Lordosis Measurements Research Articles

Considerations in sagittal evaluation of the scoliotic spine.

To predict the sagittal spinal parameters as measured in a 3D model of the spine using the 2D radiographic measurements. Bi-planar low-dose stereoradiography images of 73 right thoracic AIS patients were processed to generate 3D models of the spine and pelvis. T1-T12 kyphosis, L1-S1 lordosis, and pelvic rotation were calculated using these 3D models. With the same X-rays, T1-T12 kyphosis, L1-S1 lordosis, thoracic and lumbar frontal curves, and pelvic rotation (calculated from the frontal and sagittal distances between the femoral heads) were manually measured on the X-rays by two independent observers. 3D sagittal parameters were predicted from only 2D sagittal parameters (simple regression) and from 2D sagittal parameters, 2D frontal parameters, and pelvic rotation (multiple regression). The simple and multiple regression models were compared for efficiency and accuracy of prediction. Comparing single and multiple regression models, multiple regression improved the prediction of the 3D sagittal parameters for kyphosis (R2 = 0.78-0.86) and lordosis (R2 = 0.88-0.92) measurements when compared to simple regression. The impact of pelvic rotation was significant when 2D kyphosis was higher than 40° and thoracic curve was less than 60° or 2D kyphosis was less than 40° and thoracic curve was higher than 60°, p < 0.05. Lordosis of 60° and higher were more prone to measurement error when pelvic rotation was present, p < 0.05. Both pelvic rotation and frontal deformity affect the accuracy of the 2D sagittal measurements of the scoliotic spine. We suggest the importance of the 3D considerations in sagittal evaluation of AIS.

Changes in Sagittal Alignment After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Results of 24 Month Pilot Study

Background Context: For cervical disc replacements to be comparable to the gold standard of cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), disc replacements they must be able to provide normal range of motion as well as predictable and reliable correction of cervical alignment. The Synergy Disc was designed to provide correction of alignment in the sagittal plane while restoring physiologic range of motion. Purpose: This study evaluated whether the Synergy Disc provided preservation and/or restoration of sagittal alignment while normalizing kinematics and providing acceptable clinical outcomes. The alignment provided by the Synergy Disc was compared with a retrospective cohort of 30 single- level ACDF patients. Study Design/Setting: The pilot trial was a multi-center, prospective, consecutive patient enrollment study using the Synergy Disc for the treatment of single and two-level degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. Patient Sample: The procedure was performed on 43 patients (45 implants) with follow-up on 40 patients (42 implants). For the historical cohort ACDF arm, 30 patients with similar follow-up with single level anterior discectomy, fusion and plating were used for segmental lordosis measurements. Outcome Measures: For the Synergy Disc group, the kinematic outcome parameters included: range of motion (ROM), shell angle (SA), disc height (DH), sagittal plane translation and center of rotation (COR) in the X and Y direction. Standard assessments of clinical outcomes were also measured (Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale). For the fusion arm, only functional spinal unit (FSU) angle was recorded using a single preoperative and postoperative standing lateral cervical radiograph. Methods: In the Synergy Disc group, static and dynamic radiological assessments were performed in 43 consecutive patients prior to the placement of the Synergy Disc. Forty patients were studied for the course of the study protocol (3 patients lost to follow-up). For the Synergy Disc group, lateral cervical radiographs were evaluated for range of motion, translation, center of rotation, disc height and shell angle before and at the longest postoperativr follow-up. Neck Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale for arm and neck pain were collected and analyzed. For the fusion group, standing lateral radiographs were reviewed. Results: In all the patients (40 patients, 42 implants), followed up for at least 24 months at an average of 28 months the average SA of the Synergy Disc was maintained at 6±2.7° of lordosis. Preoperative ROM, translation and center of rotation on X axis did not change significantly following surgery. There was a significant upward shift in the center of rotation on Y axis. There was significant improvement in all clinical outcome measures. In the fusion group, with a similar follow-up period, there was a 4° increase in lordosis at the FSU. Conclusions: The Synergy Disc provided lordosis at the surgical level, while maintaining preoperative range of motion, translation and COR X. The lordosis of 6±2.7° provided by the Synergy Disc at 2 years following surgery was comparable to the lordotic correction provided by an anterior cervical discectomy with interbody fusion and plating.

