Management Of Refractory Status Epilepticus Research Articles

Electroconvulsive Therapy in Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Scoping Review.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been suggested as a treatment option for refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE). The objective of this scoping review was to conduct an extensive literature review on the role of ECT as a treatment option for RSE and SRSE. We searched Ovid MEDLINE and Scopus for journal articles from database inception until February 2024. Articles were then selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We identified five retrospective case series with 28 adult patients receiving ECT for RSE or SRSE. ECT was administered within 3-70days (mean 20days) after the development of SE, and the mean number of ECT courses ranged from 1 to 12 sessions for each patient. ECT was administered in fixed or titrated doses. A total of 20 out of 28 patients (71%) showed clinical improvement, with two (7%) having complete cessation of seizures. It is essential to note that given the lack of control, there could be overreporting of clinical improvement in these studies. 11 patients (39%) were reported as deceased due to causes that were not directly related to ECT treatment. Four patients (14%) reported adverse effects of ECT, including memory, concentration, and/or cognitive impairment. There are level-4 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine evidence and low-level Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Education evidence that suggest ECT as a treatment option for RSE and SRSE. In light of the limitations of the existing evidence, clinicians should carefully consider individual patients' clinical contexts when deciding on the appropriateness of ECT as a treatment option. Further research, including prospective studies with controlled designs, is needed to elucidate the efficacy, safety, and optimal regime of ECT in the management of RSE and SRSE.

Ketamine in the treatment of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus: Experience from two centres

PurposeThere is insufficient evidence on the management of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and super-RSE (SRSE). Ketamine is a N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist in the treatment of these entities. Our objectives were to study the effectiveness and safety of ketamine in the treatment of adult patients with RSE and SRSE, to determine the factors that can influence the response to ketamine, and to explore its use in patients without mechanical ventilation. MethodsAdult patients who had received intravenous ketamine for the treatment of RSE or SRSE at Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos (Madrid, Spain) or Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (Barcelona, Spain) from 2017 to 2023 were retrospectively analysed. ResultsThis study included 58 adult patients, mean (standard deviation) age 60.2 (15.7) years, of whom 41 (70.7 %) were male; 33 (56.9 %) patients responded to ketamine without recurrence, with a low rate of adverse effects (8.6 %). The presence of SRSE at the time of ketamine initiation (OR 0.287, p = 0.028) and the time elapsed between status epilepticus onset and ketamine administration (OR 0.991, p = 0.034) were associated with worse response to ketamine. Patients treated without mechanical ventilation had similar rates of response without recurrence (62.5% vs 56.9 %) and lower mortality (37.5% vs 53.5 %) compared to the overall group. ConclusionKetamine is an effective drug with few adverse effects. Prompt administration should be considered in patients with RSE requiring anaesthesia, in patients with SRSE, and in patients with RSE who do not respond to standard antiseizure drugs and in whom mechanical ventilation is not advised.

Comparison of induction agents for rapid sequence intubation in refractory status epilepticus: A single-center retrospective analysis

Endotracheal intubation, frequently required during management of refractory status epilepticus (RSE), can be facilitated by anesthetic medications; however, their effectiveness for RSE control is unknown. We performed a single-center retrospective review of patients admitted to a neurocritical care unit (NCCU) who underwent in-hospital intubation during RSE management. Patients intubated with propofol, ketamine, or benzodiazepines, termed anti-seizure induction (ASI), were compared to patients who received etomidate induction (EI). The primary endpoint was clinical or electrographic seizures within 12 h post-intubation. We estimated the association of ASI on post-intubation seizure using logistic regression. A sub-group of patients undergoing electroencephalography during intubation was identified to evaluate the immediate effect of ASI on RSE. We screened 697 patients admitted to the NCCU for RSE and identified 148 intubated in-hospital (n = 90 ASI, n = 58 EI). There was no difference in post-intubation seizure (26 % (n = 23) ASI, 29 % (n = 17) EI) in the cohort, however, there was increased RSE resolution with ASI in 24 patients with electrographic RSE during intubation (ASI: 61 % (n = 11/18) vs EI: 0 % (n = 0/6), p =.016). While anti-seizure induction did not appear to affect post-intubation seizure occurrence overall, a sub-group of patients undergoing electroencephalography during intubation had a higher incidence of seizure cessation, suggesting potential benefit in an enriched population.

