Local Anesthetic Agents Research Articles

Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Cervical Paraspinal Interfascial Plane Block for Postoperative Pain after Pediatric Chiari Decompression.

Surgery for lesions of the posterior fossa is associated with significant postoperative pain in pediatric patients related to extensive manipulation of the suboccipital musculature and bone. In this study, we assess the preliminary safety, effect on neuromonitoring, and analgesic efficacy of applying a cervical paraspinal interfascial plane block in pediatric patients undergoing posterior fossa surgery. In this prospective case series, we enrolled five patients aged 2-18 years undergoing surgery for symptomatic Chiari type I malformation. An ultrasound-guided cervical cervicis plane (CCeP) block was performed prior to the incision. A local anesthetic agent (bupivacaine) and a steroid adjuvant (dexamethasone) were injected into the fascial planes between the cervical semispinalis capitis and cervical semispinalis cervicis muscles at the level of the planned suboccipital decompression and C1 laminectomy. Motor-evoked and somatosensory-evoked potentials were monitored before and after the block. Patients were assessed for complications from the local injection in the intraoperative period and for pain in the postoperative period. No adverse events were noted intraoperatively, and there were no changes in neuromonitoring signals. Pain scores were low in the immediate postoperative period, and rescue medications were minimal. No complaints of incisional pain or need for narcotics were noted at the time of the 3-month postsurgical follow-up. In this study, we demonstrate the preliminary safety and analgesic efficacy of a novel application of a CCeP block to pediatric patients undergoing suboccipital surgery. Larger studies are needed to further validate the use of this block in children.

Ultra-Sound Guided Quadratus Lamborum Block Using Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine versus Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine for Post-Operative Analgesia after Labaroscopic Cholecystectomy

Abstract Background The goal of postoperative pain management is provision of comfort, early mobilization and improved respiratory function without causing inadequate sedation and respiratory compromise, which can be achieved through using regional anethesia. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been increasedly used for postoperative pain relief after lower abdominal surgeries. The main advantage of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) compared to TAP block is the extension of local anesthetic agent beyond the transversus abdominis plane to the thoracic paravertebral space. The wider spread of the local anesthetic agents may produce extensive analgesia and prolonged action of the injected local anesthetic solution. Objective To assess the analgesic effect of addition dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided QLB to prolong it’s duration in patients undergoing laparscopic abdominal surgeries in the early postoperative period regarding pain relief, provision of comfort, and improved respiratory functions. Patients and Methods After approval of anesthesiology department scientific and ethical committees in Ain Shams University Hospitals, patients undergoing laparscopic abdominal surgeries were included in the study, and were divided into two groups (n = 10; each); group A and B . Where in group A patients(n = 10) received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus 100 μg Dexmedetomidine diluted in 5ml 0.9% NaCl (the total volume injected in all patients is 25 ml), and group B patients (n = 10) received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% plus 8 mg dexamethasone (2 ml) plus 3 ml 0.9% NaCl . Results The thesis proved that the addition of either Dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone to bupivacaine 0.25% in ultrasound guided QLB for laparscopic abdominal (cholecystectomy) surgeries hastened the onset, prolonged the duration of sensory block, increased post-operative analgesia and decreased rescue analgesia needed without increasing the risk of adverse effects, with Dexmedetomidine showing better results. Conclusion The addition of either 100 μg Dexmedetomidine diluted in 5 ml 0.9% NaCl or 8 mg dexamethasone to 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% in ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block for laparscopic abdominal surgery prolonged the duration of analgesia significantly and decreased the postoperative analgesic requirement. Hence, our study suggests that either Dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone may be a useful alternative as an adjuvant to long-acting local anesthetics for quadratus lumborum nerve block with Dexmedetomidine showing better results.