Concurrent validity of photogrammetric and inclinometric techniques based on assessment of anteroposterior spinal curvatures

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to investigate correlations between parameters of anteroposterior spinal curvatures in the sagittal plane, measured with the use of photogrammetric technique and inclinometer in healthy elderly women.MethodsRandomized study involved 50 females, ranging from 50 to 70 years of age (mean 62.26 ± 6.94); mean body mass index (BMI) 27.69 ± 4.79. The examined parameters included angle of inclination in lumbosacral spine (ALFA), thoracolumbar transition (BETA), upper thoracic segment (GAMMA), angle of lumbar lordosis (LLA) and thoracic kyphosis (TKA). Results obtained with gravitational inclinometer were compared with those identified with photogrammetry method. Statistical analyses were performed with Mann–Whitney U test, regression analysis and Bland–Altman analysis.ResultsIn Mann–Whitney U test, with correction due to continuity, no statistically significant differences for any variable were found. Regression analysis was significant only for the variable of BETA angle. Bland–Altman coefficient for the respective angles was: ALFA 2.0%, BETA 4%, GAMMA 0%, LLA 2% and TKA 0%.ConclusionsThe results acquired with gravitational inclinometer and with photogrammetric technique are comparable, as the parameters of anteroposterior spinal curvatures acquired with these two methods are found to be compatible in the case of measurements of lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis.

Magnetically Controlled Devices Parallel to the Spine in Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Background:Children with severe spinal deformity frequently are managed with growth-friendly implants. After initial surgery, externally controlled magnetic rods allow spinal deformity correction during growth without further surgical intervention. The ability to lengthen the spine without additional surgical procedures is especially beneficial in high-risk children, such as those with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The purpose of the present study was to assess the level of control of spinal deformity in a homogeneous group of patients with SMA who were managed with magnetically controlled implants for 2 years.Methods:This prospective, nonrandomized study included 21 non-ambulatory children with type-II SMA and progressive scoliosis who were managed bilaterally with a magnetically controlled implant that was inserted parallel to the spine with use of rib-to-pelvis hook fixation. Radiographic measurements of scoliotic curves, kyphosis, lordosis, pelvic obliquity, and spinal length were performed before and after implantation of the magnetically controlled device and during external lengthening. The mean duration of follow-up was 2 years.Results:The mean main curve of patients without prior vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) treatment decreased from 70° before implantation of the magnetically controlled device to 30° after implantation of the device. Correction was maintained during the follow-up period, with a mean curve of 31° at the time of the latest follow-up at 2.2 years. Pelvic obliquity was surgically corrected by 76% (from 17° to 4°) and remained stable during follow-up. Thoracic kyphosis could not be corrected within the follow-up period. Spinal length of children without prior spinal surgery increased by >50 mm immediately after device implantation and steadily increased at a rate of 13.5 mm/yr over the course of treatment. During treatment, 4 general complications occurred and 6 lengthening procedures failed, with 3 patients requiring surgical revision.Conclusions:Bilateral implantation of an externally controlled magnetic rod with rib-to-pelvis fixation represents a safe and efficient method to control spinal deformity in children with SMA, achieving sufficient and stable curve correction as well as increased spinal length. The complication rate was lower than those that have been described for VEPTR and other growing rod instrumentation strategies.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Accuracy of a Radiological Evaluation Method for Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Curvatures Using Spinous Processes

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess a radiographic method for spinal curvature evaluation in children, based on spinous processes, and identify its normality limits. MethodsThe sample consisted of 90 radiographic examinations of the spines of children in the sagittal plane. Thoracic and lumbar curvatures were evaluated using angular (apex angle [AA]) and linear (sagittal arrow [SA]) measurements based on the spinous processes. The same curvatures were also evaluated using the Cobb angle (CA) method, which is considered the gold standard. For concurrent validity (AA vs CA), Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient, root-mean-square error, Pitman- Morgan test, and Bland-Altman analysis were used. For reproducibility (AA, SA, and CA), the intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change measurements were used. ResultsA significant correlation was found between CA and AA measurements, as was a low root-mean-square error. The mean difference between the measurements was 0° for thoracic and lumbar curvatures, and the mean standard deviations of the differences were ±5.9° and 6.9°, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients of AA and SA were similar to or higher than the gold standard (CA). The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the AA were always lower than the CA. ConclusionThis study determined the concurrent validity, as well as intra- and interrater reproducibility, of the radiographic measurements of kyphosis and lordosis in children.

