons was achieved with subciliary skin-muscle flap, release of the ORL and ZCL, midface lift, canthopexy, and muscle suspension. We performed a retrospective study of 89 patients, all of whom had surgical correction of malar mounds or festoons in the past 10 years and a follow-up period of at least 6 months. This study was conducted over the course of the past year and involved reviewing patient charts in the office. Specifically, patient data spanning 2012 to 2022 were analyzed. The predictor variable in this study is the specific class of malar bags the patient has, as determined by the underlying pathophysiology. Outcome variables include the presence or absence of prolonged lid or malar edema, necessary re-excision of excess orbicularis oculi of the subciliary area, lid malposition, permanent visual changes, the need for additional non-operative treatment, and recurrence requiring reoperation. The majority of patients presented with acquired festoons (81/89) with prior attempts of correction (49/89). The mean follow-up is 11.2 months. Persistent malar edema (> 6 weeks) was documented in 14 patients and mainly resolved with Medrol Dosepak (methylprednisolone) and hydrochlorothiazide. A two-proportion Z-test was conducted, comparing the proportion of patients with poor protoplasm who experienced postoperative malar edema to the proportion of those with excellent protoplasm who experienced postoperative malar edema. A p-value of 3.414e-7 was obtained, indicating a statistically significant difference of proportions between the two groups. Five patients received additional injections of deoxycholic acid and two needed fillers for smoother contour of the lower eyelids. Two patients with severe malar mounds required multiple reoperations including direct excision in one patient. One incidence of transient lid retraction was reported in a patient with previous facelift and facial nerve injury. Malar mounds and festoons present a unique challenge to plastic surgeons. They are persistent in nature and require close-interval, long-term follow-up as additional injections and reoperations are warranted. Our approach to malar mound and festoon correction is safe and effective and provides long-lasting results. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Modified Deep-Plane Face Lift and Lower Midface Lifting Using Deep Fat Compartment Mobilization and Zygomaticus Major Muscle Plication.

Most face-lift techniques greatly improve the lower face; however, techniques for lifting the midface are limited and difficult. Original deep-plane face lift is a way to lift the superficial musculoaponeurotic system and skin as a compound unit. Although it minimizes tear of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system during dissection, damage to the vascular system, and the incidence of skin necrosis, and can be easily used in secondary cases, the deep-plane face lift does not adequately improve nasolabial fold. The authors perform a modified and enhanced deep-plane face lift to improve the midface. In this article, the authors explain the effects and procedures of the method. This retrospective study included patients ( n = 632) on whom deep-plane face lift (DPF group; n = 299) and modified deep-plane face lift (M-DPF group; n = 333) was performed by a single surgeon from January of 2014 to January of 2017, and from February of 2017 to December of 2020, respectively, at a local clinic. The degree of improvement in wrinkles in the patients' nasolabial fold was assessed using the five-grade Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS). The preoperative WSRS score was 2.95 ± 0.89 in the DPF group and 2.89 ± 0.92 in the M-DPF group. There was no significant difference in the preoperative WSRS score between the two groups ( P = 0.058). The postoperative WSRS score was 1.81 ± 0.68 in the DPF group, which was significantly greater than the 1.65 ± 0.66 found in the M-DPF group. This method developed by the authors that combines deep-plane face lift with deep fat compartment mobilization and zygomaticus major muscle plication is safe and directly improves the nasolabial fold and promotes a smiling expression for rejuvenation effects. Therapeutic, III.

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Tear Trough Volume After Lower Blepharoplasty with Midface Lift.

Background: This study aims to evaluate three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry measured volume changes in the tear trough area after lower blepharoplasty with midface lift with or without orbital fat manipulation. Objective: Among patients undergoing midface lift surgery, volume change by three-dimensional photography in the tear trough region was compared between those having no orbital fat manipulation, fat transposition, or fat resection. Methods: This is a prospective study of 260 eyelids of 130 patients who underwent cosmetic midface surgery. All patients had an external skin muscle flap midface lift. During the procedure, medial inferior orbital fat was resected, repositioned to a preperiosteal dissection pocket, or not manipulated. Forty-six patients (35.4%) had no fat manipulation, 42 patients (32.3%) had fat preservation with repositioning to the preperiosteal pockets on the medial inferior orbital rim, and 42 patients (32.3%) had fat resection without repositioning. Results: All patients had volume gain in tear trough volume. The amount was not statistically significantly different between fat treatment groups. Mean follow-up time was 12 months (range 6-20 months). Conclusions: Midface lifting improved tear trough volume irrespective of how fat was manipulated.

