Lower Oswestry Disability Index Research Articles

Long Term Outcomes of Pain, Disability and Quality of Life in Open vs Minimally Invasive Surgery of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes—specifically in terms of pain, disability, and quality of life—between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. Study Design and Setting: A prospective cohort study was carried out at Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Karachi, and a teaching institution in South Asia. The study included patients with chronic back pain for over three months, unresponsive to medical treatment or accompanied by radicular symptoms, with MRI-confirmed grade I and II degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, lateral recess stenosis, and unilateral disc herniation. Patients with spinal metastasis, previous surgeries, inflammatory arthritis, or metabolic bone diseases were excluded. Methodology: The outcomes of MIS-TLIF and open-TLIF were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-36 quality of life scores at 1, 6, and 24 months postoperatively. Results: Among 93 patients, 35 underwent open-TLIF and 58 received MIS-TLIF. MIS-TLIF resulted in significantly less blood loss and faster recovery. At four weeks, the MIS group had lower VAS and ODI scores, and higher SF-36 scores. Similar trends continued at six months, with improvements in ODI and SF-36. By 24 months, the MIS group maintained lower ODI scores, though VAS and SF-36 scores were comparable. Conclusion: MIS-TLIF shows superior outcomes, especially in the early postoperative phase, with reduced morbidity and improved quality of life, making it a preferable option in resource-limited settings.

Discogenic chronic low back pain management: intradiscal radiofrequency biacuplasty versus conservative treatment

BackgroundThis prospective bicentric study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intradiscal radiofrequency biacuplasty (IDB) versus conservative management (CM) in treating chronic discogenic low back pain (CDLBP).MethodsForty-four patients with CDLBP were randomly assigned to either the biacuplasty group or the conservative management group. The biacuplasty group received treatment with two radiofrequency (RF) needles, positioned bilaterally on the annulus fibrosus under fluoroscopic guidance and local anaesthesia, to administer bipolar RF. Patients were monitored for 6 months, with the allowance of pain medication as needed. In the conservative management group, patients who continued to experience low back pain after three months were permitted to switch to the biacuplasty group. The study was conducted over two years, starting on July 1, 2020.ResultsThe studied groups had comparable age and gender distributions, with no significant difference in BMI. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. At baseline, no significant difference was observed between the groups (p = 0.263). However, at the 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up, the biacuplasty group exhibited significantly lower ODI scores compared to the conservative management group (all p < 0.001), indicating that biacuplasty was more effective in reducing disability caused by chronic low back pain.ConclusionsIntradiscal radiofrequency biacuplasty is a minimally invasive interventional technique that has proven effective for patients with CDLBP who do not respond to conservative management.

Impact of Lumbar Fusion Internal Fixation on Lumbar Disc Herniation in Young Patients: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND Lumbar fusion and internal fixation techniques have shown promise in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH), yet the impact on lumbar function in young patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of lumbar fusion on lumbar function in young patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 330 patients diagnosed with LDH admitted to our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a control group (n=264) that underwent a minimally invasive procedure with a keyhole lens, and a research group (n=66) that underwent lumbar fusion internal fixation. Clinical features and therapeutic outcomes were assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Lumbar Scores before surgery and 12 months postoperatively. Additionally, intervertebral space height, degree of vertebral spondylolisthesis (grades I, II, and III), incidence of adverse effects, and treatment efficacy were measured pre-and post-surgically. RESULTS No significant difference in ODI and JOA scores was found between the groups before surgery (P>0.05). Postoperatively, the research group had lower ODI scores, higher JOA scores, and lower intervertebral space heights compared to the control group (P=0.001). While grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis showed slight improvement (P>0.05), a significant difference was observed in grade III spondylolisthesis between the 2 groups (P=0.001). Additionally, the research group had a lower incidence of adverse effects (P=0.049) and higher treatment efficacy, although the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar fusion with internal fixation produced better postoperative outcomes and fewer adverse effects than minimally invasive procedures in young patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Efficacy of using autologous cells with graft substitutes for spinal fusion surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and imaging features.

