Lymph Node Yield Research Articles

Analysis of training pathway to reach expert performance levels based on proficiency-based progression in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was first introduced in 2003 and has since then shown to significantly improve the postoperative course. Previous studies have shown that a structured training pathway based on proficiency-based progression using individual skill levels as measures of reach of competence can enhance surgical performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate and help understand our pathway to reach surgical expert levels using a proficiency-based approach introducing RAMIE at our German high-volume center. All patients undergoing RAMIE performed by two experienced surgeons for esophageal cancer since the introduction of the robotic technique in 2017 was included in this analysis. Intraoperative outcomes and postoperative outcomes were included in the analysis. The cumulative sum method was used to analyze how many cases are needed to reach expert levels for different performance characteristics and skill sets during robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. From 06/2017 to 03/2022, a total of 154 patients underwent RAMIE at our facility and were included in the analysis. An advancement in performance level was observed for total operating time after 70 cases and for thoracic operative time after 79 cases. Lymph node yield showed an increase up until case 60 in the CUSUM analysis. Length of hospital stay stabilized after case 55. The CCI score inflection point was at case 55 in both CUSUM and regression analyses. Anastomotic leak rate stabilized at case 38 and showed another inflection point after case 83. Our data and analysis showed the progression from proficient to expert performance levels during the implementation of RAMIE at a European high-volume center. Further analysis of surgeons, especially with a different training status has yet to reveal if the caseloads found in this study are universally applicable. However, skill acquisition and respective measures of such are diverse and as a great range of number of cases was observed, we believe that the learning curve and ascent in performance levels cannot be defined by one parameter alone.

Surgical quality and prospective quality control of the D2-gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the multicenter randomized LOGICA-trial

BackgroundQuality of gastric cancer surgery is crucial for favorable prognosis. Generally, prospective trials lack quality control measures. This study assessed surgical quality and a novel D2-lymphadenectomy photo-scoring in the LOGICA-trial. MethodsThe multicenter LOGICA-trial randomized laparoscopic versus open total/distal D2-gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer (cT1-4aN0-3M0) in 10 Dutch hospitals. During the trial, two reviewers prospectively analyzed intraoperative photographs of dissected nodal stations for quality control, and provided centers weekly feedback on their D2-lymphadenectomy, as continuous quality-enhancing incentive. After the trial, these photographs were reanalyzed to develop a photo-scoring for future trials, rating the D2-lymphadenectomy dissection quality (optimal-good-suboptimal-unevaluable). Interobserver variability was calculated (weighted kappa). Regression analyses related the photo-scoring to nodal yield, recurrence and 5-years survival. ResultsBetween 2015 and 2018, 212 patients underwent total/distal D2-gastrectomy (n = 122/n = 90), and 158 (75%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. R0-resection rate was 95%. Rate of ≥15 retrieved lymph nodes was 95%. Moderate agreement was obtained in stations 8 + 9 (κ = 0.522), 11p/11d (κ = 0.446) and 12a (κ = 0.441). Consensus was reached for discordant cases (30%). Stations 8 + 9, 11p/11d and 12a were rated ‘optimal’ in 76%, 63% and 68%. Laparoscopic photographs could be rated better than open (2% versus 12% ‘unevaluable’; 73% versus 50% ‘optimal’; p = 0.042). The photo-scoring did not show associations with nodal yield (p = 0.214), recurrence (p = 0.406) and survival (p = 0.988). ConclusionsHigh radicality and nodal yield demonstrated good quality of D2-gastrectomy. The prospective quality control probably contributed to this. The photo-scoring did not show good performance, but can be refined. Laparoscopic D2-gastrectomy was better suited for standardized surgical photo-evaluation than open surgery.

Comparison of alternative N-staging models in patients with oral cancer. Is nodal yield or burden the most critical parameter?

