During the past few years there has been renewed interest in aquatic resources, and a number of attempts have been made to evaluate various aquatic habitats. Johnstone (i9ii) and others have summarized the older work in this field; Petersen (i9i8) made an exhaustive study of the sea bottom; and, in the United States, Kofoid (1903, i908), Baker (i9i8), and Richardson (1921) have recently investigated fresh-water habitats. Much has been learned concerning aquatic animals: their numbers in unit areas; their seasonal and ecological succession; the rapidity of their overturn; their chemical composition and economic value. It is comparatively easy to count microscopic plankton animals or the sluggish inhabitants of the bottom, but it is much more difficult to determine the number of large, freely moving animals in a particular area. The present paper deals with observations on turtles: the population of a shallow bay, the distribution and migration of the inhabitants of such an area. The region investigated was the shallow water behind a bar in University Bay, which is a part of Lake Mendota, Wisconsin (fig. i). The area was about 900 meters long, 225 meters wide, and included about 202.5 hectares (546.75 acres). The writer was led to take tup the tagging of turtles more or less by accident-through attempts to study the growth and migrations of fishes by marking them with aluminum tags. During the year 1917, 1,643 fishes and 15 turtles were marked with band tags. Only two fishes were recovered. One was a pumpkinseed which was caught by a fisherman where it had been released two weeks later. Nine hundred and sixty-six of the fishes released in 1917 were yellow perch that were put into deep water (15 meters). Although fishing with gill nets was continued at intervals throughout the summer for a total of 33 days at three stations, only one of these perch was recaught, indicating that the number of perch in the deeper parts of Lake Mendota must be enormous. In i919 a new style of button tag was used; i,6oo fishes and 12 turtles were marked and all were released at certain stations in shallow water. Efforts were made to recover the fishes by seining at intervals at the stations where they had been released, but the results were of little value. No fishes were caught except at stations where they had been released, and the recapture of fishes therefore only furnished evidence as to how long a particular fish had remained in a certain locality. The longest periods before recapture for
Read full abstract