Living Donor Kidney Research Articles

Trends in Patient Characteristics on the Japanese Waiting Lists for Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation. Are There no Eligibility or Ineligibility Criteria for Registration and Renewal?

BackgroundControversial issues in registering candidates for deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) comprise various factors, including age, life expectancy, and dialysis duration. We investigated patient characteristics on the waiting list and discussed suitable criteria in Japan, which has a long waiting period. MethodsThis study included 592 patients on the waiting list for DDKT at our institute between 1982 and 2023. We retrospectively reviewed patients’ medical charts and obtained their clinical information. Patient characteristics according to outcomes and eligibility criteria for applying for or renewing registration were investigated. No prisoners were used in the study, and the participants were neither coerced nor paid. ResultsApproximately 70%, 45%, and 14.5% of the registered patients were aged >60, >70, and 80 years, respectively. The number of patients aged ≥70 years gradually decreased over time. The median waiting periods of patients who underwent and interrupted DDKT were 13 and 7 years, respectively. Patients in their 70s with a >15-year dialysis period tended to have opportunities for DDKT. Living-donor kidney transplantation was performed in patients aged <60 years. Waiting patients were significantly younger and had a shorter dialysis duration. Advanced age at registration was associated with a significantly high risk of interruption. ConclusionsAdvanced age and longer dialysis periods were considered at registration because patients with these factors tended to experience interruptions despite the long waiting period and high cost. Although older patients can undergo DDKT, factors including surgical cost and risks are considered. Eligibility/ineligibility criteria should be established for DDKT waiting lists in Japan.

Abstract P339: Association of Pre-Donation Blood Pressure with Kidney Function in Living Kidney Donors

Background: Although BP is associated with kidney outcomes, its clinical significance in living kidney donors (LKD) is unknown. We aim to examine the association between pre-donation BP and the risk of kidney function decline in LKD. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using OPTN/SRTR including adult LKD, who underwent donation between 6/1972 and 9/2022, was utilized to examine the association of quartile (Q) of pre-donation SBP and DBP with time-to-event of ≥35% decline in post-donation eGFR from pre-donation eGFR by multiple Cox regression. Results: Of 174,311 adult LKD, mean±SD age was 41±12 years and 60% were female. Mean pre-donation SBP and DBP were 122±13 and 74±9 mmHg, respectively. Mean pre-donation SBP in Q 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 106±6, 117±2, 126±3, and 140±9 mmHg, respectively and the corresponding DBP were 62±5, 71±2, 78±2, and 86±5 mmHg, respectively. The median (IQR) of pre-donation eGFR was 91 (75, 111) mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Median(IQR) eGFR at immediate post-donation, 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-donation were 50 (40, 62), 54 (44, 67), 55 (45, 68), and 57 (47, 70) mL/min/1.73 m 2 , respectively. Out of 38,780 LKD with post-donation eGFR data at 6, 12, or 24 months, 31,054 had the event of ≥35% decline in post-donation eGFR from pre-donation eGFR with a median time to follow-up of 6.77 months(IQR 5.93, 12.67). The incidence rate of the event was 0.08 person-months. Compared to patients with SBP in Q 1, those with SBP in Q 2, 3, and 4 had a significantly increased risk for the event(HR SBP Q2,3,4 1.05, 1.08, and 1.15; P &lt;0.001 – 0.003) but only patients with DBP in Q 3 and 4 had a significantly increased risk for the event (HR SBP Q3,4 1.04 and 1.09). After adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, U.S. citizenship, education level, history of pre-donation HTN, diabetes, pre-donation BMI, DBP, and urine protein:creatinine ratio, there was a J-shaped association between pre-donation SBP and post-donation eGFR decline and only patients in the Q 2 became significantly associated with lower the risk for the event (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.76, 0.99; Fig1). The pre-donation DBP – post-donation eGFR association was similar to the SBP – eGFR association but there was no statistically significant in all Q (Fig2). There was no effect-measured modifier for all covariates. Conclusions: Pre-donation SBP in a normal range(113 - 120 mmHg) is associated with the lowest risk for a post-donation eGFR decline. BP control in the normal range should be achieved for potential LKD.

341.1: Fluctuations in living kidney donations in the United States from 2017 to 2022.

341.1: Fluctuations in living kidney donations in the United States from 2017 to 2022.

416.3: Exploring metabolic changes in living kidney donors before and after donation: A comparative analysis.

416.3: Exploring metabolic changes in living kidney donors before and after donation: A comparative analysis.

Anti-HLA Class II Antibodies Are the Most Resistant to Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive Living-donor Kidney Transplantations: A Patient Series.

In HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation, the efficacy of desensitization in terms of anti-HLA antibody kinetics is not well characterized. We present an overview of the course of anti-HLA antibodies throughout plasma exchange (PE) desensitization in a series of crossmatch-positive patients. All consecutive candidates in the Dutch HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation program between November 2012 and January 2022 were included. The eligibility criteria were a positive crossmatch with a living kidney donor and no options for compatible transplantation. Desensitization consisted of 5-10 PE with low-dose IVIg. A total of 16 patient-donor pairs were included. Patients had median virtual panel-reactive antibody of 99.58%. Cumulative donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (cumDSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was 31 399 median, and immunodominant DSA (iDSA) MFI was 18 677 for class I and 21 893 for class II. Median anti-HLA antibody MFI response to desensitization was worse in class II as compared with class I (P < 0.001), particularly for HLA-DQ. Class I cumDSA MFI decreased 68% after 4 PE versus 53% in class II. The decrease between the fifth and the 10th PE sessions was modest with 21% in class I versus 9% in class II. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 85% of patients, with the iDSA directed to the same mismatched HLA as before desensitization, except for 3 patients, of whom 2 had vigorous rebound of antibodies to repeated mismatches (RMMs). Rebound was highest (86%) in RMM-DSA with prior grafts removed (transplantectomy n = 7), lower (39%) in non-RMM-DSA (n = 30), and lowest (11%) for RMM-DSA with in situ grafts (n = 5; P = 0.018 for RMM-DSA transplantectomy versus RMM-DSA graft in situ). With a median follow-up of 59 mo, 1 patient had died resulting in a death-censored graft survival of 73%. Patients with class II DSA, and particularly those directed against HLA-DQ locus, were difficult to desensitize.

Seasonal Patterns of Living Kidney Donation in the United States From 1995 to 2019.

The number of living kidney donors in the United States has declined since 2005, with variations based on the donor-recipient relationship. The reasons for this decline are unclear, and strategies to mitigate declined donations remain elusive. We examined the change in donor number monthly (within-year) versus annually (between-years) to inform potentially modifiable factors for future interventions. In this registry-based cohort analysis of 141759 living kidney donors between 1995 and 2019, we used linear mixed-effects models for donor number per month and year to analyze between-year and within-year variation in donation. We used Poisson regression to quantify the change in the number of donors per season before and after 2005, stratified by donor-recipient relationship and zip-code household income tertile. We observed a consistent summer surge in donations during June, July, and August. This surge was statistically significant for related donors (incidence rate ratio [IRR] range: 1.12-1.33) and unrelated donors (IRR range: 1.06-1.16) across donor income tertiles. Our findings indicate lower rates of living kidney donation in non-summer months across income tertiles. Interventions are needed to address barriers to donation in non-summer seasons and facilitate donations throughout the year. Since the Organ Donor Leave Law provides a solid foundation for supporting year-round donation, extending the law's provisions beyond federal employees may mitigate identified seasonal barriers.

362.7: Utilization of single-use flexible ureterorenoscope for ex-vivo stone extraction in living kidney donors.

362.7: Utilization of single-use flexible ureterorenoscope for ex-vivo stone extraction in living kidney donors.

403.5: The breadwinner and the homemaker: A systematic literature review to explore gender differences in the motivation of donors and candidates to pursue living kidney donation.

403.5: The breadwinner and the homemaker: A systematic literature review to explore gender differences in the motivation of donors and candidates to pursue living kidney donation.

P.299: Addressing the kidney donor shortage: A critical review of financial incentives for living kidney donation.

P.299: Addressing the kidney donor shortage: A critical review of financial incentives for living kidney donation.

P.434: Social and psychological profile of Iraqi living kidney donors.

P.434: Social and psychological profile of Iraqi living kidney donors.

200.3: Substantial decline in perioperative mortality risk for living kidney donors.

200.3: Substantial decline in perioperative mortality risk for living kidney donors.

341.10: Comparison cystatin C- and Creatinine- based estimated GFR with scintigraphy-measured glomerular filtration rate for living kidney donor evaluation.

341.10: Comparison cystatin C- and Creatinine- based estimated GFR with scintigraphy-measured glomerular filtration rate for living kidney donor evaluation.

Deceased donor urinary Dickkopf-3 associates with future allograft function following kidney transplantation

Predicting future kidney allograft function is challenging. Novel biomarkers, such as urinary Dickkopf-3 (uDKK3), may help guide donor selection and improve allograft outcomes. In this prospective multicenter pilot trial, we investigated whether donor uDKK3 reflects organ quality and is associated with future allograft function. We measured uDKK3/crea ratios (uDKK3/crea) from 95 deceased and 46 living kidney donors. Prenephrectomy uDKK3/crea levels were 100× higher in deceased than in living donors (9888 pg/mg vs 113 pg/mg; P < .001). Among deceased donor transplantations, recipients were stratified by their corresponding uDKK3/crea donor levels ranging below (group A, n = 68) or above (group B, n = 65) median. The primary end point of best estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) within the first 3 months after kidney transplantation was superior in group A (56.3 mL/min/1.73 m2) than that in group B (44.2 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = .0139). Second, the composite clinical end point consisting of death, allograft failure or eGFR decline >50% occurred less frequent in group A. By mixed linear regression modeling, donor uDKK3/crea remained an independent predictor of eGFR after transplantation, with a slope of −4.282 mL/min/1.73 m2 per logarithmic increase in donor uDKK3/crea. In summary, uDKK3 may serve as a noninvasive, donor-dependent biomarker for assessing organ quality and future allograft function.

