Abstract Relative indices of abundance are key to providing science advice for the management of many fish stocks. Historical focus has been on design-based estimation, wherein mathematical formulae for aggregating data into a single index are directly informed by the underlying sampling design. Recent efforts have moved toward using index standardization models instead. However, the impacts sampling designs and allocation schemes have on these index standardization models have not been fully examined. Using a spatio-temporal multinomial index standardization model developed for survey data obtained with longline fishing gear, we develop a simulation framework to analyze the effects of five different combinations of sampling designs and allocation schemes under various conditions. These simulations expose bias in model-based indices caused by non-proportional-to-area designs, which are common in surveys that have historically utilized design-based estimation. We explore the impact of robust statistical alternatives on this bias. This effort highlights an important source of bias and the importance of periodically reassessing allocation schemes and sampling designs for scientific surveys.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
337 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Longline Fishing
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
332 Search results
Sort by Recency