Longer Cold Ischemia Time Research Articles

Pulmonary bacterial infection after lung transplantation: risk factors and impact on short-term mortality

To explore the risk factors for pulmonary bacterial infection (PBI) after lung transplantation (LTX)and to evaluate the impact of PBI on short-term postoperative mortality. We retrospectively analyzed data on 549 recipients who underwent LTX at the Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, China, between January 2018 and December 2021. The risk factors for PBI after LTX were explored by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of one-, two-, and three-year mortality. Subgroup analysis was performed by the time of postoperative PBI (≤7 days or 8-30day after surgery). The incidence of postoperative PBI in 549 recipients was 82.70% (454/549). Preoperative history of infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria (OR 12.34, 95% CI 1.69-1572.39), Acinetobacter baumannii infection in donor (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.26-9.66), and longer cold ischemia time (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.32) were risk factors for postoperative PBI. Postoperative PBI was associated with one-year (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.09-2.96), two-year (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.20-3.04), and three-year mortality (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.29-3.19). Subgroup analysis showed that PBI within 7 days after surgery was associated with one-year (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.12-3.08), two-year (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.25-3.17), and three-year mortality (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.35-3.36), while PBI at 8-30 days after surgery was not associated with short-term mortality (one-year: HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.69-2.69; two-year: HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.80-2.76; three-year: HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.82-2.77). Donor-recipient and surgical factors are risk factors for PBI after LTX. Active prevention and treatment of PBI within the first 7 days after surgery may improve short-term survival.

Analysis of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Risk Factors in Lung Transplantation (LuTx) Patients.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of acute lung injury (ALI) that occurs within 72 h after lung transplantation (LuTx) and is the most common early complication of the procedure. PGD is diagnosed and graded based on the ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen and chest X-ray results. PGD grade 3 increases recipient mortality and the chance of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). The aim of this retrospective study was to identify new PGD risk factors. The inclusion criteria were met by 59 patients, who all received transplants at the same center between 2010 and 2018. Donor data were taken from records provided by the Polish National Registry of Transplantation and analyzed in three variants: PGD 1-3 vs. PGD 0, PGD 3 vs. PGD 0 and PGD 3 vs. PGD 0-2. A multiple-factor logistic regression model was used to identify decreasing recipient age; higher donor BMI and higher donor central venous pressure (CVP) for the PGD (of the 1-3 grade) risk factor. Longer cold ischemia time (CIT) and higher donor CVP proved to be independent risk factors of PGD 3.

Primary Team Versus Local Recovery in Liver Transplantation in the Modern Era: A National Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database.

The implementation of acuity circles (AC) in 2020 and the COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of local surgeons to recover livers for transplant; however, the impact on liver transplant (LT) outcomes is unknown. Deceased donor adult LT recipients from the UNOS database were identified. Recipients were grouped by donor surgeon: local versus primary recovery. Patient and graft survival as well as trends in local recovery in the 2 years pre-AC and post-AC were assessed. The utilization of local recovery in LT increased from 22.3% to 37.9% post-AC (p<0.01). LTs with local recovery had longer cold ischemia times (6.5 h [5.4-7.8] vs. 5.3 h [4.4-6.5], p<0.01) and traveled further (210 miles [89-373] vs. 73 miles [11-196], p<0.01) than those using primary recovery. Multivariate analyses revealed no differences in patient or graft survival between local and primary recovery, and between OPO and local surgeon. There was no difference in survival when comparing simultaneous liver-kidney, donation after circulatory death, MELD ≥ 30, or redo-LT by recovery team. Recovery and utilization rates were also noted to be higher post-AC (51.4%vs. 48.6% pre-AC, p<0.01) as well as when OPO surgeons recovered the allografts (72.5%vs. 66.0%, p<0.01). Nearly 40% of LTs are performed using local recovery, and utilization rates and trends continue to change with changing organ-sharing paradigms such as AC. This practice appears safe with outcomes similar to recovery by the primary team in appropriately selected recipients and may lead to increased access and the ability to transplant more livers.

HOPE Mitigates Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Ex-Situ Split Grafts: A Comparative Study With Living Donation in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.

