Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Attainment Research Articles

Effect and safety of PCSK9 inhibitor in-hospital use on blood lipid level in the ACS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Main funding source(s): none Aims To evaluate the effect and safety of in-hospital use of the proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor on blood lipid levels in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Methods We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid and Cochrane Library electronic databases through July 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies using PCSK9 inhibitors during ACS hospitalization. Then we compared the PCSK9 inhibitor group with a placebo or a blank control group with the same background of lipid-lowering therapy. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias for the included studies. A software was used to analyze the changes in overall lipids from baseline and the adverse event rates. Results A total of 15 studies enrolling 3891 patients with ACS were eligible, including 10 RCTs (n = 1406) and 5 cohort studies (n = 2485). Treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors showed a greater reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) (SMD=1.46, 95% CI: 1.16-1.76, P<0.01). The cumulative meta-analysis of follow-up time showed that the degree of LDLC reduction stabilized after 12 weeks (SMD=1.42 at 12 weeks, 95% CI: 1.06-1.79, P<0.01), and thus, PCSK9 inhibitors dramatically decreased LDLC levels in comparison to controls at both ≤12 weeks and 12–72 weeks. The LDLC levels with PCSK9 inhibitors that reached the recommended standards of AHA/ACC (≤1.8mmol/l) and ESC (≤1.4mmol/l) were 95% and 80% respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the control group (58% and 22%). PCSK9 inhibitors can also reduce the total cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein (a), while increasing the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, but they have no statistical significance in reducing apolipoprotein A1. Compared with placebo or blank control, the addition of PCSK9 inhibitor did not increase the occurrence of adverse events (RR =-0.01,95% CI:-0.19-0.18, P = 0.95) and serious adverse events (RR =-0.03, 95% CI:-0.48-0.43, P=0.91). Conclusion In-hospital use of PCSK9 inhibitors can significantly improve the blood lipid levels of ACS patients and increase the target LDLC attainment rate, with satisfactory safety and good tolerance.

Association of health information technology-driven multidisciplinary approaches with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target achievement in patients with an acute coronary syndrome

ObjectiveControlling of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a challenge. Health information technology (HIT) is increasingly being applied to close quality gaps in chronic illness care. The aim of this study was to perform a qualitative review of the association of implementing HIT on lipid management processes of care and LDL-C goal attainment in patients with ACS. MethodEligible patients with a discharge diagnosis of ACS from January 2018 to December 2021 at a tertiary medical center were retrospectively reviewed. An HIT system with a multidisciplinary approach including initiating high-intensity statin therapy, periodic laboratory follow-up, titration of lipid-lowering agents, patient education, patient-level and system-level interventions involving database monitoring and outreach by centralized care teams was introduced in October 2018. Electronical medical records including data on medications and laboratory findings at discharge and within 1 year were compared before and after implementing the HIT system. ResultsA total of 2001 ACS patients (average age 63 ± 12.7 years, 79.66 % men) were analyzed. The LDL-C < 70 mg/dL goal attainment rates (36.52 %, 53.57 %, 59.22 %, 62.18 % in 2018–2021) and medium serum LDL-C levels (80.5 mg/dL, 68 mg/dL, 65 mg/dL, 64 mg/dL in 2018–2021) significantly improved within 6 months (2018 as the reference, all p<0.001). The LDL-C attainment rate at 12 months also steadily increased (53.80 %, 61.82 %, 64.21 % in 2019–2021, p = 0.019). Most of the patients switched to a high-intensity statins regimen at discharge (0.57 %, 63.67 %, 72.41 %, 84.44 %, in 2018–2021, p<0.001 with 2018 as the reference), with low adverse event rates. The maintenance rates of high-intensity statin regimens at 12 months continued to improve (41.36 %, 49.04 %, 61.39 % in 2019–2021, p<0.001). ConclusionsEfforts to control LDL-C should be increased in ACS patients by initiating and intensifying statin treatment earlier. Our results confirmed that a team-based strategy with HIT improved LDL-C target achievement for most patients with ACS.

Guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol management following acute ischemic stroke: findings from Clalit health services

Abstract Background Patients with ischemic stroke are at high risk for future cardiovascular events and should be treated intensively with lipid-modifying agents. Combination lipid-lowering therapies are often needed to achieve updated (2019) guideline-directed treatment goals. However, real-world data on intensification of lipid-lowering therapies and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets after ischemic stroke are limited. Methods Data from a single national health care service on patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke between Jan. 2020 and Feb. 2022. Included were 3027 patients surviving ≥1-year post-stroke, with documented LDL-C levels and lipid-lowering medications at 2 timepoints (&amp;lt;3 months and during 6-12 months post-discharge). Participants were classified according to preexisting stroke and/or coronary artery disease (CAD). Results LDL-C levels &amp;lt;70 mg/dL and &amp;lt;55 mg/dL were attained by 42.3% and 22.9% of patients early post-hospitalization, and in 49.5% and 27.1% during 6-12 months post-hospitalization, respectively. Attainment of guideline-recommended LDL-C goals was higher in those with preexisting cardiovascular disease. The use of combination lipid-lowering therapy (ezetimibe and/or PCSK9 inhibitor plus statin) increased between the 2 timepoints: from 2% to 3.2% in those without prior stroke and/or CAD, and from 5.4% to 7% in those with prior stroke and/or CAD. Conclusions Despite the advances in drug development and the availability of several mechanisms to lower cholesterol levels, the attainment of guideline-recommended LDL-C targets after acute ischemic stroke is suboptimal. Intensification of treatment with combination lipid-lowering therapies 6-12 months following hospitalization is uncommonly performed in clinical practice, even in those with preexisting cardiovascular disease.

Guideline-Directed Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Management After Acute Ischemic Stroke: Findings from a National Health Care Service

Patients with ischemic stroke are at high risk for future cardiovascular events and should be treated intensively with lipid-modifying agents. Combination lipid-lowering therapies are often needed to achieve updated guideline-directed treatment goals. However, real-world data on intensification of lipid-lowering therapies and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets early after ischemic stroke are limited. We extracted data from the largest healthcare provider in Israel on patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke between January 2020 and February 2022. Included were 3,027 patients surviving ≥1 year after stroke, with documented LDL-C levels and lipid-lowering medications at 2 time periods (0 to 3months and 6 to 12months after discharge). Participants were classified according to preexisting stroke and/or coronary artery disease. The use of combination lipid-lowering therapy (ezetimibe and/or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 [monoclonal antibodies] inhibitor plus statin) in the study population increased between the 2 timepoints from 3.6% to 5.1%, reaching 10.5% in those with previous coronary artery disease and stroke. LDL-C levels <70 and <55mg/100ml were attained by 42.3% and 22.9% of patients early after hospitalization, and in 49.5% and 27.1% during 6 to 12months after hospitalization, respectively. Attainment of guideline-recommended LDL-C goals was higher in patients treated with combination lipid-lowering therapies and in those with preexisting cardiovascular disease. In conclusion, despite the advances in drug development and the availability of several mechanisms to lower cholesterol levels, the attainment of guideline-recommended LDL-C targets after acute ischemic stroke is suboptimal. Intensification of treatment with combination lipid-lowering therapies after hospitalization is uncommonly performed in clinical practice, even in those with preexisting cardiovascular disease.

Clinical characteristics of adult and paediatric patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: A real-life cross-sectional study from the Turkish National Database

Background and aimsFamilial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common cause of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Türkiye is among the countries with the highest rate of ASCVD. However, no population-based study has been published so far on the prevalence of FH, demographic and clinical characteristics, burden of ASCVD, treatment compliance, and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets. MethodsWe performed a study using the Turkish Ministry of Health's national electronic health records involving 83,063,515 citizens as of December 2021 dating back 2016. Adults fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of definite or probable FH according to the Dutch Lipid Network Criteria (DLNC), and children and adolescents fulfilling the criteria of probable FH according to the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Consensus Panel report formed the study population (n = 157,790). The primary endpoint was the prevalence of FH. ResultsProbable or definite FH was detected in 0.63% (1 in 158) of the adults and 0.61% (1 in 164) of the total population. The proportion of adults with LDL-C levels >4.9 mmol/L (190 mg/dL) was 4.56% (1 in 22). The prevalence of FH among children and adolescents was 0.37% (1 in 270). Less than one-third of the children and adolescents, and two-thirds of young adults (aged 18–29) with FH were already diagnosed with dyslipidaemia. The proportion of adults and children and adolescents on lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) was 32.1% and 1.5%, respectively. The overall discontinuation rate of LLT was 65.8% among adults and 77.9% among children and adolescents. Almost no subjects on LLT were found to attain the target LDL-C levels. ConclusionsThis nationwide study showed a very high prevalence of FH in Türkiye. Patients with FH are diagnosed late and treated sub-optimally. Whether these findings may explain the high rates of premature ASCVD in Türkiye needs further investigation. These results denote the urgent need for country-wide initiatives for early diagnosis and effective management of FH patients.