A Comparison of Subarachnoid Block Characteristics Following Co-administration of Fentanyl Premixed With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Versus Antecedent or Succedent to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background Adjuvants are often used during subarachnoid block to enhance and prolong the analgesia and decrease the adverse effects of high doses of local anesthetic agents. Intrathecal fentanyl premixed with hyperbaric bupivacaine has been used in spinal anesthesia and compared with the sequential use of these drugs in separate syringes. However, given the paucity of literature, we conducted this study where premixed antecedent and succedent administration of intrathecal fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine were compared in terms of flow dynamics, block characteristics, and hemodynamic alterations. Methodology This prospective, randomized, triple-blinded comparative study was conducted among 160 patients who were randomly allocated into four groups. Group A (n = 40) (control) received 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mL of normal saline via a 5.0 mL syringe. Group B (n = 40) received 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mL (25 µg) of fentanyl premixed via a single 5.0 mL syringe. Group C (n = 40) received 0.5 mL (25 µg) of fentanyl via a 1.0 mL syringe followed by 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine via a 5.0 mL syringe. Group D (n = 40) received 3.0 mL (15 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine via a 5.0 mL syringe followed by 0.5 mL (25 µg) of fentanyl via a 1.0 mL syringe. The onset and regression of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic parameters, time to first rescue analgesia, and adverse events were observed. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results The mean time taken for the onset of sensory and motor blockade was least in Group D followed by Group C. Duration of sensory and motor blockade was prolonged in Group D. Patients in Group A experienced more hypotension than Groups B, C, and D. Requirement of rescue analgesia was delayed in Groups C and D. Conclusions Administering 25 µg (0.5 mL) of Fentanyl separately after 15 mg (3.0 mL) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine results in early onset and prolonged duration of sensory and motor blockade, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, the delayed requirement of rescue analgesia postoperatively, and fewer side effects compared to its co-administration as a premixed solution or antecedent to hyperbaric bupivacaine.

The Safety and Feasibility of Segmental Thoracic Spinal Anesthesia above Umbilicus and Breast Surgery

This study was conducted on 30 patients aged 16 to 70 years with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I, II, and III. Though general anesthesia (GA) is a universally accepted technique for most abdominal surgeries but not free from drawbacks including poly medicine side effects, prolonged recovery time, and unnoticed inadequate pain control, as well as risk to elderly patients with cardiopulmonary conditions, and safety issue limits the usefulness of general anesthesia. Thus, the new technique adopted attracts the attention of anesthesiologists, as thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia (TSSA) for several common surgeries where local anesthetic agents injected intrathecally above the termination of the spinal cord show value in patients with high risk for general anesthesia who need deep analgesia. The types of surgery were periumbilical hernia 7 (23.33%) in both age groups followed by epigastric hernia 8 (26.66%), neoplastic diseases of breast 6 (20%), laparoscopy cholecystectomy 4 (13.33%), open cholecystectomy 5 (16.66%). The analysis of intraoperative and postoperative mean systolic and diastolic arterial pressures (MAP) of patients up to 24 hours was found insignificant (P>0.05). Regarding the intraoperative hemodynamic changes, hypotension occurred in 3 patients and resolved with a single bolus of ephedrine, no tachycardia occurred, while bradycardia in 3 patients (15%). No patients need to be converted to general anesthesia due to inadequate block. On analysis complications, peri-operative or post-operative period showed that shoulder pain was experienced by 2 patients (6.66%) in the younger age group whereas in the older age group, two patients (6.66%) have hypotension and bradycardia was seen in 3 patients (13.33%). No respiratory complications, such as postoperative pneumonia or atelectasis were noted during the hospital stay with TSSA as well and no nausea/vomiting was noted. This study provides only preliminary evidence to support the feasibility and efficacy of segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia to be used effectively for safe anesthetic technique during routine laparoscopic surgery in normal patients as well as co-morbidity patients with stable intraoperative and post-operative hemodynamic and also avoidance of complications of general anesthesia with these benefits, decrease in length of stay in hospital, reduction of postoperative pain, and increased patients satisfaction. Thus, in future the segmental spinal anesthesia may become a good alternative to general anesthesia in normal patients as well as comorbid patients.