BackgroundThere is increasing evidence in the literature that alternative N-classification systems offer a simpler and more precise risk stratification than the current N- classification in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study is to compare three broadly proposed models incorporating lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes and number of positive lymph nodes regarding disease-free and overall survival. MethodsThis is a retrospective study of patients treated in a single center between 2013 and 2019. Cox proportional hazard models, Kaplan Meier curves, the long rank test and the area under the curve were implemented to compare the risk-stratification ability of the three models. Moreover, a hazard ratio plot was calculated to investigate the association between nodal yield and disease-free survival. Results231 patients were included. All three proposed N-models were significantly correlated to the patient's prognosis in the multivariate analysis. Pairwise comparisons between the groups showed that the current pN classification offers the worst stratification and that the model incorporating the number of positive lymph nodes had a better performance for predicting both endpoints. Finally, a decrease in hazard ratio was observed with each additional lymph node removed up to the number of 39 lymph nodes. ConclusionsThe model incorporating the nodal burden offered a better predictive ability. The current N-classification cannot adequately identify patients with different prognosis. A non-linear relationship was found between nodal yield and survival, which could be the disadvantage of the lymph node ratio and log odds models.

A Systematic Review of Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Cancer after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Minimally invasive surgeries for non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (VATSs) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (RATSs) have become standard of care for patients needing surgical resection in early stages. The role for neoadjuvant systemic therapy has increased with patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, there has been some equipoise over the intraoperative and overall outcomes for these patients. Here, we review the current data regarding outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgical resection after systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or both. A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies presenting data on patients with NSCLC that underwent neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by minimally invasive surgery was performed assessing complications, conversion rates, and lymph node yield. Our search strategy and review of references resulted in 239 publications to screen with 88 full texts assessed and 21 studies included in our final review. VATS had a statistically significant higher lymph node yield in five studies. The reported conversion rates ranged from 0 to 54%. Dense adhesions, bleeding, and difficult anatomy were the most common reported reasons for conversion to open surgeries. The most common complications between both groups were prolonged air leak, arrythmia, and pneumonia. VATS was found to have significantly fewer complications in three papers. The current literature supports VATS as safe and feasible for patients with NSCLC after neoadjuvant systemic treatment. Surgeons should remain prepared to convert to open surgeries in those patients with dense adhesions and bleeding risk.

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA): an international randomised non-inferiority trial.

The oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery has been questioned for several abdominal cancers. Concerns also exist regarding the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as randomised trials are lacking. In this international randomised non-inferiority trial, we recruited adults with resectable pancreatic cancer from 35 centres in 12 countries. Patients were randomly assigned to either MIDP (laparoscopic or robotic) or open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Both patients and pathologists were blinded to the assigned approach. Primary endpoint was radical resection (R0, ≥1mm free margin) in patients who had ultimately undergone resection. Analyses for the primary endpoint were by modified intention-to-treat, excluding patients with missing data on primary endpoint. The pre-defined non-inferiority margin of-7% was compared with the lower limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of absolute difference in the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN44897265). Between May 8, 2018 and May 7, 2021, 258 patients were randomly assigned to MIDP (131 patients) or ODP (127 patients). Modified intention-to-treat analysis included 114 patients in the MIDP group and 110 patients in the ODP group. An R0 resection occurred in 83 (73%) patients in the MIDP group and in 76 (69%) patients in the ODP group (difference 3.7%, 90% CI-6.2 to 13.6%; pnon-inferiority=0.039). Median lymph node yield was comparable (22.0 [16.0-30.0] vs 23.0 [14.0-32.0] nodes, p=0.86), as was the rate of intraperitoneal recurrence (41% vs 38%, p=0.45). Median follow-up was 23.5 (interquartile range 17.0-30.0) months. Other postoperative outcomes were comparable, including median time to functional recovery (5 [95% CI 4.5-5.5] vs 5 [95% CI 4.7-5.3] days; p=0.22) and overall survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67-1.46, p=0.94). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (18%) of 131 patients in the MIDP group vs 28 (22%) of 127 patients in the ODP group. This trial provides evidence on the non-inferiority of MIDP compared to ODP regarding radical resection rates in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The present findings support the applicability of minimally invasive surgery in patients with resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer. Medtronic Covidien AG, Johnson & Johnson Medical Limited, Dutch Gastroenterology Society.

