This article, written by Technology Editor Dennis Denney, contains highlights of paper SPE 105362, "The Identification of Condensate Banking With Multiphase Flowmeters - A Case Study," by B.C. Theuveny, SPE, P.D. Maizeret, SPE, N.S. Hopman, SPE, and S. Perez, Schlumberger, prepared for the 2007 SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Bahrain, 11–14 March. Identifying condensate banking is a challenge. Large productivity losses can result if a condensate bank in the near-wellbore region is not detected early. One method that has been considered more theoretical than practical is detection of a leaner effluent stream at the wellhead during production. High-resolution measurement of subtle changes in the condensate/gas ratio (CGR) is essential for successful detection of condensate banking. The multiphase flowmeter can identify such a gradual change of the CGR. Introduction The main difficulty of testing gas wells with traditional test separators is determining accurate gas, condensate, and water flow-rate measurements. The short retention time in traditional test separators can lead to significant carryover of condensate into the gas line, resulting in underestimating the condensate rate and a potentially significant error in the gas rate. The level of error in the gas rate will depend on the measurement technology used. If a traditional orifice plate is used, the presence of condensate in the gas stream usually leads to an overestimate of the gas rate. The error in the gas measurement can be compounded with the accumulation of well liquids (i.e., water or condensate) in the tubing leads of the differential-pressure (DP) cell around an orifice plate, which can create large errors (usually identifiable in the raw data by a near-linear drift of the DP measurement). There also can be a significant amount of liquid trapped at the bottom of the pipe in front of the orifice plate, which can affect the flow-rate measurements adversely. Field identification of such a problem can be straightforward, but its remediation may be impossible during the course of the well-test operation. Liquid carryover in the gas line is a large problem when testing gas wells with small separators. Short retention time, combined with very small liquid-droplet size, can lead to the entrainment of 50% of the liquid through the gas outlet of the body of the separator. Attempts to reduce the losses of condensate have yielded various levels of success. These efforts include centrifugal separation at the inlet of test separator and use of mist extractors. Although these methods improve separation, the remaining liquid carryover is not necessarily negligible.
Read full abstract