A comparative evaluation of intraperitoneal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetic agents alone or in combination with opioids, α2 agonists such as Dexmedetomidine have been found to reduce postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study was designed to compare the better drug among Bupivacaine alone and Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine with respect to their analgesic efficacy and safety profile. in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study was carried out on sixty patients of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II of either sex with ages ranging from 18 to 60 years posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under General Anaesthesia, equally divided into two groups, randomly allocated to one of the Groups using the table of randomization. Group B received Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine 40 ml 0.25% +5 ml normal saline and Group BD received Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine 40 ml 0.25% + Dexmedetomidine1 μg/kg diluted in 5 ml Normal saline. The mean heart rate and blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean) readings were significantly lower in Group BD than in Group B. The mean duration of analgesia in our study was longer in Group BD (7.5 ± 0.73 hours) when compared to Group B (5.9 ± 0.55 hours) with p-value & 0.0001 and CI 1.27 to 1.9, which was statistically significant. However, the post-operative analgesic requirement (rescue/demand) in Group B was clinically earlier and statistically significant as compared to Group BD. Postoperative VAS score ≥3 was considered the benchmark for providing rescue analgesia in the form of injection of Diclofenac 75 mg IV. In our study, we observed the pain scores via VAS/NRS at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 14 h, 16 h, 18 h, 20 h, 22 h and 24 h postoperatively. A comparison of pain scores from 30 min to 10hrs postoperatively showed a significant difference in both Groups with Group B having significantly higher VAS scores and lower VAS scores with Group BD. Our study suggests that there is a shorter duration of action of 0.25% Bupivacaine alone as compared to 0.25% Bupivacaine + Dexmedetomidine. Since the laparoscope is still inside the abdominal cavity the drugs are easy to administer with no adverse effects and with a good safety profile because of the visualization of drug deposition in the right place. Intraperitoneal instillation of Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia was very promising as a part of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Regional anaesthesia for district hospitals and clinics.

Pain is a common reason that patients seek care in the emergency department (ED). Regional anaesthesia in the form of nerve blocks provides an excellent alternative to traditional forms of analgesia, and may be superior in managing musculoskeletal pain compared to opioids. Adequate pain management improves patient satisfaction, facilitates examination and minor procedures, and allows for earlier and safe discharge. In low resource settings this modality is underutilised due to lack of trained providers and/or support from specialised services, shortages of equipment, and lack of context-sensitive guidelines. Advances in ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia has the potential to improve access to safe and reliable anaesthesia. It is often not accessible or an active part of training even for emergency physicians. There are, however, a number of nerve blocks that are easy to learn, don't require specialised equipment, and can be readily applied in EDs for minor procedures and longer acting forms of analgesia. Nerve blocks more applicable in the operating theatre or best done under ultrasound guidance are mentioned but not discussed in this article. This continuous professional development (CPD) article aims to provide guidance with respect to several key areas related to more commonly used types of regional anaesthesia in district level services. We discuss the importance of good clinical practice including thorough preparation of equipment and the patient to avoid common complications, clinical indications for regional blocks in the ED, local anaesthetic agents, different techniques for some common regional blocks, potential complications, and the need for a trained interprofessional team.

Development of ropivacaine hydrochloride-loaded dissolving microneedles as a local anesthetic agent: A proof-of-concept

Ropivacaine hydrochloride (RPL) is a local anesthetic agent that has been widely used for the treatment of pain during or after surgery. However, this drug is only available in parenteral dosage form and may contribute to the infiltration of RPL into the plasma, causing some undesirable side effects. Intradermal delivery of RPL using dissolving microneedles may become a promising strategy to deliver such drugs into the skin. This research aimed to develop RPL-loaded dissolving microneedles (DMN-RPLs) as a proof of the concept of intradermal delivery of a local anesthetic. The DMN-RPLs were fabricated using either centrifugation or air-pressurized chamber methods. Several polymers, such as poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), and sodium hyaluronate (SH), were utilized for manufacturing the DMN-RPLs. The prepared DMN-RPLs were assessed for their thermal properties, chemical bonds, mechanical strength, insertion ability, skin-dissolution study, and drug content. Furthermore, in-skin deposition and dermatokinetic studies were also performed. The results showed that F9 (30 % w/w PVP-4 % w/w SH) and F10 (30 % w/w PVP-5 % w/w PVA) containing 5 % w/w of RPL were the most promising formulations, as shown by their needle height reduction (<10 %) and insertion depth (∼400 μm). Both formulations were also able to deliver more than 60 % of the RPL contained in the DMNs into the epidermis, dermis, and receiver compartment. This study, for the first time, has provided a proof concept to deliver RPL as a local anesthetic using DMNs and the intradermal route, aiming to minimize pain and discomfort during administration and improve the patient's experience.

