Low Risk For Bacteremia Research Articles

Outpatient Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Low-risk Children with Solid Tumors: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Management of febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology usually requires inpatient parenteral antibiotics after initial evaluation, but some patients at lower risk of sepsis could be safely managed outpatient. We describe a quality improvement project to increase outpatient management of fever and neutropenia. We designed a standardized algorithm for children with a solid tumor diagnosis and low risk for bacteremia. The aim was to achieve outpatient management for at least 80% of eligible patients within 20 months of project initiation. We used plan-do-study-act cycles to improve algorithm compliance, including optimizing medical record decision support, developing targeted educational materials and outreach, and restructuring outpatient processes to allow for close follow-up. We surveyed patients (age ≥12 y) and parents/caregivers to assess the impact of outpatient management. The initiative led to 71% (n = 34) of eligible patients being managed as outpatients. Six percent (n = 2) of patients developed bacteremia, resulting in hospital admission. Fifteen of 26 parents/caregivers and five of 11 patients approached completed the survey. For the preferred setting of febrile neutropenia management, 83% of patients preferred to be home versus 40% of parents/caregivers. No patient expressed any of the three highest ratings in the question exploring fear regarding outpatient febrile neutropenia management versus 67% of parents/caregivers. Some children with a solid tumor diagnosis at low risk for bacteremia are safely managed for febrile neutropenia as outpatients. Targeted efforts to engage parents/caregivers early in this practice change are necessary for success.

Bacteremia From a Presumed Urinary Source in Hospitalized Adults With Asymptomatic Bacteriuria

Guidelines recommend withholding antibiotics in asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), including among patients with altered mental status (AMS) and no systemic signs of infection. However, ASB treatment remains common. To determine prevalence and factors associated with bacteremia from a presumed urinary source in inpatients with ASB with or without AMS and estimate antibiotics avoided if a 2% risk of bacteremia were used as a threshold to prompt empiric antibiotic treatment of ASB. This cohort study assessed patients hospitalized to nonintensive care with ASB (no immune compromise or concomitant infections) in 68 Michigan hospitals from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2022. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to January 2023. The primary outcome was prevalence of bacteremia from a presumed urinary source (ie, positive blood culture with matching organisms within 3 days of urine culture). To determine factors associated with bacteremia, we used multivariable logistic regression models. We estimated each patient's risk of bacteremia and determined what percentage of patients empirically treated with antibiotics had less than 2% estimated risk of bacteremia. Of 11 590 hospitalized patients with ASB (median [IQR] age, 78.2 [67.7-86.6] years; 8595 female patients [74.2%]; 2235 African American or Black patients [19.3%], 184 Hispanic patients [1.6%], and 8897 White patients [76.8%]), 8364 (72.2%) received antimicrobial treatment for UTI, and 161 (1.4%) had bacteremia from a presumed urinary source. Only 17 of 2126 patients with AMS but no systemic signs of infection (0.7%) developed bacteremia. On multivariable analysis, male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.02-2.05), hypotension (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.18-2.93), 2 or more systemic inflammatory response criteria (aOR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.21-2.46), urinary retention (aOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.18-2.96), fatigue (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.08-2.17), log of serum leukocytosis (aOR, 3.38; 95% CI, 2.48-4.61), and pyuria (aOR, 3.31; 95% CI, 2.10-5.21) were associated with bacteremia. No single factor was associated with more than 2% risk of bacteremia. If 2% or higher risk of bacteremia were used as a cutoff for empiric antibiotics, antibiotic exposure would have been avoided in 78.4% (6323 of 8064) of empirically treated patients with low risk of bacteremia. In patients with ASB, bacteremia from a presumed urinary source was rare, occurring in less than 1% of patients with AMS. A personalized, risk-based approach to empiric therapy could decrease unnecessary ASB treatment.

