Meniscectomy In Patients Research Articles

Reoperation Rates of Meniscal Repair Are Associated With a Higher Reoperation Rate Than Meniscectomy in Patients Aged 40 and Older

To compare the long-term reoperation rates of meniscectomy and meniscal repair and to determine patient and surgical factors associated with earlier reoperation among patients ≥40 years. A retrospective study was conducted using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2020. Patients 40 and older who received a meniscectomy or a meniscal repair with a minimum 1-year follow-up were included. The primary outcome was ipsilateral knee reoperation during the study period. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to determine differences in reoperation rates for meniscal repair and meniscectomy over time. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with earlier time to reoperation. A total of 3,026 patients (2,367 meniscectomy, 659 meniscal repair) were included. Mean follow-up was 14.5 ± 0.29 years (range, 1.0-14.91 years). There were no significant differences in baseline demographic characteristics of follow-up between the 2 groups. The survival curves of the 2 procedures significantly differed (P= .02), and the overall reoperation rate was higher after meniscal repair than meniscectomy (13.5% vs 10.1%, P= .01). However, the incidence of subsequent ipsilateral meniscectomy, meniscal repair, and knee arthroplasty procedures did not significantly differ. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified meniscal repair, obesity, concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and increasing age as being significant risks for earlier reoperation, and male sex was protective. In a population of patients aged ≥40 with surgically treated meniscal tears and 14.5-year average follow-up, meniscal repair was associated with higher overall reoperation with shorter survival times compared to meniscectomy. However, the indications for the 2 procedures likely differed. Additionally, obesity, older age, female sex, and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were risk factors for earlier reoperation. Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Arthroscopic inferior leaf meniscectomy of the involved anterior horn in the lateral meniscus horizontal tear via an accessary extreme far anteromedial portal

BackgroundAn accessory extreme far anteromedial portal can improve visualisation and ease inferior leaf meniscectomy in patients with lateral meniscal anterior horn horizontal tears. However, the therapeutic outcomes of adding an accessory extreme far anteromedial portal remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of adding an accessory extreme far anteromedial portal for treating lateral meniscal horizontal tears involving the anterior horns.MethodsThis retrospective study included 101 patients with anterior horn involvement in lateral meniscal horizontal tears who underwent arthroscopic unstable inferior leaf meniscectomy between January 2016 and December 2020. The pathologies were diagnosed using physical examinations and magnetic resonance imaging. The anterior horn involved in the lateral meniscal horizontal tears was treated using inferior leaf meniscectomy. The primary endpoints were changes in the visual analogue scale, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Tegner scores at the final follow-up. The secondary endpoint was meniscal cure rate at 3 months postoperatively. The preoperative and postoperative functional scores were compared. The occurrence of complications was recorded.ResultsAll patients were followed up for an average of 4.9 ± 1.2 years (range 2.3–7.5 years). After 4 months, none of the patients experienced pain, weakness, instability, or tenderness in the lateral joint line, achieving an imaging cure rate of 98%. At the final follow-up, significant postoperative improvements were observed in the average values of the visual analogue scale score (3.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.7 ± 0.6), Lysholm score (62.7 ± 4.4 vs. 91.8 ± 3.1), International Knee Documentation Committee score (61.9 ± 3.7 vs. 91.7 ± 9.5), and Tegner score (2.0 ± 0.7 vs. 6.1 ± 0.7). Excellent Lysholm scores were obtained in 81 patients, and good outcomes were obtained in 18 patients, with an excellent-to-good rate of 98.0%.ConclusionsInferior leaf resection via the accessory far anteromedial portal is a safe treatment option for the involved anterior horn in lateral meniscal horizontal tears. This approach enhances visibility and facilitates surgical procedures, with minimal complications.

Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Patients With Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 Osteoarthritis Shows Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Outcomes

To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 3 on preoperative knee radiographs and a symptomatic meniscal tear. This was a retrospective study design using prospectively collected data from a single institution. Patients were included if they had KL grade 3 osteoarthritis on preoperative radiographs of the knee and completed a trial of nonoperative treatment for at least 6 weeks prior to APM. Patients were excluded if they had inflammatory arthritis, incomplete preoperative and/or 1-year postoperative follow-up data, repeat knee arthroscopy, and concomitant ligamentous injury. Statistical analyses used PROMs, preoperatively and up to 2 years postoperatively, to assess improvement utilizing scales with previously established thresholds, including minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Eighty-two patients met the eligibility criteria (49 women [60%], mean [SD] age, 53.1 [9.3] years). At the 1-year follow-up, most patients achieved MCID: 73% in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain, 66% in KOOS Symptoms, and 78% in KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL). These improvements were similar at the 2-year follow-up: 75%, 72%, and 79% in each subscale, respectively. SCB was also demonstrated 1 year postoperatively, with 56%, 73%, and 71% achieving SCB for the KOOS Pain, Symptoms, and ADL subscales, respectively. These results largely persisted at the 2-year follow-up. Visual analog scale scores for pain also improved at 1- and 2-year postoperative periods with mean improvements from baseline of 2.80 and 2.87 points, respectively. Marx Activity Score decreased on average from baseline to 1- and 2-year follow-up. At a minimum of 1-year follow-up, most patients with KL grade 3 and a meniscal tear achieved MCID and SCB in KOOS Pain, KOOS Symptoms, and KOOS ADL, indicating meaningful outcome improvement for these patients. Level IV, therapeutic case series.

A REVIEW OF 2021 AND 2022 AAOS GUIDELINES FOR MENISCAL ARTHROSCOPIC PROCEDURES IN OSTEOARTHRITIS

For many decades, arthroscopy was considered the least invasive of all existing surgical methods of treating patients with gonarthrosis, however, carried out at the beginning of the XXI century randomized clinical trials (RCTs) demonstrated the futility of isolated lavage and debridement for this category of patients. The purpose of this work is to show trends in the indications for debridement and partial meniscectomy in patients with osteoarthritis in the 2021–2022 AAOS guidelines. Methods. AAOS 2021, 2022 recommendations for the treatment of osteoarthritis (without arthroplasty). The strength of recommendations depends on the number and quality of studies that may or may not recommend surgery. The results. In 2021, the third edition of the AAOS clinical guidelines for the treatment of osteoarthritis was released, which was supported by four studies. They suggest that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy be used for the treatment of meniscal tears in patients with concomitant mild or moderate osteoarthritis in whom physical therapy or other nonsurgical treatments have been ineffective. The 2022 AAOS guidelines reviewed 216 osteoarthritis situations and indications for arthroscopic procedures. The developed criteria are aimed at covering the most common clinical scenarios faced by qualified specialists treating osteoarthritis of the knee joint. The final decision on any particular criterion must take into account all the circumstances presented by the patient, as well as the needs and resources specific to the area or institution. Conclusions. The 2021 AAOS guidelines do not recommend arthroscopy with lavage and/or debridement in patients with a primary diagnosisof knee osteoarthritis. According to AAOS 2022 recommendations, arthroscopic interventions are suitable for young people with arthrosis of the knee joint in one or 2–3 departments. Arthroscopy as a method of choice for the treatment of terminal gonarthrosis has exhausted itself: most studies prove the ineffectiveness of lavage, debridement, microfracturing of the subchondral bone, and partial meniscectory.

‘OBVIOUSLY BECAUSE IT'S A TEAR IT WON'T NECESSARILY MEND ITSELF.’ A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF PATIENT EXPERIENCES AND EXPECTATIONS OF TREATMENT FOR A MENISCAL TEAR

AbstractIntroductionRecent research has questioned the role of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with a meniscal tear leading to the development of treatment recommendations for these patients. There is a clear need to understand patient perceptions of living with a meniscal tear in order to plan future research and treatment guidelines.AimsTo explore the experiences and expectations of treatment of young patients with a meniscal tear of the kneeMethodologyTen participants diagnosed with a meniscal tear were recruited from the METRO cohort study using a purposive sampling strategy. These patients underwent semi-sructured interviews between April and May 2021. Thematic analysis was used to code the transcripts and generate key themes in order to describe the data.ResultsThemes identified relate to the broad areas of: the effect of symptoms, the expericne of the clinical consultation and the experience of the treatment modality undertaken. Meniscal tears have a profound impact on pain and many patients experience effects on their family and financial life in addition to physical symptoms. Participants expected the majority of their management to occur in secondary care and most thought surgery would be a definitive treatment, while the effectiveness of physiotherapy could not be guaranteed as it would not fix the physical tear.ConclusionPatient experience of meniscal tear may not correspond with current available clinical evidence. Clinicians should consider the common misconceptions highlighted in this study when conducting a consultation and pre-empt them to optimally manage patient expectations.