Management strategies for refractory status epilepticus

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is defined as the persistence of either clinical or electrographic seizures despite the administration of appropriate doses of an initial benzodiazepine and suitable second-line antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The Neurocritical Care Society and the American Epilepsy Society have proposed a treatment paradigm for the management of convulsive status epilepticus (CSE). The third-line therapy in refractory CSE may involve general anesthesia using intravenous midazolam, propofol, or other agents, while recent evidence supports the use of ketamine to manage RSE in both adults and children. However, although these treatment strategies are frequently employed in nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), the efficacy of AEDs and anesthetics in NCSE has not been thoroughly investigated. Recent evidence has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of newer AEDs, including levetiracetam and lacosamide, in the treatment of status epilepticus (SE) and RSE, which also encompasses NCSE. Use of multiple combinations of various intravenous AEDs can also be considered in NCSE before the administration of general anesthesia. In addition, AEDs alone exhibit limited effectiveness in managing SE for new-onset RSE (NORSE) and its subset, febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome. Therefore, in cases of refractory status, it is imperative to explore treatment options beyond AEDs, including immunotherapy and the incorporation of a ketogenic diet. The present review suggests treatment approaches for RSE based on subgroups, including CSE, NCSE, and NORSE. A discussion of recent clinical studies on AEDs and anesthetics in the management of RSE, as well as proposed treatment methods for NORSE, is also provided.

Evaluation for Blood Concentration and Efficacy/Safety of Continuous Administration of Thiamylal in Children.

Thiamylal exerts excellent sedative effects. However, it is not routinely used because of its serious adverse effects. This study aimed to clarify the target blood concentration range and infusion rate of thiamylal in children by measuring its blood concentration and evaluating its relationship with efficacy and adverse effects. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital. The authors included 10 children aged between 1 and 7 years who had received continuous intravenous (IV) infusion of thiamylal for the management of refractory status epilepticus, excluding those who met the exclusion criteria. After a 2 mg/kg bolus injection of thiamylal, continuous IV infusion was initiated at a rate of 2-3 mg/kg/h. Thiamylal concentration in the blood was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. The State Behavioral Scale and the frequency of bolus injections were used to evaluate efficacy. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured to evaluate adverse effects. Statistical analyses of the time to awakening and the factors affecting it were also conducted. The State Behavioral Scale score during thiamylal administration was -2 or lower in all cases, suggesting that the depth of sedation was sufficient. The frequency of bolus injections decreased in a blood concentration-dependent manner, suggesting that the frequency tended to decrease, especially at thiamylal blood concentrations of 20 mcg/mL or higher. An increase of the infusion rate to 3 mg/kg/h was recommended, because the blood concentration may not reach 20 mcg/mL at an infusion rate of 2 mg/kg/h. There was also a case in which a rapid increase in blood concentration accompanied by a decrease in blood pressure and heart rate was observed when the infusion rate was increased to 4 mg/kg/h. Furthermore, the time to awakening after the end of administration correlated with the highest blood concentration during administration; therefore, delayed awakening was noted when using a high dose of thiamylal. The target blood concentration of thiamylal in children should be 20-30 mcg/mL, and the infusion rate should be based on 3 mg/kg/h.