91. Implementation of a blood culture algorithm in emergency department patients as a diagnostic stewardship intervention

Abstract Background Blood cultures (BCx) are commonly ordered for patients at low risk of bacteremia. Liberal ordering can increase false-positive results due to contamination, along with increasing length of stay, excess antibiotics, and unnecessary diagnostic procedures. We implemented an algorithm for appropriate blood culture obtainment (Figure 1) in an academic tertiary care emergency department (ED) and assessed the intervention’s impact on various operational, clinical, and safety metrics.Figure 1:ED Blood culture algorithm Methods We performed a prospective cohort study in the Duke University Hospital ED from 12/2022 to 3/2023 using historical controls from 12/2020-11/2022. The BCx algorithm was disseminated in-person, electronically, and accessible online. Weekly chart review of all eligible patients for algorithm adherence was completed by 7 ED clinicians with monthly feedback provided to all ED providers. We defined a BCx event as 1 or more BCx sets within 24 hours. We excluded patients < 18 years, absolute neutrophil count < 500 109/L, and heart and lung transplant recipients. We measured BCx order volume, indication, algorithm adherence, BCx positivity rate, antibiotic days of therapy (DOT), and 30-day hospital readmission. Results Average monthly BCx volume was 1387 pre-intervention compared to 1226 post-intervention (p= 0.046). An increase in culture positivity was see post-intervention with a rate of 13.9% compared to 11.23% in the pre-intervention group (Figure 2, p< 0.001). The majority of the 2168 BCx adhered to the algorithm. (Figure 3). The most common reasons for non-adherence were isolated fever or leukocytosis (29%), non-severe community-acquired pneumonia or healthcare-associated pneumonia (6.9%) and non-severe cellulitis (4%). No change in DOT (786 vs. 783 days of therapy per 1000 patient days, p-value 0.85) (Figure 4) or monthly 30-day hospital readmission (21.1% vs 19.6%, p-value 0.30) was observed.Figure 2:Blood cultures drawn per month and % appropriate pre/post-intervention (N=2168)Figure 3:Algorithm Adherent vs. Algorithm Non-Adherent blood cultures per month (N=2168)Figure 4:Emergency Department anti-bacterial days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient days Conclusion Introduction of a BCx algorithm in an academic tertiary care ED, resulted in a decrease in BCx volume, increase in BCx positivity rate, and no increase in DOT or readmission was observed. (Table 1)Table 1:Blood culture volume, positivity rate, days of antibiotic therapy, and 30-day readmission Disclosures Jessica Seidelman, MD, MPH, Uptodate: content editor for pelvic osteomyelitis page

Implementation of diagnostic stewardship in two surgical ICUs: Time for a blood-culture change

Background: Blood cultures are commonly ordered for patients with low risk of bacteremia. Liberal blood-culture ordering increases the risk of false-positive results, which can lead to increased length of stay, excess antibiotics, and unnecessary diagnostic procedures. We implemented a blood-culture indication algorithm with data feedback and assessed the impact on ordering volume and percent positivity. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study from February 2022 to November 2022 using historical controls from February 2020 to January 2022. We introduced the blood-culture algorithm (Fig. 1) in 2 adult surgical intensive care units (ICUs). Clinicians reviewed charts of eligible patients with blood cultures weekly to determine whether the blood-culture algorithm was followed. They provided feedback to the unit medical directors weekly. We defined a blood-culture event as ≥1 blood culture within 24 hours. We excluded patients aged <18 years, absolute neutrophil count <500, and heart and lung transplant recipients at the time of blood-culture review. Results: In total, 7,315 blood-culture events in the preintervention group and 2,506 blood-culture events in the postintervention group met eligibility criteria. The average monthly blood-culture rate decreased from 190 blood cultures per 1,000 patient days to 142 blood cultures per 1,000 patient days (P < .01) after the algorithm was implemented. (Fig. 2) The average monthly blood-culture positivity increased from 11.7% to 14.2% (P = .13). Average monthly days of antibiotic therapy (DOT) was lower in the postintervention period than in the preintervention period (2,200 vs 1,940; P < .01). (Fig. 3) The ICU length of stay did not change before the intervention compared to after the intervention: 10 days (IQR, 5–18) versus 10 days (IQR, 5–17; P = .63). The in-hospital mortality rate was lower during the postintervention period, but the difference was not statistically significant: 9.24% versus 8.34% (P = .17). The all-cause 30-day mortality was significantly lower during the intervention period: 11.9% versus 9.7% (P < .01). The unplanned 30-day readmission percentage was significantly lower during the intervention period (10.6% vs 7.6%; P < .01). Over the 9-month intervention, we reviewed 916 blood-culture events in 452 unique patients. Overall, 74.6% of blood cultures followed the algorithm. The most common reasons overall for ordering blood cultures were severe sepsis or septic shock (37%), isolated fever and/or leukocytosis (19%), and documenting clearance of bacteremia (15%) (Table 1). The most common indications for inappropriate blood cultures were isolated fever and/or leukocytosis (53%). Conclusions: We introduced a blood-culture algorithm with data feedback in 2 surgical ICUs and observed decreases in blood-culture volume without a negative impact on ICU LOS or mortality rate.Disclosure: None