Efficacy of Ropivacaine for Sub-Arachnoid Block in Patients with Recent History of Scorpion Sting: A case series.

Failure of sub-arachnoid block (SAB), due to resistance to bupivacaine after a recent scorpion sting can lead to multiple block attempts and subsequent conversion to general anaesthesia. We report this case series of 10 patients with successful SAB with newly launched 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine, in patients with recent scorpion sting. Thus, intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine may be considered as the local anaesthetic agent of choice in patients with scorpion sting to prevent failure of SAB.

Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST): More Common Than You Think

The number of anesthetic body procedures in the United States is rapidly increasing, with many being performed on an outpatient basis. These procedures are advertised as being safe, and many times the serious complications may not be discussed. Although local anesthetic systemic toxicity is a rare complication, it is associated with an increase in morbidity. The emergency department staff should be aware of the possibility of this rare complication, as well as the variety of resulting symptoms (from minor to severe), potential sequelae, and appropriate management for patients who have undergone an outpatient anesthetic body procedure. Multiple factors contribute to the development of local anesthetic systemic toxicity, resulting in life-threatening effects on the neurologic and cardiovascular systems. Also, the site of administration, along with the local anesthetic agent used, can impact the risk of the development of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. To minimize the risk and ensure the best possible outcome for these patients, emergency department staff must be highly aware of the mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and management/treatment of local anesthetic systemic toxicity.

Evaluation of pain-alleviating strategies during allergy shots (subcutaneous immunotherapy): a randomized controlled pilot study.

Background. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is a potential disease-modifying therapy effective for treatment of various allergic disorders. Pain and fear are common concerns of children, which can pose stress and result in negative experiences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three marketed distraction devices and ethyl chloride spray (a routinely used topical anesthetic agent for painful procedures), the current clinical standard of care in reducing the perception of needle pain during SCIT administration in children. Methods. 40 children, aged 4-17 years, receiving SCIT with use of one of three alternative pain therapies or with standard practice were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the pain-modifying interventions. The three interventional groups were ShotBlocker® (Bionix, Toledo, OH, USA), Buzzy® I (Pain Care Labs, Atlanta, GA, USA) (vibration only), and Buzzy® II (vibration with ice). Control group was ethyl chloride spray. The study consisted of two visits during SCIT administration process. Results. Of these 40 children, 12 received the ShotBlocker, 8 received the Buzzy I, 11 received the Buzzy II, and 9 received ethyl chloride spray (control group). Conclusions. There were no significant differences found between each of the distraction devices and between the control group. Type II error/false negative finding cannot be ruled out because of a small sample. Therefore, we cannot conclude that no true difference exists between each distraction device and the control group simply because of occurrence of a non-significant P-value in our study.

A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Topical and Infiltrative Anesthesia for Dermatosurgery Through a Subject-Oriented Approach.

Introduction The skin, along with its subcutaneous tissue, constitutes one of the major organ systems of the human body. Dermatosurgery is the branch dealing with skin conditions that operate at the level of skin, without disturbing the milieu intérieur of the human organ system. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was undertaken, which included 100 patients comprised of 50 patients in each group. For group A, the topical anesthetic agent used was a eutectic mixture of topical 2.5% lignocaine and 2.5% prilocaine cream (EMLA); for group B, infiltration anesthesia with 2% lignocaine injection. Patients satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited for the study. All the participants were requested to rate the pain at the time of drug administration, during the dermatosurgical procedure, and post-procedurally with a visual analogue scale (VAS) separately. Results In this study, 50% of the participants were of the age group of 21-40 years. Males constituted 57.8% whereas females constituted 42.2%. The common procedures performed in the study were electrocautery at 37%, intralesional platelet-rich plasma (PRP) at 16%, and intralesional steroid at 7%. In group A, the VAS score during drug administration was 0. In the group B, 70% had a VAS score of 4-6, and 30% had a VAS score of 1-3 pre-procedurally. The mean VAS score during procedure was 3.06 for group A and 1.03 for group B. Conclusion The study inferred that topical anesthesia is a better choice in superficial dermatosurgical procedures for providing adequate anesthesia and improved compliance when compared to infiltrative anesthesia.