Studying Dynamics of Mid-face Lifting During Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection Using Ultrasound Imaging.

The ageing in the mid-face involves volume deficiency in multiple anatomical units, including the zygomatic arch, infraorbital region, medial and lateral cheek and nasolabial fold (NLF). Hyaluronic acid (HA) is extensively used in the minimally invasive procedures of mid-face rejuvenation. MD CodesTM is proposed to perform combined treatment of multiple sites to reduce treatment variability and increase clinician success rates. Although the detailed procedure of this technique, aesthetic effects and complications have been disclosed, its anatomical information has yet to be discussed. This paper elaborated on the static and dynamic anatomical characteristics of MD CodesTM through cadaveric dissection and ultrasound imaging. Anatomical dissection and ultrasound imaging help us look back on the injection methods and anatomical principles of MD CodesTM. The treatment is threefold: (1) the bolus injections, for lifting purposes, are performed at the most depressing point along the zygomatic arch, zygomatic eminence, the prominent optimal point in the zygomatic region, the most depressed point of upper NLF with 0.2-0.3ml HA. (2) The linear injections, featuring facial contouring refinement, are performed at the deep fat pad of the medial cheek and infraorbital region with 0.4ml HA. (3) The linear injections, featuring volume replacement, are performed at the subcutaneous fat layer of lateral cheek and NLF with 0.8 and 0.4ml HA. MD CodeTM is led by the principle of "less dosage and better effect", and a special injection sequence is formulated based on the anatomical characteristics. Ultrasound is a useful tool to make for a dynamic anatomical understanding of MD CodeTM and visualize the anatomical information such as layers and thicknesses. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Buccal mucosal membrane graft for correction of cicatricial lower eyelid retraction

BackgroundTo evaluate the outcomes of a surgical technique using buccal mucosal membrane graft for correction of cicatricial lower eyelid retraction.MethodsTwelve patients with unilateral cicatricial lower eyelid retraction were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent a four-step surgical technique consisted of release of scars, midface lift, transfer of buccal mucosal membrane to posterior lamella as spacer graft, and canthal tightening. All patients were followed for at least 12 months.ResultsMean preoperative Margin-to-Reflex-Distance 2 (MRD2) was 7.73 ± 1.10 mm, compared to mean postoperative MRD2 of 5.04 ± 0.49 mm (P < 0.0001). The mean improvement in retraction was 2.69 mm. Postoperative scleral show was present in only one case and no major complications were observed.ConclusionThe four-step procedure (scar release, midface lift, buccal mucosal graft and canthal tightening) was an effective procedure to correct cicatricial lower eyelid retractions with acceptable outcomes and a low morbidity rate.

High SMAS Facelift: Combined Single Flap Lifting of the Midface, Cheek, and Jawline

The traditional deep plane and "low" cheek superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flaps elevated below the zygomatic arch suffer the drawback that they cannot, by design, exert an effect on tissues of the midface and infra-orbital region. Traditional deep plane and low designs target the lower cheek and jowl only and produce no improvement in the upper anterior cheek and "midface" area. Planning the flap "higher," along the zygomatic arch, and extending the dissection medially in an "extended SMAS" fashion to release and mobilize midface tissue, overcomes this problem and allows a combined, simultaneous, single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. An improved outcome is obtained in many patients and no separate midface lift procedure is needed.

Subperiosteal Midface Lift with Sub–Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Rhytidectomy

The subperiosteal midface lift is a powerful tool that allows the surgeon to reposition the SOOF and malar fat pad in a vertical direction. Additionally, it significantly softens deep nasolabial folds. Its effect, however, is minimal with regards to addressing the jowl, jawline, gonial angle and cervicomental angle. Combining the subperiosteal midface lift with an extended sub-SMAS rhytidectomy addresses the pre-jowl sulcus by releasing the mandibular ligament. The jawline and gonial angle become more defined with the transposition and suspension of the SMAS flap. The SMAS transposition flap along with the suspension of the platysma flap to the mastoid fascia support the submandibular glands and deepen the cervicomental angle. These two approaches are valuable additions to the surgeons armamentarium and can yield excellent results in carefully selected patients.

FACELIFT TECHNIQUES: AN OVERVIEW.