Evaluation of interprovider consistency in interpretation of blood culture guidelines at an academic medical center

Background: Blood cultures are a fundamental tool in the diagnosis of infections, but they can lead to clinical confusion and waste resources when they yield false results. To optimize blood-culture orders at our institution, we developed an evidence-based clinical guideline (Fig. 1) to be used by frontline providers on nonneutropenic hospitalized adult inpatients. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients with positive blood cultures to evaluate whether frontline providers and infectious diseases (ID) attending physicians were able to consistently interpret the guidelines to determine whether blood cultures were drawn appropriately. Methods: In total, 95 nonneutropenic adults with an initial positive blood culture collected while on an inpatient unit were identified through a query of the electronic medical record from January 2021 through June 2022. Patients with polymicrobial bacteremia and bacteremia due to Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and gram-positive rods were excluded. Moreover, 4 medical resident physicians reviewed all patients and 2 ID attending physicians reviewed one-quarter of cases; all were blinded to the culture results. Blood cultures were determined to be either appropriately or inappropriately performed based on our institution’s guideline. The free-marginal multirater κ statistics with 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate interrater agreement. Results: Baseline patient demographics are shown in Table 1. Immune compromise without neutropenia was noted in 21 of 95 patients. Most patients were at high risk for bacteremia (72%) per our institutional guideline, most of whom were septic (67.7%). Low risk for bacteremia was found in only 12.3% of reviews. Medical resident physicians, ID attending physicians, and all reviewers combined agreed on whether blood cultures were drawn appropriately or inappropriately (84.2%, 92%, and 86.4% agreement rates, respectively). The free-marginal κ statistic was highest for ID attending physicians (0.84; 95% CI, 0.62–0.78), followed by attending physicians and resident physicians combined (0.73; 95% CI, 0.56–0.90), and resident physicians alone (0.68; 95% CI, 0.58–0.78). In the 21 patients with immune compromise, the agreement rates on blood culture appropriateness remained high among all reviewers, resident physicians, and ID attending physicians were 86.6%, 90.5%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: In our retrospective study of nonneutropenic hospitalized adult inpatients, frontline providers and ID attending physicians interpreted blood-culture guidelines consistently, largely agreeing on which patients had cultures drawn appropriately. Agreement among ID attending physicians was excellent and remained substantial among medical resident physicians. Guidelines on the appropriate use of blood cultures are vital to limiting unnecessarily collected cultures, which can lead to extended length of stay and increase cost across hospital systems. Further analyses on the clinical impact of this guideline are ongoing.Disclosures: None

Assessing a standardized decision-making algorithm for blood culture collection in the intensive care unit