Impact of the Surgical Approach for Neoadjuvantly Treated Gastroesophageal Junction Type II Tumors: A Multinational, High-volume Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

The aim of this study was to explore oncologic outcomes of transhiatal gastrectomy (THG) or transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) for neoadjuvantly treated gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) Siewert type II adenocarcinomas, a multinational, high-volume center cohort analysis was undertaken. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) followed by surgery is the standard therapy for locally advanced GEJ. However, the optimal surgical approach for type II GEJ tumors remains unclear, as the decision is mainly based on individual experience and assessment of operative risk. A retrospective analysis of 5 prospectively maintained databases was conducted. Between 2012 and 2021, 800 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria for type II GEJ tumors and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or CTx. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. Patients undergoing THG (n=163, 20.4%) had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and cT stage ( P <0.001) than patients undergoing TTE (n=637, 79.6%). Neoadjuvant therapy was different as the THG group were mainly undergoing CTx (87.1%, P <0.001). The TTE group showed higher tumor regression ( P =0.009), lower ypT/ypM categories (both P <0.001), higher nodal yield ( P =0.009) and higher R0 resection rate ( P =0.001). The mOS after TTE was longer (78.0 vs 40.0 months, P =0.013). After propensity score matching a higher R0 resection rate ( P =0.004) and mOS benefit after TTE remained ( P =0.04). Subgroup analyses of patients without distant metastasis ( P =0.037) and patients only after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( P =0.021) confirmed the survival benefit of TTE. TTE was an independent predictor of longer survival. Awaiting results of the randomized CARDIA trial, TTE should in high-volume centers be considered the preferred approach due to favorable oncologic outcomes.

Immune microenvironment and lymph node yield in colorectal cancer.

Lymph node (LN) harvesting is associated with outcomes in colonic cancer. We sought to interrogate whether a distinctive immune milieu of the primary tumour is associated with LN yield. A total of 926 treatment-naive patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma with more than 12 LNs (LN-high) were compared with patients with 12 or fewer LNs(LN-low). We performed immunohistochemistry and quantification on tissue microarrays for HLA class I/II proteins, beta-2-microglobulin (B2MG), CD8, CD163, LAG3, PD-L1, FoxP3, and BRAF V600E. The LN-high group was comprised of younger patients, longer resections,largertumours, right-sided location, and tumours with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). The tumour microenvironment showed higher CD8+ cells infiltration and B2MG expression on tumour cells in the LN-high group compared to the LN-low group. The estimated mean disease-specific survival was higher in the LN-high group than LN-low group. On multivariate analysis for prognosis, LN yield, CD8+ cells, extramural venous invasion, perineural invasion, and AJCC stage were independent prognostic factors. Our findings corroborate that higher LN yield is associated with a survival benefit. LN yield is associated with an immune high microenvironment, suggestingthat tumour immune milieu influences the LN yield.

Retrospective Evaluation of a Single Surgeon's Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion via Ileal Conduit.

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) is increasingly being performed instead of open surgery. A criticism of this technique is the long learning curve, but limited data are available on this topic. At our center, the transition from open radical cystectomy (ORC) to iRARC began in May 2017. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the initial 53 cases of robot-assisted cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion via ileal conduit, which were performed by one single surgeon. The patients were divided into four consecutive groups according to the surgeon's increasing experience, and perioperative parameters were analyzed as a surrogate for the learning curve. Over the course of the learning curve, a decline in median operation time from 415 to 361 min (p = 0.02), blood loss from 400 to 200 mL (p = 0.01), and minor complications from 71% to 15% (p = 0.02) was observed. No significant difference in overall and major complications, length of hospital stay, and total lymph node yield was shown. During the initial period of the learning curve, only the less complex cases were operated on using robotic surgery, while the more challenging ones were handled through open surgery. After experience with 28 cases, no more cystectomies were performed through open surgery. This led to an increase in operation time and length of hospital stay, as well as a higher incidence of both minor and overall complications among cases 28-40. After 40 cases, a significant decrease in these parameters was observed again. Our analysis demonstrated that operation time, blood loss, and minor complications decrease with increasing surgical experience in iRARC, while suggesting that technically challenging cases should be operated on after experience with 40 robotic cystectomies.

Perioperative Outcomes of Systematic Mesopancreas Dissection for Pancreatic and Periampullary Carcinoma at a Tertiary Referral Center From a Low Middle-Income Country.