THE MENISCAL TEAR OUTCOME (METRO) STUDY: A PROSPECTIVE NATIONAL COHORT STUDY EXPLORING THE OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH A MENISCAL TEAR

AbstractIntroductionPrevious research has demonstrated no clinically significant benefit of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with a meniscal tear, however, patients included in these studies would not meet current treatment recommendations. Prior to further randomised controlled trials (RCTs) research is needed to understand a younger population in more detail.AimTo describe the baseline characteristics of patients with a meniscal tear and explore any association between baseline characteristics and outcome.MethodologyA prospective, national multicentre cohort study was performed recruiting patients aged 18 to 55 presenting to secondary care. MRI analysis of arthritis was performed using Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) and bone shape analysis. Outcomes included the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4) at 12 months.Results150 participants were recruited across eight sites with a mean age of 43.47 (SD 9.63). MRI analysis using WORMS score and bone shape analysis revealed no or early osteoarthritis. At 12 months, 67 (44.67%) of participants were managed non-operatively and 68 (45.33%) were operatively. Participants in the operative group were significantly younger with a lower BMI (p<0.05). A stepwise logistic regression model including 17 characteristics revealed that only baseline score and surgery significantly affected 12-month WOMET and KOOS4.ConclusionThis study in contrast to previous trials demonstrated a benefit of surgery for patients with a meniscal tear. The METRO study demonstrates that it is feasible to recruit younger patients and a future RCT is required using the study population included in this cohort.

Prior Meniscectomy in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Worse Short-Term Outcomes

BackgroundPatients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who have prior meniscectomy may have increased rates of postoperative infection, arthrofibrosis, and revision. However, aside from an increased risk of complications, it is unclear whether prior meniscectomy impacts functional outcomes after TKA. This study was conducted to compare functional outcomes following TKA in patients who did and did not have a prior meniscectomy. We hypothesized that patients who had a prior ipsilateral meniscectomy would have worse functional outcomes after undergoing TKA. MethodsA retrospective matched case-control study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. Patients who underwent both meniscectomy and TKA (cases) or TKA alone (controls) from 2013 to 2020 were identified from our institutional database using current procedural terminology codes. Cases were matched in a 1:3 ratio to controls using age, sex, race, body mass index, and a comorbidity index. Inclusion criteria comprised a minimum of 1-year follow-up for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior (KOOS-JR). Exclusion criteria included patients undergoing revision TKA and patients who had a history of ligamentous knee surgery or fracture. T- and Chi-squared analyses were conducted, with significance threshold being P < .05. A total of 589 cases and 1,767 controls were included after matching. There were no significant differences in demographic variables. Cases underwent TKA after their meniscectomy at a mean of 2.9 years (range: 42 days to 16 years). ResultsWhile no significant difference existed for preoperative KOOS-JR scores (46.4 versus 46.4; P = .984), postoperative KOOS-JR scores were significantly lower in the case group (71.9 versus 75.3; P = .001). The case group also achieved the KOOS-JR minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at significantly lower rates than the control group [(MCID: 71.0 versus 77.3%; P = .011) (PASS: 69.4 versus 76.7%; P = .001);]. ConclusionPatients who had a prior meniscectomy may experience lower postoperative functional outcome scores after TKA and had a lower rate of achieving the MCID and PASS for KOOS-JR. Patient expectations should be adjusted accordingly.

Clinical Outcome Measures in Arthroscopic Meniscectomy: Clinician versus Patient Completed Knee Scores.

Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate the difference between clinician-completed and patient-completed outcome scores in detecting improvement following arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with meniscal tears of the knee. Methods Thirty-four patients with meniscal tears were prospectively assessed using 9 clinical outcome measures. The five clinician-completed knee scores included the Tegner Activity Score, the Lysholm Knee Score, the Cincinnati Knee Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Examination Knee Score, and the Tapper and Hoover Meniscal Grading Score. The four patient-completed knee scores included the IKDC Subjective Knee Score, the Knee Outcome Survey - Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), the Short Form-12 Item Health Survey (SF-12), and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Twenty-nine of the 34 patients underwent an arthroscopic meniscectomy and were reassessed with all 9 outcome scores upon their follow-up review. Results A significant longitudinal improvement was observed in 4 of the 5 clinician-completed scores (Tegner [ p < 0.001], Lysholm [ p = 0.004], Cincinnati [p = 0.002] and Tapper and Hoover [ p < 0.001], but not in the IKDC Examination [ p = 0.332]. However, the IKDC Subjective score ( p = 0.021) was the only patient-completed score to demonstrate significant improvement postoperatively. Conclusion Overall, clinician-completed scoring systems were found to be inconsistent with those of patient-completed instruments. The mode of administering outcome measures can have a significant influence on the outcome results both for research and for clinical practice. A combination of both a clinician-completed with a patient-completed instrument may be a more balanced approach to assessing and quantifying meniscus tears and the outcome following arthroscopic meniscectomy.

Meniscus repair with simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinical outcomes, failure rates and subsequent processing

PurposeTo retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes of meniscus repair with simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and explore the causes of failure of meniscus repair. MethodsFrom May 2013 to July 2018, the clinical data of 165 patients who were treated with meniscus surgery and simultaneous ACL reconstruction, including 69 cases of meniscus repair (repair group) and 96 cases of partial meniscectomy (partial meniscectomy group) were retrospectively analyzed. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) ACL rupture associated with fracture, collateral ligament injury, or complex ligament injury; (2) a history of knee surgery; or (3) a significant degree of osteoarthritis. The 69 patients in the repair group were divided into the non-failure group (62 cases) and the failure group (7 cases) depending on the repair effect. Postoperative outcomes of the repair group and the partial meniscectomy group were compared. General conditions and postoperative outcomes of the failure group and the non-failure group were compared. During the median follow-up period of 28 months (range, 4 - 65 months) after the second arthroscopy, postoperative outcomes of seven patients in the failure group were summarized. SPSS 25.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsSeven patients in the failure group who underwent the second arthroscopy were followed up for (30 ± 17.4) months and their postoperative outcomes were summarized. Compared with the partial meniscectomy group, the International Knee Documentation Committee scores of patients in the repair group improved significantly (p = 0.031). Compared with the non-failure group, more patients in the failure group were younger than 24 years (p = 0.030). The median follow-up period was 39.5 months. All patients recovered well after subsequent partial meniscectomy and relieved clinical symptoms. Visual analog scale scores decreased significantly (p = 0.026), and the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores improved significantly (p = 0.046 for both). ConclusionThe failure rate of meniscus repair in this study was 10.1% (7/69), all of which were medial meniscus tears. However, the surgical outcomes of ACL reconstruction were not affected, and there might be a role for graft protection. Therefore, meniscus retears can be successful treated by performing subsequent partial meniscectomy in patients with repair failure.

