Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) are defined as infections occurring upto 30 days after surgery or (upto one year in patients receiving implants) and affecting either the incision or deep tissue at the operative site. SSIs are potential complications associated with any type of surgical procedure. Even though SSIs are among the most preventable hospital acquired infections, they still symbolize a significant burden in terms of patient’s morbidity and mortality leading to prolonged hospital stay and increase the patient susceptibility to other nosocomial infections affecting the financial condition of patients. Risk factors for SSIs are grouped as patient related, preoperative or pre pregnancy, intraoperative or intrapartum, and postoperative. SSI causes a substantial risk to patients and financial loses for health system because the multi-factorial causes achieving a measurable and sustained reduction in SSIs. In this context it becomes important to determine the prevalence of SSI, assess the magnitude of problem and provide a rationale to set priorities in infection control in the hospitals. Materials and Methods: The present prospective observational study was conducted on 200 patients in the Department of Obstetrics and gynaecology, at Dr B R Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital for a period of 12 months. Prior to the initiation of the study, Ethical and Research Committee clearance was obtained from Institutional Ethical Committee. Results: There was a significant statistical difference in the incidence of SSIs basing on the body mass index of subjects (pvalue:<0.001). SSI incidence was high in morbidly obese subjects. There was a highly significant statistical difference in the incidence of SSIs basing on the history of previous surgeries of subjects (p-value: <0.0001). SSI incidence was low in subjects with no history of previous surgeries. There was a highly significant statistical difference in the incidence of SSIs basing on the type of surgery (p-value: 0.48). SSI incidence was high in caesarean and low in tubectomy surgeries. There was a significant no statistical difference in the incidence of SSIs basing on the type of incision (p-value: 0.70). There was a highly significant statistical difference in the incidence of SSIs basing on the methods of skin closure (p-value: 0.002). SSI incidence was high in mattress method of skin closure and low in subcuticular method of skin closure. There was a highly significant statistical difference in the incidence of SSIs basing on the class of wound (p-value: 0.00001). SSI incidence was high in dirty wounds and low in clean wounds of skin closure. Conclusion: Although several preoperative risk factors (e.g., age, morbid obesity, ability to pursue a minimally invasive approach, type of gynaecologic surgery, type of incision, methods of skin closure, class of wound) may not be within the surgeon’s control, several evidence based interventions can limit the incidence of SSIs.
Read full abstract