Impact of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) on mid-term clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: A secondary analysis of the DACAB trial.

The objective was to evaluate the influence of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This is a secondary analysis of a 5-year follow-up of the DACAB trial (NCT02201771), in which 500 patients who underwent primary isolated CABG were randomized to three-antiplatelet therapy for 1 year after surgery. Of them, 459 patients were recruited in this secondary analysis. Baseline LDL-C and Lp(a) levels were collected, and repeated measurement of LDL-C levels during the follow-up were recorded. Cut-off values for LDL-C were set at 1.8 and 2.6 mmol/L; thus, the patients were stratified into LDL-C <1.8, 1.8-<2.6, and ≥2.6 mmol/L subgroups. Cut-off value for Lp(a) was 30 mg/dL; thus, the patients were divided into Lp(a) <30 and ≥30 mg/dL subgroups. The primary outcome was 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-4), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization. Median follow-up time was 5.2 (interquartile range, 4.2-6.1) years. During the follow-up, 129 (28.1%) patients achieved the attainment of LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L, 186 (40.5%) achieved LDL-C 1.8-<2.6 mmol/L, and 144 (31.4%) remained LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L. Compared with the postoperative LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L group, the risk of MACE-4 was significantly higher in the LDL-C 1.8-<2.6 mmol/L group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.92, 95% CI, 1.12-3.29; P = 0.019] and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L group (aHR = 3.90, 95% CI, 2.29-6.64; P < 0.001). Baseline Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL was identified in 131 (28.5%) patients and was associated with an increased risk of MACE-4 (aHR = 1.52, 95% CI, 1.06-2.18; P = 0.022). For CABG patients, exposure to increased levels of postoperative LDL-C or baseline Lp(a) was associated with worse mid-term clinical outcomes. Our findings suggested the necessity of achieving LDL-C target and potential benefit of adding Lp(a) targeted lipid-lowering therapy in CABG population.

Number of lipid-lowering medications and attainment of lipid goals in familial hypercholesterolemia patients: Data from the Latvian registry

Background and Aims : Attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals remains a challenge in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Combinations of lipid lowering medications (LLM) are commonly required. National registries play a crucial role to monitor quality of care in FH patients. We aimed to provide contemporary data on the number of used LLM, achieved lipid levels and attainment of LDL-C goals in FH patients from the Latvian Registry of FH (LRFH).

Attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in statin treated patients: Real-world evidence from Australia.

Little is known about the attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in patients treated with statins in Australian primary healthcare setting that are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from electronic medical records of patients treated by general practitioners across Australia. LDL-C target attainment was defined as LDL-C levels ≤ 2 mmol/L for all risk groups, in line with Australian guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with LDL-C target attainment. Overall, 61,407 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65 years (± standard deviation [SD] 12.1); 52.0% were males.. Overall, the median LDL-C level was 2.3 mmol/L (IQR = 1.8 - 2.8) and 36.0% of the study population met therapeutic targets. Increased likelihood to achieve LDL-C targets was observed in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.92 - 2.24), stroke (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.39 - 1.79, P < 0.001) or chronic heart disease (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.55 - 1.81, P < 0.001). Patients diagnosed with dyslipidemia (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.55 - 0.64, P < 0.001), hypertension (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 - 1.00, P < 0.05) and current smokers (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.71 - 1.00, P < 0.05), were less likely to attain LDL-C targets, regardless of the type, intensity and length of use of the prescribed statin. Longer duration and higher intensity statin were associated with more patients achieving targeted LDL-C goal, however nearly two thirds of Australians still failed to achieve targeted outcome even after 24 months of statin therapy.

EE217 Lost Therapeutic Benefit of Delayed LDL-C Control and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lipid-Lowering Intensification

Attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic goals in statin-treated patients remains suboptimal. We quantified the health and economic impact of achieving LDL-C control at different time points.

Attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in patients treated with combination therapy: A retrospective cohort study in primary care

The attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic goals in real-world settings among patients receiving combination lipid-lowering therapy (LLT, statins plus non-statins) is not well characterised. To evaluate LDL-C levels and LDL-C goal attainment in patients treated with combination LLT in real-world primary care settings. A retrospective cohort study of patients treated with combination LLT. Data were drawn from general practitioner electronic medical records across Australia from 2013 to 2019. The on-treatment goal for LDL-C was < 2 mmol/L (77 mg/dL), as per Australian guidelines. The cohort analysed included 9,173 individuals treated with combination LLT. The mean age was 65.8 years (standard deviation [SD] 11.5), 60.1% were males, and 56.7% had at least one cardiovascular risk factor. The median on-treatment LDL-C was 2.1 mmol/L (IQR 1.6-2.8), and overall 45.4% of the cohort met LDL-C goals, with individuals on fixed-dose combination of statins plus ezetimibe having the highest rates of achievement (49.8%). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, factors associated with LDL-C goal achievement were male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-1.6, p < 0.001), aged >80 years (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.5 - 6.6, p=0.006), and a history of T2DM (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.5-1.9, p < 0.001) or coronary heart disease (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 - 1.6, p < 0.001). More than half of Australians on combination LLT did not achieve LDL-C goals. Urgent measures are needed to address this gap in clinical practice to minimise negative health outcomes.

Risk stratification and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment rates in patients with very high-risk or extreme high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases regarding three guidelines

Objective: To explore the differences of risk stratification of very high-risk or extreme high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) and the attainment rates of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management targets evaluated by three different criteria, and the causal attributions of these differences. Methods: Patients with ASCVD were consecutively enrolled from January 1 to December 31 in 2019, and were evaluated for very high-risk or extreme high-risk and LDL-C goal attainment rates with 2018 American guideline on the management of blood cholesterol (2018AG), 2019 China Cholesterol Education Program (CCEP) Expert Advice for the management of dyslipidemias (2019EA) and 2020 Chinese expert consensus on lipid management of very high-risk ASCVD patients(2020EC), respectively. The causal attributions of the differences in attainment rates were analyzed as well. Results: A total of 1 864 ASCVD patients were included in this study. According to 2018AG, 2019EA and 2020EC, the proportions of the patients with very high-risk or extreme high-risk were 59.4%, 90.7%, and 65.6%, respectively. The absolute LDL-C target attainment rates were 37.2%, 15.7%, and 13.7%, respectively, the differences between each two rates were statistically significant (all P<0.001). As to the differences in attainment rates between 2020EC and 2018AG, 61.5% were due to the different LDL-C goal attainment values and 38.5% were caused by the different risk stratifications, while for the differences between 2020EC and 2019EA attainment rates, different LDL-C goal attainment values were responsible for 13.2%, and different risk stratifications were responsible for 86.8% of the differences. Conclusions: There are significant differences in the proportions and LDL-C attainment rates among the three different criteria for very high-risk or extreme high-risk ASCVD. 2020EC showed a moderate proportion of patients with extreme high-risk, and had the lowest LDL-C attainment rate. The differences between 2020EC and 2018AG are mainly due to the LDL-C target values, and the differences between 2020EC and 2019EA are mainly caused by the risk stratifications.

POSA388 Attainment of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets in Patients Treated with Combination Therapy in Australia: A Retrospective Cohort Study of a Primary Care Database

The attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic goals in real-world settings is not well characterised, especially among patients receiving combination lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). We evaluated the LDL-C goal achievement in patients treated with combination LLT in the Australian primary care setting.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of amlodipine/losartan-based single-pill combination therapy in patients with hypertension: Findings from real-world, multicenter observational databases.