Outcomes at 20 Years After Meniscectomy in Patients Aged 50 to 70 Years

To report the outcomes of arthroscopic meniscectomy (AM) at 20 years of follow-up through timing/rate of conversion to total knee replacement (TKR) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), focusing on detection of specific predictor variables for these outcomes, in patients 50 to 70 years old. We performed a retrospective study of 289 patients, ages at surgery 50 to 70 years, with diagnosis of degenerative meniscal tear who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy. We collected the following baseline data: age, sex, injured meniscus (medial, lateral, or both), knee alignment, osteoarthritis (OA), associated lesion identified during arthroscopy, and associated procedure performed during arthroscopy. At 20 years of follow-up, we collected rate and timing of TKR conversion, and we evaluated clinical outcomes with KOOS. Female sex (P < .01), older age (P < .01), lateral meniscectomy (P= .02), malalignment (P= .03), and advanced chondral lesion (P < .01) were found to be significantly related to subsequent TKR. No significant correlation was found between amount of resection and subsequent TKR (P= .26). Negative predictor factors to obtain equal or superior to age- and sex-adjusted KOOS scores were age 60 to 70 years at time of AM (P= .03) and lateral meniscectomy (P= .02). We report a 15.7% conversion rate at 20 years from AM to TKR and a mean time between surgeries of 7 years. Subsequent TKR in the 20 years after AM for degenerative meniscus tears were significantly associated with preoperative OA and chondral lesion (Kellgren Lawrence 2; Outerbridge >2), lateral meniscectomy, age at surgery, female sex, and malalignment. Furthermore, age >60 years, lateral meniscectomy, and concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were negative predictors for poor clinical outcomes at 20 years. Therefore, if patients present with negative predictor factors, the AM should not be proposed as second-line treatment, and nonoperative management should be continued until TKR is unavoidable. IV, case series.

Patient-reported outcomes of meniscal repair and meniscectomy in patients 40 years of age and older show similar good results.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients aged 40years and older who underwent meniscal repair or meniscectomy. All patients aged 40 and older who underwent a meniscal repair at a single institution from 2006 to 2017 were included. Meniscal repair cases were matched with a meniscectomy control group in a 1:3 ratio, selected for an equal proportion of concomitant ACL reconstruction in each group. PROMs, collected at a minimum follow-up of 24months, included International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC), Marx activity scale, and a patient satisfaction scale. The primary outcome was IKDC score, which was compared between groups using a Mann-Whitney U test. Rate of failure, defined as repeat ipsilateral knee surgery or surgeon report of failure, was reported. Thirty-five meniscal repair patients and 131 meniscectomy patients were identified; 28 (80.0%) and 67 (51.1%) completed all PROMs with mean follow-up of 4.9 and 5.2years, respectively. The mean age was 48.5 ± 7.0years in the meniscal repair cohort and 52.8 ± 7.1years in the meniscectomy cohort (p = 0.009). Concomitant ACL reconstruction was present in 46.4% and 49.3% of the meniscal repair and meniscectomy cohorts, respectively (n.s.). The median IKDC score was 78 (IQR 66, 87) in the repair cohort and 77 (IQR 56, 86) in the meniscectomy cohort (n.s.). The median Marx activity scale was 3.5 (IQR 0, 8) in the repair cohort and 3.0 (IQR 0, 9) in the meniscectomy cohort (n.s.). Over 85% of both groups were satisfied or very satisfied with no between-group differences (n.s.). In patients aged 40years and older, patient-reported outcomes at an average of 5years postoperatively were satisfactory and similar in patients undergoing meniscal repair and meniscectomy, indicating that age alone should not be a contraindication to meniscal repair.Level of evidence: Level III.

Chondral lesions at the medial femoral condyle, meniscal degeneration, anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, and lateral meniscal tears impair the middle-term results after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

The aim of the present study was to analyse which clinical, radiological and arthroscopic findings are able to predict the postoperative outcome after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Furthermore, the present study aimed to investigate the postoperative outcome after partial meniscectomy in patients with degenerative meniscal lesions. A total of 91 patients with a follow-up period of 34.7 ± 11.4months after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were included in this retrospective study. Clinical, radiological, and arthroscopic data were analysed at the time of follow-up. The multivariable linear regression analysis for postoperative outcome, based on the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET), included age, gender, body mass index, physical activity, presence of cartilage lesions, leg alignment, grade of radiographic osteoarthritis, location of meniscal lesions, meniscal extrusion, meniscal degeneration, presence of an anterior cruciate ligament tears as well as bone marrow lesions. WOMET and WOMAC scores showed a significant improvement of 45.0 ± 48.1 points (CI 34.9-55.1; p ≤ 0.0001) and 75.1 ± 69.3 points (CI 60.6-89.6; p = 0.001) within the follow-up period. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that poor preoperative WOMET scores (p = 0.001), presence of cartilage lesions at the medial femoral condylus (p = 0.001), meniscal degeneration (p = 0.008), the presence of an anterior cruciate ligament lesion (p = 0.005), and lateral meniscal tears (p = 0.039) were associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Patients with femoral bone marrow lesions had better outcome (p = 0.038). Poor preoperative WOMET scores, presence of cartilage lesions at the medial femoral condylus, meniscal degeneration, concomitant anterior cruciate ligament lesions as well as lateral meniscal tears are correlated with worse postoperative outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Patients with femoral bone marrow lesions femoral are more likely to gain benefit from arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in the middle term. Despite justified recent restrictions in indication, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy seems to effectively reduce pain and alleviate symptoms in carefully selected patients with degenerative meniscal tears. III.