Introduction Systematic mesopancreas dissection (SMD) is an emerging surgical approach in pancreatic cancer surgery. There is still debate about early postoperative and pathological outcomes using SMD in pancreatic cancer surgery. This study has been conducted to compare the perioperative outcomes, the lymph node yield, and the margin status in patients who underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (ST-PD) and SMD-PD for pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma. Methods A retrospective comparative study was conducted in patients who underwent PD for pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma in a single unit of gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Nepal. Early perioperative and pathological outcomes were compared between the SMD-PD and ST-PD. Results The demographic data of 30 patients who underwent SMD-PD was comparable with the historical data of 40 patients who underwent ST-PD. The intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were found to be comparable between ST-PD and SMD-PD. However, the median operative time for SMD-PD was longer than ST-PD (360 minutes [IQR: 90 minutes] vs. 360 minutes [IQR: 60 minutes]). The rate of margin negative resection was similar between both groups. The median lymph node yield was significantly high in patients who underwent SMD-PD (17.5 (IQR: 6.5) vs. 11 [IQR-10.75]; p < 0.05). Conclusion SMD is safe and feasible for treating periampullary carcinoma and is particularly helpful in increasing lymph node yield.

Lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A two-center comparative study of robotic versus open surgery.

This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lymph node dissection (LND) during robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC). From October 2003 to December 2021, 122 patients underwent LND during RARC and 103 patients underwent LND during ORC at Tokushima University Hospital and Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital. We investigated the safety and efficacy of LND during RARC by comparing the surgical and oncological outcomes between the two groups. The patients were significantly older in the RARC than the ORC group. The operative time was significantly shorter and the estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the RARC than the ORC group. Although the lymph node yield was significantly higher in the RARC than the ORC group, there was no significant difference in lymph node positivity between the groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis between the two groups. The 5-year survival rates (overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival) were not different between the RARC and ORC groups. This study suggests that the surgical and oncological safety and efficacy of LND during RARC are greater than those of LND during ORC. We believe that LND during RARC is a higher-quality procedure than LND during ORC.

Three-year survival and distribution of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from a European randomized clinical trial

BackgroundAdequate lymphadenectomy is an important step in gastrectomy for cancer, with a modified D2 lymphadenectomy being recommended for advanced gastric cancers. When assessing a novel technique for the treatment of gastric cancer, lymphadenectomy should be non-inferior. The aim of this study was to assess completeness of lymphadenectomy and distribution patterns between open total gastrectomy (OTG) and minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MITG) in the era of peri-operative chemotherapy.MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of the STOMACH trial, a randomized clinical trial in thirteen hospitals in Europe. Patients were randomized between OTG and MITG for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three-year survival, number of resected lymph nodes, completeness of lymphadenectomy, and distribution patterns were examined.ResultsA total of 96 patients were included in this trial and randomized between OTG (49 patients) and MITG (47 patients). No difference in 3-year survival was observed, this was 57.1% in OTG group versus 46.8% in MITG group (P = 0.186). The mean number of examined lymph nodes per patient was 44.3 ± 16.7 in the OTG group and 40.7 ± 16.3 in the MITG group (P = 0.209). D2 lymphadenectomy of 71.4% in the OTG group and 74.5% in the MITG group was performed according to the surgeons; according to the pathologist compliance to D2 lymphadenectomy was 30% in the OTG group and 36% in the MITG group. Tier 2 lymph node metastases (stations 7–12) were observed in 19.6% in the OTG group versus 43.5% in the MITG group (P = 0.024).ConclusionNo difference in 3-year survival was observed between open and minimally invasive gastrectomy. No differences were observed for lymph node yield and type of lymphadenectomy. Adherence to D2 lymphadenectomy reported by the pathologist was markedly low.

Impact of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging on Lymphadenectomy Quality During Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (Greeneye): An Adaptative, Phase 2, Clinical Trial