Various single‐pill combinations (SPCs) have been introduced to improve drug compliance and clinical efficacy. However, there is a lack of real‐world evidence regarding the effectiveness of these SPCs for hypertension. This study evaluated the real‐world clinical efficacy and safety of amlodipine/losartan‐based SPC therapies in patients with hypertension in a real‐world setting. A total of 15 538 patients treated with amlodipine/losartan‐based SPCs [amlodipine + losartan (AL), amlodipine + losartan + rosuvastatin (ALR), and amlodipine + losartan + chlorthalidone (ALC)] were selected from the database of three tertiary hospitals in Korea. The efficacy endpoints were target blood pressure (BP) and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) achievement rates. Safety was evaluated based on laboratory parameters. Drug adherence was defined as the proportion of medication days covered (PDC). The target BP attainment rate was above 90% and was similar among the three groups. Although many patients in the AL and ALC groups took statins, the target LDL‐C attainment rate was significantly higher in the ALR group than in the AL and ALC groups. Safety endpoints were not significantly different among the groups, except serum uric acid level and incidence rate of new‐onset hyperuricemia, which were significantly lower in the AL and ALR groups than in the ALC group. The PDC was > 90% in all groups. In the real‐world hypertensive patients, amlodipine/losartan‐based SPC therapy demonstrated good target BP achievement rates. Especially, rosuvastatin‐combination SPC showed better target LDL‐C goal achievement rate compared to the other SPCs. All three amlodipine/losartan‐based SPC had excellent drug adherence.

Differences in lipid treatment patterns in women versus men in a large cohort of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Ontario, Canada

Abstract Background/Introduction The prevalence of ischaemic heart disease is lower in women vs men in Canada. Studies have shown that women are more likely to be underdiagnosed and less likely to receive guideline-recommended treatments than men. Women receiving lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) are also less likely to attain treatment goals vs men. Purpose We analysed use of LLTs and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment goals in a recent longitudinal cohort of patients with ASCVD with public drug coverage in Ontario to describe differences observed between female and male patients. Methods Patients ≥65 years with a primary ASCVD event/procedure between 1 Apr 2005 and 31 Mar 2016, treated with an LLT and with index and follow up LDL-C values were identified from claims data at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences data repository. Patients were assessed over a 1 year follow up period for LDL-C goal attainment (&amp;lt;2.0 mmol/L or 50% reduction from index LDL-C as per Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines) and analysed by LLT category. Results 143,302 patients with ASCVD ≥65 years on LLTs were identified of which 41% were female. A higher proportion of female vs male patients were prescribed low (3% vs 2%) and medium intensity statins (51% vs 44%) compared with high intensity statins (43% vs 52%). A higher proportion of women failed to attain LDL-C goal compared to men (33% vs 24%) (Figure). When analysed by low, moderate or high intensity statin, 65%, 35%, and 27% of female patients and 49%, 25% and 19% of male patients failed to attain LDL-C goal at follow up. Conclusions In this retrospective study, women with a diagnosis of ASCVD were more frequently treated with low/moderate intensity statins whereas men were more frequently treated with high intensity statins. Approximately 2 of 3 women and 3 of 4 men receiving statin treatment attained LDL-C goal during the 1-year follow up period. Overall, there appear to be treatment differences between female and male patients with ASCVD, with males receiving higher intensity statin therapy and attaining LDL-C goal more frequently. Further research is needed to determine why these discrepancies exist. This study made use of de-identified data from the ICES Data Repository, which is managed by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences with support from its funders and partners: Canada's Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR), the Ontario SPOR Support Unit, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Government of Ontario. The opinions, results and conclusions reported are those of the authors. No endorsement by ICES or any of its funders or partners is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and/or information compiled and provided by CIHI. However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed in the material are those of the author(s), and not necessarily those of CIHI. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen Canada Inc

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment and treatment patterns in a cohort of &amp;gt;143,000 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Ontario, Canada

Abstract Background/Introduction Limited real-world data are available on attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment goals in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in Canada. Purpose A retrospective observational study was conducted to describe types of ASCVD events/procedures, time between events and use of lipid lowering treatment (LLT) in patients who did not achieve LDL-C goal. Methods Patients in Ontario ≥65 years with a primary ASCVD event/procedure between 1 Apr 2005 and 31 Mar 2016, treated with an LLT and with index and follow up LDL-C values were identified from claims data at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences data repository. Patients were assessed over a 1-year follow up period for LDL-C goal attainment (&amp;lt;2.0 mmol/L or 50% reduction from index LDL-C) and analysed by LLT and by index event type. Results Overall, 28% of 143,302 patients ≥65 years on LLT failed to attain LDL-C goal at follow up (Figure). The proportion of patients failing to achieve LDL-C goal decreased from 35% to 22% over the 11-year study period. Mean time between index and follow up LDL-C (based on lowest score &amp;gt;2 weeks and up to 1 year after index LDL-C) was 203±97 days. When analysed by low-, moderate- or high-intensity statin, 57%, 30%, and 22% of patients failed to achieve LDL-C goal at follow up, respectively. Conclusions In this study, more than 1 in 4 patients with ASCVD in Ontario failed to achieve guideline recommended LDL-C goal despite treatment. In particular, ∼1 in 3 patients with cerebral and peripheral arterial disease were not at goal. An opportunity exists to better manage these high risk ASCVD patients with further statin intensification and additional LLTs This study made use of de-identified data from the ICES Data Repository, which is managed by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences with support from its funders and partners: Canada's Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR), the Ontario SPOR Support Unit, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Government of Ontario. The opinions, results and conclusions reported are those of the authors. No endorsement by ICES or any of its funders or partners is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and/or information compiled and provided by CIHI. However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed in the material are those of the author(s), and not necessarily those of CIHI Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen Canada Inc.

Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Goal Achievement in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients in Fuzhou, China.

This study aims to analyze the treatment patterns and goal attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) in the real-world setting in Fuzhou, China. Patients aged ≥20 years with a valid LDL-C measurement (index date) in 2016 were selected from National Healthcare Big Data in Fuzhou, China. Patients were stratified into mutually exclusive cardiovascular risk categories: ASCVD (including recent acute coronary syndrome [ACS], chronic coronary heart disease [CHD], stroke, and peripheral arterial disease [PAD]), and DM alone (without ASCVD). Lipid-modifying medication and LDL-C attainment at the index date were assessed. A total of 21 989 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 17 320 (78.8%) with ASCVD and 4669 (21.2%) with DM alone; 47.7% of patients received current statin therapy in the overall cohort (53.5% in ASCVD, 26.5% for DM); 20.5% ASCVD population achieved LDL-C target with the highest in patients with recent ACS (33.8%), followed by chronic CHD (21.2%), PAD (20.9%), and ischemic stroke (17.3%); 49.0% of patients with DM achieved LDL-C target. Higher LDL-C attainment was observed in high-intensity statin and a combination of statin and nonstatin groups. Atorvastatin was the most commonly used statin with the highest LDL-C attainment, followed by rosuvastatin. Compared with previous studies in China, our study found a relatively low statin use and LDL-C target attainment, but higher than similar studies in Europe. Guidelines should be well complied and more prescription of high-intensity statin or statin and nonstatin combination should be advocated.

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in a Bulgarian Population of Patients with Dyslipidaemia and Diabetes: An Observational Study.

IntroductionPatients with diabetes and familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) are at very high risk of cardiovascular events, but rates of FH detection are very low in most countries, including Bulgaria. Given the lack of relevant data in the literature, we conducted a retrospective observational study to (1) identify individuals with previously undiagnosed FH among patients being treated at Bulgarian diabetes centres, and (2) gain insight into current management and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals in such patients.MethodsFrom a database of diabetes centres across Bulgaria we retrieved medical records from patients aged ≥ 18 years with type 1/2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM/T2DM) who were being treated with insulin/insulin analogues, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and/or sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Patients with FH (Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score ≥ 3) were identified, and their data analyzed (lipid-modifying therapy (LMT), diabetes treatment, cardiovascular events and glycaemic and lipid parameters).ResultsA total of 450 diabetic patients with FH (92.0% with T2DM; 52.4% receiving insulin/insulin analogues) were included in the analysis. LMT consisted of statin monotherapy (86% of patients; 18% receiving high-intensity statin monotherapy), statin-based combination therapy (13%) or fenofibrate (< 1%). Median LDL-C was 4.4 mmol/L. Although 30% of patients had a glycated haemoglobin level of ≤ 7%, only one patient (< 1%) achieved the LDL-C target recommended in 2016 European guidelines for very high-risk patients (< 1.8 mmol/L). Previous cardiovascular events were documented in 40% of patients.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically explore lipid target achievement in diabetic patients with FH. In this preselected Bulgarian population, < 1% of patients achieved the 2016 European guideline-defined LDL-C target. These data highlight the importance of identifying FH in diabetic patients as early as possible so that they can receive appropriate treatment.Electronic Supplementary MaterialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-00748-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Real-life LDL-C treatment goals achievement in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Results of the PLANET registry

