In the United States, youth of color, youth with a trauma history, and youth with disabilities are suspended and expelled at higher rates than their white peers without disabilities and trauma. Few researchers examine how this gap intersects to impact exclusionary discipline. DisCrit guides the article because it explains the pathways that lead to the overrepresentation of disabled youth of color in school exclusionary discipline through public policy. The purpose is to analyze the Minnesota Student Survey (2019) to examine how the impact of trauma on exclusionary discipline varies by race and disability. The main goal of this study was to examine the impact of ACEs on exclusionary discipline outcomes for youth of color with mental disabilities (MD). In the Minnesota Student Survey (2019), we use a representative sample (N=104,043) of students' self-reported data from all public school districts in Minnesota. We conducted a logistic regression analysis of students with ACEs on exclusionary discipline. ACEs (odds ratios [OR]=1.91) and youth with MD (OR=1.36) are strongly associated with exclusionary discipline among youth of color. Lastly, the odds of exclusionary discipline are higher for youth with ACEs and a known MD than those youth without an MD but with ACEs among youth of color (OR=0.74) and white youth (OR=0.75). The results confirmed youth of color with MD are at higher risk for exclusionary discipline with undersupported ACEs than their white peers without MD. Implications for social work collaboration are discussed for school mental health services.
Read full abstract