Management Of Vulvar Cancer Research Articles

Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma (CAP) as a New Tool for the Management of Vulva Cancer and Vulvar Premalignant Lesions in Gynaecological Oncology.

Vulvar cancer (VC) is a specific form of malignancy accounting for 5–6% of all gynaecologic malignancies. Although VC occurs most commonly in women after 60 years of age, disease incidence has risen progressively in premenopausal women in recent decades. VC demonstrates particular features requiring well-adapted therapeutic approaches to avoid potential treatment-related complications. Significant improvements in disease-free survival and overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with post-stage I disease have been achieved by implementing a combination therapy consisting of radical surgical resection, systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Achieving local control remains challenging. However, mostly due to specific anatomical conditions, the need for comprehensive surgical reconstruction and frequent post-operative healing complications. Novel therapeutic tools better adapted to VC particularities are essential for improving individual outcomes. To this end, cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) treatment is a promising option for VC, and is particularly appropriate for the local treatment of dysplastic lesions, early intraepithelial cancer, and invasive tumours. In addition, CAP also helps reduce inflammatory complications and improve wound healing. The application of CAP may realise either directly or indirectly utilising nanoparticle technologies. CAP has demonstrated remarkable treatment benefits for several malignant conditions, and has created new medical fields, such as “plasma medicine” and “plasma oncology”. This article highlights the benefits of CAP for the treatment of VC, VC pre-stages, and postsurgical wound complications. There has not yet been a published report of CAP on vulvar cancer cells, and so this review summarises the progress made in gynaecological oncology and in other cancers, and promotes an important, understudied area for future research. The paradigm shift from reactive to predictive, preventive and personalised medical approaches in overall VC management is also considered.

Multidisciplinary personalized approach in the management of vulvar cancer – the Vul.Can Team experience

IntroductionMultidisciplinary treatment strategy involving adjuvant radiotherapy for advanced vulvar cancer could be useful in offering the best personalized clinical approach. In 2013, the VULvar CANcer Multi-Disciplinary Team (Vul.Can MDT) was...

Complication rates and lymph node count between two different skin incisions at time of inguino-femoral lymph node dissection in vulvar cancer

IntroductionInguino-femoral lymph node dissection plays a crucial role in the management of vulvar cancer. The procedure is associated with high complication rates, including infection, lymphocysts/lymphoedema and wound dehiscence. Several skin...

Palliative electrochemotherapy in primary or recurrent vulvar cancer

ObjectiveSince vulvar cancer is such a rare disease, the international experience with electrochemotherapy has been derived from only a few centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical...

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer: A series of 19 cases

Introduction: Vulvar cancer is a relatively rare gynaecologic malignancy that represents less than 5% of gynaecological cancers and is primarily seen in postmenopausal women. The classical approach for the surgical management of vulvar cancer was radical vulvectomy with en-bloc inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. In current practice, radical local excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the best surgical option for selected patients, with comparable efficacy, less morbidity and disfigurement.

Right technique and sufficient dose equal effective radiation to the groins in vulvar cancer

The management of vulvar cancer has significantly evolved from radical en bloc vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy to a more nuanced approach. Current management, for example, can involve radical local excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy. These advances have significantly reduced the morbidity associated with the surgical management of this disease. However, there remain unanswered questions regarding the treatment of vulvar cancer, including the ideal management of gross groin lymphadenopathy. Surgery remains the standard of care, but a risk of chronic lymphedema and poor wound healing are potential complications. These can have long term impacts on quality of life and so efforts are warranted to explore ways to minimize these risks.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Management of Vulvar Carcinoma: An Evidence-Based Insight.