PurposeBlood cultures are commonly ordered for patients with low risk of bacteremia. Indications for obtaining blood cultures are often broad and ill defined, and decision algorithms for appropriate blood cultures have not been comprehensively evaluated in critically-ill populations. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the frequency of inappropriate blood cultures in the ICUs at Montefiore Medical Center based on an evidence-based guidance algorithm. Blood cultures were reviewed against this algorithm to determine their appropriateness. We calculated the prevalence of inappropriate blood culture and explored the reasons for these collected cultures. Results300 patients were randomly selected from an initial cohort of 3370 patients. 294 patients were included and of these, 167 patients had at least 1 blood culture drawn. 125 patients had one or more inappropriate blood culture. 61.4% of blood cultures drawn were assessed to be inappropriate. The most common reason for inappropriate cultures was a culture drawn as a result of isolated fever or leukocytosis. ConclusionIn a cohort of critically-ill patients, inappropriate blood cultures were common. The indications for blood cultures are often not evidence-based, and evidence-based algorithms to guide the collection of blood cultures may offer a way to decrease inappropriate culture orders.

The role of systemic diseases and local conditions as risk factors.

The role of systemic diseases and local conditions as risk factors.

Validation of a predictive model for bacteraemia (MPB5-Toledo) in the patients seen in emergency departments due to infections

ObjectiveTo validate a simple risk score to predict bacteremia (MPB5-Toledo) in patients seen in the emergency departments (ED) due to infections. MethodsProspective and multicenter observational cohort study of the blood cultures (BC) ordered in 74 Spanish ED for adults (aged 18 or older) seen from October 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020.The predictive ability of the model was analyzed with the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The prognostic performance for true bacteremia was calculated with the cut-off values chosen for getting the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. ResultsA total of 3.843 blood samples wered cultured. True cases of bacteremia were confirmed in 839 (21.83%). The remaining 3.004 cultures (78.17%) were negative. Among the negative, 172 (4.47%) were judged to be contaminated. Low risk for bacteremia was indicated by a score of 0–2 points, intermediate risk by 3–5 points, and high risk by 6–8 points. Bacteremia in these 3 risk groups was predicted for 1.5%, 16.8%, and 81.6%, respectively. The model’s area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.930 (95% CI, 0.916−0.948). The prognostic performance with a model’s cut-off value of ≥5 points achieved 94.76% (95% CI: 92.97−96.12) sensitivity, 81.56% (95% CI: 80.11−82.92) specificity, and negative predictive value of 98.24% (95% CI: 97.62−98.70). ConclusionThe 5MPB-Toledo score is useful for predicting bacteremia in patients attended in hospital emergency departments for infection.

Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study

ObjectivesTo develop predictive models for blood culture (BC) outcomes in an emergency department (ED) setting.DesignRetrospective observational study.SettingED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 1 September 2018 and...

Outpatient and oral management is suitable for infants 60-90days old with urinary tract infections at low risk of bacteremia.

One previous study recommended oral and outpatient management for those infants aged 60-90days with urinary tract infection (UTI) meeting the low-risk criteria identified: to be well-appearing and to have a procalcitonin value of < 0.7ng/mL. A retrospective study was conducted, including infants aged 29 to 90days with UTI from 2014 to 2019, to validate these low-risk criteria identified and determine the adherence to the new algorithm for managing these patients at the Emergency Department. Two hundred one patients were included; 105 (52.2%) were aged 60 to 90days. Twelve (6%, 95% CI 3.4-10.1%) had bacteremia. One hundred thirty-six (67.7%) infants met low-risk criteria; none had a positive blood culture (0%, 95% CI 0-2.7%). Overall protocol adherence was 90.6%. One hundred and forty-four (71.6%) infants were admitted to the hospital; all patients meeting high-risk criteria were hospitalized. Among the 57 (28.4%) infants initially sent home, 4 (7.0%) required later hospital admission.Conclusions: A prediction rule including general appearance and procalcitonin is highly accurate in identifying young infants with UTI at low risk for bacteremia. Outpatient management with appropriate follow-up is safe for these infants. What is Known: • Patients under 2-3 months of age with a presumptive urinary tract infection (UTI) are commonly hospitalized because of concerns regarding concomitant bacteremia. What is New: • A prediction rule including general appearance and procalcitonin is highly accurate in identifying young infants with UTI at low risk for bacteremia. Outpatient management with appropriate follow-up is safe for these infants.