Optimizing graft preservation is key for ex-situ split grafts in pediatric liver transplantation (PSLT). Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) improves ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and post-operative outcomes in adult LT. This study compares the use of HOPE in ex-situ partial grafts to static cold storage ex-situ partial grafts (SCS-Split) and to the gold standard living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). All consecutive HOPE-Split, SCS-Split and LDLT performed between 2018-2023 for pediatric recipients were included. Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS, drop ≥30% in systolic arterial pressure) and reperfusion biopsies served as early indicators of IRI. We included 47 pediatric recipients (15 HOPE-Split, 17 SCS-Split, and 15 LDLT). In comparison to SCS-Split, HOPE-Split had a significantly shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) (470min vs. 538min; p =0.02), lower PRS rates (13.3% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.04) and a lower IRI score (3 vs. 4; p = 0.03). The overall IRI score (3 vs. 3; p = 0.28) and PRS (13.3% vs. 13.3%; p = 1) after HOPE-Split were comparable to LDLT, despite a longer CIT (470min vs. 117min; p < 0.001). Surgical complications, one-year graft, and recipient survival did not differ among the groups. In conclusion, HOPE-Split mitigates early IRI in pediatric recipients in comparison to SCS-Split, approaching the gold standard of LDLT.

Risk Factors for Recurrence of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis after Liver Transplantation: Single-Center Data.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), comprising 5-15% of European liver transplantation (LT) cases, poses a significant challenge due to the risk of post-transplant disease recurrence (rPSC). This single-center study aimed to determine the rPSC rate and long-term post-LT outcomes in PSC patients and to identify potentially modifiable risk factors of rPSC. All PSC patients receiving LT at Padua Hospital from 1993 to 2021 were included. Recipient data were collected pre-LT, at LT, and during the follow-up. Donor and LT features were recorded. The rPSC rate was assessed according to Mayo Clinic criteria. Patient and graft survival were reported. Thirty-three patients were included. The main indication of LT was decompensated cirrhosis (70%). Nine patients (27%) developed rPSC during a median follow-up of 59 months (45-72). A longer cold ischemia time (p = 0.026), donor female gender (p = 0.049), inflammatory bowel disease reactivation (IBD) post LT (p = 0.005) and hepaticojejunostomy (p = 0.019) were associated with a higher risk of rPSC. Graft and patient survival at 1, 5 and 10 years post LT, 94%, 86%, 74% and 97%, 89%, 77% respectively, were not affected by rPSC development. Specific donor and surgical features might increase the risk of rPSC. Identifying predictive factors for rPSC to prevent graft loss is challenging but could lead to a more personalized organ allocation and follow-up in PSC transplanted patients. IBD reactivation might have a pathogenic role in rPSC. In our single-center experience, rPSC did not affect patient and graft survival.

Liver transplant outcomes using late allocation grafts.

Post-cross clamp late allocation (LA) liver allografts are at increased risk for discard for many reasons including logistical complexity. Nearest neighbor propensity score matching was used to match 2 standard allocation (SA) offers to every 1 LA liver offer performed at our center between 2015 and 2021. Propensity scores were based on a logistic regression model including recipient age, recipient sex, graft type (donation after circulatory death vs. donation after brain death), Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), and DRI score. During this time, 101 liver transplants (LT) were performed at our center using LA offers. In comparing LA and SA offers, there were no differences in recipient characteristics including indication for transplant ( p = 0.29), presence of PVT ( p = 0.19), TIPS ( p = 0.83), and HCC status ( p = 0.24). LA grafts came from younger donors (mean age 43.6 vs. 48.9y, p = 0.009) and were more likely to come from regional or national Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) ( p < 0.001). Cold ischemia time was longer for LA grafts (median 8.5 vs 6.3h, p < 0.001). Following LT, there were no differences between the 2 groups in intensive care unit ( p = 0.22) and hospital ( p = 0.49) lengths of stay, need for endoscopic interventions ( p = 0.55), or biliary strictures ( p = 0.21). Patient (HR 1.0, 95% CI, 0.47-2.15, p = 0.99) and graft (HR 1.23, 95% CI, 0.43-3.50, p = 0.70) survival did not vary between the LA and SA cohorts. One-year LA and SA patient survival was 95.1% and 95.0%; 1-year graft survival was 93.1% and 92.1%, respectively. Despite the additional logistical complexity and longer cold ischemia time, LT outcomes utilizing LA grafts are similar to those allocated by means of SA. Improving allocation policies specific to LA offers, as well as the sharing of best practices between transplant centers and OPOs, are opportunities to further help minimize unnecessary discards.

