Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Research Articles

The risk profile change in patients with severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treated with subcutaneous treprostinil.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is successfully treatable with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), balloon pulmonary angioplasty, and medical therapy. Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management risk score (RRS) is able to predict long-term outcome in inoperable patients or in patients with residual PH after surgery. We performed a post hoc analysis of RRS in patients who were enrolled in the CTREPH study (NCT01416636), a randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing high-dose and low-dose subcutaneous (SC) treprostinil in patients with severe CTEPH that was classified by an interdisciplinary CTEPH team as nonoperable, or as persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension after PEA. Baseline mean RRS was similar in both treatment groups (8.7 in high-dose arm vs. 8.6 in low-dose arm), but mean RRS change from baseline to Week 24 was greater in the high-dose treprostinil group than in the low-dose treprostinil group (-0.88 vs. -0.17). The difference in RRS change from baseline to Week 24 between high dose versus low dose was statistically significant with mean difference of -0.70 (95% confidence interval: -1.36 to -0.05, p = 0.0352), and was driven mainly by improvement of World Health Organization functional class and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentration. SC treprostinil therapy administered in standard dose had positive effect on the risk profile measured by RRS in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent severe CTEPH. Although our study was limited by the small sample size and post hoc nature, assessment of risk profile is of great importance to this particular patient population with very poor prognosis.

Pulmonary Artery Strain Predicts Prognosis in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

BackgroundCurrent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) focuses on measures of ventricular function and coupling. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate pulmonary artery (PA) global longitudinal strain (GLS) as a prognostic marker in patients with PAH. MethodsThe authors included 169 patients with PAH from the ASPIRE (Assessing the Spectrum of Pulmonary hypertension Identified at a REferral centre) and INITIATE (Integrated computatioNal modelIng of righT heart mechanIcs and blood flow dynAmics in congeniTal hEart disease) registries, and 82 normal controls with similar age and gender distributions. PA GLS was derived from CMR feature tracking. Right ventricular measurements including volumes, ejection fraction, and right ventricular GLS were also derived from CMR. Patients were followed up a median of 34 months with all-cause mortality as the primary endpoint. Other known risk scores were collected, including the REVEAL (Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management) 2.0 and COMPERA (Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension) 2.0 scores. ResultsOf 169 patients (mean age: 57 ± 15 years; 80% female), 45 (26.6%) died (median follow-up: 34 months). Mean PA GLS was 23% ± 6% in normal controls and 10% ± 5% in patients with PAH (P < 0.0001). Patients with PA GLS <9% had a higher risk of mortality than those with PA GLS ≥9% (P < 0.001), and this was an independent predictor of mortality in PAH on multivariable analysis after adjustment for known risk factors (HR: 2.93; P = 0.010). Finally, in patients with PAH, PA GLS provided incremental prognostic value over the REVEAL 2.0 (global chi-square; P = 0.001; C statistic comparison; P = 0.030) and COMPERA 2.0 (global chi-square; P = 0.001; C statistic comparison; P = 0.048). ConclusionsPA GLS confers incremental prognostic utility over the established risk scores for identifying patients with PAH at higher risk of death, who may be targeted for closer monitoring and/or intensified therapy.

