Last year we postulated a connection between the economic recession and a shift of maxillofacial trauma payer status patients from private and commercial to federal insurers. Medicaid patients at Vanderbilt Medical Center, treated by OMS for facial trauma increased from 10% to 18%, while the reimbursement from these patients decreased from 26% to 22% from 2007 to 2009. Medicaid cost sharing problems are projected with attempts to enroll more low-income patients amidst nationwide attempts to control budget costs. In 2009 state Medicaid programs spent $7.9 billion on dental services, but the cost of maxillofacial trauma in Medicaid patients by OMS has not been recently well documented. This survey details Medicaid patients presenting to a metropolitan trauma center, and the important role OMS plays in providing services for this vulnerable population. Deidentified data were collected from all facial trauma patients treated by OMS at a level one trauma center during 2010. Patients with an isolated dentoalveolar injury were excluded. Demographic parameters of interest included patient age, race, sex, length of stay, maxillofacial injury (ICD-9 code), maxillofacial procedures performed (CPT); and charges, collections, and contractuals per procedure. All patients meeting inclusion criteria (n = 335) and the procedures performed (n = 611) were analyzed with summary statistics compared across different groups with the use of independent T-test where appropriate. The variance in reimbursement of professional charges across payers was calculated with a charge recovery ratio (collections/charges). Tests of association and variance between demographics, procedures, and financial variables were assessed using correlation coefficients and χ2 tests. In 2010, 335 patients presented for facial trauma and 50 (14.9%) of these patients were classified as Medicaid, with an average age of 23.1 (SD 18.9). Males made up 66% of the Medicaid sample, and average length of stay was 5.3 days (SD 10.4). Median hospital bill for Medicaid patients was $42,400. Overall OMS professional fees averaged $6,632, while Medicaid patient bills averaged $5,913, but this difference was not significant (P = .05). Average charges for individual maxillofacial procedures based on ICD-9 was $2,825, and average collections were $739, compared to average Medicaid charges and collections of $2,712 and $566, respectively. The percent reimbursement (collections/charges) for professional fees was 20.9% in the Medicaid group. The percent was significantly greater than the Medicare group at 13.8% (P < .05). Interestingly, average soft tissue procedure reimbursement (31%) was highest in the Medicaid group when compared with Medicaid reimbursement for mid-face (20%) and mandible procedures (22%). The calendar year data showed a statistically significant 5.5% increase (P < .05) in Medicaid contractuals after fiscal year renegotiation. There was also a significant increase in collections (16%) from patients after the contractual changes, and significant difference between contractuals for those under age 19 ($1,807) (state Medicaid age limit), and over 19 ($2,459). This study shows that Medicaid patients make up an important percentage of the OMS trauma cases at our metropolitan trauma center; and percent reimbursement continues to decline from previous estimates in 2009 despite increases in contractuals. Hospitals can use these data to advocate for increased Medicaid reimbursement for maxillofacial trauma patients, and for the continued involvement of OMS in providing care to this growing patient population.
Read full abstract