The short and long-term prognostic influences of liver grafts with high bilirubin levels at the time of organ recovery.

Donors with hyperbilirubinemia are often not utilized for liver transplantation (LT) due to concerns about potential liver dysfunction and graft survival. The potential to mitigate organ shortages using such donors remains unclear. This study analyzed adult deceased donor data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2002-2022). Hyperbilirubinemia was categorized as high total bilirubin (3.0-5.0mg/dL) and very high bilirubin (≥5.0mg/dL) in brain-dead donors. We assessed the impact of donor hyperbilirubinemia on 3-month and 3-year graft survival, comparing these outcomes to donors after circulatory death (DCD). Of 138622 donors, 3452 (2.5%) had high bilirubin and 1999 (1.4%) had very high bilirubin levels. Utilization rates for normal, high, and very high bilirubin groups were 73.5%, 56.4%, and 29.2%, respectively. No significant differences were found in 3-month and 3-year graft survival between groups. Donors with high bilirubin had superior 3-year graft survival compared to DCD (hazard ratio .83, p=.02). Factors associated with inferior short-term graft survival included recipient medical condition in intensive care unit (ICU) and longer cold ischemic time; factors associated with inferior long-term graft survival included older donor age, recipient medical condition in ICU, older recipient age, and longer cold ischemic time. Donors with ≥10% macrosteatosis in the very high bilirubin group were also associated with worse 3-year graft survival (p=.04). The study suggests that despite many grafts with hyperbilirubinemia being non-utilized, acceptable post-LT outcomes can be achieved using donors with hyperbilirubinemia. Careful selection may increase utilization and expand the donor pool without negatively affecting graft outcome.

S1601 Cold Normal Saline as a Preservative Solution for Complex and Technically Challenging Liver Grafts Requiring Back-Table Reconstruction With Longer Cold Ischemia Time

S1601 Cold Normal Saline as a Preservative Solution for Complex and Technically Challenging Liver Grafts Requiring Back-Table Reconstruction With Longer Cold Ischemia Time

Multi-phasic eGFR trajectory during follow up and long-term graft failure after kidney transplantation.

The prevailing assumption is that following kidney transplantation the pattern of kidney function decline is consistent. Nevertheless, numerous factors leading to graft loss may emerge, altering the trajectory of kidney function. In this study, we aim to assess alterations in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trajectory over an extended period of follow-up and examine its correlation with graft survival. We calculated eGFR using all creatinine values available from 1-year post transplantation to the end of follow-up. For pattern analysis, we used a piecewise linear model. Nine hundred eighty-eight patients were included in the study. After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 297 (30.1%) patients had a multi-phasic eGFR trajectory. Change in eGFR trajectory was associated with increased risk for graft failure (HR 7.15, 95% CI 5.17-9.89, p<.001), longer follow-up time, younger age, longer cold ischemia time, high prevalence of acute rejection, longer hospitalization and a lower initial eGFR. Of the 988 patients included in the study, 494 (50.0%) had a mono-phasic stable trajectory, 197 (19.9%) had a mono-phasic decreasing trajectory, 184 (18.6%) had bi-phasic decreasing trajectory (initial stability and then decline, 46(4.7%) had a bi-phasic stabilized (initial decline and then stabilization) and 67(6.8%) had a more complex trajectory (tri-phasic). Out of the total 144 patients who experienced graft loss, the predominant pattern was a bi-phasic decline characterized by a bi-linear trajectory (66 events, 45.8%). Changes in eGFR trajectory during long-term follow-up can serve as a valuable tool for assessing the underlying mechanisms contributing to graft loss.