Adrenaline and Anesthesia - Clinical Review

Abstract Adrenaline or epinephrine is one of the primarily important catecholamines in the general stress response and is manufactured in the adrenal medulla. In stress, it is secreted into the blood circulation and evokes many bodily transformations which prepare the body for the fight or flight response, some of which include tachycardia and hypertension, dilation of the air passages, and mobilization of energy reserves. This catecholamine surge can, however, cause myocardial stress, as evidenced during acute ischemia, hence an implication of increased risk of myocardial injury. In terms of functioning at the molecular level, adrenaline interacts with adrenergic receptors, which trigger intracellular processes associated with the readiness of a body to act fast as well as affecting more general forms of cardiac activity. Adrenaline stimulates beta-adrenergic receptors, enhancing heart rate and contractility, vital under stress but harmful with constant exposure. It is metabolized in the liver and may also cause dysrhythmias when used together with some inhaled anesthesia such as halothane. In anesthesia, adrenaline gets used to increase the local anesthetic action of the drug by constricting blood vessels and thereby increasing the duration and extent of analgesia besides reducing the uptake of the anesthetic into the systemic circulation. The common dose schedule is 1 in 2 lakh of adrenaline which means 5 μ/mL. The usual dose should not increase to 3 μ/kg. Preferably, the dose can be supplemented after 10–15 min. The use of adrenaline also creates a plane to dissect. The duration of action of local anesthetic drug is prolonged following the addition of adrenaline. Epidural test doses detect accidental intravascular catheterization. There is evidence that adrenaline belongs to anesthetic protocols, enabling deeper anesthesia, which, in turn, contributes to more effective outcomes of the surgery and easier recovery. Adrenaline by way of its alpha 2 agonism is likely to increase the effects of local anesthetic drugs and inhalational agents. Still, practitioners must address those benefits against possible side effects since minor, albeit significant, changes in the electrocardiographic characteristics have been recorded with lignocaine–adrenaline mixtures. Adrenaline nebulization is used for acute respiratory conditions like croup postextubation. The dose is 0.5 mg/kg, max 5 mg, diluted in 2–3 mL saline, repeated every 30 min if needed, with monitoring for tachycardia and hypertension. For perioperative anaphylaxis, administer 0.5 mg intramuscular for adults, adjusted by age for children. Hence, adrenaline is extremely useful in local anesthesia because of its vasoconstrictive effects, which must, however, be monitored continuously for patient and operational safety.

Effects of addition of fentanyl to lidocaine plus adrenaline during peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery: A prospective study

Background: Local anaesthesia is most commonly used for cataract surgery in adult patients. Different combinations of local anesthetic agents and adjuvants have been used to provide adequate anaesthesia and analgesia. This study assessed the effect of adding 25 µg fentanyl to lidocaine with adrenaline mixture on the onset and duration of anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing cataract surgery under peribulbar anaesthesia. Methods: This was a double blind, randomized controlled study. Adult patients aged 40 years and above with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classes 1 and 2 undergoing cataract surgery under peribulbar block (PB) were studied. Sixty-six patients were randomized into two equal groups. Group A had 25 µg fentanyl (0.5 mL) added to 6 mL of 2% lidocaine with adrenaline while Group B had sterile water 0.5 mL added to 6 mL of 2% lidocaine with adrenaline for PB. Onset and duration of lid akinesia, globe akinesia, globe anaesthesia, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, time to analgesia request as well as patient and surgeon satisfaction were assessed. Results: The differences in the onset of lid akinesia, globe akinesia, and globe anaesthesia between the two groups were statistically significant (P ≤ 0.001, respectively). The mean duration of globe akinesia and globe anaesthesia was longer in Group A as compared to Group B (P = 0.008 and P = 0.009, respectively). Statistically significant differences in median NRS scores were found at the 4th, 5th, and 6th h (P = 0.001, respectively). The mean duration to analgesia request was 238.1 ± 65.5 min in Group A compared to 207.2 ± 49.1 min in Group B (P = 0.034). Conclusion: The addition of 25 µg fentanyl to 2% lidocaine plus adrenaline mixture improved the quality of peribulbar anaesthesia and is recommended in Nigerian adults scheduled for cataract surgery under peribulbar anaesthesia to improve their surgical experience.