Association Between Vertebral Cross-sectional Area and Vertebral Wedging in Children and Adolescents: A Cross-sectional Analysis

A small vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) imparts a mechanical disadvantage that escalates the risk for vertebral fractures in elderly populations. We examined whether a small vertebral CSA is also associated with a greater degree of vertebral wedging in children. Measurements of vertebral CSA, lumbar lordosis (LL) or thoracic scoliosis angle, and vertebral wedging were obtained in 100 healthy adolescents (50 boys and 50 girls) and 25 girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using magnetic resonance imaging. Vertebral CSA of the lumbar vertebrae negatively correlated to the degree of posteroanterior vertebral wedging at L5 (r = -0.49; p < 0.0001); this was true whether all subjects were analyzed together or boys and girls independently. In contrast, we found a positive correlation between the degree of LL and vertebral wedging (r = 0.57; p < 0.0001). Multiple regression analysis showed that the association between vertebral CSA and wedging was independent of age and body mass index. In girls with AIS, vertebral CSA negatively correlated to the degree of lateral thoracic vertebral wedging (r = -0.66; p = 0.0004), an association that persisted even after accounting for age and body mass index. Additionally, Cobb angle positively correlated to lateral thoracic vertebral wedging (r = 0.46; p = 0.021). Our cross-sectional results support the hypothesis that smaller vertebral CSA is associated with greater vertebral deformity during growth, as in adulthood. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

The effect of prophylactic vertebroplasty on the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure following posterior spinal fusion in adult spinal deformity: a 5-year follow-up study

Background ContextThe incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) ranges from 5% to 46% following adult spinal deformity surgery. Approximately 66% to 76% of PJK occurs within 3 months of surgery. A subset of these patients, reportedly 26% to 47%, develop proximal junctional failure (PJF) within 6 months postoperatively. To date, there are no studies evaluating the impact of prophylactic vertebroplasty on PJK and PJF incidence at long-term follow-up. PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes, and incidence of PJK and PJF, after prophylactic vertebroplasty for long-segment thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Study DesignThis is a prospective cohort study. Patient SampleThirty-nine patients, of whom 87% were female, who underwent two-level prophylactic vertebroplasty at the upper instrumented and supra-adjacent vertebrae at the time of index PSF were included in this study. Outcome MeasuresClinical outcomes were assessed using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22), and Short-Form (SF) 36 questionnaires, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiographic parameters including PJK angle, and coronal and sagittal alignment, were calculated, along with relevant perioperative complications and revision rates. MethodsOf the 41 patients who received two-level prophylactic vertebroplasty at the upper instrumented and supra-adjacent vertebrae at the time of index PSF, and comprised a cohort with previously published 2-year follow-up data, 39 (95%) completed 5-year follow-up (average: 67.6 months). Proximal junctional kyphosis was defined as a change in the PJK angle ≥10° between the immediate postoperative and final follow-up radiograph. Proximal junctional failure was defined as acute proximal junctional fracture, fixation failure, or kyphosis requiring extension of fusion within the first 6 months postoperatively. ResultsThirty-nine patients with a mean age of 65.6 (41–87) years were included in this study. Of the 39 patients, 28.2% developed PJK (11: 7.7% at 2 years, 20.5% between 2 and 5 years), and 5.1% developed acute PJF. Two of the 11 PJK patients required revision for progressive worsening of the PJK. There were no proximal junctional fractures. There was no significant difference in preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up measurements of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and coronal or sagittal alignment between patients who developed PJK, PJF, or neither (p>.05). There was no significant difference in ODI, SRS-22, or SF-36 scores between those with and without PJK or PJF (p>.05). ConclusionsThis long-term follow-up demonstrates that prophylactic vertebroplasty may minimize the risk for junctional failure in the early postoperative period. However, it does not appear to decrease the incidence of PJK at 5 years.

Goniometric evaluation of the spinal sagittal curves in children and adolescents: A reliability study.