Time-Dependent Changes of Klotho and FGF-23 Levels after Kidney Transplantation: Role of Cold Ischemia Time, Renal Function and Graft Inflammation.

We investigated the evolution of serum klotho (s-Kl) and FGF-23 during the first two years post-kidney transplantation (KT), considering the cold ischemia time (CIT), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and graft subclinical inflammation (SCI). We undertook a prospective, cohort, multicenter study of consecutive patients between April 2018 and January 2021 (with follow-up at 24 months). Subgroups were analyzed according to the median CIT (<14 vs. ≥14 h), the median GFR (≤40 vs. >40 mL/min/1.73 m2) and the presence of SCI at month 3. A total of 147 patients were included. s-Kl and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) levels were measured at baseline and at months 3, 12 and 24. Graft biopsies (n = 96) were performed at month 3. All patients had low s-Kl levels at month 3. Patients with CIT < 14 h exhibited a significant increase in s-Kl at month 24. In patients with CIT ≥ 14 h, s-Kl at month 3 fell and lower s-Kl levels were seen at month 24. Patients with a GFR > 40 had a lesser decrease in s-Kl at month 3. FGF-23 fell significantly at months 3 and 12 in both GFR groups, a reduction maintained during follow-up. There were significant inter-group differences in s-Kl from months 3 to 24. CIT, GFR at 3 months and SCI were significantly associated with s-KI at month 3. A reduction in s-Kl at month 3 post-KT could be explained by longer CIT and delayed graft function as well as by impaired graft function. Early SCI may regulate s-Kl increase post-KT.

Reassessing Geographic, Logistical, and Cold Ischemia Cutoffs in Liver Transplantation

Liver acceptance patterns vary significantly between transplant centers. Data pertaining to outcomes of livers declined by local and regional centers and allocated nationally remains limited. The objective was to compare post-liver transplant outcomes between liver allografts transplanted as a result of national and local-regional allocation. This was a retrospective evaluation of 109 nationally allocated liver allografts used for transplant by a single center. Outcomes of nationally allocated grafts were compared to standard allocation grafts (N = 505) during the same period. Recipients of nationally allocated grafts had lower model for end stage liver disease scores (17 vs 22, P = .001). Nationally allocated grafts were more likely to be post-cross clamp offers (29.4% vs 13.4%, P = .001) and have longer cold ischemia times (median hours 7.8 vs 5.5, P = .001). Early allograft dysfunction was common (54.1% vs 52.5%, P = .75) and did not impact hospital length of stay (median 5 vs 6 days, P = .89). There were no differences in biliary complications (P = .11). There were no differences in patient (P = .88) or graft survival (P = .35). In a multivariate model, after accounting for differences in cold ischemia time and posttransplant biliary complications, nationally allocated grafts were not associated with increased risk for graft loss (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4-1.8). Abnormal liver biopsy findings (33.0%) followed by donor donation after circulatory death status (22.9%) were the most common reasons for decline by local-regional centers. Despite longer cold ischemia times, patient and graft survival outcomes remain excellent and comparable to those seen from standard allocation grafts.

Knowing When to Ignore the Numbers: Single-Center Experience Transplanting Deceased Donor Kidneys with Poor Perfusion Parameters.

Hypothermic machine perfusion is frequently used in evaluating marginal kidneys with poor perfusion parameters (PPP) contributing to delays in kidney placement or discard. We examined outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplants with PPP compared with those with optimal perfusion parameters (OPP). We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study from 2001 to 2021 comparing PPP (n = 91) with OPP (n = 598) deceased donor kidney transplants. PPP was defined as terminal flow ≤80 mL/min and terminal resistance ≥0.40 mmHg/mL/min. OPP was defined as terminal flow ≥120 mL/min and terminal resistance ≤0.20 mmHg/mL/min. Mean terminal flow was PPP 66 ± 16 vs OPP 149 ± 21 mL/min and resistance was PPP 0.47 ± 0.10 vs OPP 0.15 ± 0.04 mmHg/mL/min (both p < 0.001). Donor age, donation after cardiac death, and terminal serum creatinine levels were similar between groups. Mean Kidney Donor Profile Index was higher among PPP donors (PPP 65 ± 23% vs OPP 52 ± 27%, p < 0.001). The PPP transplant group had more females and lower weight and BMI. Delayed graft function was comparable (PPP 32% vs OPP 27%, p = 0.33) even though cold ischemia times trended toward longer in PPP kidneys (PPP 28 ± 10 vs OPP 26 ± 9 hours, p = 0.09). One-year patient survival (PPP 98% vs OPP 97%, p = 0.84) and graft survival (PPP 91% vs OPP 92%, p = 0.23) were equivalent. PPP did predict inferior overall and death-censored graft survival long-term (overall hazard ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.23 and death-censored hazard ratio 1.77, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.74). At 1 year, the estimated glomerular filtration rate was higher with OPP kidneys (PPP 40 ± 17 vs OPP 52 ± 19 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , p < 0.001). Short-term outcomes in PPP kidneys were comparable to OPP kidneys despite higher Kidney Donor Profile Index and longer cold ischemia times, suggesting a role for increased utilization of these organs with careful recipient selection.

