AbstractMatching cupsVesicles, as a means of transport and storage of information, have been around longer than humankind. In fact, it seems they have been used as a means of communication as long as eukaryotic cells have felt the need to gossip. They have used general external vesicle systems containing secreted metabolites (cytokines, hormones, and neurotransmitters), systems specifically related to the payload of external vesicles and methods dependent on the mechanism of vesicle formation (budding off, shedding from excetome) to convey information. Koppen et al. looked at the swirling mass of various sized vesicles surrounding Drosophila and asked “Where did these come from?” Not only were the microvesicles found in eukaryotes, but also in Drosophila, nematodes, pathogenic yeast and Leishmania parasites. Cell lines shedding vesicles included Hedgehog, Wnt and Wingless. Sizes range from 40 nm to 1 μm and generally have a common, cup‐like structure.Koppen, T. et al., Proteomics 2011, 11, 4397–4410.Moles, warts, nevi, ugly brown spots, melanomas, mycoses, dermatophytes,...in a word: uglysMost of the uglys of the human race seem to be suffered by the adolescents, regardless of their natural skin color. Most of the human superficial mycoses are caused by a variety of dermatophytes, fungi that live on keratin. Many have been sequenced at the genome level (Microsporum canis, Arthroderma benhamiae). These fungi secrete virulence factors that are neutral or acidic proteases and peptidases including subtilisins, leucine amino peptidases, dipeptidyl‐peptidases,and metallocarboxypeptidases. A particularly interesting feature of all of these fungi is that as they grow, they release metabolites that improve the pH of the growth medium and thus the rate of growth. When 2‐D PAGE/shotgun LC was used to determine approximate numbers of active peptides, M. canis yielded 196 different hydrolases, including lipases, glucosidases, phosphatases, plus miscellaneous other enzymes (Background image obtained from CDC Public Health Image Library).Sriranganadane, D. et al., Proteomics 2011, 11, 4422–4433.Too late for new tricksEven software wears out in time – some of you may remember the millennium panic, when the turn of the calendar from 1999 to 2000 was going to knock the planes out of the air! Now we face the aging of proteomic and genomic analysis packages – our comfortable old shoes that cannot handle the load anymore. As of September 2011, the International Protein Index (IPI) will no longer be supported. Released in 2001, it mediated the differences between specific pairs of genomes – limited to seven specifically chosen models because of the cost of sequencing at that time. Currently there are more genomes sequenced and mutual aid agreements between analysis packages than you can shake a stick at. The replacement for IPI is UniProtKB complete Proteome set, comprising two databases, one manually curated (Swiss‐Prot) and one automatically curated (TrEMBL). Griss et al. cover a number of issues surrounding the recommended substitutions (Image provided courtesy of UniProt Consortium).Griss, J. et al., Proteomics 2011, 11, 4434–4438.
Read full abstract