Risk Assessment Tool Implementation in Congenital Heart Disease-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Risk assessment is recommended for patients with congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. This study aims to compare an abbreviated version of the risk assessment strategy, noninvasive French model, and an abridged version of the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management 2.0 risk score calculator, Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management Lite 2. We enrolled a mixed prevalent and incident cohort of patients with congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (n = 126). Noninvasive French model comprising World Health Organization functional class, 6-minute walk distance, and N-terminal pro-hormone of brain natriuretic peptide or brain natriuretic peptide was used. Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management Lite 2 includes functional class, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, 6-minute walk distance, brain natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro-hormone of brain natriuretic peptide, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The mean age was 32.17 ± 16.3 years. The mean follow-up was 99.41 ± 58.2 months. Thirty-two patients died during follow-up period. Most patients were Eisenmenger syndrome (31%) and simple defects (29.4%). Most patients received monotherapy (76.2%). Most patients were World Health Organization functional class I-II (66.6%). Both models effectively identified risk in our cohort (P =.0001). Patients achieving 2 or 3 noninva-sive low-risk criteria or low-risk category by Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management Lite 2 at follow-up had a significantly reduced risk of death. Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management Lite 2 approximates noninvasive French model at discriminating among patients based on c-index. Age, high risk by Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management Lite 2, and the presence of 2 or 3 low-risk criteria by noninvasive French model emerged as an independent predictors of mortality (multivariate hazard ratio: 1.031, 95% CI: 1.005-1.058, P =.02; hazard ratio: 4.258, CI: 1.143-15.860, P =.031; hazard ratio: 0.095, CI: 0.013-0.672, P =.018, respectively). Both abbreviated risk assessment tools may provide a simplified and robust method of risk assessment for congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Patients not achieving low risk at follow-up may benefit from aggressive use of available therapies.

Portopulmonary Hypertension in Nontransplanted Patients: Results of the Largest US Single-Institution Registry

ObjectiveTo explore clinical characteristics, risk profiles, and outcomes of patients with portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) who have contraindications to liver transplant (LT). MethodsFrom the largest US single-institution registry of patients with PoPH, we analyzed 160 patients who did not receive LT between 1988 to 2019. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)–pertinent characteristics, hemodynamic features, treatments, and risk stratification were compared at baseline, first follow-up visit, and censor/death time. ResultsMedian survival for the entire cohort was 27.5 months from the diagnosis of PoPH. Overall survival was 89%, 77%, 51%, and 38% at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively. Survival was significantly affected by the severity of liver disease (P<.001). Most patients received PAH-specific therapies (136 [85%]), predominantly monotherapy (123 [77%)]. With treatment, significant improvements were noted in World Health Organization functional class (P=.04), 6-minute walk distance (P<.001), right ventricular function (P<.001), pulmonary vascular resistance (P<.001), and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL) Lite 2 score (P=.02) univariately. Per European Society of Cardiology risk stratification, no patient met full criteria for low risk at baseline or at follow-up. In a multivariate Cox risk model, 6-minute walk distance, right atrial pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, bilirubin level, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease–sodium score of 15 or higher were associated with increased risk of death. ConclusionPatients with PoPH who did not undergo LT had a poor prognosis. This persisted despite use of PAH-specific therapies and significant improvements in hemodynamics, echocardiography parameters of right ventricle function, 6-minute walk distance, and World Health Organization functional class.

The Consistent Effectiveness and Safety of Macitentan Therapies Across Idiopathic and Congenital Heart Disease-Associated PulmonaryArterial Hypertension: A Single-Center Experience.

In this single-center study, we evaluated efficacy and safety issues and predictors of survival in patients with idiopathic and congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension who were under macitentan therapies. Our study retrospectively evaluated 221 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension enrolled in our single-center study, and mono, dual, and triple macitentan therapies were noted in 30, 115, and 76 patients, respectively. The longitudinal changes in clinical, neurohumoral, and echocardiographic measures of pulmonary arterial hypertension were evaluated. The Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management, Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management 2.0, and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long- Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management Lite 2 scores at baseline, Swedish PAH Registry, Comparative Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension registry, and French Pulmonary Hypertension Network registry risk status both at baseline and first control were assessed. The median follow-up period was 1068 [415-2245] days. Macitentan was associated with significant improvements in functional class, 6-minute walk distance, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and echocardiographic measures without any deterioration of hemoglobin or hepatic enzymes. The low-risk scores with each model at baseline and/or first control are related to significantly better survival. Age, gender, and log-NT-proBNP in time-fixed and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, and log-NT-proBNP in time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were independent predictors of mortality. Mono- or sequential combination macitentan therapies were associated with sustained benefits in functional class, 6-minute walk distance, NT-proBNP, and echocardiographic measures in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and congenital heart disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension, and low-risk scores at baseline and/or first controls can be translated to better survival.