Influence of meniscal repair versus meniscectomy on ACL reconstruction in terms of knee stability and radiological imaging

Objective: To compare effect of meniscus repair and meniscectomy in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction in terms of clinical instability and radiological tunnel widening 1 year after surgery. Introduction: Meniscectomy has been shown to have detrimental effects on knee in terms of increased contact pressure in femoral and tibial condyles, rotary instability and early changes of osteoarthritis. These changes are exaggerated in ACL deficient knees. Patients present to the surgeon at different times after injury ranging from 3 weeks to one year. Depending upon status of meniscal tears and its reparability at the time of surgery, surgeon has to choose between meniscectomy and meniscus repair during ACL reconstruction. We tried to compare meniscus repair and meniscectomy in terms of knee stability and radiological tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction in short term follow up. Methodology: 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were selected after going through selection criteria, were divided between meniscus repair group and meniscus excision group. Meniscus tears, which were in the red red zone were repaired with inside out, all inside and outside in methods, depending upon their location from anterior to posterior zones. Those tears which presented late were irreducible, avascular and became loose body scuffing articular cartilage, were excised with shaver. All patients underwent standard ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically at 3 months 6 months and 12 months. Results: Group 1 had 14 patients who underwent meniscus repair and group 2 had 16 patients who underwent meniscectomy during ACL reconstruction. Evaluation with Lachman’s test showed that, 14% patients (2 out of 14) from Group 1 had grade 2 Lachman test. Thirty seven % of group 2 had grade 2 Lachman test though the difference was not significant (p = 0.151). Tibial tunnel diameter in meniscectomy group increased from 8 mm to 11.86mm (S.D= 1.11.) at 12 months. Tibial diameter in group 2 increased from 8 mm to 12.28 mm (S.D. = 1.52), (p= 0.394). Conclusion: Whenever ACL tear is associated with medial or lateral meniscal tears, meniscal repair is the preferred treatment over meniscectomy. The amount of tunnel widening is higher when meniscus is excised as compared to meniscal repair. The anterior tibial translation remains higher when meniscus is excised during ACL reconstruction, though short term functional results are same.

Middle-aged patients with an MRI-verified medial meniscal tear report symptoms commonly associated with knee osteoarthritis

Background and purpose — No consensus exists on when to perform arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in patients with a degenerative meniscal tear. Since MRI and clinical tests are not accurate in detecting a symptomatic meniscal lesion, the patient’s symptoms often play a large role when deciding when to perform surgery. We determined the prevalence and severity of self-reported knee symptoms in patients eligible for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy due to a degenerative meniscal tear. We investigated whether symptoms commonly considered to be related to meniscus injury were associated with early radiographic signs of knee osteoarthritis.Patients and methods — We included individual baseline items from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score collected in 2 randomized controlled trials evaluating treatment for an MRI-verified degenerative medial meniscal tears in 199 patients aged 35–65 years. Each item was scored as no, mild, moderate, severe, extreme, and at least “mild” considering the symptoms present. Early radiographic signs of osteoarthritis, defined as a Kellgren and Lawrence grade of at least 1, were seen in 70 patients.Results — At least monthly knee pain, pain during stair walking and when twisting on the knee, and lack of confidence in knee was present in at least 80% of the patients. Median severity was at least moderate for knee pain, pain when twisting on the knee, pain walking on stairs, lack of confidence in knee, and clicking. Mechanical symptoms such as catching were rare. Early radiographic signs of osteoarthritis were associated with an increased risk of self-reported swelling, catching, and stiffness later in the day; the odds ratio was 2.4 (95% CI 1.2–4.9), 2.3 (1.2–4.3), and 2.3 (1.1–5.0), respectively.Interpretation — Middle-aged patients with a degenerative medial meniscus tear reported symptoms commonly associated with knee osteoarthritis. Frequent knee pain, presence of lack of confidence in the knee, and clicking did not distinguish those with a meniscal tear alone from those with early radiographic knee OA. Our findings support the notion that symptoms reported by those with a degenerative meniscal tear represent early signs of knee osteoarthritis.