Prognostic Factors for Non-anastomotic Biliary Strictures Following Adult Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The development of non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) following orthotopic adult liver transplantation (OLT) is associated with significant morbidity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all prognostic factors for the development of NAS. A systematic review was conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the quality of the included studies. Using the random-effects model, we calculated the weighted pooled odds ratios (OR), mean differences (MD), hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the risk factors. Based on 19 international studies that included a total of 8269 adult LT patients, we calculated an 8% overall incidence of NAS. In this study, 7 potential prognostic factors were associated with a statistically significant hazard ratio for NAS in pooled analyses including (1) DCD donors compared to DBD donors (2) PSC as an indication for a liver transplant (3) Roux-en-Y bile duct reconstruction compared to duct-to-duct reconstruction (4) hepatic artery thrombosis (5) longer cold ischemia time (6) longer warm ischemia time (7) and total operative times. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we identified 7 prognostic factors for the development of NAS following OLT. These findings might lay the groundwork for development of diagnostic algorithms to better risk stratify patients at risk for development of NAS.

Days alive and out of hospital after liver transplant: comparing a patient-centered outcome between recipients of grafts from donation after circulatory and brain deaths

We retrospectively compared outcomes between recipients of donation after circulatory death (DCD) and donation after brain death (DBD) liver allografts using days alive and out of hospital (DAOH), a composite outcome of mortality, morbidity, and burden of care from patient perspective. The initial length of stay and duration of any subsequent readmission for the first year after liver transplantation were recorded. Donor category and perioperative and intraoperative characteristics pertinent to liver transplantation were included. The primary outcome was DAOH365. Secondary outcomes included early allograft dysfunction and hepatic arterial and biliary complications. Although the incidence of both early allograft dysfunction (P < .001) and ischemic cholangiopathy (P < .001) was significantly greater in the recipients of DCD, there were no significant differences in the length of stay and DAOH365. The median DAOH365 was 355 days for recipients of DBD allografts and 353 days for recipients of DCD allografts (P = .34). Increased transfusion burden, longer cold ischemic time, and non-White recipients were associated with decreased DAOH. There were no significant differences in graft failure (P = .67), retransplantation (P = .67), or 1-year mortality (P = .96) between the 2 groups. DAOH is a practical and attainable measure of outcome after liver transplantation. This metric should be considered for quality measurement and reporting in liver transplantation.

Intra-Abdominal Hypertension and Compartment Syndrome after Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcome.

In pediatric liver transplantation (pLT), the risk for the manifestation and relevance of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is high. This observational study aimed to evaluate the incidence, relevance and risk factors for IAH and ACS by monitoring the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), macro- and microcirculation (near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)), clinical and laboratory status and outcomes of 27 patients (16 female) after pLT (median age at pLT 35 months). Of the patients, 85% developed an elevated IAP, most of them mild. However, 17% achieved IAH° 3, 13% achieved IAH° 4 and 63% developed ACS. A multiple linear regression analysis identified aortal hepatic artery anastomosis and cold ischemia time (CIT) as risk factors for increased IAP and longer CIT and staged abdominal wall closure for ACS. ACS patients had significantly longer mechanical ventilation (p = 0.004) and LOS-PICU (p = 0.003). No significant correlation between NIRS or biliary complications and IAH or ACS could be shown. IAH and ACS after pLT were frequent. NIRS or grade of IAH alone should not be used for monitoring. A longer CIT is an important risk factor for higher IAP and ACS. Therefore, approaches such as the ex vivo machine perfusion of donor organs, reducing CIT effects on them, have great potential. Our study provides important basics for studying such approaches.