12 Comparison of induction agents for rapid sequence intubation in refractory status epilepticus

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Multiple induction agents can facilitate rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in management of refractory status epilepticus (rSE), many which have anti-seizure properties. We examine the anti-seizure efficacy and safety of induction agents used during RSI in the management of rSE. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of patients admitted to the neuro-ICU intubated for management of rSE. Propofol, ketamine and benzodiazepines were considered anti-seizure medication (ASMs), etomidate was not. Patients were treated with propofol or midazolam following intubation. Our primary outcome was clinical or electrographic recurrence of SE within 12 hours of intubation. Exploratory outcomes included time to recover command following, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and complications related to intubation. We used multivariable logistical regression to evaluate outcomes between patients induced with ASMs and etomidate. A Fisher exact test was used to compare rSE cessation in a subset of patients with continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) at the time of intubation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We identified 149 induced for RSI in management of rSE: 88 patients intubated using ASMs (propofol,n=56; ketamine,n=14; benzodiazepines,n=18) and 61 patients intubated with etomidate. Forty-one patients had recurrence (29.9% ASMS, 24.6% etomidate). The induction agent was not associated with recurrence of SE, time to command following, or duration of MV. Twenty-seven patients had cEEG monitoring at the time of intubation. Sixteen of the 22 patients induced with ASMs had cessation of rSE with induction, while 1 of 5 intubated with etomidate had cessation (Fisher exact test, p=0.047). There were 34 patients with post-induction hypotension (22.9% ASMs, 22.9% etomidate (Fisher exact test, p=1)). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Induction with an anti-seizure medication during intubation was more likely to halt rSE, but did not decrease the likelihood of clinical or electrographic recurrence of rSE and may not affect time to recovery of command following or duration of MV.

Malignant Hyperthermia Like Manifestations during Management of Refractory Status Epilepticus

AbstractManagement of refractory status epilepticus is challenging for a neurointensivist consequent to systemic complexities associated with various drugs and modalities involved in its treatment. We report one such case that manifested with multiple signs of malignant hyperthermia following use of isoflurane to control seizures. However, the delayed and random occurrence of the signs and negative genetic test report raises doubts regarding the final diagnosis. Delayed presentation of malignant hyperthermia has been reported earlier. Unavailability of dantrolene sodium handily is a major hurdle in treating such cases. We enumerate management of the patient in our intensive care unit.

The Frequency of Refractory Status Epilepticus and Its Outcome in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan: A Retrospective Study.

BackgroundRefractory status epilepticus (RSE) is a common neurologic emergency with refractory cases leading to increased rates of morbidity and mortality in patients. The lack of previous studies on the incidence, causes, and management of refractory status epilepticus in the pediatric population from our region prompted us to investigate further in this study.MethodsWe included retrospective data of all patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with a provisional diagnosis of RSE at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi from February 2019 to February 2021. No personal identification data was used, and confidentiality of the data was maintained throughout the analysis. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to pool data and perform a descriptive analysis.ResultsAmong the 687 patients who presented to the PICU with seizures, 50 (7.27%) patients were eventually diagnosed with RSE during the two-year period. The majority of the patients were male and less than one year of age. Infectious causes predominated our data cohort, and a four-drug regimen consisting of phenytoin, levetiracetam, valproic acid, and midazolam was able to terminate RSE in the majority of the patients in our setting (70%). The mortality rate was noted to be 22% among patients with RSE.ConclusionMorbidity and mortality among pediatric RSE patients are high in our settings. Urgent emergency services and timely cause-directed intervention could improve outcomes.

Electroencephalogram in the intensive care unit: a focused look at acute brain injury.