Validation of the REVEAL Prognostic Models in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

No previous studies have investigated the predictive performance of the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL) prognostic equation and simplified risk score calculator in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SLE-PAH). We aimed to validate these prediction tools in an external cohort of patients with SLE-PAH. In this study, the validation cohort consisted of patients with SLE-PAH registered in a prospective, multicenter, nationwide database between November 2006 and May2016. The follow-up of patients was censored at 1 year. Discrimination, calibration, model fit, and risk stratification of the REVEAL prognostic equation and simplified risk score calculator were validated. As a result, a total of 306 patients with SLE-PAH were included. The 1-year overall survival rate was 91.5%. The C-index of the prognostic equation was 0.736, demonstrating reasonably good discrimination, and it was greater than that for the simplified risk score calculator (0.710). The overall calibration slope was 0.83, and the Brier score was 0.079. The risk of renal insufficiency and World Health Organization Functional Class III (WHO FC III) were underestimated, and the risk assigned to a heart rate >92 bpm in the REVEAL prognostic models was not observed in our validation cohort. Both model discrimination and calibration were poor in the very high-risk group. In conclusion, the REVEAL models exhibit good discriminatory ability when predicting 1-year overall survival in patients with SLE-PAH. Findings from both models should be interpreted with caution in cases of renal insufficiency, WHO FC III, and heart rate >92 bpm.

Maximal Exercise Testing Using the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test Can Be Used to Risk-Stratify Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Rationale: Exercise capacity predicts mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), but limited data exist on the routine use of maximal exercise testing.Objectives: This study evaluates a simple-to-perform maximal test (the incremental shuttle walking test) and its use in risk stratification in PAH.Methods: Consecutive patients with pulmonary hypertension were identified from the ASPIRE (Assessing the Spectrum of Pulmonary hypertension Identified at a REferral centre) registry (2001–2018). Thresholds for levels of risk were identified at baseline and tested at follow-up, and their incorporation into current risk stratification approaches was assessed.Results: Of 4,524 treatment-naive patients with pulmonary hypertension who underwent maximal exercise testing, 1,847 patients had PAH. A stepwise reduction in 1-year mortality was seen between levels 1 (≤30 m; 32% mortality) and 7 (340–420 m; 1% mortality) with no mortality for levels 8–12 (≥430 m) in idiopathic and connective tissue disease–related PAH. Thresholds derived at baseline of ≤180 m (>10%; high risk), 190–330 m (5–10%; intermediate risk), and ≥340 m (<5%; low risk of 1-yr mortality) were applied at follow-up and also accurately identified levels of risk. Thresholds were incorporated into the REVEAL (Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management) 2.0 risk score calculator and French low-risk approach to risk stratification, and distinct categories of risk remained.Conclusions: We have demonstrated that maximal exercise testing in PAH stratifies mortality risk at baseline and follow-up. This study highlights the potential value of the incremental shuttle walking test as an alternative to the 6-minute walking test, combining some of the advantages of maximal exercise testing and maintaining the simplicity of a simple-to-perform field test.

Global Right Heart Assessment with Speckle-Tracking Imaging Improves the Risk Prediction of a Validated Scoring System in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Right ventricular (RV) function and right atrial (RA) remodeling are major determinants of outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Strain echocardiography is emerging as a valuable approach for the study of RV and RA function. We sought to assess the incremental prognostic value of serial combined speckle-tracking examination of right chambers in newly diagnosed therapy-naïve PAH patients. The study endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalizations due to worsening PAH, and initiation of parenteral prostanoids. Patients were assessed at baseline and at first revaluation after initiation of treatment. Right ventricular free-wall longitudinal strain (FWLS) and RA peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) were used as measures of RV and RA function. Eighty-three patients were included. Mean RV-FWLS and RA-PALS were -13.9%±6.1% and 23.1%±11.4%. The best performing prognostic score among the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension, French Pulmonary Hypertension Registry, and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL) scores was the REVEAL (area under the curve=0.79, P<.001). With the identified cutoffs, both RV-FWLS (hazard ratio for RV-FWLS<-13.2%=0.366; 95% CI, 0.159-0.842; P=.018) and RA-PALS (hazard ratio for RA-PALS>20%=0.399; 95% CI, 0.176-0.905; P=.028) were independently associated with the primary outcome after correction for the REVEAL score. The combined assessment of RV-FWLS and RA-PALS in addition to the REVEAL score determined a net improvement in prediction of 0.439 (95% CI, 0.070-0.888, P=.04). At 5months (interquartile range, 4-8) of follow-up, RV-FWLS and RA-PALS improved significantly only in patients free from the primary outcome (P<.001 and P=.001, respectively). The combined assessment of RV-FWLS and RA-PALS determined an improvement in outcome prediction of validated prognostic risk scores and should be considered within the multiparametric evaluation of patients with PAH.