Gold standard for spine deformities assessment is X rays, but the procedure bears a risk of exposure. To investigate intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a pocket compass needle goniometer (IncliMed®, University of Padua) to non-invasively evaluate spine curves in children and adolescents. Prospective reliability study in a paediatric population (mean age 12.5 years ± 2.5). Children with spine deformities (Scheuermann's or postural kyphosis, idiopathic scoliosis) and healthy controls were included. Two physician measured spinal curves with the surface goniometer IncliMed® within a temporal range of 10 minutes. Participants were re-tested after a mean of 28 days for the intra-rater study. Agreement limit and coefficient of repeatability were calculated according to the linear regression analysis; the Bland and Altman method was applied to obtain average of differences and standard error of the mean of the differences. One hundred and thirty-nine subjects participated to the inter-rater reliability assessment; 30 to the intra-rater reliability assessment. Inter-observer variability for IncliMed® measurements was ± 11° both for kyphosis and for lordosis. The intra-observer variability for kyphosis and lordosis measurements was ± 11° and ± 12°. IncliMed® is a reliable, non-invasive tool to screen and monitor spinal curves in paediatric populations.

Anterior hyperlordotic cages: early experience and radiographic results.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the segmental correction obtained from 20° and 30° hyperlordotic cages (HLCs) used for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in staged anterior and posterior fusion in adults with degenerative spinal pathology and/or spinal deformities. METHODS The authors report a retrospective case series of 69 HLCs in 41 patients with adult degenerative spine disease and/or deformities who underwent staged anterior, followed by posterior, instrumentation and fusion. There were 29 females and 12 males with a mean age of 55 years (range 23-76 years). The average follow-up was 10 months (range 2-28 months). Radiographic measurements of segmental lordosis and standard sagittal parameters were obtained on pre- and postoperative radiographs. Implant subsidence was measured at the final postoperative follow-up. RESULTS For 30° HLCs, the mean segmental lordosis achieved was 29° (range 26°-34°), but in the presence of spondylolisthesis this was reduced to 19° (range 12°-21°) (p < 0.01). For 20° HLCs, the mean segmental lordosis achieved was 19° (range 16°-22°). The overall mean lumbar lordosis increased from 39° to 59° (p < 0.01). The mean sagittal vertical axis (SVA) reduced from 113 mm (range 38-320 mm) to 43 mm (range -13 to 112 mm). Six cages (9%) displayed a loss of segmental lordosis during follow-up. The mean loss of segmental lordosis was 4.5° (range 3°-10°). A total complication rate of 20% with a 4.1% transient neurological complication rate was observed. The mean blood loss per patient was 240 ml (range 50-900 ml). CONCLUSIONS HLCs provide a reliable and stable degree of segmental lordosis correction. A 30° HLC will produce correction of a similar magnitude to a pedicle subtraction osteotomy, but with a lower complication rate and less blood loss.

The Reliabilities of Radiographic Measurements of Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Ankylosing Spondylitis.

This is a prospective study design. To test the interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities of 5 specific measures of global cervical sagittal alignment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and to suggest a better means of measuring cervical sagittal alignment. The intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of several different methods of measuring cervical lordosis have been reported. However, they have not been studied till yet in patients with AS. Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities of 5 specific measures of cervical lordosis were evaluated in patients with AS. Eighty patients with AS were allocated to a nonankylosis or an ankylosis group, and the reliabilities of the Cobb C1-C7, Cobb C2-C7, centroid, posterior tangent, and Ishihara index methods were evaluated. The intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of all 5 methods were generally high. For the 80 study subjects, ICCs were ≥0.84 (excellent) for all 5 radiographic methods. However, comparison of the ICCs, 95% confidence intervals, and mean absolute differences (MAD) between groups with varying degrees of ankylosis showed that the reliability of lordosis measurements decreased as the severity of ankylosis increased. The 5 methods consistently demonstrated higher ICCs for both interobserver and intraobserver comparisons in the nonankylosis group. However, in the ankylosis group, the Cobb C1-C7 method demonstrated high ICCs for both interobserver and intraobserver comparisons, whereas the other 4 methods had high ICCs only for intraobserver comparisons. The intraobserver MADs were similar for the 5 methods (2.4-3.9), but the interobserver MADs of measurement methods in both groups showed low measurement reliability except for the Cobb C1-C7 methods. This study provides a reliability analysis of different cervical lordosis measurement methods in AS, and shows that the Cobb C1-C7 method provides a reliable means for measuring cervical lordosis in AS.

Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Standing Lordosis After Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: An Analysis of Radiographic Parameters and Surgical Strategy

Study DesignRetrospective consecutive case series. ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between intraoperative and postoperative lumbar spine measurements after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). We analyzed the amount of lordosis lost between the prone intraoperative image and the final upright standing film. The outcome of this analysis should be used in preoperative planning for osteotomy procedures. MethodsSixteen patients had pre-, intra- and postoperative measurements of lumbar lordosis. Pre- and postoperative measures of pelvic parameters were also determined. Comparisons were made between pre-, intra- and postoperative measures of pelvic parameters, with specific attention to lumbar lordosis correction and the loss of correction with transition to a standing position. ResultsThe average pelvic mismatch between preoperative lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence was 37 degrees whereas the postoperative mismatch measured 3.2 degrees. All patients had a significant correction of their lumbar lordosis. The lumbar lordosis showed a highly significant loss of 12.5 degrees from the intraoperative prone position to the postoperative standing position, with the average lumbar lordosis intraoperatively (67 degrees) decreasing to a standing lumbar lordosis of 54 degrees (p < .000001). ConclusionsThis analysis should aid in preoperative planning for sagittal global alignment correction and can reduce the chance of over- or under-correction in patients having a PSO procedure. Given the narrow postoperative target that is associated with better outcomes for patients, the loss of lumbar lordosis from prone to standing position may be a crucial variable in this planning process.

Comparative Analysis of Evaluation of Lumbar Lordosis Measured in the Standing Positions Radiography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Introduction Research of degenerative diseases of the spine it is recommended performing radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Physiological curvature of the lumbar spine varies from 35 to 50. Changes sagittal alignment can lead to changes in the lumbar spine kinematics, having influence on the support and load distribution on the spine, causing low back pain. Methods 100 patients with chronic low back pain (51 men and 49 women), being evaluated degree of lumbar lordosis by three independent examiners by radiography in the standing position and MRI in supine position with flexed lower limbs. Measurement of lumbar lordosis by the Cobb method (L1 to L5 levels) in lumbar radiographs in profile and in the sagittal plane in lumbar MRI. Results Average of lumbar curvature on X-rays and the MRI cushion was 42,2° and 31,5°, respectively (p value &lt; 0.001). Average angles of lumbar lordosis by MRI underestimates by 25% compared with lumbar radiographs. Conclusion MRI is insufficient for evaluation of lumbar lordosis, it underestimates the true lumbar lordosis. Thus, the lumbar radiological evaluation is essential in assessing the true lumbar lordosis.

Lumbar Osteotomy.

When a patient presents with spine problems, the spine surgeon would do well to avoid use of, reliance on, and acceptance of radiographs as the sole or primary source of information. Measurement of pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis, although crucial, does not take into account the effort the patient must make to move, the level of involvement of other parts of the body, and the history of previous procedures and outcomes. Radiographs may show pathology that is not consistent with the appearance of the patient. How should we assess this situation?

Normal pediatric lumbar lordosis: Measurement of magnitude and age of maximum development using three radiographic techniques

Background: A retrospective measurement of lumbar lordosis (LL) in normal supine lateral lumbosacral spine radiographs of 27 children aged 0.04-14.00 years. Measurement of the LL may aid in the early diagnosis and management of some pediatric conditions before irreversible neurologic change occurs. They include spondylolisthesis (congenital or acquired); achondroplasia and muscular dystrophies are less common. The sagittal radiographic lumbar lordotic angle is poorly documented in normal pediatric population. Objective: To evaluate the magnitude and age of maximum development of the normal pediatric LL using three different radiographic techniques. Methods: Ferguson (for lumbosacral angle [LSA]), Cobb (for Cobb angle) and tangential radiologic assessment of LL (for TRALL angle) were the methods used. Data were analyzed with SPSS statistics version 20.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: LSA varied from 15° to 62°, Cobb angle 15-65° and TRALL angle 20-46°. The mean (standard deviation) of LSA, Cobb, and TRALL angles were 35.8 (10.3)°, 35.6 (13.7)°, and 32.3 (7.3),° respectively; the 0.95 confidence interval for the LSA was 27.6-44.5°, Cobb angle 27.2-50.7°, and TRALL angle 26.8-40.1°. Each angle showed no significant gender difference. The major part of estimated adult LL was gained during the first 5 years of life; the second peak occurred in the 11-14 years age-group. Conclusion: In children under 15 years, poor management of pathologies affecting LL can cause irreversible neurologic damage arising from spinal deformity.

Reliability of cervical lordosis measurement techniques on long-cassette radiographs.