Over the past several decades, there has been a notable increase in the total number of spinal fusion procedures worldwide. Advanced spinal fusion techniques, surgical approaches, and new alternatives in grafting materials and implants, as well as autologous cellular therapies, have been widely employed for treating spinal diseases. While the potential of cellular therapies to yield better clinical results is appealing, supportive data are needed to confirm this claim. This meta-analysis aims to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes between graft substitutes with autologous cell therapies and graft substitutes alone. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies comparing graft substitutes with autologous cell therapies and graft substitutes alone up to February 2024. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated using the Downs and Black checklist. The following outcomes were extracted for comparison: fusion success, complications/adverse events, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Thirteen studies involving 836 patients were included, with 7 studies considered for the meta-analysis. Results indicated that the use of graft substitutes with autologous cell therapies demonstrated higher fusion success rates at 3, 6, and 12 months, lower VAS score at 6 months, and lower ODI score at 3, 6, and 12 months. The complication rate was similar between graft substitutes with autologous cell therapies and graft substitutes alone. Although the current literature remains limited, this meta-analysis suggests that the incorporation of cellular therapies such as bone marrow and platelet derivatives with graft substitutes is associated with a higher fusion rate and significant improvements in functional status and pain following spinal fusion. Future well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to definitively assess the clinical effectiveness of cellular therapies in spinal fusion.

Predictors of patient satisfaction after surgery for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 5-year analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.

Lumbar decompression and/or fusion surgery is a common operation for symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis refractory to conservative management. Multiyear follow-up of patient outcomes can be difficult to obtain but allows for identification of preoperative patient characteristics associated with durable pain relief, improved functional outcome, and higher patient satisfaction. A query of the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) low-grade spondylolisthesis module for patients who underwent surgery for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis (from July 2014 to June 2016 at the 12 highest-enrolling sites) was used to identify patient satisfaction, as measured with the North American Spine Society (NASS) questionnaire, which uses a scale of 1-4. Patients were considered satisfied if they had a score ≤ 2. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify baseline demographic and clinical predictors of long-term satisfaction 5 years after surgery. Of 573 eligible patients from a cohort of 608, patient satisfaction data were available for 81.2%. Satisfaction (NASS score of 1 or 2) was reported by 389 patients (83.7%) at 5-year follow-up. Satisfied patients were predominantly White and ambulation independent and had lower baseline BMI, lower back pain levels, lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and greater EQ-5D index scores at baseline when compared to the unsatisfied group. No significant differences in reoperation rates between groups were reported at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, patients who were independently ambulating at baseline had greater odds of long-term satisfaction (OR 1.12, p = 0.04). Patients who had higher 5-year ODI scores (OR 0.99, p < 0.01) and were uninsured (OR 0.43, p = 0.01) were less likely to report long-term satisfaction. Lumbar surgery for the treatment of grade 1 spondylolisthesis can provide lasting pain relief with high patient satisfaction. Baseline independent ambulation is associated with a higher long-term satisfaction rate after surgery. Higher ODI scores at 5-year follow-up and uninsured status are associated with lower postoperative long-term satisfaction.

Minimally Invasive versus Traditional Surgery: Efficacy of PELD and PLIF in Treating Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis.

BACKGROUND Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is infection of the intervertebral disc or discs and the adjacent vertebrae. This retrospective study aimed to compare the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar debridement (PELD) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in 40 patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PSD). MATERIAL AND METHODS Medical records of patients who underwent PELD (n=18) or PLIF (n=22) for PSD between 2018 and 2023 were reviewed. The recorded outcomes encompassed surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) measurements, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, duration of hospitalization, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading, lumbar sagittal parameters, and the incidence of complications. RESULTS The PELD group had shorter surgical duration, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter length of hospital stay compared to the PLIF group (P<0.01). At the last follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in ESR, CRP levels, and ASIA classification (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The PELD group had lower ODI and VAS ratings at 1 month and 3 months, respectively (P<0.01). The PLIF group had significant improvements in intervertebral space height and lumbar lordosis angle (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Both PLIF and PELD surgical approaches demonstrate adequate clinical efficacy in the treatment of monosegmental PSD. PLIF can better ensure more spinal stability than PELD, but PELD offers advantages such as reduced minimal surgical trauma, shorter operative duration, and faster recovery after surgery.

