CCQM-P48 was a Pilot Study of the Inorganic Analysis Working Group of the ComitéConsultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM) and was organized by the Institute forReference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) of the European Commission. It was the firstCCQM comparison dedicated to isotope ratio measurements.It involved a rather rare combination of 5 national metrology institutes (NMIs), representing at theComité International des Poids et Mesures (CIPM) 3 Member States of the Metre Conventionand 2 international organisations, and 10 invited laboratories (5 'nuclear experts', 5'geochemistry/mass spectrometry experts') selected outside CIPM. The aim was to comparecapabilities to measure the n(234U)/n(238U), n(235U)/n(238U) and n(236U)/n(238U) ratios in 4simulated biological/environmental materials prepared at a nominal uranium mass fraction of5 µg g-1 (series A) and, optionally, in 4 simulated biological/environmental materials preparedat a nominal uranium mass fraction of 5 ng g-1 (series B). In addition, a diluted solution of IRMM-184, a natural uranium isotopic certified reference material (ICRM), had also been distributedfor rehearsal as well as for calibration purposes. Participants, however, were free to apply themeasurement strategy of their choice.The test material can be assimilated to a biological/environmental type of sample as thematrix simulated approximately the composition of urine, from the combination in ~ 3%HNO3 solution of purified inorganic salt (aquarium seawater salts to 18 ± 2 g kg-1) and urea(to 17 ± 2 g kg-1). Four uranium isotopic mixtures were produced by mixing uranium ICRMsin the gas phase as UF6. Fractions of these mixtures, following their transformation under theform of solid UO3, were dissolved individually into ~ 3% HNO3 to get separate ~ 1000 mguranium kg-1 mother solutions. Both series of test materials derived from these solutions(simple dilution into batches of simulated urine), but participants were not informed about thissimilitude.The absolute value of the n(235U)/n(238U) ratio in each isotopic mixture was established at theearliest stage (i.e. in the gas phase) by calibrated gas source mass spectrometry measurements,and thus could serve as independent reference value (expanded, k = 2, uncertainty U = 0.05%,relative) for results from series A. 'Mixture mode' (MM) median data based on participants'results were proposed as consensus reference values for all the other sets of results produced.For samples from series A, 6 laboratories implemented a combination of sample digestion andmatrix separation steps, whereas 3 laboratories did not report any particular sample treatment(apart possibly from dilution). Only mass spectrometry was employed for isotope ratiomeasurements, including 9 MC-ICPMS, 3 HR-ICPMS, 2 TIMS and 1 ICP-QMS. For n(235U)/n(238U) ratios, results from 11 laboratories were in agreement within stated U withreference values for at least 3 mixtures; stated relative U were always > 0.0120% (except for1 participant) and always ⩽ 0.7% (except for 1 participant with U > 1% for 3 samples).Results on n(234U)/n(238U) ratios were almost always within ± 3% around the calculated MMmedian value. For the n(236U)/n(238U) smallest ratio, ~ 5 × 10-7, results relative to thecalculated MM median value were within ± 20% for 8 participants, between 20% and 50%above for 3 other participants, over 50% above for 1 participant, and 3 participants did notreport results. The perception of which factor caused the largest contribution to theseuncertainty estimations differed among participants because of differences in the analyticalmethodologies deployed but mostly because of wide differences in concepts of uncertaintyestimation.Main text.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM IAWG.
Read full abstract