Professional Attitudes and Practice of Pediatric Dentists About the Use of Local Anesthesia for the Treatment of Children Under General Anesthesia.

The application of local anesthesia in dental surgeries conducted under general anesthesia poses a challenge in pediatric dentistry. There is a lack of consensus regarding the benefits and drawbacks of using general anesthesia in this field. The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes and practices of pediatric dentists regarding the use of local anesthesia for dental treatments in children under general anesthesia in Iran. This cross-sectional study involved 110 pediatric dentists from across Iran. The dentists' professional attitudes and practices were assessed using a specially designed questionnaire for this study. The questionnaire was distributed through the Line press system, and the data were analyzed following collection. Regarding professional practices, 34.5% of specialists refrained from using local anesthesia. The most frequent application of local anesthesia was observed in tooth extractions. The preferred local anesthetic agent was 2% lidocaine with 1:100 000 epinephrine. A lower dose than that used in outpatient settings was administered, and most specialists allowed sufficient time for the anesthesia to take effect. This study revealed that opinions and attitudes towards the use of local anesthesia in the dental treatment of children under general anesthesia vary across different specialties and are significantly influenced by the patient's condition, type of treatment, and practice techniques.

Comparative study between 0.5% bupivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine in peribulbar anesthesia for cataract surgery

Background: For intraocular surgery, the optimal local anesthetic agent must have a rapid onset of action and a sufficient duration of effect so as to enable a painless, motionless procedure without prolonging akinesia. Aims and Objective: This prospective, comparative observational study compares ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for cataract surgery peribulbar block. Hyaluronidase is utilized in both groups because it promotes local anesthetic diffusion. Material and Methods: Present prospective, observational, comparative study performed at the Department of Anesthesia Tertiary Care Teaching Institute of India for the duration of 1 year. All eligible patients were allocated in two groups as GROUP B and GROUP R. GROUP B: 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 15 I.U./mL of hyaluronidase. GROUP R: 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and 15 I.U./mL of hyaluronidase. Patients were assessed for sensory block, eyelid, and ocular movements at an interval of 2 min, and Visual Analog Scale score for pain assessment. Results: Age and gender did not differ significantly between the two study groups, according to the findings. Comparable and similar patient characteristics distinguished the two study groups. (P&gt;0.05). The difference in onset of eyelid motor blockade between the two groups was not statistically significant. The difference in the onset of motor blockade [ocular movement] between the two groups was not statistically significant (P&gt;0.05). (P&gt;0.05) Analgesia duration differed significantly between the two groups in a statistical sense. Ropivacaine exhibits a significantly prolonged duration of analgesic effect than bupivacaine (P≤0.05). Conclusion: Peribulbar block utilizing 0.5% ropivacaine is a more favorable and secure option for a local anesthetic that effectively extends postoperative pain alleviation, in comparison to the use of 0.5% bupivacaine.

Comparison of Pre-emptive Analgesic Effect of Paracetamol, Ibuprofen, and Placebo in Reducing Post-operative Pain in Intra-alveolar Tooth Extraction at The University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City. A Randomised Trial.

