Management Of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Research Articles

Preferred Practice Patterns of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Jordan.

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is fairly common in newborns. The main aim of this cross-sectional study is to assess the preferred practice patterns of CNLDO among ophthalmologists in Jordan. This cross-sectional study was conducted across all ophthalmological practices in Jordan, using convenience sampling. An online questionnaire, designed through Google Forms, was distributed through social media. The survey contained four domains: baseline characteristics of participants and the diagnosis (7 items), medical management (3 items), and surgical management (11 items) of CNLDO. Descriptive statistics were conducted using SPSS (IBM SPSS Corp, SPSS Statistics ver. 26, USA). Eighty-three physicians responded to the survey, with an average age of 40.6 ± 8.6. More than half of the participants (53.0%, n = 44) were general ophthalmologists. Only 37.3% of our sample (n = 31) regularly evaluated the refraction of a child presenting with epiphora suggestive of CNLDO. Criggler's nasolacrimal duct massage was recommended by 62.7% of respondents (n = 52) for up to 12 months. In addition, 72.3% of respondents (n = 60) recommended 12 months as the minimum age for primary probing of CNLDO. Silicon intubation was considered for primary probing starting at 24 months by 31.3% of ophthalmologists (n = 20). Monocanalicular stent was preferred by 42.2% of respondents (n = 27) while 31.3% (n = 20) preferred bicanalicular stent. There is considerable variability in preferred practice patterns regarding the diagnosis and management of CNLDO in Jordan. Our findings highlight the gaps in optimum practices which need to be addressed for better management.

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction update study (CUP study): paper I-role and outcomes of Crigler's lacrimal sac compression.

To assess the exclusive role and outcomes of Crigler's lacrimal sac compression in the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). Retrospective interventional case-series was performed on patients diagnosed with CNLDO and who were advised Crigler's lacrimal sac compression (CLSC) at a tertiary care Dacryology Institute from Jan 2016 to June 2019. CNLDO patients who were practicing incorrect techniques of lacrimal sac compression at presentation were separately assessed. All the patients were assigned to four groups (Gr 1: 0-3 months, Gr 2: >3 & <6 months, Gr 3: >6 & <9 months and Gr 4: >9 and <12 months) based on the age at which the CLSC was initiated and followed up quarterly or as needed till at least1 year of age. The parameters studied include patient demographics, clinical presentation, age of initiation of CLSC, success rate with CLSC, and need for additional interventions. Success was defined as the subjective resolution of epiphora and discharge with objective measures of normal tear meniscus height and dye clearance on fluorescein dye disappearance test. A total number of 1240 patients with CNLDO were assessed. Of these, 1037 patients were advised correct techniques of CLSC from the beginning, and the remaining 203 patients were referred but performing it incorrectly at presentation. Of the 1037 patients, 236 were lost to follow-up; hence, a total of 1004 patients (801 + 203) were included for final analysis. CLSC was found to be an effective conservative strategy in the management of CNLDO. The rate of resolution of CNLDO in Gr 1 to Gr 4 was 87.3%, 78.9%, 77.9%, and 76.8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcomes based on the age of CLSC initiation. The referred patients whose techniques were rectified following the initial incorrect techniques showed a resolution of 61.2% (79/129). The correct techniques of CLSC appeared to influence the outcomes. However, the age of its initiation did not substantially impact the outcomes. Significantly high resolution was noted even beyond nine months of ageand encouraging results beyond 12 months of age. It is crucial to initiate the correct techniques of Crigler's lacrimal sac compression to achieve favourable outcomes. Age of initiation of CLSC in infancy does not appear to influence the outcomes.The resolution rate continued to be significantly high up to 1 year of age. There is a need to assess the role of CLSC beyond 12 months of age.

A survey of management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction by pediatric primary health care providers in Spain.

To survey the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) by pediatric primary health care providers in Spain. This was a descriptive study using a web-based questionnaire to evaluate the perceptions of the members of the Pediatric Primary Care Society in Castilla-León, Spain (APAPCYL), regarding management of CNLDO. The questionnaire contained 14 direct questions and was sent by e-mail to all the pediatricians. All the responses were analyzed by the frequency of occurrence and percentages. Ninety physicians responded to the questionnaire. Massage 2 or 3 times a day was the initial treatment advised by 60.47% of pediatricians. Nearly half of the pediatricians recommended continuing massage until symptoms resolved. Fewer than 50% of children required referral to an ophthalmologist. Reasons for an ophthalmic consult included persistence of symptoms among 87.21% of pediatricians and parental/guardian request among 10.5% of pediatricians. According to 45.6% of pediatricians, their knowledge about CNLDO is limited, and 92.2% would like to receive further training on CNLDO. Massage was the main initial treatment for managing CNLDO among pediatricians. The outcomes of this survey indicated that massage fails in fewer than 50% of patients and an ophthalmic referral is required for these cases.

Indian survey on practice patterns of lacrimal and eyelid disorders (iSUPPLE) report 1: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

BackgroundTo assess the preferred practice patterns in the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) among oculoplastic surgeons in India. The survey was aimed at obtaining data on the timing of intervention, procedure of choice, and the use of adjunctive techniques such as silicone intubation and nasal endoscopy. MethodsAn anonymized survey that included questions on the management of lacrimal disorders was sent in April 2015 to members of the Oculoplastic Association of India (OPAI), through an e-mail communication. The results were tabulated and analyzed. ResultsA large proportion (84%) of respondents indicated that they advise lacrimal sac compression up to 1 year of age. Fourteen percent (12/87) indicated 2 years as their upper age limit for advising sac compression. One year is the preferred minimum age for advising primary nasolacrimal duct (NLD) probing by majority (45%) of respondents and the upper age limit being 5 years for 62% of respondents. Based on experience, younger surgeons (<10 years experience) when compared to more experienced surgeons are more likely to offer a trial of primary probing in children between 8 and 12 years age (29% versus 8%). Nasal endoscope is used by 50% (44/88) respondents during primary NLD probing. Nearly a third of the respondents (29/88) use intubation in all cases of NLD probing. Eighty one percent (71/88) of the surgeons would rather repeat NLD probing with adjunctive procedures over dacryocystorhinostomy (17%). Balloon Dacryoplasty is rarely used for CNLDO amongst our respondents. ConclusionsThis study highlights the variation in practice pattern in the management of CNLDO across India. While there are certain trends that are global phenomena, such as the shift towards the use of a nasal endoscope; use of silicone intubation in repeated procedures and time of performing primary NLD probing; issues like the use of balloon dacryoplasty showed lesser degree of agreement.