Current clinical utilization of risk assessment tools in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a descriptive survey of facilitation strategies, patterns, and barriers to use in the United States.

Practice guidelines suggest that treatment decisions in pulmonary arterial hypertension be informed by periodic assessment of patients’ clinical risk. Several tools, well validated for risk discrimination, such as the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management calculator, were developed to assess pulmonary arterial hypertension patients’ risk of death based on multiple parameters, including functional class, hemodynamics, biomarkers, comorbidities, and exercise capacity. Using an online survey, we investigated the use of risk assessment tools by pulmonary hypertension healthcare providers in the United States. Of 121 survey respondents who make treatment decisions, 59% reported using risk assessment tools. The use of these tools was lower for non-physicians (48% vs. 65% physicians) and for practitioners at centers with 1 to 100 pulmonary arterial hypertension patients compared with centers with >100 patients (47% vs. 64%). Risk was most frequently assessed by decision makers at the time of diagnosis (cited by 54%) and at the time of worsening symptoms (cited by 42%), suggesting that use of pulmonary arterial hypertension risk assessment tools remains low. In our survey, non-physicians compared with physicians cited two major barriers to increased tool use: lack of education and training (20% vs. 4%) and lack of clarity on the best tool to use (30% vs. 18%). Information technology tools, such as electronic medical record integration and web or phone-based risk calculating applications, were cited most frequently as ways to increase the use of risk assessment tools.

Incorporation of renal function in mortality risk assessment for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Risk assessment is important for prognostication and individualized treatment decisions for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The purpose was (1) to compare contemporary risk assessment tools and (2) to determine the prognostic significance of risk parameters of kidney function and whether they can further improve risk prediction for patients with PAH. We identified a cohort of treatment-naive patients (n = 211) who received an incident diagnosis of PAH at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. Using demographics, disease characteristics, and hemodynamic data at diagnosis, we categorized patients as low, intermediate, or high risk according to current European guidelines (European Society of Cardiology [ESC]) and registry to evaluate early and long-term pulmonary arterial hypertension disease management (REVEAL) risk scores. The primary end-point was transplant-free survival (TFS). Patients were predominantly women (64.6%) with World Health Organization function Class III symptoms (66.5%). The median TFS was 7.09 years. There was little agreement between ESC- and REVEAL-based risk estimates (weighted kappa = 0.21-0.34). Although both the ESC (log-rank, p = 0.0002) and REVEAL algorithms stratified TFS risk (p < 0.0001), the REVEAL score provided superior discrimination (C-statistic = 0.70 vs 0.59, p = 0.004). Renal function at diagnosis (p < 0.0001) and Δ renal function at 6 months (p < 0.0001) were identified as novel risk parameters and served to reclassify some patients in the intermediate-risk category to a lower or higher risk stratum (p < 0.0001). REVEAL-based strategies provide superior TFS risk discrimination to ESC/European Respiratory Society-based approaches. However, the classification of intermediate-risk patients varied significantly across tools. We demonstrate the importance of renal function, which further improved the stratification of risk in patients with PAH, particularly in patients who are considered intermediate risk.