Validación del modelo predictivo de bacteriemia (5MPB-Toledo) en los pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias por infección

ObjectiveTo validate a simple risk score to predict bacteremia (MPB5-Toledo) in patients seen in the emergency departments (ED) due to infections. MethodsProspective and multicenter observational cohort study of the blood cultures (BC) ordered in 74 Spanish ED for adults (aged 18 or older) seen from from October 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020.The predictive ability of the model was analyzed with the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The prognostic performance for true bacteremia was calculated with the cut-off values chosen for getting the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. ResultsA total of 3.843 blood samples wered cultured. True cases of bacteremia were confirmed in 839 (21.83%). The remaining 3.004 cultures (78.17%) were negative. Among the negative, 172 (4.47%) were judged to be contaminated. Low risk for bacteremia was indicated by a score of 0 to 2 points, intermediate risk by 3 to 5 points, and high risk by 6 to 8 points. Bacteremia in these 3 risk groups was predicted for 1.5%, 16.8%, and 81.6%, respectively. The model's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.930 (95% CI, 0.916-0.948). The prognostic performance with a model's cut-off value of ≥ 5 points achieved 94.76% (95% CI: 92.97-96.12) sensitivity, 81.56% (95% CI: 80.11-82.92) specificity, and negative predictive value of 98.24% (95% CI: 97.62-98.70). ConclusionThe 5MPB-Toledo score is useful for predicting bacteremia in patients attended in hospital emergency departments for infection.

Practices, Perceptions, and Attitudes in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Children for Bacteremia: A National Survey.

Sending blood cultures in children at low risk of bacteremia can contribute to a cascade of unnecessary antibiotic exposure, adverse effects, and increased costs. We aimed to describe practice variation, clinician beliefs, and attitudes about blood culture testing in critically ill children. Cross-sectional electronic survey. Fifteen PICUs enrolled in the Blood Culture Improvement Guidelines and Diagnostic Stewardship for Antibiotic Reduction in Critically Ill Children collaborative, an investigation of blood culture use in critically ill children in the United States. PICU clinicians (bedside nurses, resident physicians, fellow physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and attending physicians). None. Survey items explored typical blood culture practices, attitudes and beliefs about cultures, and potential barriers to changing culture use in a PICU setting. Fifteen of 15 sites participated, with 347 total responses, 15-45 responses per site, and an overall median response rate of 57%. We summarized median proportions and interquartile ranges of respondents who reported certain practices or beliefs: 86% (73-91%) report that cultures are ordered reflexively; 71% (61-77%) do not examine patients before ordering cultures; 90% (86-94%) obtain cultures for any new fever in PICU patients; 33% (19-61%) do not obtain peripheral cultures when an indwelling catheter is in place; and 64% (36-81%) sample multiple (vs single) lumens of central venous catheters for new fever. When asked about barriers to reducing unnecessary cultures, 80% (73-90%) noted fear of missing sepsis. Certain practices (culture source and indication) varied by clinician type. Obtaining surveillance cultures and routinely culturing all possible sources (each lumen of indwelling catheters and peripheral specimens) are positively correlated with baseline blood culture rates. There is variation in blood culture practices in the PICU. Fear and reflexive habits are common drivers of cultures. These practices may contribute to over-testing for bacteremia. Further investigation of how to optimize blood culture use is warranted.

Admit Versus Discharge—A Cost Analysis of Infants 29 to 60 Days Old With Febrile Urinary Tract Infection at Low Risk for Bacteremia