Variable outcomes of medial meniscectomy in middle aged and older patients after 2 to 8 years

Objectives:To review midterm results of arthroscopic medial meniscectomy in patients over the age of 40.Methods: Retrospective observational series.All 354 patients over 40 years of age (after exclusion criteria) who underwent medial meniscectomy by a single surgeon for clinical and MRI correlated medial meniscal tears, having failed conservative treatment, between 2009 and 2014 were sent a questionnaire. Completed questionnaires from 179 patients at an average follow up of 52 ± 15 months (range, 20-79) were analysed.Results:The average time to maximum recovery was longer than expected at 5.6 ± 6 months (range 0.5-36). 74% (133) felt they were largely or completely relieved of symptoms, but, as predicted from past experience, 5% (8) were worse post-operatively. Symptoms became worse in the follow-up period in another 26% (47). 11% (20) had further surgery (15 to TKR). 9% (17) preferred to have left the knee alone in retrospect. Final WOMET and Tegner-Lysholm scores showed overall fair results (36% excellent, 17% good, 22% fair, 25% poor.)Conclusion:Medial meniscectomy in the middle aged and elderly remains controversial, with some claiming that it is no better than placebo, and possibly harmful. This data should provide guidance in counselling patients regarding the risks, and likelihood of benefit, from such surgery, and has led to the authors using more rigorous selection criteria. Prospective studies are needed.

The Role of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in the Management of Degenerative Meniscus Tears: A Review of the Recent Literature.

Background:The use of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for middle aged to older adults with knee pain is one of the most common surgical procedures with approximately 150,000 knee arthroscopies being carried out in the United Kingdom each year, and about five times that number in the United States. Despite this, the procedure remains controversial. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the role of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with degenerative meniscus tears and suggest recommendations for clinical practice.Methods:A thorough literature search was performed using available databases, including Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to cover important randomised control trials surrounding the use of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.Results:The majority of randomised control trials suggest that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is not superior to conservative measures such as exercise programmes. Furthermore, one randomised control trial found that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy was not even superior to sham surgery.Conclusion:There is significant overtreatment of knee pain with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy when alternative, less invasive and less expensive treatment options are equally effective. First-line treatment of degenerative meniscus tears should be non-operative therapy focused on analgesia and physical therapy to provide pain relief as well as improve mechanical function of the knee joint. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy should be considered as a last resort when extensive exercise programmes and physiotherapy have been tried and failed.

The role for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in knees with degenerative changes: a systematic review.

Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee commonly have degenerative meniscal tears. Arthroscopic meniscectomy is frequently performed, although the benefits are debatable. Recent studies have concluded that there is no role for arthroscopic washout in osteoarthritis of the knee. Our aim was to perform a systematic review to assess the evidence for the efficacy of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with meniscal tears and degenerative changes in the knee. A literature search was performed, using the PubMed/MEDLINE database, for relevant articles published between 1975 and 2015. A total of six studies, including five randomised controlled trials and one cross-sectional study of a prospective cohort, met the inclusion criteria. Relevant information including study design, operations, the characteristics of the patients, outcomes, adverse events and further operations were extracted. The degree of osteoarthritis in the patients who were included and the rate of cross over from one form of treatment to another varied in the studies. Two randomised controlled trials showed a benefit of arthroscopic surgery in patients with limited degenerative joint disease, compared with conservative treatment. One cross-sectional study showed that patients with less severe degenerative changes had better outcomes. Patients with symptomatic meniscal tears and degenerative changes in the knee can benefit from arthroscopic meniscectomy, particularly if the osteoarthritis is mild. A trial of conservative management may be effective and should be considered, especially in patients with moderate osteoarthritis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:934-8.