Background and aimsDespite the high prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and available effective lipid-lowering therapy, most of the individuals with this disorder remain undiagnosed and undertreated. The aim of the PLANET registry was to assess the real-life attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic target level in patients with heterozygous FH, to characterize prescribed lipid-lowering therapy with assessment of its efficiency according to the attainment of the target LDL-C level, and to characterize cardiovascular events observed in this patient population again in relation to LDL-C target level attainment. MethodsPLANET registry was designed as a non-interventional, retrospective, cross-sectional, multicentre disease registry for adult patients with heterozygous FH in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. ResultsOverall, 1755 patients were enrolled at 32 sites specialized in FH treatment. 15.4% of patients attained the target LDL-C value. The proportion of patients with LDL-C goal achievement increased to 17.3% in the subgroup of patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy (54.6% of study population). Out of 55 patients receiving inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), 61.8% reached the LDL-C treatment goal. Of all cardiovascular events reported, 14.0% occurred in patients attaining the LDL-C goal, while it was 86.0% in the not-at-target group. It was documented (p=0.004) that the longer is the patient in care at the specialized FH centre, the higher is the probability that he/she will attain the target LDL-C level. ConclusionsAlthough target LDL-C level attainment remains relatively low, the likelihood of LDL-C goal attainment increases with duration of specialized care.

Target achievement with maximal statin-based lipid-lowering therapy in Korean patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: A study supported by the Korean Society of Lipid and Atherosclerosis.

Data on treatment results of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are limited, particularly in Asian patients. We sought to evaluate the target achievement rate and associated variables in Korean patients with FH after maximal statin-based LLT. We enrolled 146 patients with heterozygous FH, and 90 patients were finally analyzed. Patients were initially prescribed rosuvastatin 10 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg, and the regimen was adjusted to achieve the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of 100 mg/dL. The primary evaluation point was the achievement rate of the LDL-C targets at 12 months: LDL-C < 100 mg/dL and ≥50% LDL-C reduction. The associations between clinical variables and target achievement were also analyzed. At 12 months, 58% of patients were receiving high-intensity regimens, whereas 46% were receiving combination therapy. The mean pre- and post-treatment LDL-C levels were 229 and 118 mg/dL, respectively. Twenty-eight percent of patients achieved LDL-C < 100 mg/dL, and 47% achieved ≥50% LDL-C reduction. Pretreatment LDL-C and high-intensity regimens indicated a negative tendency toward the attainment of LDL-C < 100 mg/dL. Conversely, pretreatment LDL-C and diabetes mellitus were positively associated with a higher rate of ≥50% LDL-C reduction. The target achievement of LDL-C < 100 mg/dL was low, and 50% LDL-C reduction was moderately achieved in Korean patients with FH receiving maximal statin-based LLT. Pretreatment LDL-C levels and diabetes mellitus were associated with target achievement. Our results provide rare and informative data on FH treatment in Asian patients.

Factors associated with lipid goal attainment among acute coronary syndrome patients.

BackgroundThe incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), one of the most common cardiovascular diseases, is high. Lipid goal attainment is one of the important factors to reduce the risk of recurrent heart attack. Identification of factors influencing lipid goal attainment such as age, female, race, underlying comorbidities, intensity of lipid-lowering therapy, patients’ knowledge, and patients’ belief about medicine would be beneficial in achieving the lipid goal. This study is aimed to determine lipid profile attainment and prescribing pattern of lipid-lowering therapy as well as to identify factors influencing lipid profile attainment among ACS patients.Patients and methodsThis researcher-assisted cross-sectional survey was carried out at a cardiology clinic in a tertiary hospital from March to May 2015.ResultsA total of 101 ACS patients were involved in this study. The mean values for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were 2.75 (0.82) mmol/L and 1.14 (0.27) mmol/L, respectively, while the median value for triglyceride level was 2.75 (0.82) mmol/L. Only 15.8% of our participants achieved the targeted LDL-C. Simvastatin 20 mg was the most common regimen prescribed. Predictors for better LDL-C attainment were younger age (β=−0.228; P=0.032) and higher knowledge score (β=−0.255; P=0.049), while predictors for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol attainment were male (β=0.268; P=0.006), smoking (β=−0.192; P=0.045), and higher knowledge score (β=−0.195; P=0.039). Smoking (β=−0.361; P<0.0001) was the only predictor for higher triglyceride level.ConclusionYounger age, female, lower knowledge score, and smoking status are good predictors for lipid attainment among ACS patients.