Reviewed by: Females by Andrea Long Chu Kimberly Henry Andrea Long Chu, Females New York: Verso, 2019. 94 pp. The past decade has seen an explosion in trans discourse online especially between trans activists and the "gender critical," giving the search for a definition of "woman" new urgency. Andrea Long Chu's first book, Females, makes a playfully radical intervention into the fields of feminist and gender theory, bypassing questions of binary and biology with the simple statement, "Everyone is female." Her thesis, however, will not likely result in applause from the "future is female" crowd, as Long Chu immediately follows this statement by defining "female" not as a biological phenomenon but a psychological one, marked by self-negation to make room for the desires of others. The deliberately provocative idea at the center of Females operates on many levels to engage and challenge scholarly and popular conversations on gender. Long Chu stretches the theory of socially constructed gender to its extreme by defining "female" as "any psychic operation in which the self is sacrificed to make room for the desires of another" (11). Those termed female under the conventional—already embattled—definition, may initially feel taken aback at this re-definition, especially as it incorporates some of the worst misogynistic stereotypes about females: We are a hollow signifier, a vessel and canvas for the desires of the other. By casting "female" as the universal sex, however, Long Chu builds the basis for an almost humanist project, joining all genders together under the universally human suffering of femaleness. This book's playful radicality takes inspiration from Long Chu's muse, Valerie Solanas, self-publisher of the SCUM Manifesto and shooter of Andy Warhol. Long Chu's meditations on Solanas and particularly her play, Up Your Ass, make up a large portion of Females. Each short chapter is named for a quote from Up Your Ass, with scenes and characters function as a jumping off point for Long Chu to break down Solanas' theories on gender as stated in the SCUM Manifesto. Long Chu describes Solanas' caustic rhetoric with honesty and affection, acknowledging its occasional incomprehensibility. Of Solanas' many extreme suggestions, the inversion of gendered traits—that men behave in all the bad ways they assign to women, and vice versa—and the eventual "genocide" of men inspire Females the [End Page 378] most. They are the spiritual precursor for Long Chu's theory and in a certain sense the project of her book. Indeed, Females argues, men do act like women, but everybody does, so we are all female—a sentence which neatly satisfies Solanas' genocidal streak. Long Chu, however, rejects Solanas' preferred medium, the manifesto, though she doesn't opt for a standard academic manuscript in its place. Females blends media analysis and memoir, covering in its tight ninety-four pages Solanas' major works, new media criticism, and autobiographical reminiscences of Long Chu's gender transition. Long Chu identifies new media artifacts and phenomena, such as the development of a tumblr based porn subgenre called "sissy porn," and reads them through her theory of gender, building her argument for the universality of femaleness as she defines it. One of the more interesting, and likely more controversial, of these examples is Long Chu's analysis of Gigi Gorgeous, a trans YouTuber and makeup influencer. Long Chu explores the archive of images which constitute Gigi, her YouTube documented transition, and her steadfast dedication to conventional beauty, with a both critical and openly longing eye. Long Chu ends her first chapter on Gigi, writing, "Gender transition"—she later expands this to all gender—"no matter the direction, is always a process of becoming a canvas for someone else's fantasy" (30). This is the edge that Long Chu pushes up against, offering readers ideas that engage and threaten to offend, tempered by a genuine humanity. Long Chu is not Solanas; Females is not a manifesto, but a question. Hovering over this memoir/media studies approach to gender is the specter of psychoanalysis. Long Chu even acknowledges its presence, writing "When I say that everyone is female, I am simply restating something psychoanalytically uncontroversial" (22). Setting aside the fact that the words "psychoanalysis...
Read full abstract