Facelift techniques can be classified according to the depth and extent of the dissection applied. Imbrication and plication of the SMAS referred to as "SMAS lifts" or "classical facelifts" are the most commonly used techniques. Plication techniques involve in-folding of the SMAS and suture suspension without any SMAS incision whereas imbrication techniques involve a SMAS incision with a portion of the SMAS either removed or transposed with or without limited subSMAS dissection. Ageing changes in the lower face and neck can be successfully treated with SMAS lift techniques. However, there is no lifting effect at midface level or improvement of the nasolabial folds since the retaining (zygomatic cutaneous and masseteric cutaneous) ligaments that prevent the transmission of traction to the malar portion of the facelift dissection are not released. Extended facelift techniques involve surgical release of these ligaments, and produce combined, balanced and harmonious rejuvenation of the midface, cheek, and lower face without requiring a separate midface lift procedure. There are different techniques having similar extended midface dissections with some variations: The extended SMAS technique involves a long skin flap and a distinct SMAS flap dissected and pulled separately. The high SMAS technique has a similar dissection but involves a higher SMAS flap along the superior border of the zygomatic arch. The deep plane facelift involves undermining of skin-SMAS flap as a single unit following a more limited subcutaneous dissection. In the composite plane facelift, in addition to deep plane facelift dissection, the lower part of the orbicularis oculi muscle is also dissected and included in the flap. As they have a single unit, deep and composite flap facelifts allow excellent blood supply to the overlying skin. In this article, various facelift techniques are discussed in detail in line with the relevant surgical anatomy.

MODIFIED COMPOSITE PLANE FACELIFT WITH EXTENDED NECK DISSECTION.

The attenuation of retaining ligaments with aging leads to downward displacement of facial fat compartments, and is responsible for many of the stigmata that occur with aging. The zygomatic cutaneous and masseteric cutaneous ligaments prevent the transmission of adequate traction to the malar portion of the dissection during traditional low SMAS facelift techniques which involve plication or imbrication of the exposed surface of the SMAS because they do not include surgical release of these ligaments. Inadequate release of these ligaments, especially the zygomatic cutaneous ligament may lead to an unbalanced, unnatural appearance with unopposed nasolabial folds. In contrast, extended facelift techniques (extended SMAS, High SMAS, deep plane facelift, composite plane facelift) involving the release of these ligaments and can reposition the ptotic malar fat, and diminish the nasolabial folds. Additionally, the composite and modified composite plane facelifts include orbicularis oculi muscle elevation and can achieve a more harmonious rejuvenation. However, due to facial nerve injury risk, many facelift surgeons either inadequately release these ligamentous attachments or prefer less invasive techniques. Modified composite plane facelift allows safe release of the zygomatic cutaneous ligament, and safe entry into the right plane leaving all malar fat pad attached to the skin. Modified composite plane facelift technique also produces combined, balanced, and harmonious rejuvenation of the midface, cheek, lower face, and neck without requiring a separate midface lift procedure or a transblepharoplasty approach. Extending the subSMAS/subplatysmal dissection inferior to the angle of mandible, releasing of the cervical retaining ligaments, and adding a horizontal platysma myotomy below the angle of the mandible significantly improves the cervical contouring and enhances the jawline rejuvenation. This paper explains modified composite-flap facelift with extended neck dissection in a step by step manner, and highlights anatomical details to perform a safe, effective and successful extended face and neck lift surgery.

Intraorbital Fixation Midface Lift.

Subperiosteal midface lift provides a comprehensive solution to the soft tissue component of midfacial aging. However, midfacial aging also has a skeletal component that is rarely addressed with conventional mid-facelift techniques. Moreover, many of the adverse outcomes after a mid-facelift are closely related to failures and limitations of mid-face fixation. The author's technique was designed to overcome these limitations. The author aimed to describe the rationale, technical details, and outcomes of the author's mid-facelift technique with intraorbital fixation. This study was a retrospective review of 82 nonconsecutive cases where the intraorbital fixation mid-facelift was performed by the author between September 2016 and December 2021. Patient data were obtained from patient records and standardized photography. Preoperative differences in mid-face volume were assessed utilizing the Allergan midface volume deficit scale on standardized photography. The average mid-face volume deficit score significantly improved after surgery. Failure of fixation, flat midface deformity, and relapse of mid-face ptosis were not seen in any of the primary patients. Infraorbital hollow did not recur in any of the patients operated on with this technique. None of the primary patients (0/58) in this series developed ectropion or permanent lower eyelid malposition. Intraorbital fixation mid-face lift is an effective and durable surgical option for the treatment of midfacial aging. The technique is applicable in problem cases such as negative vector patients, negative canthal tilt patients, male patients with large bags, and secondary lower blepharoplasties where conventional techniques tend to fail.