Risk Reduction and Right Heart Reverse Remodeling by Upfront Triple Combination Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Combinations of therapies are currently recommended for patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and excellent results have been reported with triple upfront combination of these drugs. We evaluated the effects of this approach on right ventricular (RV) function and outcome in patients with severe PAH. Twenty-one patients (age, 44 ± 15 years) with newly diagnosed high-risk idiopathic PAH that was nonreversible by the inhalation of nitric oxide were treated upfront with a combination of ambrisentan, tadalafil, and subcutaneous treprostinil between 2014 and 2018. Clinical evaluation, World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walk distance, biomarkers, echocardiography, and right-sided heart catheterization data were recorded at baseline and during follow-up. At a median follow-up of 2 years, all patients were still alive. The Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management score decreased from 10 ± 1 to 5 ± 1, right-sided atrial pressure decreased from 13 ± 3 to 5 ± 2mmHg, mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 60 ± 9 to 42 ± 5mmHg, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) decreased from 16.4 ± 4.4 to 5.5 ± 1.3 Wood units, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide decreased from 3,379 ± 1,921 to 498 ± 223 pg/mL, and World Health Organization functional class decreased from 3.4 ± 0.5 to 2.0 ± 0.4 (all P< .001). Cardiac index increased from 1.8 ± 0.3 to 3.5 ± 0.8 L/min/m2 and 6-min walk distance increased from158 ± 130 to 431 ± 66m (both P< .001). Echocardiography showed decreased right-sided atrial and RV areas, improved left ventricular eccentricity index, and increased fractional area change (all P< .001) in proportion to treatment-induced decrease in PVR. Triple upfront combination therapy with ambrisentan, tadalafil, and subcutaneous treprostinil in severe nonreversible PAH is associated with considerable clinical and hemodynamic improvement and right-sided heart reverse remodeling.

Validation of the REVEAL Prognostic Equation and Risk Score Calculator in Incident Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

A prognostic equation and risk score calculator derived from the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL) are being used to predict 1-year survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), but little is known about the performance of these REVEAL survival prediction tools in systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated PAH (SSc-PAH). Prospectively gathered data from the Johns Hopkins Pulmonary Hypertension Program and Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcome in Scleroderma Registries were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the REVEAL models for predicting the probability of 1-year survival in patients with SSc-PAH. Model discrimination was assessed by comparison of the Harrell's C-index, model fit was assessed using multivariable regression techniques, and model calibration was assessed by comparing predicted to observed survival estimates. The validation cohort consisted of 292 SSc-PAH patients with a 1-year survival rate of 87.4%. The C-index for predictive accuracy of the REVEAL prognostic equation (0.734, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.652-0.816) and for the risk score (0.743, 95% CI 0.663-0.823) demonstrated good discrimination, comparable to that in the model development cohort. The calibration slope was 0.707 (95% CI 0.400-1.014), indicating that the overall model fit was marginal (P = 0.06). The magnitude of risk assigned to low distance on the 6-minute walk test (6MWD) and elevated serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was lower in the validation cohort than was originally seen in the REVEAL derivation cohort. Model calibration was poor, particularly for the highest risk groups. In predicting 1-year survival in patients newly diagnosed as having SSc-PAH, the REVEAL prognostic equation and risk score provide very good discrimination but poor calibration. REVEAL prediction scores should be interpreted with caution in newly diagnosed SSc-PAH patients, particularly those with higher predicted risk of poor 1-year survival resulting from a low 6MWD or a high BNP serum level.

Low plasma stem cell factor combined with high transforming growth factor-α identifies high-risk patients in pulmonary arterial hypertension

In pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), severe vasoconstriction and remodelling of small pulmonary arteries result in high mortality. Receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands, such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-α, modulate proliferation in PAH. Although the receptor tyrosine kinase c-Kit has been shown to be overexpressed in PAH, the expression and role of its ligand stem cell factor (SCF) remain unknown. However, low plasma SCF levels are known to be linked to higher cardiovascular mortality risk.Using proximity extension assays, we measured SCF and TGF-α in venous plasma from treatment-naïve PAH patients and healthy controls. Patients were stratified into risk classes based on PAH guidelines.Plasma SCF was decreased (p=0.013) and TGF-α was increased (p<0.0001) in PAH patients compared to controls. SCF correlated to pulmonary vascular resistance (r=−0.66, p<0.0001), cardiac index (r=0.66, p<0.0001), venous oxygen saturation (r=0.47, p<0.0008), mean right atrial pressure (r=−0.44, p<0.002) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic protein (r=−0.39, p<0.006). SCF was lower in “high-risk” compared to “intermediate-risk” (p=0.0015) or “low-risk” (p=0.0009) PAH patients. SCF and TGF-α levels combined (SCF/TGF-α) resulted in 85.7% sensitivity and 81.5% specificity for detecting high-risk patients (p<0.0001). Finally, REVEAL (Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management) risk scores in PAH patients correlated to SCF/TGF-α levels (r=−0.50, p=0.0003).In conclusion, low plasma SCF combined with high TGF-α identifies high-risk PAH patients at baseline. Lower circulating SCF levels, which are associated with worse haemodynamics, may be related to the c-Kit accumulation previously observed in PAH.

Tolerability and clinical efficacy of inhaled treprostinil in patients with group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue that directly vasodilates pulmonary and systemic arterial vascular beds. The United States Food and Drug Administration approved inhaled treprostinil in July 2009 for the treatment of group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension. Inhaled treprostinil avoids issues with continuous infusion prostanoids. This study describes a single institutional experience with inhaled treprostinil. This was a retrospective review of group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension patients receiving inhaled treprostinil from July 2009 through September 2015. Patient demographics, vital signs, prognostic indicators, pulmonary arterial hypertension assessments, treprostinil dosing, pulmonary arterial hypertension medications, and physician assessment were collected. Prognostic indicators and the physician assessment were used to assess treatment response. A modified Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL) risk score was calculated prior to and after initiation of inhaled treprostinil. The mean time on inhaled treprostinil for the 16 patients was 21 ± 17 months. A total of 31% discontinued treatment. The New York Heart Association Functional Class, right ventricular size, and right ventricular function improved after inhaled treprostinil. Directional improvement in B-type natriuretic peptide, 6-minute walk distance, right arterial pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure were also observed. The mean modified REVEAL risk score (RRS) was 7 ± 3 at baseline. The RRS decreased in 7 of the 11 patients that improved and remained stable in 2 patients. The majority of patients in this consecutive series receiving inhaled treprostinil tolerated treatment. Most patients remained on therapy for over 12 months. Clinical assessments of disease severity all changed directionally toward improvement and the overall risk assessment was improved or stable in 56% by the RRS.

Baseline and Serial Brain Natriuretic Peptide Level Predicts 5-Year Overall Survival in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Data From the REVEAL Registry

Plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level is a prognostic biomarker in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Its impact on long-term overall survival (OS) was investigated in the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL), a 5-year observational, multicenter, US registry of patients with PAH. Patients were≥ 18 years of age, met right heart catheterization criteria at rest, had World Health Organization group I PAH, and had BNP measurement at enrollment. Optimal BNP threshold was obtained via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. OS was compared in patients with low (≤ 340 pg/mL) vshigh (> 340 pg/mL) BNP at baseline; changes between baseline and last assessment were also examined. Patients were categorized based on baseline (low or high) and follow-up (low or high) BNP values; hazard ratios (HRs) for OS were estimated and compared using Cox regression. Overall, 1,426 patients were analyzed. Mortality risk was significantly higher in patients with baseline high vslow BNP (HR, 3.6; 95%CI, 3.0-4.2). BNP change analysis at≤ 1 year postenrollment demonstrated that the low-low group had the lowest and the high-high group had the highest 5-year mortality risk (HR, 0.23; 95%CI, 0.19-0.27). Changes in BNP score also correlated with change of risk of death. Baseline BNP threshold of 340 pg/mL strongly predicted survival up to 5 years in patients with PAH. A BNP reduction at 1 year since enrollment was associated with decreased mortality risk, whereas an increase in BNP at 1 year was associated with an increased mortality risk, supporting BNP as a surrogate marker of PAH survival.

