Like any science focusing on man (either as an individual or as part of a group), demography is faced with the need to develop a systematic approach: its units of observation (individual or collective) are multidimensional systems, whose many components define a single entity, which takes decisions, experiences events and influences its environment. The various disciplines as we currently know them are simply different points of view from which we observe these units. Economics, sociology, epidemiology and medicine, the disciplines closest to demography from a thematic perspective, all face the same dilemma: in order to explain the behaviour of the unit studied, all dimensions of that unit must be taken into account, and no single dimension considered as exclusive (or more important than the others).The need for a multidisciplinary (or, more precisely, systematic) approach is not, therefore, unique to demography. It is, perhaps, simply more apparent, more acute in this discipline, for two reasons that can be seen as constraints, but also as opportunities, in that they strengthen the imperative to move beyond the classical approach. The first reason is the need to take both micro and macro dimensions into account. Demography, which is based upon a macro approach to the study of populations, has only recently begun to concern itself with micro (individual) and meso (family) units. Bringing these strands together is quite clearly vital (although moves to do so were late in coming, as indeed was the micro approach itself, if one considers the history of the discipline).The second reason arises out of the fact that with time, the events of specific interest to the demographer have lost much of their essentially biological nature and are increasingly matters of individual choice. They are, however, events of great significance in the life of an individual - birth of a child, migration, family formation, death - which are not the result of merely circumstantial choices (or situations), but rather milestones on a long decision path (or life course). Many different elements come into play (individual and collective, economic and social, cultural and biological, etc.), and it is often impossible - perhaps also ill-advised - to attempt to determine the specific part played by each.A multidisciplinary approach is thus vital to progress in demography, just as the advent of longitudinal methods has proven to be in recent years for the reconstruction of processes whose unfolding, on an individual timescale, as on a historical timescale, leads to certain demographic choices and events. The same applies today for the simultaneous consideration of micro and macro (and/or meso) levels when interpreting demographic behaviour.A further constraint - or opportunity - is the relative inadequacy of the theoretical corpus of demography, which favours an approach based on empirical observation. Such an approach does not, of course, allow one to dispense with a conceptual framework for analysing a phenomenon. On the contrary, a clear and well-structured theoretical framework with which to organize the system of relations governing the phenomenon is absolutely essential, even when collecting the initial statistics that will subsequently serve to describe its evolution and properties. What is often lacking is the grouping of sectorial hypotheses and theories into one coherent ensemble to be expressly adopted by those undertaking and initiating research. In one respect, the caution with which demographers have always approached the construction of theories reflects the realism of a discipline that, to build bridges between social and biological sciences, has always needed to be wary of partial approaches and the inadequacy of simple theories to resolve the complexity of the object of study. But this circumspection is liable to become a growing hindrance, as it quite clearly runs counter to the process of theory testing-appraisal-refutation that has been a driving force for progress in other fields, thanks notably to the passionate debates it has sparked (though such debate has not always been free from ideology and prejudice) (Popper, 1999)(1). …
Read full abstract