Osteoporosis, spinal degenerative disorders, and their association with low back pain, activities of daily living, and physical performance in a general population

Osteoporosis, vertebral fractures, and spinal degenerative diseases are common conditions that often coexist in older adults. This study aimed to determine the factors influencing low back pain and its impact on activities of daily living (ADL) and physical performance in older individuals with multiple comorbidities. This cross-sectional study was part of a large-scale population-based cohort study in Japan, involving 1009 participants who underwent spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess cervical cord compression, radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis, and lumbar disc degeneration. Vertebral fractures in the thoracolumbar spine were evaluated using sagittal MRI with a semi-quantitative method. Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Low back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and physical performance tests, such as one-leg standing time, five times chair-stand time, maximum walking speed, and maximum step length, were assessed. Using clinical conditions as objective variables and image evaluation parameters as explanatory variables, multiple regression analysis showed that vertebral fractures were significantly associated with low back pain and ODI. Vertebral fractures and osteoporosis significantly impacted physical performance, whereas osteoporosis alone did not affect low back pain or ODI. Our findings contribute to new insights into low back pain and its impact on ADL and physical performance.

Impact of educational background on preoperative disease severity and postoperative outcomes among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Quality Outcomes Database study.

Deficiency in patient education has been correlated with increased disease-related morbidity and decreased access to care. However, the associations between educational level, preoperative disease severity, and postoperative outcomes in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis have yet to be explored. The spondylolisthesis dataset of the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD)-a cohort with prospectively collected data by the SpineCORe study team of the 12 highest enrolling sites with an 81% follow-up at 5 years -was utilized and stratified for educational level. Patients were classified into three categories (high school or less, graduate, or postgraduate). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) documented at baseline and follow-up included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, EQ-5D in quality-adjusted life years, and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for back and leg pain. Disease severity was measured with PROMs. Postoperatively, patients also completed the North American Spine Society assessment to measure their satisfaction with surgery. Multivariable regression analysis was used to compare education level with disease severity and postoperative outcomes. A total of 608 patients underwent analysis, with 260 individuals (42.8%) at an educational level of high school or less. On univariate analysis, baseline disease severity was worse among patients with lower levels of education. On multivariable regression analysis, patients with postgraduate level of education had significantly lower ODI scores (β = -3.75, 95% CI -7.31 to -0.2, p = 0.039) compared to graduates, while the other PROMs were not associated with significant differences at baseline. Five years postoperatively, patients from various educational backgrounds exhibited similar rates of minimal clinically important differences in PROMs. Nevertheless, patients with the lowest educational level had higher ODI scores (27.1, p < 0.01), lower EQ-5D scores (0.701, p < 0.01), and higher NRS leg pain (3.0, p < 0.01) and back pain (4.0, p < 0.01) scores compared to those with graduate or postgraduate levels of education. The odds for postoperative satisfaction were also comparable between cohorts at 5 years (reference, graduate level; high school or less, OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.46-1.64, p = 0.659; postgraduate, OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7-3.65, p = 0.262). Lower patient education level was associated with a greater baseline disease severity in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Surgery demonstrated similar benefits irrespective of educational background; however, individuals with lower educational level reported lower outcomes overall. This emphasizes the need for enhanced health literacy to mitigate disparities for reported outcomes.