Objective: Pain is one of the most common postoperative complications of extraction. Thus, this study is aimed at determining the pre-emptive effectiveness of paracetamol and ibuprofen in the management of post extraction pain.&#x0D; Methods: A randomized, placebo‐controlled, single‐blinded comparative study of patients who needed intra-alveolar extraction of posterior teeth. Sixty‐nine patients aged 18 years and above were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (A) paracetamol 1g; (B) ibuprofen 400mg; and (C) placebo (calcium lactate) 300mg. Each of the three tablets was given 30 minutes before administration of the local anesthetic agent. The pain level was assessed using the visual analogue scale®. Chi-square (X²) test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with an appropriate post-hoc test was used. Level of significance was set at 95% (p-value &lt; 0.05).&#x0D; Results: Ibuprofen and paracetamol groups showed lower pain scores compared to placebo. Although, there was no significant difference between the VAS scores at the post-operative period (P= 0.080). There was a significant difference in time taken for use of rescue medication among the three groups (p = 0.022), with those in placebo group 8 times more likely to use rescue medication relative to the analgesics.&#x0D; Conclusion: The use of preemptive analgesics showed lower pain scores compared to placebo, and also significantly increased the time for use of rescue medication postoperatively.

Effects of Ketamine and Tramadol As Adjuvants to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Unilateral Open Ovarian Cystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Spinal anesthesia offers numerous advantages and desirable features. However, it is associated with various side effects related to local anesthetic agents used. Reducing the dose of local anesthetic in spinal anesthesia can help minimize side effects but may lead to a diminished analgesic effect or failure of anesthesia. Therefore, adding an adjuvant may enhance the benefits while mitigating side effects. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ketamine and tramadol as adjuvants to bupivacaine on the duration of spinal analgesia. The objectives were to compare the three groups and prove their analgesic effects, safety, and superiority.The primary outcomes werethe duration of spinal analgesia, as well as the onset and duration of both sensory and motor blocks. Secondary outcomes included the heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and the incidence of undesired effects such as nausea, vomiting, sedation, shivering, and postoperative headache. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 120 female patients undergoing elective open unilateral ovarian cystectomy under spinal anesthesia were studied. The inclusion criteria included patients aged 16-45 years with a physical status classified as American Societyof Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups: group B (n=40) received only bupivacaine, group BK (n=40) received bupivacaine mixed with preservative-free ketamine, and group BT (n=40) received bupivacaine mixed with preservative-free tramadol. The mean duration of spinal analgesia, measured in minutes, showed significant differences (P < 0.001) between group BK (165 ± 4) and group B (170 ± 5). There was also a significant difference between group BT (313 ± 8) and group B (170 ± 5) (P < 0.001). Additionally, significant differences were observed between group BK (165 ± 4) and group BT (313 ± 8) (P < 0.001). The administration of 25 mg of ketamine and 25 mg of tramadol as adjuvants to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia significantly affected the postoperative duration of analgesia. Tramadol prolonged the duration of spinal anesthesia, while ketamine shortened it. The use of both adjuvants did not result in undesired effects.

A comparative evaluation of the effect of addition of 8 mg dexamethasone to 2% lignocaine with adrenaline in mandibular third molar surgery: a split mouth randomised double blind study.

Impacted lower third molar surgeries involve trauma in a highly vascularized zone with loose connective tissue leading to inflammatory sequelae including postoperative pain, swelling, trismus and generalised oral dysfunction during the post-operative phase. In minor oral surgical procedures, an all-inclusive method to protract anaesthesia and reduce the inevitable post-operative sequelae is yet to be explored substantially. To evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone added to local anaesthetics in extending the depth and duration of anaesthesia and decreasing the postoperative complications after surgical removal of impacted third molars. A controlled, randomized, split-mouth, double-blind prospective study involving lower third molar surgery was performed in 35 patients wherein the test group (Group I) received 8 mg dexamethasone added to 2 ml of 2% lignocaine with epinephrine and the control group (Group II) received 2 ml of sterile water added to 2 ml of 2% lignocaine with epinephrine. Onset and duration of anaesthesia were evaluated; followed by evaluation of pain, swelling and trismus for 7 days post-surgery, using independent t-test and ANOVA for repeated measures. Test group had a faster onset of anaesthesia by 69 s and a lengthier duration of 128.4 min (p < 0.001). Pain scores (Visual Analogue Scale) in the first 24 h were 4.9 and 7.5 in the test and control group respectively (p < 0.001). The average dosing of analgesics until postoperative day 7 in the test and control group were 12.6 and 18.4 respectively (p < 0.001). The swelling was significantly lesser in the test group, in addition, trismus was significantly lesser by 1 cm on postoperative days 1 and 2 and 0.2 cm on day 7. The addition of dexamethasone to lignocaine in the nerve block reduces the time of onset and significantly prolongs the duration of anaesthesia with decreased pain, swelling and trismus. Steroids mixed directly with the local anaesthetic agent can minimise the post-operative sequelae associated with third molar surgery with a single needle prick.