Mechanical Symptoms and Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Patients with Degenerative Meniscus Tear: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

Mechanical Symptoms and Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy in Patients with Degenerative Meniscus Tear: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

Articular Cartilage Degenerates After Subtotal/Total Lateral Meniscectomy but Radiographic Arthrosis Progression Is Reduced After Meniscal Transplantation

Background: Little is known about the degree of articular cartilage degeneration after subtotal/total lateral meniscectomy in patients who later undergo isolated lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (LMAT). It has not yet been studied whether arthritic changes as shown on radiographs were lower during the posttransplantation period than during the meniscus-deficient period. Hypothesis: Articular cartilage will significantly degenerate during the meniscus-deficient period, but the progression in radiographic arthrosis is reduced after LMAT. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 49 patients who underwent subtotal/total lateral meniscectomy before isolated LMAT performed over 1 year later by the same surgeon. International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grades of the femorotibial joint at the time of subtotal/total meniscectomy and at LMAT were compared. Radiographic evaluation was performed at the time of initial meniscectomy, LMAT, and the latest follow-up in 38 patients (after 11 patients whose radiographs showed incomplete ossification at the time of meniscectomy were excluded). Arthrosis, based on Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades, was determined on standing anteroposterior views. Joint space width (JSW) was measured on weightbearing flexion posteroanterior views. Results: Over a mean meniscus-deficient period of 4.5 years (range, 1-13 years), articular cartilage significantly degenerated on the femoral and tibial sides (P < .001). Grade ≥3 degeneration on the lateral tibial plateau was observed in 13 patients (27%) at the time of initial meniscectomy; this incidence doubled to 28 patients (57%) by the time of LMAT. The K-L grades worsened (P < .001) and JSWs narrowed significantly (–0.65 ± 1.09 mm; P = .001) during the mean meniscus-deficient period of 3.1 years. At radiographic assessment, however, the K-L grades (P = .097) and JSWs (4.06 ± 1.19 vs 3.92 ± 1.21 mm; mean difference, –0.14 ± 0.68 mm; P = .213) did not significantly change during the mean posttransplantation period of 3.8 years. The changes in ICRS grade and JSW during the meniscus-deficient period were not associated with age, body mass index, mechanical axis deviation, or Tegner activity level (P > .05 for all relationships). Conclusion: Patients who underwent isolated LMAT showed substantial articular cartilage degeneration at the time of initial subtotal/total lateral meniscectomy, and this degeneration progressed thereafter. Further progression of radiographic arthrosis was delayed after LMAT.

"Fatigue meniscal tears": a description of the lesion and the results of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical outcomes of partial meniscectomy in patients with "fatigue meniscal tear", which presents as a non-traumatic tear with abrupt onset of symptoms of a radial tear in the transition between the middle and posterior thirds of the meniscus. We prospectively followed 71 patients with "fatigue meniscal tear" (41 women and 30 men, mean age of 63years, SD 6.9years) recruited among 497 patients with isolated medial meniscal lesions treated between January 2006 and June 2011. Inclusion criteria were spontaneous abrupt onset knee pain, minor or no trauma, no radiographic or MRI osteoarthritis, no bone oedema, pre-operative magnetic resonance image of medial meniscus tear, and arthroscopic evaluation demonstrating radial or vertical flap tear in the body to posterior horn junction of the medial meniscus. We followed all patients for a minimum of two years and reviewed their clinical symptoms, physical exam, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction at last follow-up. The average follow-up was 4.2years, with a minimum follow-up of two years. Among the 71 patients, there were 59 (83.1%) good or excellent results and 12 (16.9%) poor results. These 12 patients demanded further treatment because of persistent pain, with three of the patients developing subchondral bone fracture. All patient complaints and poor outcomes could be identified in the initial six months after surgery. There was no gender difference in the subgroup analysis. Our findings indicate that patients with "fatigue meniscal tear" benefit from arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, with only 16.9% reporting unfavourable results. IV, Cohort study or case series.