Clinical effect of full endoscopic lumbar annulus fibrosus suture

PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of full endoscopic lumbar annulus fibrosus suture in the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation (LDH).MethodsThe clinical data of patients with single-segment LDH who underwent full endoscopic lumbar discectomy from January 2017 to January 2019 in our hospital were retrospectively analysed. Patients with full endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus suture were divided into group A, and those with simple full endoscopic lumbar discectomy were divided into group B. The general information, surgery-related data, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), modified MacNab score at the last follow-up, reoperation rate and recurrence were compared between the two groups.ResultsAll patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months, and the surgical time was 133.6 ± 9.6 min in group A and 129.0 ± 11.7 min in group B. The difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The blood loss of group A was higher than that of group B, and the difference was statistically significant when comparing the groups (p < 0.05). The postoperative symptoms of patients in both groups were significantly relieved, and the VAS score of low back pain and ODI index were significantly lower than the preoperative ones at all postoperative time points (1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery, and at the last follow-up) (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). The excellent rate of MacNab at the last follow-up in the two groups were 93.55% and 87.80%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the recurrence rate of group A was significantly lower than that of group B, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), while the difference between the reoperation rate of the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).ConclusionsFull endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus repair reduces the postoperative recurrence rate and achieves satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Surgical treatment of Roussouly type 1 with realigning Roussouly spinal shape and improving SRS-Schwab modifier: effect on minimal clinically important difference.

To evaluate outcomes of choosing different Roussouly shapes and improving in Schwab modifiers for surgical Roussouly type 1 patients. Baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) clinical data of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients presenting with Roussouly type 1 sagittal spinal alignment were isolated in the single-center spine database. Patients were grouped into Roussouly type 1, 2 and 3 with anteverted pelvis (3a) postoperatively. Schwab modifiers at BL and 2Y were categorized as follows: no deformity (0), moderate deformity (+), and severe deformity (++) for pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL). Improvement in SRS-Schwab was defined as a decrease in the severity of any modifier at 2Y. A total of 96 patients (69.9 years, 72.9% female, 25.2kg/m2) were included. At 2Y, there were 34 type 1 backs, 60 type 2 backs and only 2 type 3a. Type 1 and type 2 did not differ in rates of reaching 2Y minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores (all P > 0.05). Two patients who presented with type 3a had poor HRQOL scores. Analysis of Schwab modifiers showed that 41.7% of patients improved in SVA, 45.8% in PI-LL, and 36.5% in PT. At 2Y, patients who improved in SRS-Schwab PT and SVA had lower Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores and significantly more of them reached MCID for ODI (all P < 0.001). Patients who improved in SRS-Schwab SVA and PI-LL had more changes of VAS Back and Short Form-36 (SF-36) outcomes questionnaire physical component summary (SF-36 PCS), and significantly more reached MCID (all P < 0.001). By 2Y, type 2 patients who improved in SRS-Schwab grades reached MCID for VAS back and ODI at the highest rate (P = 0.003, P = 0.001, respectively), and type 1 patients who improved in SRS-Schwab grades reached MCID for SF-36 PCS at the highest rate (P < 0.001). For ASD patients classified as Roussouly type 1, postoperative improvement in SRS-Schwab grades reflected superior patient-reported outcomes while type 1 and type 2 did not differ in clinical outcomes at 2Y. However, development of type 3a should be avoided at the risk of poor functional outcomes. Utilizing both classification systems in surgical decision-making can optimize postoperative outcomes.

Efficacy of Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis With Single-Arm Analysis and Comparative Analysis With Microscopic Decompression and Uniportal Endoscopic Decompression.

Biportal endoscopic decompression is a minimally invasive surgical technique for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic decompression through both a single-arm analysis and a comparative analysis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify eligible studies reporting the outcomes of biportal endoscopic decompression for LSS. Single-arm analysis and comparisons with microscopic and uniportal endoscopic decompression were performed. Evaluated outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, operation time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, and adverse events. Single-arm analysis demonstrated significant improvements in VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, and ODI scores after biportal endoscopic decompression at postoperative 1-day to 36-month follow-up (all P < .001), compared with preoperative levels. The pooled mean single-level operation time was 71.44 min, and the pooled mean hospital stay was 3.63 days. The overall adverse event rate was 4.0%, with dural tear being the most common complication (3.0%). Compared with microscopic decompression, biportal endoscopic decompression showed significantly lower VAS back pain at 1-month ( P < .001) and 6-month ( P < .001) follow-up; lower VAS leg pain at 1-month ( P = .045) follow-up; lower ODI scores at 3-month ( P < .001), 12-month ( P = .017), and >12-month ( P = .007) follow-up; lower estimated blood loss ( P = .003); and shorter hospital stay ( P < .001). Adverse event rates did not differ between the techniques. No significant differences were observed between biportal endoscopic and uniportal endoscopic decompression groups for most efficacy and safety outcomes. Biportal endoscopic decompression emerges as a safe and effective alternative for LSS, presenting potential advantages over the microscopic technique and comparable efficacy with the uniportal endoscopic technique.

Clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease

BackgroundTo compare the early clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PE-PLIF) and modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MPLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).MethodsA total of 37 patients who underwent PE-PLIF and 58 patients who underwent MPLIF from March 2019 to January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative hospitalization time, and post-operative bedrest time were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of leg pain and low back pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were evaluated and compared before the operation, 3 days after the operation, 1 week after the operation, 1 month after the operation, 6 months after the operation and at the last follow-up. The modified MacNab’s criteria were applied at the last follow-up. The fusion rate and surgical-related complications during follow-up were recorded.ResultsThe average operation time in the PE-PLIF group was highly significant longer than that in the MPLIF group (P < 0.01). The intraoperative blood loss, post-operative hospitalization time, and post-operative bedrest time were significantly less in the PE-PLIF group than those in the MPLIF group (P < 0.01). There were highly significant differences in VAS scores of leg pain, VAS scores of low back pain, JOA scores, ODI scores at the last follow-up compared with those before the operation in the two groups (P < 0.01). Three days after the operation and 1 week after the operation, the VAS scores for low back pain and ODI were highly significant less in the PE-PLIF group than that in the MPLIF group (P < 0.01). Three days after the operation, the JOA scores were highly significant higher in the PE-PLIF group than that in the MPLIF group (P < 0.01). All patients showed intervertebral fusion at 6 months after the operation. Two patients (5.4%) in the PE-PLIF group experienced complications.ConclusionBoth PE-PLIF and MPLIF surgery were clinically effective and safe for patients with single-segment LDD. PE-PLIF surgery is a promising technique that can be used as an alternative treatment for single-segment LDD.

Effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave versus manual therapy in postpartum patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective clinical trial

ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (FESWT) in treating postpartum sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction.MethodsA total of 90 patients with SIJ dysfunction were included and randomly assigned to FESWT, manual therapy (MT), or combination therapy (CT) groups. Pain intensity and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were measured upon admission, after 1 and 2 weeks of treatments. The treatment efficacy and adverse events of each group were also assessed.ResultsThere were no significant differences among three groups regarding clinical data, pain intensity, and ODI score on admission (all P > 0.05). After 1 week of treatment, FESWT exhibited similar pain intensity and lower ODI score (P < 0.001) compared to MT. After 2 weeks of treatment, the pain and ODI in FESWT were similar with MT. The pain in CT was lower than MT after 1 week, but lower than FESWT after 2 weeks. Furthermore, we identified interaction effects between treatment method and duration in relation to pain intensity (Fgroup*time = 5.352, P = 0.001) and ODI score (Fgroup*time = 5.902, P < 0.001). FESWT group exhibited the highest improvement rate of 66.7%, while CT group achieved the highest cure rate of 73.3%. No adverse events were observed in any of the patients during 2 months follow-up period.ConclusionsCompared to MT, FESWT mainly reduced the ODI score rather than pain after 1 week of treatment. After 2 weeks, the effect of FESWT in relieving the pain was inferior to the MT.

The effect of length of sport experience on the prevalence of non-specific back pain and injury in soccer and ice hockey

Background: Back pain is one of the most common health problems not only in the general population but also in athletes. However, there is a lack of evidence-based findings on the dose-response effect of athletic training on back pain and injuries. The aim of this study was to determine whether training experience affects the intensity of back pain and the number of injuries in moderate-to-high performance team sport athletes. Methods: A total of 147 male soccer players (age 27.8 ± 5.9 y; training experience 17.2 ± 5.6 y) and 179 male ice hockey players (age 29.2 ± 5.9 y; training experience 20.5 ± 6.1 y) were asked to complete questionnaires focusing on back pain and injuries: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Results: Spearman correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations between length of training experience and the occurrence of thoracic pain (p=0.005), low back pain (p=0.016), thoracic injuries (p=0.006), and ODI (p=0.007) in soccer players. In hockey players, training duration was significantly correlated with low back pain (p&lt;0.001) and injuries (=0.006), ODI (p&lt;0.001), affective dimension (p&lt;0.001), evaluative dimension (p=0.002), miscellaneous dimension (p=0.027), and total MPQ (p=0.029). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the length of training experience is another important factor influencing low back pain. Therefore, it is necessary to focus more attention on more experienced players and to include significantly more compensatory exercises and recovery time in their training process.