BackgroundNinety percent of infants 29 to 60 days old presenting to the emergency department with fever and urinary tract infection are admitted due to fear of concomitant bacteremia. Many of these infants are at low risk for bacteremia and can be safely discharged with no heightened risk of adverse events. This study sought to estimate the potential savings from outpatient management of low-risk infants. MethodsA comparative cost analysis was performed using bacteremia probability estimates from a previously published prediction model. We estimated costs using a national pediatric database coupled with retrospective chart review of infants who presented to our emergency department between 2011 and 2015. ResultsThe relative cost savings for the discharge strategy were $80,333 ($19,127 vs $99,460; 80% savings) for each patient with bacteremia and $257,073 per 100 patients overall. Similar savings were found for charges—$304,949 ($71,421 vs $376,371; 80%) for each patient with bacteremia and $975,838 per 100 patients. Our institutional reimbursements provided an estimated savings of $148,924 ($73,280 vs. $222,204; 67%) and $476,533 per 100 patients overall. ConclusionsThe relative cost savings from discharging rather than admitting low-risk infants with febrile urinary tract infection were significant, even accounting for expenditures associated with the return emergency room visit of initially discharged bacteremic patients. These savings are achievable without an increase in adverse events. Similar outcomes were demonstrated for hospital charges and reimbursements, further strengthening these results. This study emphasizes how risk stratification in clinical decision-making can lead to substantial cost savings without compromising patient outcomes.

Inpatient versus Outpatient Management of Infants 29-60 Days of Age with Presumed Pyelonephritis at Low Risk for Bacteremia: A Cost Analysis

Inpatient versus Outpatient Management of Infants 29-60 Days of Age with Presumed Pyelonephritis at Low Risk for Bacteremia: A Cost Analysis

Mo1230 Low Risk of Bacteremia After Endoscopic Ultrasound With Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mo1230 Low Risk of Bacteremia After Endoscopic Ultrasound With Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chills During Hemodialysis: Prediction and Prevalence of Bacterial Infections – A Retrospective Cohort Study

IntroductionChills are a complication of patients undergoing hemodialysis. The rate of infection among hemodialysis patients presenting with chills is not well established, and empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics are usually the rule. MethodsWe performed a retrospective study aiming to assess the rates of infection and bacteremia in hemodialysis patients presenting with chills. We evaluated risk factors for infection and bacteremia and tested a prediction model for infection. ResultsOverall, 269 hemodialysis patients with a first episode of chills were included. Ninety patients (33.5%) had bacteremia and 162 (60.2%) had an infection. Risk factors for bacteremia in multivariate analysis included fever (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.3; P = .009) and vascular catheter as dialysis access (OR 6.2; 95% CI, 3.2-12.0, P <.001). Leukocytosis was an additional risk factor in multivariate analysis for any type of infection (OR 1.265; 95% CI, 1.113-1.438; P <.001). Using a prediction model to evaluate patients without obvious source of infection, we found that patients with fistula or graft as their access, without fever, abnormal leukocytes, or hypoalbuminemia, had a low rate (1/17, 6%) of bacteremia. ConclusionsHemodialysis patients presenting with chills during dialysis, with or without fever, have high rates (∼60%) of infection. Patients with no obvious source of infection, with fistula or graft as access, presenting without fever, leukocytosis, or hypoalbuminemia have low risk for bacteremia and may be investigated without prompt antibiotic treatment. All other patients should receive antibiotic coverage immediately following a chills episode.

Mortality in intensive care: The impact of bacteremia and the utility of systemic inflammatory response syndrome

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of bacteremia on intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and to develop a bacteremia prediction tool using systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Patients included those aged >18 years who had blood cultures taken in the ICU from January 1, 2011-December 31, 2013. Eligible patients were identified from microbiology records of the Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Scotland. Clinical and outcome data were gathered from ICU records. Patients with clinically significant bacteremia were matched to controls using propensity scores. SIRS criteria were gathered and used to create decision rules to predict the absence of bacteremia. The main outcome was mortality at ICU discharge. The utility of the decision tools was measured using sensitivity and specificity. One hundred patients had a clinically significant positive blood culture and were matched to 100 controls. Patients with bacteremia had higher ICU mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.35; P = .001) and longer ICU stay (OR, 17.0 vs 7.8 days; P ≤ .001). Of 1,548 blood culture episodes, 1,274 met ≥2 SIRS criteria (106 significant positive cultures and 1,168 negative cultures). There was no association between SIRS criteria and positive blood cultures (P = .11). A decision rule using 3 SIRS criteria had optimal predictive performance (sensitivity, 56%; specificity, 50%) but low accuracy. ICU patients with bacteremia have increased mortality and length of ICU stay. SIRS criteria cannot be used to identify patients at low risk of bacteremia.