Over the past decades, electroencephalography (EEG) has become a widely applied and highly sophisticated brain monitoring tool in a variety of intensive care unit (ICU) settings. The most common indication for EEG monitoring currently is the management of refractory status epilepticus. In addition, a number of studies have associated frequent seizures, including nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), with worsening secondary brain injury and with worse outcomes. With the widespread utilization of EEG (spot and continuous EEG), rhythmic and periodic patterns that do not fulfill strict seizure criteria have been identified, epidemiologically quantified, and linked to pathophysiological events across a wide spectrum of critical and acute illnesses, including acute brain injury. Increasingly, EEG is not just qualitatively described, but also quantitatively analyzed together with other modalities to generate innovative measurements with possible clinical relevance. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge and emerging applications of EEG in the ICU, including seizure detection, ischemia monitoring, detection of cortical spreading depolarizations, assessment of consciousness and prognostication. We also review some technical aspects and challenges of using EEG in the ICU including the logistics of setting up ICU EEG monitoring in resource-limited settings.

Pathophysiology and management of refractory status epilepticus in children

Pathophysiology and management of refractory status epilepticus in children

Successful Wean Despite Emergence of Ictal-Interictal EEG Patterns During the Weaning of Prolonged Burst-Suppression Therapy for Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus.

Management of refractory status epilepticus (SE) commonly involves the induction of burst suppression using intravenous anesthetic agents. However, the endpoints of these therapies are not well defined. Weaning anesthetic agents are complicated by the emergence of electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns along the ictal-interictal continuum (IIC), which have uncertain significance given that IIC patterns may worsen cerebral metabolism and oxygenation, have a dissociation between scalp and depth EEG recordings, or may indicate a late stage of SE itself. Determining the significance of IIC patterns in the unique context of anesthetic weaning is important to prevent the potential for unnecessarily prolonging anesthetic coma. Among 118 individuals with SE, we retrospectively identified a series of patients who underwent at least 24h of burst-suppression therapy, experienced two or more weaning trials, and developed IIC patterns during anesthetic weaning. Anesthetic titration strategies during the emergence of these patterns were examined. Each of the six individuals who met inclusion criteria experienced aggressive weaning despite the emergence of IIC patterns. The IIC patterns that were encountered during anesthetic weaning (including generalized and lateralized periodic discharges) are described in detail. Favorable outcomes were reported in each subject. IIC patterns encountered during anesthetic weaning may be transitional and warrant observation, allowing for the emergence of more definitive clinical or electrographic results. The metabolic impact of these IIC patterns on brain activity is uncertain, but weaning strategies that treat IIC as a surrogate of recurrent SE risk further prolonging anesthetic management and its known toxicity. We speculate that these patterns may have a context-specific association with SE relapse, with less-risk conferred when these patterns are observed during the weaning of anesthetic agents after prolonged burst-suppression therapy. Other electrographic features aside from this clinical context may discriminate the risk of SE relapse, such as EEG background activity.

Updates in Refractory Status Epilepticus.

Refractory status epilepticus is defined as persistent seizures despite appropriate use of two intravenous medications, one of which is a benzodiazepine. It can be seen in up to 40% of cases of status epilepticus with an acute symptomatic etiology as the most likely cause. New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a recently coined term for refractory status epilepticus where no apparent cause is found after initial testing. A large proportion of NORSE cases are eventually found to have an autoimmune etiology needing immunomodulatory treatment. Management of refractory status epilepticus involves treatment of an underlying etiology in addition to intravenous anesthetics and antiepileptic drugs. Alternative treatment options including diet therapies, electroconvulsive therapy, and surgical resection in case of a focal lesion should be considered. Short-term and long-term outcomes tend to be poor with significant morbidity and mortality with only one-third of patients reaching baseline neurological status.

Status Epilepticus and Beyond: A Clinical Review of Status Epilepticus and an Update on Current Management Strategies in Super-refractory Status Epilepticus.

Status epilepticus and refractory status epilepticus represent some of the most complex conditions encountered in the neurological intensive care unit. Challenges in management are common as treatment options become limited and prolonged hospital courses are accompanied by complications and worsening patient outcomes. Antiepileptic drug treatments have become increasingly complex. Rational polytherapy should consider the pharmacodynamics and kinetics of medications. When seizures cannot be controlled with medical therapy, alternative treatments, including early surgical evaluation can be considered; however, evidence is limited. This review provides a brief overview of status epilepticus, and a recent update on the management of refractory status epilepticus based on evidence from the literature, evidence-based guidelines, and experiences at our institution.