The correlation between clinical symptom and morphological parameters on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with spondylolisthesis levels L4/L5 and L5/S1.

Spondylolisthesis is one of the common causes of spinal pain. There is currently a lack of studies on the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical symptoms of patients with spondylolisthesis. This study is aimed to find the correlation between clinical symptoms of L4/L5, L5/S1 lumbar spondylolisthesis, and imaging parameters on MRI. A retrospective study on 100 patients who were diagnosed with lumbar spondylolisthesis at the L4/L5, L5/S1 levels from August 2022 to February 2023. Parameters on MRI are measured the cross-sectional area of the dural sac (DSA), the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal (SCA), the ligamentum flavum cross-sectional area (LFA), and ligamentum flavum thickness (LFT), anterior-posterior diameter (APD), sliding distance (SD) at the spondylolisthesis level. Clinical symptoms were investigated according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for grading of pain and the subjective disability was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). There was no statistically significant difference between SD, APD, SCA, DSA, LFA, and LFT between the mild and moderate pain VAS and severe pain VAS groups. No correlation was found between VAS and SD, APD, SCA, DSA, LFA, and LFT. There is a negative correlation between ODI and APD, SCA, and DSA. The statistically significant difference in APD, SCA, and DSA indexes in the two groups with mild/moderate disability (ODI ≤40%) and the group with severe disability (ODI >40%). A higher DSA and SCA, APD are associated with lower ODI. Decreased APD, SCA, and DSA are all suggestive of decreased spinal function. However, the MRI findings did not correlate with the patient's clinical pain level.

Scale agreement, ceiling and floor effects, construct validity, and relative efficiency of the PROPr and EQ-5D-3L in low back pain patients

BackgroundThe PROMIS Preference score (PROPr) is a new health state utility (HSU) score that aims to comprehensively incorporate the biopsychosocial model of health and apply favorable psychometric properties from the descriptive PROMIS system to HSU measurements. However, minimal evidence concerning comparisons to the EQ-5D-3L and the PROPr’s capability to differentiate clinical severity are available. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the PROPr to the EQ-5D-3L in terms of scale agreement, ceiling/floor effects, distribution, construct validity, discriminatory power, and relative efficiency (RE) in terms of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for patients with low back pain (LBP).MethodsWe used intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots to compare the PROPr and EQ-5D-3L with regared to scale agreement in a cross-sectional routine sample of LBP patients. For distribution, we used the Pearson’s coefficient for skewness and for ceiling/floor effects, a 15%-top/bottom threshold. For convergent validity, we used Pearson’s correlation coefficients. For known-groups validity, we applied a linear regression with interaction terms (predictors sex, age, and ODI level) and an analysis of variance (ANOVA). For discriminatory power, we calculated the effect size (ES) using Cohen’s d and the ratio of the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curves (AUROC-ratio = AUROCPROPr/AUROCEQ-5D-3L). RE was measured using the ratio of F-values (RE = FPROPr/FEQ-5D-3L).ResultsOf 218 LBP patients, 50.0% were female and the mean age was 61.8 years. The mean PROPr (0.20, 95%CI: 0.18; 0.22) and EQ-5D-3L scores (0.55, 95%CI: 0.51; 0.58) showed low agreement (d = 0.35, p < 0.001; ICC 0.27, 95%CI: -0.09; 0.59). The PROPr’s distribution was positively skewed, whereas the EQ-5D-3L’s was negative. Neither tool showed ceiling/floor effects, but all EQ-5D-3L dimensions did. Pearson correlation was r = 0.66 (95%CI: 0.58; 0.73). Differences were invariant to sex and age but not to ODI severity: ESEQ-5D-3L > ESPROPr and RE < 1 in higher ODI severity; ESEQ-5D-3L < ESPROPr and RE > 1 in lower ODI severity. AUROC-ratios did not show significant differences in terms of ODI severity.ConclusionsAll PROPr and EQ-5D-3L biopsychosocial dimensions of health showed impairment in LPB patients. The capability of EQ-5D-3L and PROPr to differentiate ODI levels depends on ODI severity. Joint application of both tools may provide additional information.