BackgroundIndocyanine green (ICG)-guided lymphadenectomy using near-infrared visualization (NIR) may increase nodal yield during gastrectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of NIR visualization on the quality of D2 lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.MethodsThis single-arm, open-label, Simon’s two-stage, adaptive, phase 2 trial included patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic peritumoral injection of ICG was performed 24 ± 6 h before surgery. Intraoperatively, after standard D2 lymphadenectomy and specimen extraction, NIR was used for eventual completion lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit of NIR (i.e., at least one additional harvested station containing lymph nodes, with negative points for every harvested station with no lymph nodes at final pathology).ResultsWe enrolled 18 patients (61% female, median age 69 years). With NIR, an extra 23 stations were harvested: 9 contained no lymph nodes, 12 contained nonmetastatic lymph nodes, and 2 contained metastatic lymph nodes. The most commonly visualized station with NIR were station 6 (8 patients) and 1 (4 patients). The total number of harvested nodes per patient was 32 (interquartile range [IQR] 26–41), with a median of 1 (IQR 0–1) additional lymph node after NIR. Overall, seven (39%) patients had a clinical benefit from NIR, of which two (11%) had one metastatic lymph node harvested with NIR.ConclusionsNIR visualization improves the quality of D2 lymphadenectomy in distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Considering the limited improve in the number of harvested lymph nodes, its real oncological benefit is still questionable.

Minimizing the learning curve for robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: A single-surgeon, retrospective, cohort study.

Studies published to date have suggested non-inferiority of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC), while few centers in Canada have adopted this approach. Though multifactorial, the learning curve and operative time are often discussed barriers. Herein, we present outcomes from the largest Canadian cohort of RARC performed to date. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing RARC by a single surgeon with greater than 1500 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) experience at our institution from May 2020 to December 2021. Clinicopathological, intraoperative, and postoperative data, as well as complications in the first 90 days were collected. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between case volume and operative time/lymph node yield. A total of 31 patients underwent RARC during the study period, 26 of which were male. The median length of stay was six days (Q1-Q3 5-10), while days alive and out of hospital at 90 days were 83 days (Q1-Q3 80-85). Soft tissue margins were positive in 9.6% (3/31) of patients. Median lymph node yield was 17.0 lymph nodes (Q1-Q3 11-23). Median operative time was 241 minutes (Q1-Q3 228-252) in the ileal conduit group and 320 minutes (Q1-Q3 302-337) in the neobladder group. We observed four Clavien-Dindo grade >3 complications. The 90-day readmission rate and mortality rate were 17.2% (5) and 0% (0), respectively. There was no correlation between case volume and any outcome variables. Previous high-volume experience performing RARP reduces the learning curve for preforming RARC, with similar short-term outcomes to high-volume centers.

Complete mesocolic excision versus standard resection for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative safety and an evaluation of the use of a robotic approach.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been associated with improved oncological outcomes in treatment of colon cancer. However, widespread adoption is limited partly because of the technical complexity and perceived risks of the approach. The aim of out study wasto evaluate the safety of CME compared to standard resection and to compare robotic versus laparoscopic approaches. Two parallel searches were undertaken in MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases 12 December 2021. The first was to evaluate IDEAL stage3 evidence to compare complication rates as a surrogate marker of perioperative safety between CME and standard resection. The second independent search compared lymph node yield and survival outcomes between minimally invasive approaches. There were four randomized control trials (n = 1422) comparing CME to standard resection, and three studies comparing laparoscopic (n = 164) to robotic (n = 161) approaches. Compared to standard resection, CME was associated with a reduction in Clavien-Dindo grade3 or higher complication rates (3.56% vs. 7.24%, p = 0.002), reduced blood loss (113.1ml vs. 137.6ml, p < 0.0001) and greater mean lymph node harvest (25.6 vs. 20.9 nodes, p = 0.001). Between the robotic and laparoscopic groups, there were no significant differences in complication rates, blood loss, lymph node yield, 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.05, p = 0.87) and overall survival (OR 0.83, p = 0.54). Our study demonstrated improved safety with CME. There was no difference in safety or survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic CME. The advantage of a robotic approach may lie in the reduced learning curve and an increased penetration of minimally invasive approach to CME. Further studies are required to explore this. CRD42021287065.

Eugene Nicholas Myers' Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer, 2020: The Surgeon as a Prognostic Factor in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery.