Lymph node metastasis has been shown to represent the most significant prognostic factor in vulvar carcinoma. Because only 25% to 35% of patients with early stage disease have lymph node metastases, a significant 65% to 75% possibly do not benefit from elective inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy considering the related morbidities of wound infection, breakdown, and lower limb lymphedema. This review article aims to present and summarize the evidence available with regard to sentinel lymph node (SLN)-guided management of vulvar carcinoma. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE resources using the subject headings "vulvar neoplasms," "sentinel lymph node," "sentinel lymph node biopsy," and "lymphatic metastasis." This search returned 886 articles that were published through January 2017. Prospective studies investigating sentinel node identification techniques and their impact on vulvar cancer management and prognosis were considered. Case reports were excluded from the review. Technetium-99-m-labeled nanocolloid with or without blue dye and more recently indocyanine green fluorescence have been the main techniques used for SLN identification in vulvar carcinoma. Radioisotope and near-infrared techniques have been shown to be superior to blue dye particularly with midline lesions that drain bilaterally or that drain directly to a deep pelvic node. Patients with a small unifocal primary tumor (<4 cm) and no obvious preoperative metastasis have been shown to have low groin recurrence rates and excellent disease-specific survival rates with minimal treatment-related morbidity when undergoing SLN biopsy-guided management. Sentinel lymph node biopsy-guided management seems to be safe when restricted to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IB to II cases where tumors are unifocal, less than 4 cm in size, and when there is no evidence of lymph node metastasis on clinical/radiological assessment. This reduces operative morbidity in this cohort of patients.

Primary Versus Preoperative Radiation for Locally Advanced Vulvar Cancer.

The objective of this study was to evaluate patterns of care and the survival impact of primary radiation and preoperative radiation therapy with surgery in women with locally advanced vulvar cancer using a large national cohort. Women with vulvar cancer, diagnosed from 2004 to 2012, who received primary or preoperative radiation therapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Patient characteristics, such as age, race, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, and comorbidity score, were compared between those that received primary radiation only and those that received preoperative radiation with surgery using the χ, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney tests as appropriate. Overall survival (OS) by treatment approaches was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Factors associated with OS were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. A total of 2046 women were identified; 1407 of these women (69%) received primary radiation therapy (RT; n = 421) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT; n = 986) (RT/CRT), and 639 women (31%) received preoperative RT (n = 92) or CRT (n = 547) followed by surgery (RT/CRT + S). The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging distributions were as follows: T1 (n = 152), T2 (n = 1436), T3 (n = 405), N0 (n = 899), N1 (n = 480), N2 (n = 445), and N3 (n = 40). Median follow-up was 21.9 months. Primary RT/CRT was associated with compromised OS, compared with preoperative RT/CRT + S (41.7% vs 57.1% at 3 years, respectively; P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, OS associated with primary RT/CRT with doses more than 55 Gy was not significantly different from RT/CRT + S (hazards ratio, 1.139; 95% confidence interval, 0.969-1.338; P = 0.116). Use of concurrent chemotherapy improved OS of primary RT with doses more than 55 Gy compared with CRT + S (hazards ratio, 1.107; 95% confidence interval, 0.919-1.334; P = 0.234). In a large nationwide analysis, primary nonsurgical management of vulvar cancer with RT was associated with compromised survival compared with preoperative RT with surgery. However, with doses more than 55 Gy and concurrent chemotherapy, nonoperative approaches had comparable survival compared with preoperative CRT + S.

Surgical Management of Vulvar Cancer.

Vulvar cancer is a rare malignancy with high curability in early-stage disease, yet poor outcomes for advanced-stage and recurrent disease. Surgical management is at the cornerstone of treatment for most vulvar cancers, and includes conservative and radical resection of the primary vulvar tumor and excision of local lymph nodes, which are major prognostic factors and drive adjuvant treatment. This review summarizes the surgical management of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, specifically initial treatment guidelines by stage, based on the 2017 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Vulvar Cancer.

Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Vulvar Cancer and its Precursors. Guideline of the DGGG and DKG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/059, November 2015

Purpose: This is an official guideline, published and coordinated by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO, Study Group for Gynecologic Oncology) of the Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG, German Cancer Society) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG, German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics). The number of cases with vulvar cancer is on the rise, but because of the former rarity of this condition and the resulting lack of literature with a high level of evidence, in many areas knowledge of the optimal clinical management still lags behind what would be required. This updated guideline aims to disseminate the most recent recommendations, which are much clearer and more individualized, and is intended to create a basis for the assessment and improvement of quality care in hospitals. Methods: This S2k guideline was drafted by members of the AGO Committee on Vulvar and Vaginal Tumors; it was developed and formally completed in accordance with the structured consensus process of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF). Recommendations: 1. The incidence of disease must be taken into consideration. 2. The diagnostic pathway, which is determined by the initial findings, must be followed. 3. The clinical and therapeutic management of vulvar cancer must be done on an individual basis and depends on the stage of disease. 4. The indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy must be evaluated very carefully. 5. Follow-up and treatment for recurrence must be adapted to the individual case.

A Pilot Study: An Online Teaching Tool for Standardization of Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Curriculum

BACKGROUND: Learning objectives for gynecologic oncology (GO) fellowships have been created, however a standard curriculum does not exist. There is interest amongst program directors to develop a standardized curriculum with online teaching tools. This study was conducted to determine the learning needs of GO fellows and to assess the use of web-based teaching in this group of learners. METHODS: An 18 minute teaching module on surgical management of vulvar cancer was created and validated by experts. The module was then emailed to fellows with a pre and post-module survey. The survey assessed the learners needs, the learners knowledge and the usefulness of the module. RESULTS: One hundred ninety GO fellows were surveyed, 72 (38%) responses were received. Most participants were in their second year of clinical fellowship (42%). The majority of GO fellowships have a weekly teaching conference with faculty participation. Resources utilized by fellows for learning are textbooks and journal articles, with all responders ranking these as their first or second preferred resource. The teaching module was an effective teaching tool as demonstrated by improved scores across the four content based questions. The webinar was well received by the fellows, with 92% saying they liked this teaching tool and 46/48 (96%) felt that they would view additional presentations if provided. In addition 45/49 (92%) felt that this type of teaching filled a need in GO fellowship. DISCUSSION: Many GO fellowships utilize faculty directed teaching conferences. This online teaching tool improved fellow knowledge and additional modules would be well received in this population of learners.

A Review of Squamous Cell Vulvar Cancers in Waikato Region, New Zealand.

e17032Background: Squamous cell vulvar cancer management guidelines are scarce. The objectives of the study were to review the patient characteristics and outcomes of vulvar cancers. Methods: Retro...

Review of the current surgical management of vulval cancer

Review of the current surgical management of vulval cancer

Management of Vulvar Cancer.

Vulvar cancer is an uncommon malignancy and accounts for around 5% of all gynecologic cancers. Incidence rates have increased for young adults and may be linked to increasing HPV prevalence. Treatment of vulvar cancer has evolved from 'en-bloc' surgery with high morbidity to more conservative approaches without compromising oncological safety. In recent years sentinel node evaluation has been advocated in early stage cancers to reduce complications of inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy. Minimising extent of radical excision for the vulvar growth and separate incisions for groin dissection have reduced the number of wound breakdowns, infection, lymphocoele and chronic lymphedema but complication rate is still as high as 60%. Incorporating sentinel node evaluation into clinical practice has brought down complications to less than 10% for both lymphedema and wound infection. Role of imaging is increasing in vulvar cancer, especially for locally advanced disease as a result of transition from exenterative and extensive surgery to use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and a less moribund approach to management. Locally advanced vulvar cancer includes large primary tumors or locally advanced disease i.e. FIGO stages III and IV. Treatment decision here is still a challenge as there is no standard recommended treatment strategy. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an effective modality for locally advanced vulvar cancer, as it reduces tumor size and renders the lesion operable. Primary chemoradiation without post treatment surgery has been used as an alternative treatment to avoid extensive radical surgery and complex reconstructive procedures.

