叶面积指数(LAI)是量化冠层结构最常用的参数之一, 准确估测LAI对森林生态系统结构特性的研究具有重要意义。利用半球摄影图像法和LAI-2000法及半球摄影图像法结合凋落物法估测了小兴安岭白桦次生林LAI及其动态变化。 首先对该林型叶凋落末期(11月初)的半球摄影图像进行合理校正(包括木质部分所占比例 <em>α</em>, 冠层水平集聚指数<em>Ω</em><sub>E</sub>), 校正值作为该时期常绿树种的真实LAI(LAI<sub>t</sub>), 结合各调查期的凋落物数据, 得到落叶季节(7-11月)的LAI<sub>t</sub>, 并以该值为参考值, 对比分析了两种光学仪器法估测值。结果表明: 两种光学仪器法在LAI最大时期低估(分别低估2.83%、6.20%), 其他时期显著高估(平均高估118.13%、89.34%), 但两种光学仪器法与探讨方法估测值存在很好的相关性: LAI<sub>t</sub>=-1.1393 + 1.0934·LAI<sub>HP</sub>, <em>R</em><sup>2</sup>= 0.80; LAI<sub>t</sub>=-0.1712 + 0.6259·LAI<sub>LAI-2000</sub>, <em>R</em><sup>2</sup>= 0.83。研究结果可为将来方便、快捷、准确的估测白桦次生林的LAI提供参考。;Leaf area index (LAI), defined as the total one-sided leaf area per unit ground surface area (m<sup>2</sup>m<sup>-2</sup>), is among the most frequently used parameters for analysis of plant canopy structure. Most ecosystem process models that simulate carbon and water cycles at a stand or regional scale require LAI as an input variable, thus accurate measurement of LAI is essential for conversion of leaf-level processes to the canopy level. The main methods of LAI measurement generally are classifiable into two groups: direct measures, which mainly include destructive sampling and the litterfall method; and indirect measures, which mainly include hemispherical photography and the LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer. However, using a direct or indirect method alone may not accurately estimate LAI for mixed needle and broadleaf forest or broadleaf forest with a high proportion of evergreen species. Secondary <em>Betula platyphylla</em> is among the most common broadleaf forest types that regenerate naturally after clear cutting of broadleaved-Korean pine forest in the Xiaoxing'an Mountains in north-east China. In the present study, we estimated LAI and its seasonal dynamics in secondary <em>B. platyphylla</em> forest in the Xiaoxing'an Mountains using optical methods (hemispherical photography and the LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer) and a combinational method (hemispherical photography combined with the litterfall method). In the combinational method, hemispherical photographs obtained in early November were calibrated with consideration of the woody-to-total ratio (<em>α</em>) as well as the clumping index (for clumping beyond the shoots, <em>Ω</em><sub>E</sub>). The calibrated value was regarded as the true LAI (LAI<sub>t</sub>) of coniferous species; the LAI<sub>t</sub> of the study stand and its seasonal dynamics (from July to November) were obtained by supplementation of the LAI<sub>t</sub> of coniferous species by incorporation of litterfall data for each observation. Using this result as a reference value, we compared the results obtained with the two optical methods. The LAI for the litter of <em>B. platyphylla</em> and <em>Larix gmelini</em> accounted for 87.65% of the total litter, and leaves of <em>B. platyphylla</em> began to fall distinctly earlier than those of other species, and the LAI for the litter of <em>B. platyphylla</em> accounted for 98.24% of all species during July and August. Leaf fall for most species excluding <em>B. platyphyll</em>a peaked in mid-September. In contrast to the proposed method, hemispherical photography and LAI-2000 both underestimated LAI by 2.83% and 6.20%, respectively, during the maximum LAI period and overestimated LAI significantly on average by 118.13% and 89.34%, respectively, on other dates. However, hemispherical photography and LAI-2000 yielded LAI values that were significantly correlated with the results obtained with the combinational method; the regression curves were LAI<sub>t</sub>= -1.1393 + 1.0934·LAI<sub>HP </sub>(<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>= 0.80) and LAI<sub>t</sub>= -0.1712 + 0.6259·LAI<sub>LAI-2000</sub> (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>= 0.83), respectively. The corrected hemispherical photography data were used to simulate the seasonal dynamics of LAI from May to November, which was indicated to be accurate (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>= 0.87). The LAI estimate obtained with the two optical methods did not differ significantly from July to September, but the estimate with the LAI-2000 method was significantly lower than that obtained with hemispherical photography after October. However, LAI estimated with the two optical methods was significantly correlated (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>= 0.86) for secondary <em>B. platyphylla</em> forest. This study lays a foundation for convenient, rapid and accurate estimation of LAI for secondary <em>B. platyphylla</em> forest in subsequent studies.
Read full abstract