Liraglutide In Type Research Articles

One-Year Weight Reduction With Semaglutide or Liraglutide in Clinical Practice

Limited data are available on long-term weight loss achieved with semaglutide or liraglutide for type 2 diabetes (T2D) or obesity in clinical practice. To document weight loss achieved with injectable forms of semaglutide or liraglutide and identify factors associated with weight reduction of 10% or greater at 1 year. This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from a large, integrated health system in Ohio and Florida. Participants included adults with a body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared) of at least 30.0 who initiated treatment with semaglutide or liraglutide between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2022. Follow-up was completed July 28, 2023. Injectable forms of semaglutide or liraglutide approved for T2D or obesity. Percentage weight change and categorical weight reduction of 10% or greater at 1 year. A total of 3389 patients (mean [SD] age, 50.4 [12.2] years; 1835 [54.7%] female) were identified. Of these, 1341 patients received semaglutide for T2D; 1444, liraglutide for T2D; 227, liraglutide for obesity; and 377, semaglutide for obesity. Mean (SD) percentage weight change at 1 year was -5.1% (7.8%) with semaglutide vs -2.2% (6.4%) with liraglutide (P < .001); -3.2% (6.8%) for T2D as a treatment indication vs -5.9% (9.0%) for obesity (P < .001); and -5.5% (7.5%) with persistent medication coverage (ie, a cumulative gap of less than 90 days) at 1 year vs -2.8% (7.0%) with 90 to 275 medication coverage days and -1.8% (6.7%) with fewer than 90 medication coverage days (P < .001). In the multivariable model, semaglutide vs liraglutide (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.19 [95% CI, 1.77-2.72]), obesity as a treatment indication vs T2D (AOR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.83-3.30]), persistent medication coverage vs 90 medication coverage days (AOR, 3.36 [95% CI, 2.52-4.54]) or 90 to 275 medication coverage days within the first year (AOR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.10-2.06]), high dosage of the medication vs low (AOR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.11-2.25]), and female sex (AOR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.27-1.94]) were associated with achieving a 10% or greater weight reduction at year 1. In this retrospective cohort study of 3389 patients with obesity, weight reduction at 1 year was associated with the medication's active agent, its dosage, treatment indication, persistent medication coverage, and patient sex. Future research should focus on identifying the reasons for discontinuation of medication use and interventions aimed at improving long-term persistent coverage.

Development of 1 Month Sustained-Release Microspheres Containing Liraglutide for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment.

Liraglutide has been extensively applied in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but its 11-15 h half-life resulted in daily administration, which led to poor patient compliance. This study aimed to solve this problem by developing liraglutide-loaded microspheres with a 1 month sustained release prepared by the W1/O/W2 method combined with the premix membrane emulsification technique to improve therapeutic efficacy. Remarkably, we found that the amphiphilic properties of liraglutide successfully reduced the oil-water interfacial tension, resulting in a stable primary emulsion and decreasing the level of drug leakage into the external water phase. As a result, exceptional drug loading (>8%) and encapsulation efficiency (>85%) of microspheres were achieved. Furthermore, the uniformity in microsphere size facilitated an in-depth exploration of the structural characteristics of liraglutide-loaded microspheres. The results indicated that the dimensions of the internal cavities of the microspheres were significantly influenced by the size of the inner water droplets in the primary emulsion. A denser and more uniform cavity structure decreased the initial burst release, improving the release process of liraglutide from the microspheres. To evaluate the release behavior of liraglutide from microspheres, a set of in vitro release assays and in vivo pharmacodynamics were performed. The liraglutide-loaded microspheres effectively decreased fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels while enhancing the pancreatic and hepatic functions in db/db mice. In conclusion, liraglutide sustained-release microspheres showed the potential for future clinical applications in the management of T2DM and provided an effective therapeutic approach to overcoming patient compliance issues.

De-Intensification from Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy to Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes: Predictive Value of Mean Glycaemia during Fasting Test.

Successful conversion from insulin therapy to glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) with basal insulin in well-controlled patients has already been demonstrated. However, the data concerning individuals with poor glycaemic control are scarce. The aim of this work was to assess the success rate of insulin therapy to liraglutide transition in poorly controlled diabetes in a real-world clinical setting and to define predictors of success. We are the first to present the method of a fasting test as a way to identify the patients at higher risk of failure after treatment de-intensification. The retrospective observational study analyzed data of 62 poorly controlled obese diabetic patients on high-dose insulin therapy, who were subjected to a 72 h fasting test during hospitalization and subsequently switched to liraglutide ± basal insulin therapy. During the fasting, all antidiabetic treatment was discontinued. Patients were classified as responders if they remained on GLP-1RA treatment after 12 months. Non-responders restarted the basal-bolus insulin (BBI) regimen. Development of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight in both groups, alongside with parameters associated with the higher risk of return to the BBI regimen, were analyzed. A total of 71% of patients were switched successfully (=responders). Responders had more significant improvement in HbA1c (-6.4 ± 19.7 vs. -3.4 ± 22.9 mmol/mol) and weight loss (-4.6 ± 7.1 vs. -2.5 ± 4.0). Statistically significant difference between groups was found in initial HbA1c (75.6 ± 17.9 vs. 90.5 ± 23.6; p = 0.04), total daily dose of insulin (67.6 ± 36.4 vs. 90.8 ± 32.4; p = 0.02), and mean glycaemia during the fasting test (6.9 ± 1.7 vs. 8.6 ± 2.2 mmol/L; p < 0.01). This study confirms that therapy de-intensification in poorly controlled patients with a BBI regimen is possible. Higher baseline HbA1c, total daily insulin dose, and mean glucose during fasting test are negative predictive factors of successful therapy de-escalation.