Lateral radiographs are commonly used to assess cervical sagittal alignment. Three assessment methods have been described and are commonly utilized in clinical practice. These methods are described for perfect lateral cervical radiographs, however in everyday practice radiograph quality varies. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and reproducibility of 3 cervical lordosis (CL) measurement methods. Forty-four standing lateral radiographs were randomly chosen from a lateral long-cassette radiograph database. Measurements of CL were performed with: Cobb method C2-C7 (CM), C2-C7 posterior tangent method (PTM), sum of posterior tangent method for each segment (SPTM). Three independent orthopaedic surgeons measured CL using the three methods on 44 lateral radiographs. One researcher used the three methods to measured CL three times at 4-week time intervals. Agreement between the methods as well as their intra- and interobserver reliability were tested and quantified by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and median error for a single measurement (SEM). ICC of 0.75 or more reflected an excellent agreement/reliability. The results were compared with repeated ANOVA test, with p<0.05 considered as significant. All methods revealed excellent intra- and interobserver reliability. Agreement (ICC, SEM) between three methods was (0.89°, 3.44°), between CM and SPTM was (0.82°, 4.42°), between CM and PTM was (0.80°, 4.80°) and between PTM and SPTM was (0.99°, 1.10°). Mean values CL for a CM, PTM, SPTM were 10.5°±13.9°, 17.5°±15.6° and 17.7°±15.9° (p<0.0001), respectively. The significant difference was between CM vs PTM (p<0.0001) and CM vs SPTM (p<0.0001), but not between PTM vs SPTM (p>0.05). All three methods appeared to be highly reliable. Although, high agreement between all measurement methods was shown, we do not recommend using Cobb measurement method interchangeably with PTM or SPTM within a single study as this could lead to error, whereas, such a comparison between tangent methods can be considered.

Choice of Approach Does Not Affect Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes: A Comparative Cohort of Patients Having Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Patients Having Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion at 24 Months.

Study Design Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data.Objective This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes between comparative cohorts of patients having anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and patients having lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF).Methods Ninety consecutive patients were treated by a single surgeon with either ALIF (n = 50) or LLIF (n = 40). Inclusion criteria were patients age 45 to 70 years with degenerative disk disease or grade 1 to 2 spondylolisthesis and single-level pathology from L1 to S1. Patient-reported outcome measures included pain (visual analog scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), and quality of life (Short Form 36 physical component score [PCS] and mental component scores [MCS]). Assessment of fusion and measurement of lordosis and posterior disk height were performed on computed tomography scans.Results At 24 months, patients having ALIF had significant improvements in back (64%) and leg (65%) pain and ODI (60%), PCS (44%), and MCS (26%; p < 0.05) scores. Patients having LLIF had significant improvements in back (56%) and leg (57%) pain and ODI (52%), PCS (48%), and MCS (12%; p < 0.05) scores. Fourteen complications occurred in the ALIF group, and in the LLIF group, there were 17 complications (p > 0.05). The fusion rate was 100% for ALIF and 95% for LLIF (p = 0.1948). ALIF added ∼6 degrees of lordosis and 3 mm of height, primarily measured at L5–S1, and LLIF added ∼3 degrees of lordosis and 2 mm of height between L1 to L5. Mean follow-up was 34.1 months.Conclusions In comparative cohorts of patients having ALIF and patients having LLIF at 24 months postoperatively, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes, complication rates, or fusion rates.

Avaliação de sinais e sintomas da disfunção temporomandibular e sua relação com a postura cervical

Introdução As disfunções temporomandibulares (DTM) podem acarretar alterações gerais nos movimentos mandibulares devido à modificação nas condições musculares e articulares. Objetivo Avaliar os sinais e sintomas da disfunção temporomandibular e sua relação com a postura cervical. Material e método Estudo transversal e descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa, realizado na Universidade de Fortaleza, de agosto de 2011 a abril de 2012, em que 23 participantes com disfunção temporomandibular responderam o questionário ProDTMmulti sobre os sinais e sintomas da patologia, e foram fotografados para avaliação da postura da cabeça e mensuração da lordose cervical. Resultado A idade média das participantes foi de 34,7 anos. A média do ângulo cervical foi de 29,7 graus e da lordose cervical, 3,6 cm. A cefaleia (82,6%), a dor muscular (78,3%) e o ruído na articulação temporomandibular (73,9%) foram os sinais e sintomas mais referidos pela amostra. A otalgia (26,1%) também figurou entre os sintomas, sendo o menos relatado. A maioria dos participantes relatou os sinais e sintomas bilateralmente. Não se observou correlação entre a medida do ângulo cervical e os sinais, sintomas e dificuldades pesquisados. Foi constatada uma correlação moderada entre a medida da lordose cervical e a dificuldade em abrir a boca (r= –0,4; p= 0,03). Conclusão Evidenciou-se que, na população do estudo, dentre os sinais e sintomas de DTM, a cefaleia é a mais referida, e que a maior dificuldade apresentada pelos participantes com disfunção foi a de mastigar. Evidenciou-se ainda correlação entre a dificuldade de abrir a boca e a lordose cervical.