(29) - REVEAL Risk Score in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Receiving Riociguat

The Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) disease Management (REVEAL) risk score (RRS) predicts 1-year survival in patients with PAH. We applied a RRS to patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in the 16-week, double-blind CHEST-1 study and open-label CHEST-2 extension. Relationships between RRS and riociguat treatment, and RRS and long-term outcomes were examined.

40-Year-Old Woman With Breathlessness and Fatigue

40-Year-Old Woman With Breathlessness and Fatigue

Validation of two predictive models for survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

The French Pulmonary Hypertension Network (FPHN) registry and the Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL) have developed predictive models for survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In this collaboration, we assess the external validity (or generalisability) of the FPHN ItinérAIR-HTAP predictive equation and the REVEAL risk score calculator. Validation cohorts approximated the eligibility criteria defined for each model. The REVEAL cohort comprised 292 treatment-naïve, adult patients diagnosed <1 year prior to enrolment with idiopathic, familial or anorexigen-induced PAH. The FPHN cohort comprised 1737 patients with group 1 PAH. Application of FPHN parameters to REVEAL and REVEAL risk scores to FPHN demonstrated estimated hazard ratios that were consistent between studies and had high probabilities of concordance (hazard ratios of 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.80, and 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.77, respectively). The REVEAL risk score calculator and FPHN ItinérAIR-HTAP predictive equation showed good discrimination and calibration for prediction of survival in the FPHN and REVEAL cohorts, respectively, suggesting prognostic generalisability in geographically different PAH populations. Once prospectively validated, these may become valuable tools in clinical practice.

Research Reviews

In this issue of Advances, section editors Oksana Shlobin, MD, and Jonathan Rich, MD, review findings from 2 recently published studies focused on outcomes and implications of the REVEAL registry. Farber HW, Miller DP, Poms AD, et al. Five-year Outcomes of Patients Enrolled in the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Disease Management (REVEAL). Chest. 2015 Jun 11. [Epub ahead of print] Benza RL, Miller DP, Foreman AJ, et al. Prognostic implications of serial risk score assessments in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease (REVEAL) analysis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(3):356–361.

Progress in the understanding and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

In 1981 the “Patient Registry for the Characterization of Primary Pulmonary Hypertension” was set up, supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, and recruited 194 patients across 32 clinical centres over 4 years in the United States1,2. The estimated median survival of these incident cases of primary pulmonary hypertension (which approximates to what we would now term idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, IPAH) was 2.8 years, with a 68% survival rate at 1 year, 48% at 3 years and 35% at 5 years1. Since 2000 a number of national registries have been set-up across the world to study the developing epidemiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)3. The largest of these is the REVEAL (Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management) Registry in the United States4. Between 2006 and 2009, 2635 prevalent and incident cases were included in survival analysis across 55 centres. For IPAH, there was a 91% survival rate at 1 year, 74% at 3 years and 65% at 5 years4. The Spanish registry also recruited 866 prevalent and incident cases of IPAH between 2007 and 2008 and calculated 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 87%, 75% and 65% respectively5. In the French registry, which also analysed prevalent and incident cases, for a sub-population of 190 patients with IPAH, hereditary PAH (HPAH) and anorexigen-associated PAH cases (which all have similar baseline characteristics and outcomes) between 2002 and 2003, a 1-year survival rate of 83% and 3-year of 58% was calculated6,7. In the UK there was a focus on incident cases, and 482 patients with IPAH, HPAH, and anorexigen-associated PAH were included between 2001 and 2009 and had 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 93%, 73% and 61% respectively8. Although there is debate about the inclusion of both prevalent and incident cases in these registries (owing to survivor bias), there is broad agreement over current survival rates across these registries. Measurable progress has been made in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension over the last 33 years – now, at 5 years, a larger proportion of people are living with the disease, rather than dying from it. In this review article we take a historical approach to reflect on the journey that has brought us to where we are today, focussing on the key milestones in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension, signposted by the World Health Organisation (WHO) “World Symposia in Pulmonary Hypertension”. It will become apparent that this mirrors the developments and movements in medicine over the last 150 years: from pathology to physiology, from physiology to pharmacology, from pharmacology to cell biology, from cell biology to genetics9.