Review and update of the Hong Kong Epilepsy Guideline on status epilepticus.

Convulsive status epilepticus is the most extreme form of seizure. It is a medical and neurological emergency that requires prompt and appropriate treatment. Treatment of convulsive status epilepticus is usually divided into stages/steps. The International League Against Epilepsy has released a new definition of status epilepticus that may help to unify the definition in future studies. Over the last few years new information has become available regarding its management. The Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial demonstrated non-inferiority of intramuscular midazolam in early status epilepticus compared with intravenous lorazepam. Valproate and levetiracetam have also emerged as possible alternatives to phenytoin in established status epilepticus. The potential role of lacosamide in this stage of status epilepticus remains to be defined. The ongoing Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial may help to determine the most effective treatment for benzodiazepine-resistant status epilepticus. Management of refractory status epilepticus and super-refractory status epilepticus remains mostly non-evidence-based. Increasing recognition of a possible autoimmune aetiology has led to the use of immune-modulation in super-refractory status epilepticus. Ketamine is also increasingly used in this challenging condition. There are also reports of potential use of a ketogenic diet and magnesium.

Should Barbiturates be Used in Refractory Status Epilepticus?

Status epilepticus (SE) is a frequent neurologic emergency, one third of patients do not respond to treatment with benzodiazepines followed by a second antiepileptic drug. While initial treatment of complex partial SE is accordant to that of generalized convulsive SE, further management of refractory SE depends on the risk for acute complications and long-term clinical consequences. These risks are low in complex partial SE; therefore, in this clinical form anesthetics commonly are not used. Generalized convulsive SE-even in its early course-is a potentially life-threatening condition; therefore, prompt use of anesthetics is urgently required. Drugs of choice are barbiturates, midazolam, and propofol, all of which exhibit specific advantages and disadvantages. Up to now, data from clinical studies do not allow to prefer or to discard one of these anesthetics, therefore also barbiturates still should be used in refractory SE. A widely accepted in-house protocol for the management of initial and refractory SE is highly recommended.

AAN and AAP meetings: Latest research in neurology, psychiatry

Emerging advances in neurology ranging from management of refractory status epilepticus to multiple sclerosis were the focus of numerous abstracts presented at the American Academy of Neurology‘s (AAN) 67th annual meeting, held April 18–25 in Washington, DC. At the American Psychiatric Association's (AAP) 168th meeting, held May 16–20 in Toronto, topics ranged from use of psychotropic medications in patients with dementia to lithium toxicity. Following are highlights from both conferences.

Clobazam: An effective add-on therapy in refractory status epilepticus.

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is a medical emergency, with significant morbidity and mortality. The use and effectiveness of clobazam, a unique 1,5-benzodiazepine, in the management of RSE has not been reported before. Over the last 24 months, we identified 17 patients with RSE who were treated with clobazam in our hospital. Eleven of the 17 patients had prior epilepsy. Fifteen patients had focal status epilepticus. Use of clobazam was prompted by a favorable pharmacokinetic profile devoid of drug interactions. Clobazam was introduced after a median duration of 4 days and after a median of three failed antiepileptic drugs. A successful response, defined as termination of RSE within 24 h of administration, without addition or modification of concurrent AED and with successful wean of anesthetic infusions, was seen in 13 patients. Indeterminate response was seen in three patients, whereas clobazam was unsuccessful in one patient. Clobazam averted the need for anesthetic infusions in five patients. Clobazam was well tolerated, and appears to be an effective and promising option as add-on therapy in RSE. Its efficacy, particularly early in the course of SE, should be further investigated in prospective, randomized trials.

Status epilepticus: impact of therapeutic coma on outcome.