360.3: Predicting long-term outcomes in living kidney donor transplant recipients using deep learning algorithm-estimated medullary pyramid count: A novel biomarker.

360.3: Predicting long-term outcomes in living kidney donor transplant recipients using deep learning algorithm-estimated medullary pyramid count: A novel biomarker.

260.8: A retrospective cohort study of ABO-incompatible living kidney donor transplantation before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

260.8: A retrospective cohort study of ABO-incompatible living kidney donor transplantation before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

P.035: Longitudinal change patterns in estimated glomerular filtration rate in a European population of living kidney donors.

P.035: Longitudinal change patterns in estimated glomerular filtration rate in a European population of living kidney donors.

P.206: The reasons for potential donor ineligibility in living donor kidney transplants at the Libyan transplant Authority. A Retrospective single centre cohort study.

P.206: The reasons for potential donor ineligibility in living donor kidney transplants at the Libyan transplant Authority. A Retrospective single centre cohort study.

Living donor kidney nephrectomy: analysis of trends and outcomes from a contemporary national dataset

ObjectivesTo analyze the temporal trends and perioperative and long-term outcomes of living donor kidney nephrectomy in the United States. MethodsThe PearlDiverTM Mariner database (Pearl-Diver Technologies, Colorado Springs, CO, USA) was used for our retrospective analysis. The data were identified using ICD-9/10 codes, as well as CPT codes. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using 2-sided tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of 5-year ESRD. ResultsA total of 6333 patients were identified (median age 54, IQR 46-62 years) from 2010 to April 2022. A greater percentage of living donor nephrectomies were performed by general surgeons (56.1%), followed by transplant surgeons (16.5%) and urologists (14.7%). Unfortunately, physician specialty was not reported for the remaining patients. The MIS exceeded open surgery in each specialty group and inpatient setting. The significant predictors of ESRD were male, preoperative DM and hypertension, tobacco smoking, perioperative AKI and younger age at the time of kidney donation. ConclusionsMIS represents the main surgical approach for organ procurement. A meticulous selection process for donors and subsequent close monitoring are necessary to minimize the putative consequences of donor nephrectomy.

Program Evaluation of Pharmacist-Performed Medication Adherence Assessments in Candidates for Living Donor Kidney Transplant.

Introduction: Medication education and adherence assessments are integral to kidney transplant success. This program evaluation aimed to describe candidate-reported findings using a standardized medication adherence assessment in candidates undergoing living-donor kidney transplantation. Design: This was a single-center retrospective description of medication adherence on adult HIV-negative living-donor candidates from July 1, 2018 to December 1, 2018 who had ≥6 months post-operative follow-up. Medication adherence assessments were performed by a pharmacist at the pre-operative visit within 2 weeks prior to transplant. Candidates were considered to (a) have adherence concerns if they reported missed/late medications within 2 weeks of assessment or ever stopped a medication without medical advice and (b) considered using adherence strategies if they reported active use of pill box, method to keep track of refills/auto-refill use, medication list, or medication reminder(s). Missed medication data were collected at 3- and 6-months posttransplant. Results: Among 181 candidates included, 81 (45%) had adherence concerns and 169 (93%) reported using adherence strategies. There were no significant differences with adherence concerns by age ≤ 29 years, sex, race, prior transplant/dialysis, or less than a high school education. More candidates with greater than a high school education used adherence strategies (96% vs 86%, P = .002). Too few candidates had documentation on missing medications at 3 and 6 months. Conclusions: Over 40% of candidates reported characteristics concerning medication nonadherence despite over 90% reporting adherence strategies used. Medication adherence assessments can assist with identification of medication nonadherence and education individualization.

Impact of Dialysis Time on Long-term Outcomes in HLA-identical Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Dialysis vintage is associated with worse outcomes after kidney transplantation. The reasons behind this observation include immunological and nonimmunological risk factors. To mitigate the influence of immunological factors, we examined the association between time on dialysis and clinical outcomes in a cohort of HLA-identical kidney transplant recipients. This retrospective study included 13 321 kidney transplant recipients between 1999 and 2016, of whom 589 were HLA identical followed for at least 5 y. Patient and graft survivals were compared according to dialysis time (<12 or >12 mo) using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. We compared surgical complications, cytomegalovirus infection, acute rejection, disease recurrence, and the trajectories of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Median time on dialysis was 15 mo; 9.2% of patients received preemptive transplants, and 55.3% of patients were on dialysis for >12 mo. After a median follow-up time of 154 mo, there were no differences in unadjusted and adjusted patient and graft survivals (1, 5, 10, and 15 y) between the 2 groups. There were no differences in the incidence of surgical complications (6.2% versus 3.1%), acute rejection (6.1% versus 7.7%), cytomegalovirus infection (7.6% versus 4.0%), and disease recurrence (4.2% versus 4.0%), respectively. There were no differences in mean eGFR during 5 y or in the proportion of patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min at 5 y (9.9% versus 9.2%). In this low immunological risk cohort of HLA-identical kidney transplant recipients, we did not observe any association between dialysis vintage on patient survival and graft survival.