Clinical measurements of cervical lordosis using flexirule and inclinometer methods in individuals with and without cervical spine dysfunction: A reliability and validity study.

The purposes of this study were to determine the reliability and validity of two clinical measurements of cervical lordosis and to compare these measurements of individuals with cervical spine symptoms to those of asymptomatic individuals. Fifty-seven participants were recruited for the study: 18 following cervical fusion, 20 with neck pain and no surgery, and 19 with no neck pain. Cervical lordosis was measured using a flexible ruler (flexirule) and a modified bubble inclinometer. Intertester and intratester reliability were calculated for both methods. Validity was assessed by correlating measurements taken using both methods to Cobb angles between C2 and C7 on lateral view radiography of the participants in the cervical fusion and the neck pain groups. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) revealed good intratester reliability for both methods. Intertester reliability was fair for the flexirule method but good for the inclinometer method. Pearson correlations with radiographic angles were poor for both methods. ANOVAs showed no significant difference in cervical lordosis measurements between asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. Although both the flexirule and inclinometer methods are reliable, neither method correlated with the Cobb angle on the radiography, suggesting these methods may measure different aspects of cervical spine alignment.

Validation of spinal sagittal alignment with plain radiographs and the Debrunner Kyphometer

Validation of the Debrunner Kyphometer as a clinical non-radiological method for investigating spinal sagittal alignment was compared with standing lateral radiographs. The sample group (n=102) consisted of elite Alpine skiers (n=75) and a non-athletic population (n=27), mean age 17.7 (±1.4) years. Non-radiological and radiological measurements of the spinal sagittal kyphosis and lordosis range of motion were carried out in the erect standing position. Thoracic kyphosis measurements comparing the Debrunner Kyphometer with a radiological standard, showed a good level of agreement and a statistical significance (ICC 0.67, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.83, p<0.001). Lumbar lordosis measurements showed poor levels of agreement in spite of being statistically significant (ICC 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.50, p=0.001). There was no significant difference reported in the spinal alignment between skiers and controls using both radiological and non-radiological methods. Therefore, we conclude that due to the large variation in ranges between both methods, there is a limited value in using the Debrunner Kyphometer as a non-invasive method for the evaluation of spinal sagittal alignment. Key words: Debrunner Kyphometer, kyphosis, lordosis, radiological, spinal sagittal alignment.

Sitting Sagittal Balance is Different From Standing Balance in Children With Scoliosis

Several variables can have effect on sagittal balance. The changes that occur between standing and sitting have been inadequately studied, especially in the, pediatric population. Preoperative sagittal radiographs were obtained in both standing and sitting positions for 26 patients with idiopathic scoliosis before spinal fusion and instrumentation. Standard measurements of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and lumbar intervertebral angles were, recorded. Differences were compared between positions using 2-sided paired t tests. When moving from standing to a seated position, the spine loses 5-degree thoracic kyphosis (P=0.007), 29-degree lumbar lordosis (P<0.0001), and the sacrum rotates 20 degrees (P<0.0001) to a more vertical position. The greatest change in sitting sagittal balance occurs due to increased pelvic tilt with decreased SS. The next greatest change is increased forward flexion of the lowest 2 lumbar vertebrae, 6.5 degrees between L4-L5 (P<0.0001) and 5.9 degrees between L5-S1 (P<0.0001). Flexion occurs throughout the lumbar spine but its magnitude decreases in the more proximal lumbar segments, 1.6 degrees between L1-L2 (P=0.028). The sagittal vertical axis also moves more anterior by 44 mm (P<0.0001). Sitting significantly straightens the spine with decreases of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and SS. The majority of the changes occur in the lumbar spine and pelvis. As humans spend much of their time sitting, this difference should be considered when spinal instrumentation is performed. These findings may be important to those who only sit, especially when instrumentation is extended to the pelvis. Level II--retrospective prognostic study.