See article on page 46 The natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can follow a very variable course. A majority of them progress without symptoms until the advanced stage. Distant metastases are reported to be uncommon. The rapid progression of this disease (HCC) to death occurs before the clinical presentation of metastases. In addition, the search for distant metastases is futile among patients with advanced HCC, especially when effective treatment is lacking. In a review of seven reports on 1673 HCC patients, lung (44%), portal vein (35%) and portal lymph nodes (27%) were found to be the three leading sites of metastases.1 Bone metastases were only found in 8% of patients. These reports are mostly based on post-mortem series, and bone metastases in long bones could have been missed. Two Italian studies reported 5–7% bone metastases among HCC patients with skeletal pain.2, 3 In a Japanese study of a specific subgroup of 323 patients with resected HCC, 12 (3.7%) developed bone metastasis at 1–36 months of follow-up. The time interval to the development of bone metastasis after resection was closely related to the presence of intrahepatic metastasis and the stage of the HCC at operation.4 In this issue of JGH, Iwata et al. report a prospective study of post-treatment bone metastasis in 202 patients with HCC.5 These patients were assigned to different treatment modalities: surgical resection, TAE (transcatheter arterial embolization), PEIT (percutaneous ethanol injection therapy), PMCT (percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy), chemotherapy or a combination of them. Before treatment, the patients were all carefully staged and found to be free of bone metastasis by the use of a technecium 99 m-methylene diphosphonate bone scan, which has an accuracy of 0.78. During the follow-up period, 21 (10.4%) patients developed bone metastasis after 2–82 months (median 24 months). This prevalence is slightly higher than in previous published data.1-4 The authors offered three explanations for this: (i) longer survival; (ii) a more sensitive bone scan method; and (iii) the treatment itself. Univariate analyses showed that pretreatment characteristics such as multiple tumor, tumor size > 5 cm in diameter, distant metastasis, α-fetoprotein > 100 ng/mL, chemotherapy and insufficient therapeutic effects are risk factors. Among these, tumor size > 5 cm in diameter and insufficient therapeutic effects are independent predisposing factors. The study by Iwata et al. highlights two important points in the management of HCC. Surveillance and early diagnosis of HCC while it is small is important. Chemotherapy, identified as a risk factor, probably reflects more advanced disease among patients who are assigned to this treatment and thus are more likely to develop bone metastasis. Furthermore, the choice of treatment modalities is important in order to aim for a complete ablation of the tumor. This study used surgical resection, TAE, PEIT, PMCT, chemotherapy or combination of these treatments. Unfortunately, the algorithm for treatment choice is not given in the paper. Neither was methodology for the assessment of sufficiency of the therapy explained. The authors postulated that the apparently higher prevalence of post-treatment bone metastasis in this study, compared to other reported prevalences, might be related to an insufficient therapeutic effect. A tumor-necrotic factor is then released and facilitates hematogenic metastasis. It does so by interfering with proper intracellular junction, damaging endothelium and inducing cellular detachment. This encourages the release of viable tumor cells to distant metastatic sites. Apart from bone metastasis, lung metastasis will presumably also be increased. The author has not addressed this aspect. Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy and PMCT are increasingly used for small HCC cases, instead of surgical resection. Tumor cells seeding along percutaneous track or released during instrumentation is likely and subsequently jeopardizes the chance of a cure. To detect micrometastasis, a highly-sensitive method by the identification of mRNA in circulating peripheral blood of hepatocellular carcinoma patients may be an useful too.6 Further studies are needed to gain a better understanding about the mechanism of distant metastasis, so that it can be detected and early treatment can be provided.7
Read full abstract