Comparative outcomes for over 100 deceased donor kidney transplants from SARS-CoV-2 positive donors: A single-center experience

Emerging data supports the safety of transplantation of extra‐pulmonary organs from donors with SARS‐CoV‐2‐detection. Our center offered kidney transplantation (KT) from deceased donors (DD) with SARS‐CoV‐2 with and without COVID‐19 as cause of death (CoV+COD and CoV+) to consenting candidates. No pre‐emptive antiviral therapies were given. We retrospectively compared outcomes to contemporaneous DDKTs with negative SARS‐CoV‐2 testing (CoVneg). From 2/01/2021 to 01/31/2022, there were 220 adult KTs, including 115 (52%) from 35 CoV+ and 33 CoV+COD donors. Compared to CoVneg and CoV+, CoV+COD were more often DCD (100% vs 40% and 46%, p<0.01) with longer cold ischemia times (25.2h vs 22.9h and 22.2h, p=0.02). At median follow‐up of 5.7 months, recipients of CoV+, CoV+COD and CoVneg kidneys had similar rates of delayed graft function (10.3%, 21.8% and 21.9%, p=0.16), rejection (5.1%, 0% and 8.5%, p=0.07), graft failure (1.7%, 0% and 0%, p=0.35), mortality (0.9%, 0% and 3.7%; p=0.29), and COVID‐19 diagnoses (13.6%, 7.1%, and 15.2%, p=0.33). Though follow‐up was shorter, CoV+COD was associated with lower but acceptable eGFR on multivariable analysis. KT from DDs at various stages of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection appears safe and successful. Extended follow‐up is required to assess the impact of CoV+COD donors on longer term graft function.

MCPggaac haplotype is associated with poor graft survival in kidney transplant recipients with de novo thrombotic microangiopathy.

De novo thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is associated with poor kidney graft survival, and as we previously described, it is a recipient driven process with suspected genetic background. Direct Sanger sequencing was performed in 90 KTR with de novo TMA and 90 corresponding donors on selected regions in CFH, CD46, C3, and CFB genes that involve variations with a functional effect or confer a risk for aHUS. Additionally, 37 recipients of paired kidneys who did not develop TMA were analyzed for the MCPggaac haplotype. Three-years death-censored graft survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. The distribution of haplotypes in all groups was in the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and there was no clustering of haplotypes in any group. In the TMA group, we found that MCPggaac haplotype carriers were at a significantly higher risk of graft loss compared to individuals with the wild-type genotype. Worse 3-year death-censored graft survival was associated with longer cold ischemia time (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06, 1.36) and recipients’ MCPggaac haplotype (HR 3.83, 95% CI 1.42, 10.4) in the multivariable Cox regression model. There was no association between donor haplotypes and kidney graft survival. Similarly, there was no effect of the MCPggaac haplotype on 3-year graft survival in recipients of paired kidneys without de novo TMA. Kidney transplant recipients carrying the MCPggaac haplotype with de novo TMA are at an increased risk of premature graft loss. These patients might benefit from therapeutic strategies based on complement inhibition.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

