Extant photosynthetic organisms all appear to use transmembrane H + fluxes as the coupling agent in the use of light energy in ATP synthesis. In the steady-state there is a large H + free energy difference across the coupling membrane, and when this is reflected as a light-induced change in pH of the phase (cytosol or stroma) containing the enzymes of carbon assimilation, the H + transport can have an informational role in activating and inactivating enzymes. The earliest organisms probably lived fermentatively (substrate-level phosphorylation) in an anaerobic environment provided with organic solutes synthesised abiotically. There are good reasons for believing that one of the earliest primary active transport systems (interconverting chemical and electrical/osmotic energy) was an H + extrusion pump powered by ATP or PP i. Its initial function was extrusion of excess H + from the fermenting cells, and the support of a number of co-transport processes. The earliest energetic use of light energy is envisaged as being the energization of an alternative H + extrusion pump, with bacteriorhodopsin or (bacterio-) chlorophyll as the pigment. The former type of cyclic photoredox system ( Halobacterium-type) is simpler than the latter: a “pre-respiratory” chemical redox H + pump may have preceded the (bacterio-) chlorophyll-based process. Any of these H + pumps could spare the use of fermentative ATP in powering active H + efflux and would thus have been favoured as fermentative substrates became scarce; eventually the larger Δ μ H + generated by the light-powered H + pump was used to drive the ATP-powered H + pump backwards and thus generate ATP with light as the ultimate energy source. Scarcity of suitable reductants for biosynthesis as life proliferated provided a selective impetus for a non-cyclic photoredox system which could use light energy to generate a low-potential reductant at the expense of more readily available higher-potential reductants. The non-cyclic photoredox system is not possible in its simplest form (with all the redox energy coming from excitation energy of one or more photoreactions) in the bacteriorhodopsin line of evolution. Such a simple photoredox system is found in the Chlorobiaceae; even if (as seems likely) the non-cyclic photoredox process generates a Δ μ H + (and thus, potentially, ATP), some of the ATP needed for CO 2 fixation and cell growth must be generated by a cyclic photoredox system. In the extant purple bacteria the generation of low-potential reductant involves a non-cyclic photoredox pathway which produces a reductant unable to reduce NAD +; the “energy gap” is spanned by “reverse electron transfer” which uses energy from a Δ μ H + . It is not clear if this energetic requirement for the H + gradient can be quantitatively satisfied from a non-cyclic photoredox H + transport; it is certain that there is a major requirement for cyclic photoredox H + pumping in these organisms. The photosynthetic bacteria are today restricted to reducing (low E h ) environments similar to those found in the early, anoxic earth; they are unable to use very weak reductants as donors for non-cyclic photoredox processes. As the sources of even weakly reducing donors (other than H 2O) on the primitive earth were depleted the two photoreactions scheme of extant O 2-producers evolved by modification of the bacterial photoreaction. This non-cyclic photoredox process is definitely H +-translocating and the role of cyclic photoredox processes in ATP generation in O 2-evolvers is smaller than in photosynthetic bacteria. In parallel with the biochemical and biophysical changes in the photosystems there was a morphological evolution, with an increasing tendency for “internalisation” of the photoredox processes (originally present in the plasma membrane, as in extant Chlorobineae) into thylakoids (as in most Rhodospirillineae, Cyanobacteria and in all eukaryotes). With a plasmalemma-located photoredox system, and the constraints of a fixed, alkaline external pH and the cytoplasmic pH of 7–8, the Δ μ H + would be generated largely as an electrical P.D. The presence of a phase (intrathylakoid space) with a “negotiable pH” would permit the generation and use of a Δ μ H + largely present as a pH gradient. In both cases illumination can cause an increase in cytoplasmic (stromal) pH over the dark value; this is an important aspect of the regulation of “phototrophic” and “heterotrophic” enzyme systems in the light and in the dark. However, it is argued that these differences in pH are not absolutely light-dependent unless they depend upon some more uniquely light-dependent signal, probably based on a redox component only generated in the light.
Read full abstract