Feasibility and Safety of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review.

ObjectiveTo systematically review previous studies and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in vulvar cancer.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive review of studies published through September 2014 to retrieve all relevant articles. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wan Fang Data and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched for all relevant studies published in English or Chinese through September 2014. Data were abstracted independently by two reviewers, and any differences were resolved by consensus.ResultsA total of 9 studies containing 249 VEIL procedures involving 138 patients were reviewed. Of the 249 VEIL procedures, only 1 (0.4%) was converted to an open procedure for suturing because of injury to the femoral vein. The range of operative time was 62 to 110 minutes, and the range of estimated blood loss was 5.5 to 22 ml. The range of the number of harvested lymph nodes was 7.3 to 16. The length of hospital stay varied from 7 to 13.6 days across reports. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was 19.7% (27/138), and the recurrence rate was 4.3% (3/70) within 3 to 41 months of follow-up. One or more short-term complications were documented in 18 of 138 (13.0%) patients. Complications after VEIL were observed in 14 (10.13%) patients and in 15 (6.0%) of the VEIL cases, including major lymphocyst formation in 9 (3.6%), lymphorrhea in 2 (0.8%), inguinal wound infection without wound breakdown in 3 (1.2%) and lymphedema in 1 (0.4%).ConclusionsVEIL appears to be a feasible procedure in the management of vulvar cancer. There may be potential benefits that result in lower morbidity compared to traditional methods, but this has yet to be objectively proven.

Recent trends in surgical and reconstructive management of vulvar cancer: review of literature.

Vulvar cancer (VC) is a rare disease. The most common histologic type is squamous-cell carcinoma. VC could be divided into two types: type one, commonly associated with HPV infection, occurs in young women and type two, associated with non-neoplastic lesions that usually occurs in older women. Previously VC was often treated with radical Vulvectomy. Today update in diagnostic and surgery technique, capable to identify early stages of disease and adaptation in surgery procedures, according to the stage of disease, age of patients and possible physical and psychological morbidity consequence, allow using less radical surgery approaches. That has led to decrease therapy-associated morbidity while preserving oncologic safety and improving psychosexual outcomes. Finally, several surgical treatments are available in case of VC and, despite radical surgery is often required, less radical surgery associated with reconstructive plastic surgery decreases some of short- and long-term associated complications.

ROCK1 as a novel prognostic marker in vulvar cancer

BackgroundVulvar carcinoma is an infrequent tumour, accounting for fewer than 3% of all malignant tumours that affect women, but its incidence is rising in the past few decades. In young women, the manifestation of the vulvar carcinoma is often linked to risk factors such as smoking and HPV infection, but most cases develop in women aged over 50 years through poorly understood genetic mechanisms. Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK1) has been implicated in many cellular processes, but its function in vulvar cancer has never been examined. In this study, we aimed to determine the prognostic value of ROCK1 gene and protein analysis in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC).MethodsROCK1 expression levels were measured in 16 vulvar tumour samples and adjacent normal tissue by qRT-PCR. Further, 96 VSCC samples were examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to confirm the involvement of ROCK1 in the disease. The molecular and pathological results were correlated with the clinical data of the patients. Sixteen fresh VSCC samples were analyzed by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).ResultsIn each pair of samples, ROCK1 levels were higher by qRT-PCR in normal tissue compared with the tumour samples (p = 0.016). By IHC, 100% of invasive front areas of the tumour and 95.8% of central tumour areas were positive for ROCK1. Greater expression of ROCK1 was associated with the absence of lymph node metastasis (p = 0.022) and a lower depth of invasion (p = 0.002). In addition, higher ROCK1 levels correlated with greater recurrence-free survival (p = 0.001). Loss of ROCK1 was independently linked to worse cancer-specific survival (p = 0.0054) by multivariate analysis. This finding was validated by IHC, which demonstrated enhanced protein expression in normal versus tumour tissue (p < 0.001). By aCGH, 42.9% of samples showed a gain in copy number of the ROCK1 gene.ConclusionsROCK1 is lower expressed in tumour tissue when compared with adjacent normal vulvar epithelia. In an independent sample set of VSCCs, lower expression levels of ROCK1 correlated with worse survival rates and a poor prognosis. These findings provide important information for the clinical management of vulvar cancer.