Therapeutic coma is advocated in guidelines for management of refractory status epilepticus; this is, however, based on weak evidence. We here address the specific impact of therapeutic coma on status epilepticus outcome. Retrospective assessment of a prospectively collected cohort. Academic hospital. Consecutive adults with incident status epilepticus lasting greater than or equal to 30 minutes, admitted between 2006 and 2013. We recorded prospectively demographics, clinical status epilepticus features, treatment, and outcome at discharge and retrospectively medical comorbidities, hospital stay, and infectious complications. Associations between potential predictors and clinical outcome were analyzed using multinomial logistic regressions. Of 467 patients with incident status epilepticus, 238 returned to baseline (51.1%), 162 had new disability (34.6%), and 67 died (14.3%); 50 subjects (10.7%) were managed with therapeutic coma. Therapeutic coma was associated with poorer outcome in the whole cohort (relative risk ratio for new disability, 6.86; 95% CI, 2.84-16.56; for mortality, 9.10; 95% CI, 3.17-26.16); the effect was more important in patients with complex partial compared with generalized convulsive or nonconvulsive status epilepticus in coma. Prevalence of infections was higher (odds ratio, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.66-8.75), and median hospital stay in patients discharged alive was longer (16 d [range, 2-240 d] vs 9 d [range, 1-57 d]; p < 0.001) in subjects managed with therapeutic coma. This study provides class III evidence that therapeutic coma is associated with poorer outcome after status epilepticus; furthermore, it portends higher infection rates and longer hospitalizations. These data suggest caution in the straightforward use of this approach, especially in patients with complex partial status epilepticus.

Complications during the management of pediatric refractory status epilepticus with benzodiazepine and pentobarbital infusions.

Sir, Patten et al. in their interesting study compared complications in the management of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) treated with benzodiazepine and pentobarbital infusions. The authors addressed that children with RSE, who required pentobarbital therapy had a longer hospital stay and were more likely develop hypotension, require inotropic support, need intubation, mechanical ventilation, peripheral nutrition, and blood products. Furthermore, they were more likely to develop hypertension and movement disorder after or during weaning.[1] I presume that these results ought to be cautiously taken owing to the presence of the following three limitations. (1) The data were taken from a single center. (2) The study period was relatively short (3 years). (3) The size of the studied cohort was small (n = 28). Conducting a large scale multicenter study over an extended period could better evaluate that the issue. Despite the aforementioned three limitations, the observation in Patten et al's. study[1] on more complications associated with pentobarbital infusion compared to benzodiazepine infusion renders pentobarbital less recommended first-line in treating patients with RSE. This observation supports the recently published Indian consensus guidelines on the management of childhood convulsive status epilepticus[2] and recommendations of the Italian League Against Epilepsy,[3] which stress that the initial management of RSE should consist of a parenteral benzodiazepine (lorazepam, diazepam, or midazolam) by any route feasible and when first-line anti-epileptic drugs fail, sodium phenytoin, and phenobarbital should be used. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Complications during the management of pediatric refractory status epilepticus with benzodiazepine and pentobarbital infusions.

The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate complications in the management of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) treated with benzodiazepine and pentobarbital infusions. Of 28 children with RSE, eleven (39%) were treated with a pentobarbital infusion after failure to control RSE with a benzodiazepine infusion; while17 children (61%) required only a benzodiazepine infusion. The mean maximum pentobarbital infusion dosage was 5.2 ± 1.8 mg/kg/h. Twenty-five patients received a continuous midazolam infusion with an average dosage of 0.41 ± 0.43 mg/kg/h. The median length of stay was longer for the pentobarbital group. Children requiring pentobarbital therapy were more likely to develop hypotension, require inotropic support, need intubation, mechanical ventilation, peripheral nutrition, and blood products; furthermore, they were more likely to develop hypertension and movement disorder after or during weaning. In conclusion, children with RSE who required pentobarbital therapy had a longer hospital stay with more complications.