Revisional Endoscopic Foraminal Decompression via Modified Interlaminar Approach at L5-S1 after Failed Posterior Instrumented Lumbar Fusion in Elderly Patients.

Elderly people usually have poorer surgical tolerance and a higher incidence of complications when undergoing revision surgery after posterior instrumented lumbar fusion (PILF). Full-endoscopic transforaminal surgery is a safe and effective option, but sometimes, it is difficult to revise L5-S1 foraminal stenosis (FS) after PILF. Therefore, we developed full-endoscopic lumbar decompression (FELD) at the arthrodesis level via a modified interlaminar approach under local anesthesia. This study aimed to describe the technical note and clinical efficacy of the technique. Eleven patients with unilateral lower limb radiculopathy after PILF underwent selective nerve root block and then underwent FELD. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computer tomography (CT) were performed on the second postoperative day. Their clinical outcomes were evaluated with a Visual analog scale (VAS) of low back pain and sciatica pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the MacNab score. Complete decompression was achieved in every case with FELD without serious complications. Postoperative VAS of sciatica pain and ODI at each time point and VAS of low back pain and ODI after three months postoperatively were significantly improved compared with those preoperative (p < 0.05). According to the MacNab criteria, seven patients (63.6%) had excellent results at the two-year follow-up, and four patients (36.4%) had good results. No patients required further revision surgery. FELD, via a modified interlaminar approach, is effective for treating unilateral L5-S1 FS after PILF in elderly people.

Multiple-Rod Constructs in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The purpose of this research was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of multiple-rod constructs vis-a-vis 2-rod constructs in the treatment of adult spinal deformity. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine whether the multiple-rod construct outperformed the 2-rod construct. We initially retrieved 357 papers, but only 12 were chosen for further meta-analysis. The rod breakage rates in the multiple-rod and the 2-rod groups were 10.66% and 29.87%, respectively. The multiple-rod construct inhibited rod breakage (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.41; p<0.001), pseudarthrosis (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18-0.50; p<0.001) and rod fracture at the osteotomy site (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.89; p=0.03). Furthermore, the multiple-rod construct reduces the risk of revision surgery (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.73; p=0.04) as well as the revision risk of pseudarthrosis/rod fracture in the multiple- rod group (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18-0.52; p<0.001), but increases the risk of caudal screw loosening (OR, 4.99; 95% CI, 1.87-13.30; p=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) parameters (p=0.85), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (p=0.09), wound infection (p =0.71), age at surgery (p=0.62), gender distribution (p=0.93), body mass index (p =0.86), smoking status (p=0.05), hospital stay (p=0.09), osteoporosis (p=0.95), CoCr rod material (p=0.15), bone morphogenetic protein-2 (p=0.58), L5/S1 interbody fusion (p=0.07), high-grade osteotomies (p=0.07), the number of fusion levels (p=0.11), operation time (p=0.30), and blood loss volume (p=0.34). Regarding radiographic parameters, only preoperative sagittal vertical axis was found to be higher (weight means difference [WMD], 25.60; 95% CI, 15.43-35.77; p<0.001) in the multiple-rod group. There was no difference in preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (WMD, -3.32; 95% CI, -7.38 to 0.73; p=0.11), but the multiple-rod group had a lower ODI at follow-up (WMD, -7.71; 95% CI, -11.62 to -3.86; p<0.001). Multiple-rod constructs could prevent rod breakage and pseudarthrosis while also lowering the revision rate, resulting in a better clinical outcome than the 2-rod construct. Nonetheless, due consideration should be given to PJK and screw loosening in multiple-rod constructs, possibly due to the increased stiffness caused by the multiple-rod structure.