This paper is a transcript of the 29 th Eugene N. Myers, MD International Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) in 2020. By the end of the 19 th century, the survival rate in treated patients was 10%. With the improvements in surgical techniques, currently, about two thirds of patients survive for > 5 years. Teamwork and progress in surgical reconstruction have led to advancements in ablative surgery; the associated adjuvant treatments have further improved the prognosis in the last 30 years. However, prospective trials are lacking; most of the accumulated knowledge is based on retrospective series and some real-world data analyses. Current knowledge on prognostic factors plays a central role in an efficient treatment decision-making process. Although the influence of most tumor- and patient-related prognostic factors in head and neck cancer cannot be changed by medical interventions, some environmental factors-including treatment, decision-making, and quality-can be modified. Ideally, treatment strategy decisions should be taken in dedicated multidisciplinary team meetings. However, evidence suggests that surgeons and hospital volume and specialization play major roles in patient survival after initial or salvage head and neck cancer treatment. The metrics of surgical quality assurance (surgical margins and nodal yield) in neck dissection have a significant impact on survival in head and neck cancer patients and can be influenced by the surgeon's expertise. Strategies proposed to improve surgical quality include continuous performance measurement, feedback, and dissemination of best practice measures.

Rectal Cancer: Are 12 Lymph Nodes the Limit?

Lymph node dissection is a crucial element of oncologic rectal surgery. Many guidelines regard the removal of at least 12 lymph nodes as the quality criterion in rectal cancer. However, this recommendation remains controversial. This study examines the factors influencing the lymph node yield and the validity of the 12-lymph node limit. Patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection or abdominoperineal amputation between 2000 and 2010 were analyzed. In total, 20,966 patients from 381 hospitals were included. Less than 12 lymph nodes were found in 20.53% of men and 19.31% of women (p = 0.03). The number of lymph nodes yielded increased significantly from 2000, 2005 and 2010 within the quality assurance program for all procedures. The univariate analysis indicated a significant (p < 0.001) correlation between lymph node yield and gender, age, pre-therapeutic T-stage, risk factors and neoadjuvant therapy. The multivariate analyses found T3 stage, female sex, the presence of at least one risk factor and neoadjuvant therapy to have a significant influence on yield. The probability of finding a positive lymph node was proportional to the number of examined nodes with no plateau. There is a proportional relationship between the number of examined lymph nodes and the probability of finding an infiltrated node. Optimal surgical technique and pathological evaluation of the specimen cannot be replaced by a numeric cut-off value.

Preserving or peeling the inferior mesenteric arterial sheath during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a prospective study of surgical outcomes

BackgroundWe mainly evaluated whether preserving the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) sheath to dissecting IMA root lymph nodes (also called No.253 lymph nodes) would benefit patients in terms of comparable lymph-node yield removed during operation and postoperative complications in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.MethodsThis is a prospective study included 141 rectal cancer patients who received laparoscopic radical resection during September 2018 to December 2020. All patients were randomly assigned to the preserved group (n = 71) and the peeled group (n = 70). The baseline characteristics, pathological features, intraoperative and postoperative data outcomes and complications were analyzed by independent samples t test, chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test between the 2 groups.ResultsThe baseline characteristic and pathological features had no statistical difference between the 2 groups. The preserved group had a shorter operative time (P = 0.002), a shorter lymph node dissection time (P < 0.001), less intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.004), an earlier time to first flatus (P = 0.013), an earlier time to fluid intake (P = 0.033) and a shorter length of hospitalization (P = 0.012) than the peeled group. The differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) in regard to the total number of lymph nodes cleared, positive lymph nodes, bleeding, anastomotic leakage, pneumonia, wound infection, abscess, ileus, urinary retention, urinary tract infection and chyle leakage.ConclusionPreserving of the IMA sheath in laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer will reduce the total operation time and the length of hospitalization. This surgical method could lead to lower complication rate and faster recovery.Trial registrationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College and registered by the China Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2200060830, Date of Registration:2022-06-12 -retrospective registration) http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Textbook outcome contributes to long-term prognosis in elderly colorectal cancer patients.