Comparison of the Efficacy Between Regional Nerve Block and Ring Block as Local Anesthetic Techniques for Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment.

Introduction Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a solution of concentrated platelets, has been widely used to promote wound repair and tissue regeneration. In the treatment of pattern hair loss, platelets in PRP secrete an abundance of growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor(FGF), and many more, which stimulate and increase signaling molecules and accelerate cell proliferation. In the PRP treatment for hair regrowth, the supratrochlear nerve (STN) block and supraorbital nerve (SON) block are given to anesthetize the scalp up to the vertex except for the temporal region. The ring block is the common local anesthetic technique usedby infiltrating local anesthetic agents around the target area. The primary objectives were to compare the pain and anesthetic success rates produced by regional nerve blocks and ring blocks. Materials and methods A sample size of 100 patients undergoing PRP treatment for hair regrowth were taken as the subjects for the study. Patients were allotted into two groups by randomization. Group 1 was given regional nerve blocks as the anesthetic technique used for local anesthesia, and group 2 was given ring blocks. In the study group, STN and SON blocks as the regional nerve blocks were given 2% lignocaine with 1:80000 adrenaline to anesthetize the area, and the PRP was injected from the anterior hairline up to the vertex of the scalp, not involving the occipital and temporal regions. In the control group, a ring block was given for the same procedure. Participants from both groups were assessed for the pain and analgesia caused by ring block and regional nerve blocks using the visual analog scale (VAS). Results A mean rank of 30.28 was observed for the regional nerve block technique, and a mean rank of 70.72 was observed for the ring block technique. A p-value of 0.00 that is <0.05 was observed, which shows there is a significant difference in the pain and the analgesia experienced by the subjects between the two groups, during and three hours after the procedure. Conclusion PRP is one of the most commonly used treatments for hair regrowth. The ring block is the common local anesthetic technique used for producing anesthesia, while regional nerve blocks are more effective in producing local anesthesia. This study proves that STN and SON blocks are better anesthetic techniques than the ring block technique for PRP treatment in hair growth.

Comparison of clinical efficacy of hyperbaric ropivacaine with hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection of prostate: A randomized and double-blind study

Background: Ropivacaine is an ammino-amide local anesthetic agent with properties similar to bupivacaine, but its decreased lipophilicity is associated with reduced incidence of central nervous system toxicity and cardiotoxicity. This study evaluated the safety, efficacy, effects on hemodynamics and complications of spinal anesthesia using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Aims and Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, hemodynamic stability, and side effects of spinal anesthesia using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine in patients undergoing TURP. Materials and Methods: Sixty adult patients with physical status classes I and II, as determined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, scheduled to undergo elective transurethral resection of prostate, were randomly allocated to receive either hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.75% 2.8 mL plus fentanyl 15 mcg or hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 2.8 mL plus fentanyl 15 mcg. The parameters, such as demographic characteristics, duration of surgery, onset of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic stability, and complications, were compared in both groups. Results: Hyperbaric ropivacaine exhibited significantly slower onset times for sensory and motor blockade compared to hyperbaric bupivacaine. Patients in the ropivacaine group demonstrated better hemodynamic stability and experienced less hypotension compared to those who received bupivacaine. Moreover, the sensory and motor block lasted significantly longer in the bupivacaine group. Conclusion: About 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine is a better choice for spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing TURP as compared to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.