Preoperative Low Back Pain Affects Postoperative Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.

A single-center retrospective study. To research the predictive factors associated with postoperative patient satisfaction 1 year after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), a minimally invasive procedure for lumbar degenerative disease. There have been reports of numerous variables influencing patient satisfaction with lumbar surgery; however, there have been few investigations on MIS are limited. This study included 229 patients (107 men and 122 women; mean age, 68.9 years) who received one or two levels of MISTLIF, and the patient's age, gender, disease, paralysis, preoperative physical functions, duration of symptom(s), and surgery-associated factors (waiting for surgery, number of surgical levels, surgical time, and intraoperative blood loss) were studied. Radiographic characteristics and clinical outcomes such as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-100) ODI scores for low back pain, leg pain, and numbness were studied. One year following surgery, patient satisfaction (defined as satisfaction for surgery and for present condition; 0-100) was assessed using VAS and its relationships with investigation factors were examined. The mean VAS scores of satisfaction for surgery and for present condition were 88.6 and 84.2, respectively. The results of multiple regression analysis showed that preoperative adverse factors of satisfaction for surgery were being elderly (β =-0.17, p =0.023), high preoperative low back pain VAS scores (β =-0.15, p =0.020), and postoperative adverse factors were high postoperative ODI scores (β =-0.43, p <0.001). In addition, the preoperative adverse factor of satisfaction for present condition was high preoperative low back pain VAS scores (β =-0.21, p =0.002), and postoperative adverse factors were high postoperative ODI scores (β =-0.45, p <0.001) and high postoperative low back pain VAS scores (β =-0.26, p =0.001). According to this study, significant preoperative low back pain and high postoperative ODI score after surgery are linked to patient unhappiness.

Poor muscle health and low preoperative ODI are independent predictors for slower achievement of MCID after minimally invasive decompression

Although some previous studies have analyzed predictors of non-improvement, most of these have focused on demographic and clinical variables and have not accounted for radiological predictors. In addition, while several studies have examined the degree of improvement after decompression, there is less data on the rate of improvement. To identify the risk factors and predictors (both radiological and non-radiological) for slower as well as non-achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after minimally invasive decompression. Retrospective cohort PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lumbar spine conditions and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Patients with preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) <20 were excluded. MCID achievement in ODI (cut off 12.8). Patients were stratified into two groups (achieved MCID, did not achieve MCID) at two timepoints (early ≤3 months, late ≥6 months). Non-radiological (age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, anxiety, depression, number of levels operated, preoperative ODI, preoperative back pain) and radiological (MRI - Schizas grading for stenosis, dural sac cross-sectional area, Pfirrmann grading for disc degeneration, psoas cross-sectional area and Goutallier grading, facet cyst/effusion; X-ray - spondylolisthesis, lumbar lordosis, spinopelvic parameters) variables were assessed with comparative analysis to identify risk factors and with multiple regression models to identify predictors for slower achievement of MCID (MCID not achieved by ≤3 months) and non-achievement of MCID (MCID not achieved at ≥6 months). 338 patients were included. At ≤3 months, patients who did not achieve MCID had significantly lower preoperative ODI (40.1 vs. 48.1, p<0.001) and worse psoas Goutallier grading (p=0.048). At ≥6 months, patients who did not achieve MCID had significantly lower preoperative ODI (38 vs. 47.5, p<0.001), higher age (68 vs. 63 years, p=0.007), worse average L1-S1 Pfirrmann grading (3.5 vs. 3.2, p=0.035), and higher rate of pre-existing spondylolisthesis at the operated level (p=0.047). When these and other probable risk factors were put into a regression model, low preoperative ODI (p=0.002) and poor Goutallier grading (p=0.042) at the early timepoint and low preoperative ODI (p<0.001) at the late timepoint came out as independent predictors for MCID non-achievement. After minimally invasive decompression, low preoperative ODI and poor muscle health are risk factors and predictors for slower achievement of MCID. For non-achievement of MCID, low preoperative ODI, higher age, greater disc degeneration, and spondylolisthesis are risk factors and low preoperative ODI is the only independent predictor.