This article presents a comprehensive mapping of wall-pressure fluctuations over an airfoil under three different inflow conditions to shed light on some basic assumptions taken for granted for the recent aeroacoustic and aerodynamics experimental studies and in the noise prediction models. Unsteady and steady pressure measurements were performed over a heavily instrumented airfoil, which was exposed to smooth inflow, grid-generated turbulent inflow, and a smooth inflow with a tripping tape over the airfoil to explore the unsteady response of the airfoil for a broad range of angles of attack, 0°≤α≤20°. The results are presented in terms of non-dimensional pressure coefficient, root mean square non-dimensional pressure coefficient, frequency-energy content pattern map at isolated frequencies for the entire airfoil, and spectra of frequency-energy content at selected transducer locations. The results show that the unsteady airfoil response patterns for the tripped boundary layer and turbulence ingestion cases show a dramatic difference compared to the airfoil response patterns of the smooth inflow conditions. The response patterns differ across angles of attack, frequency, and between both sides of the airfoil. The results suggest a three-region pattern for the smooth inflow case, a two-region pattern for the tripped boundary layer case, and a two-region pattern for the turbulence ingestion case. Moreover, the results indicate that the presence of tripping may provide a flow with necessary statistical characteristics for the experimental rigs representing the full-scale application; however, it may misrepresent the frequency-dependent nature of the boundary layer.
Read full abstract