There are unique technical and management challenges associated with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for Budd-Chiari Syndrome (BCS). The outcomes of LDLT for BCS in comparison to other indications remain unclear and warrant elucidation. Data of 24 BCS patients who underwent LDLT between January 2012 and June 2019 were analyzed. There were 20 adults and 4 children. The early and long-term outcomes of adult LDLT BCS patients were compared to a control group of LDLT patients for other indications and matched using propensity scoring methodology. Primary BCS was observed in 18 (90%) patients. Caval replacement was performed in 7 (35%) patients. Early and late hepatic venous outflow tract (HVOT) complications were seen in 1 (5%) and 3 (15%) patients. Preoperative acute kidney injury was identified as a risk factor for mortality in the BCS cohort (p = 0.013). On comparison, BCS recipients were younger with fewer comorbidities, more large volume ascites and higher rates of PVT. They also had longer cold ischemia time, increased blood loss and transfusion requirements, increased hospital stay, and higher late outflow complications. The 1-year and 3-year survivals were similar to non-BCS cohort (84.2% vs. 94% and 71.3% vs. 91.9%, respectively, log rank test p = 0.09). LDLT is a good option for symptomatic BCS who have failed non-transplant interventions. The clinical and risk factor profile of BCS recipients is distinct from non-BCS recipients. By following an algorithmic management protocol, we show on propensity-score matched analysis that outcomes of LDLT for BCS are similar to non-BCS indications.

Post-pancreatic transplant enteric leaks: The role of the salvage operation

Enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation is complicated by an enteric leak in 5%–8%, frequently necessitating pancreatectomy. Pancreatic salvage outcomes are not well studied. Risk factors for enteric leak were examined and outcomes of attempted graft salvage were compared to immediate pancreatectomy. Pancreas transplants performed between 1995 and 2018 were reviewed. Donor, recipient, and organ variables including demographics, donor type, ischemic time, kidney donor profile index, and pancreas donor risk index were analyzed. Among 1153 patients, 33 experienced enteric leaks (2.9%). Donors of allografts that developed leak were older (37.9y vs. 29.0y, p = .001), had higher KDPI (37% vs. 24%, p < .001), higher pancreas donor risk index (1.83 vs. 1.32, p < .001), and longer cold ischemic time (16.5 vs. 14.8 h, p = .03). Intra-abdominal abscess and higher blood loss decreased the chance of successful salvage. Enteric leak increased 6-month graft loss risk (HR 13.9[CI 8.5–22.9], p < .001). However, 50% (n = 12) of allografts undergoing attempted salvage survived long-term. After 6 months of pancreas graft survival, salvage and non-leak groups had similar 5-year graft survival (82.5% vs. 81.5%) and mortality (90.9% vs. 93.5%). Enteric leaks remain a challenging complication. Pancreatic allograft salvage can be attempted in suitable patients and accomplished in 50% of cases without significantly increased graft failure or mortality risk.

Donation after circulatory death transplant outcomes using livers recovered by local surgeons.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT) outcomes have been attributed to multiple variables, including procurement surgeon recovery techniques. Outcomes of 196 DCD LTs at Mayo Clinic Arizona were analyzed based on graft recovery by a surgeon from our center (transplant procurement team [TPT]) versus a local procurement surgeon (non-TPT [NTPT]). A standard recovery technique was used for all TPT livers. The recovery technique used by the NTPT was left to the discretion of that surgeon. A total of 129 (65.8%) grafts were recovered by our TPT, 67 (34.2%) by the NTPT. Recipient age (p=0.43), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (median 17 vs. 18; p=0.22), and donor warm ischemia time (median 21.0 vs. 21.5; p=0.86) were similar between the TPT and NTPT groups. NTPT livers had longer cold ischemia times (6.5 vs. 5.0median hours; p<0.001). Early allograft dysfunction (80.6% vs. 76.1%; p=0.42) and primary nonfunction (0.8% vs. 0.0%; p=0.47) were similar. Ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) treated with endoscopy occurred in 18.6% and 11.9% of TPT and NTPT grafts (p=0.23). At last follow-up, approximately half of those requiring endoscopy were undergoing a stent-free trial (58.3% TPT; 50.0% NTPT; p=0.68). IC requiring re-LT in the first year occurred in 0.8% (n=1) of TPT and 3.0% (n=2) of NTPT grafts (p=0.23). There were no differences in patient (hazard ratio [HR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-5.03; p=0.23) or graft (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 0.98-4.09; p=0.10) survival rates. Graft survival at 1 year was 91.5% for TPT grafts and 95.5% for NTPT grafts. Excellent outcomes can be achieved using NTPT for the recovery of DCD livers. There may be an opportunity to expand the use of DCD livers in the United States by increasing the use of NTPT.