Low risk of bacteremia after endoscopic variceal therapy for esophageal varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and study aims: Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy (EVS) are the main therapeutic procedures for the emergency treatment and secondary prophylaxis of esophageal varices in cirrhotics. Post-endoscopic bacteremia has been reported after EVS and EVL, but data on the frequency of bacteremia are conflicting. This study aims to provide incidences of bacteremia after EVS and EVL in different settings through meta-analysis. Methods: Only prospective or randomized studies were included in this meta-analysis. Binomial distribution was used to compute variance for each study. Random effects models were used as the final model for estimating the effect size and 95 % confidence interval. Adjusted effects were obtained using meta-regression analysis. Results: Nineteen prospective studies involving 1001 procedures in 587 patients were included in the meta-analysis on the risk of bacteremia after EVS or EVL in cirrhotics with esophageal varices. The frequency of bacteremia after endoscopic variceal therapy was 13 %. The frequency of bacteremia after EVS (17 %) was higher than after EVL (6 %) with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.106). The frequency of bacteremia after elective EVS (14 %) was significantly less than after emergency EVS (22 %) (P < 0.001). The frequency of bacteremia after elective EVL (7.6 %) was not significantly different from after emergency EVL (3.2 %) (P = 0.850). Conclusions: The incidence of bacteremia is low in patients with cirrhosis and varices after esophageal variceal therapy. These results are consistent with our current guidelines that antibiotic prophylaxis before endoscopic variceal therapy is only necessary for bleeding patients.

An external validation study of a clinical prediction rule for medical patients with suspected bacteraemia

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to externally validate a clinical prediction rule (CPR)—the ‘Shapiro criteria’—to predict bacteraemia in an acute medical unit (AMU).MethodsProspectively collected data, retrospectively evaluated over 11...

A single-center evaluation of the risk for colonization or bacteremia with piperacillin-tazobactam- and cefepime-resistant bacteria in patients with acute leukemia receiving fluoroquinolone prophylaxis.

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is indicated to prevent neutropenic fever in patients with acute leukemia. However, fluoroquinolone use has been associated with development of multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended spectrum β-lactamase producing gram-negative bacilli. Due to a presumed risk of multi-drug resistance associated with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, patients admitted to our hospital with neutropenic fever receive empiric carbapenem therapy until cultures are negative for 72 h or identification of an organism. Our study seeks to identify the incidence of multi-drug-resistant organism colonization and bacteremia among patients who receive fluoroquinolone prophylaxis and to evaluate duration of empiric carbapenem therapy. A retrospective review of adult patients with acute leukemia receiving a fluoroquinolone as outpatient infection prophylaxis, admitted to our tertiary cancer center for treatment of neutropenic fever was completed. Surveillance and blood cultures were reviewed for antibiotic resistance. Duration of empiric carbapenem therapy was reviewed. One hundred patients and 177 admissions for neutropenic fever were included. Six patients harbored a piperacillin-tazobactam-resistant organism found during routine surveillance. Among these patients, two bacteremias were identified, one of which was a piperacillin-tazobactam-resistant organism. Five bacteremias were identified among 83 patients with negative surveillance cultures. Among the bloodstream infections, five organisms isolated were fluoroquinolone resistant. No cefepime-resistant organism was isolated on surveillance or bloodstream cultures. Adherence to the institution guideline of narrowing antibiotics after 72 h of negative cultures occurred in only 13% of neutropenic fever cases. The average duration of carbapenem therapy in 177 neutropenic fever episodes was 4.4 days. Our findings show that among our patient population, there is a low risk of bacteremia with a piperacillin-tazobactam-resistant or cefepime-resistant organism. However, prompt de-escalation of carbapenem therapy needs to be reiterated within hospital practice.