Textbook outcome (TO) has been used to define achievement of multiple "ideal" or "optimal" surgical and postoperative quality measures from the patient's perspective. However, TO has not been reported for their impact on survival in elderly, including CRC surgery. This study determined whether TO is associated with long-term outcomes after curative colorectomy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Patient who underwent curative surgery over 75 years old for CRC between March 2005 and December 2016. TO included five separate parameters: surgery within 6 weeks, radical resection, Lymph node (LN) yield ≥ 12, no stoma, and no adverse outcome. When all 5 short-term quality of care parameters were realized, TO was achieved (TO). If any one of the 5 parameters was not met, the treatment was not considered TO (nTO). TO was realized in 80 patients (43.0%). Differences in surgical-related characteristics and pathological characteristics according to TO had no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for Lymph node dissection. The Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and RFS association between TO and nTO had significantly poor 5-year OS and 5-year RFS compared with the TO groups (OS, 77.8% vs. 60.8%, P < 0.01; RFS, 69.6% vs. 50.8%, P = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, nTO was an independent predictive factor for worse OS (HR, 2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.175-3.557; P = 0.01) and RFS (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.043-2.842; P = 0.03). TO can be a useful predictor for postoperative morbidity and prognosis after curative colorectomy for CRC.

Distal Versus Total D2-Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Secondary Analysis of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes Including Quality of Life in the Multicenter Randomized LOGICA-Trial

BackgroundDistal gastrectomy (DG) for gastric cancer can cause less morbidity than total gastrectomy (TG), but may compromise radicality. No prospective studies administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and few assessed quality of life (QoL). MethodsThe multicenter LOGICA-trial randomized laparoscopic versus open D2-gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1–4aN0–3bM0) in 10 Dutch hospitals. This secondary LOGICA-analysis compared surgical and oncological outcomes after DG versus TG. DG was performed for non-proximal tumors if R0-resection was deemed achievable, TG for other tumors. Postoperative complications, mortality, hospitalization, radicality, nodal yield, 1-year survival, and EORTC-QoL-questionnaires were analyzed using Χ2-/Fisher’s exact tests and regression analyses. ResultsBetween 2015 and 2018, 211 patients underwent DG (n = 122) or TG (n = 89), and 75% of patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. DG-patients were older, had more comorbidities, less diffuse type tumors, and lower cT-stage than TG-patients (p < 0.05). DG-patients experienced fewer overall complications (34% versus 57%; p < 0.001), also after correcting for baseline differences, lower anastomotic leakage (3% versus 19%), pneumonia (4% versus 22%), atrial fibrillation (3% versus 14%), and Clavien-Dindo grading compared to TG-patients (p < 0.05), and demonstrated shorter median hospital stay (6 versus 8 days; p < 0.001). QoL was better after DG (statistically significant and clinically relevant) in most 1-year postoperative time points. DG-patients showed 98% R0-resections, and similar 30-/90-day mortality, nodal yield (28 versus 30 nodes; p = 0.490), and 1-year survival after correcting for baseline differences (p = 0.084) compared to TG-patients. ConclusionsIf oncologically feasible, DG should be preferred over TG due to less complications, faster postoperative recovery, and better QoL while achieving equivalent oncological effectiveness. Mini-abstractDistal D2-gastrectomy for gastric cancer resulted in less complications, shorter hospitalization, quicker recovery and better quality of life compared to total D2-gastrectomy, whereas radicality, nodal yield and survival were similar.

Comparison of conventional right colectomy and complete mesocolic excision technique—case–control analysis of short-term results

Summary Introduction The long-term oncologic advantages of complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation and extended lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer have been emphasized in several studies, without compromise of perioperative morbidity or mortality; however, prospective randomized data are scarce. Methods We performed a single-center non-randomized case–control study comparing conventional non-CME right colectomies (nCME) and complete mesocolic excision (CME) procedures during the period from January 2019 to December 2020. Perioperative morbidity, length of hospital stay (LOHS), operative time, and lymph node yield were analyzed. Results A total of 131 patients underwent surgery for right-sided colon cancer, with 28 (21%) in the CME group and 103 (79%) in the conventional group. Operative time was significantly longer in the CME group (p &lt; 0.001) compared to conventional procedures. The duration of hospitalization was statistically similar (p = 0.226), no difference was observed in 30-day morbidity (p = 0.166), and the majority of complications in both groups were grades 0–2 (CME: 82%; nCME: 91%). There were no 30-day mortalities. The lymph node yield in CME was significantly higher compared to the conventional surgery (p = 0.041). Conclusion Complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer is safe without increasing complications or hospital stay, with an acceptable increase in operative time. The significant increase in lymph node yield enables better staging and may lead to improved long-term oncologic outcomes.