Key concepts in management of vulvar cancer

Vulvar carcinoma is an uncommon tumor that is seen most often in older women. Subtle symptoms such as pruritus should prompt examination and targeted biopsy in all women as this disease can be successfully treated even in elderly, frail individuals. Vulvar cancer has a bimodal age distribution and is seen in both young and older women with risk factors including human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, smoking, and vulvar skin diseases (i.e., lichen sclerosus). This cancer is staged surgically, with an update in 2009 incorporating prognostic factors. The treatment of vulvar carcinoma has evolved to include more conservative surgical techniques that provide improved cure rates with emphasis on minimizing morbidity. Advanced and metastatic lesions are now treated with chemoradiation which produces substantial cure rates with decreased morbidity. Promising areas of research in vulvar cancer include refinement of sentinel lymph node biopsy, prevention of lymphedema, and preservation of sexual function following treatment.

The role of regional anaesthesia in the surgical management of vulval malignancy

Surgical excision is the management of choice in vulval cancer however, the patient population are typically elderly and comorbid, for whom general anaesthesia (GA) carries considerable risk. The outcome of 107 procedures were reviewed in order investigate the postoperative complication rates associated with general and regional anaesthesia for the surgical management of vulval cancer. GA was used in 78 (72.9%) cases; 27 (22.9%) had a regional anaesthetic (spinal/epidural/ileoinguinal) and two women had a GA following a failed spinal anaesthetic. Women having a regional anaesthetic were significantly older (p = 0.0198), had a higher ACE (p = 0.0001) and ASA score (p < 0.0001) than those having a GA. There was an association between GA and grade II+ complications, compared with regional techniques (odds ratio, OR 2.72) but this was not significant due to the small number of events. Regional anaesthetic techniques are safe, well-tolerated alternatives to GA for the surgical management of vulval cancer, especially in an elderly and comorbid population.

Utility of the PET/CT in vulvar cancer management

ObjectiveTo describe the clinical impact of PET/CT in the management of patients with vulvar cancer. Material and methodsRetrospective analysis of 13 PET/CT studies with 18F-FDG (6 staging and 7 suspected recurrence) corresponding to 10 patients diagnosed with vulvar cancer by biopsy, with a mean age of 64.5 years. The preoperative PET/CT study was analyzed qualitatively according to the lesion region. Surgical excision was carried out, covering all the suspected areas according to the PET/CT study. This was compared with the histopathologic analysis. ResultsAbnormal vulvar PET/CT uptake was found in 9 out of the 13 studies and invasion of adjacent structures in 5 of them (urethra, perianal, vagina). The inguinal–femoral lymph nodes were considered as affected in 3 studies and one pelvic lymph node was also affected. Four of the studies had extralymphatic involvement: 3 in lung and 1 in ischiorectal fossa. The PET/CT showed a 100% sensitivity for the detection of the vulvar lesion in squamous cell carcinomas and 60% in non-squamous cell ones. There was a false positive result for local invasion due to urine contamination. One of the studies with lung metastases was related to a synchronous breast tumor. All the pathological lymph node levels detected in the PET/CT study were confirmed in the histopathology study. No new lesions were identified by surgery. PET/CT changed the therapeutic management in 8/13 studies (61.5%). ConclusionsPET/CT is postulated as a useful imaging test for the management of vulvar cancer, mainly in the identification of nodal metastases. It may affect both surgical planning and clinical management. Larger series are needed to confirm our findings.