Although the majority of existing research addresses the stiffness characteristics of rail pads, the considerable impact of damping on vibration reduction underscores its significant research importance. In this study, the hammer test and theoretical calculation are both employed to assess the damping capacity across three rail pad types: prismatic (PRP), grooved (GRP), and mesh-type high-damping (MTHDRP). Through the hammer test, the MTHDRP notably surpassed GRP and PRP, achieving higher damping ratios by 51.40 % and 49.71 %, respectively, leading to significant vibration reductions in the track bed and rail. Comparison tests between three types of rail pads highlighted the enhanced performance of the MTHDRP, as it not only reduced vibration amplitudes and enhanced decay rates but also decreased vibration levels by 2−5 dB. Moreover, we established a refined finite element model of the fastener system and integrated it with the Logarithmic Decay Rate (LDR) method. Our findings demonstrate that this combination facilitates the calculation of the damping ratio of the rail pad. Furthermore, we conducted a comparative analysis between the LDR method and the envelope method, confirming its superior efficiency and reliability. Finally, the LDR method is used to predict the damping ratio of the rail pad with varying stiffness, showing that the softer the rail pad, the higher the corresponding damping ratio. Overall, our insights bridge the gap in theoretical calculations and experimental studies on rail pad damping characteristics, offering crucial guidance for rail pad selection in track vibration mitigation.
Read full abstract