The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES): Final patient-reported outcomes at 24 months.

To report health-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating their first injectable glucose-lowering medication (GLM) with two commonly prescribed glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) from the prospective, observational TROPHIES study (The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients). TROPHIES was a two-cohort, 24-month study conducted in France, Germany and Italy. Adults with a T2D diagnosis, naïve to injectable treatment for T2D and prescribed dulaglutide or liraglutide as their first injectable GLM, were eligible for inclusion. Study objectives included describing the following PROs associated with the treatment of T2D with GLP-1RAs: health-related quality of life; impact of weight on self-perception; life and work productivity; and patient satisfaction with treatment and injection device. Additional analyses formally compared PRO measures between the treatment cohorts. Overall, improvements from baseline in PRO scores were observed among people who started dulaglutide or liraglutide. A more pronounced trend of improvement was observed in the dulaglutide cohort for changes from baseline in treatment satisfaction and impact of weight on self-perception, supported by statistically significant differences between treatment cohorts in additional comparative analyses at 12, 18 and 24 months. More positive patient perceptions of the injection device were observed with dulaglutide than with liraglutide. Improvements in PROs observed in TROPHIES, which were more evident with dulaglutide than liraglutide, reflect a relevant clinical benefit. From the patients' perspective, satisfaction, and confidence in continuing treatment with GLP-1RAs is likely to contribute to long-term treatment persistence.

Insulin degludec/liraglutide versus its monotherapy on T2D patients: A lifetime cost-utility analysis in China.

Introduction: IDegLira (brand name Xultophy) is a novel fixed ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide for type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. This study aimed to investigate the lifetime cost-effective value of IDegLira compared with its single component (Degludec or Liraglutide) and to explore the suitable annual cost of IDegLira if necessary. Methods: UKPDS OM2 was applied to determine the long-term quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and total costs. The efficacy data that were inputted into the model were synthesized from 6 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that directly assessed the clinical benefit of IDegLira and its components in the treatment of uncontrolled T2D patients. The economic results were examined by one-way sensitivity analysis (OSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Further price reduction of IDegLira was investigated by binary search. Results: The IDegLira, IDeg, and Lira yielded 11.79 QALYs, 11.62 QALYs, and 11.73 QALYs and total cost of $20281.61, $3726.76, and $11941.26, respectively. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of IDegLira versus IDeg was $99464.12/QALYs, and the ICUR of IDegLira versus Lira was $143348.26/QALYs, which indicated that IDegLira was not a cost-effective therapy for T2D patients compared with its components at the current price from a Chinese national healthcare system perspective. Base case results were robust to OSA and PSA. A further binary search showed that IDegLira appears to only be cost-effective if the annual cost of IDegLira is decreased by 58% when IDeg is considered as a reference, or by 30.57% when Lira is considered as a reference. Conclusion: In conclusion, IDegLira appears to not be cost-effective when compared with the current prices of IDeg or Lira for T2D patients in China. However, after the binary search, IDegLira appears to only be cost-effective if the annual cost of IDegLira is decreased 58% when IDeg is considered as a reference, or by 30.57% when Lira is considered as a reference.

746-P: The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES) : Final 24-Month Primary Endpoint Analysis

TROPHIES was a 24-month, prospective, non-comparative, observational study in adult patients with T2D initiating their first injectable glucose-lowering treatment with once-weekly dulaglutide (DU; N=1,014) or once-daily liraglutide (LIRA; N=991) in France, Germany, and Italy. Primary objective: to assess the time patients remained on their first GLP-1 RA without a significant treatment change due to treatment- or diabetes-related factors. Kaplan-Meier (KM) probability (95% CI) of no significant treatment change at 24 months was 0.71 (0.68-0.74) and 0.53 (0.49-0.56) in the DU and LIRA cohorts, respectively (Figure) . Two-hundred and eighty-six (28.2%) and 448 (45.2%) patients receiving DU and LIRA, respectively, had a significant treatment change. The main driver of treatment change in the DU and LIRA cohorts was intensification with an add-on therapy (insulin or OAD) and intensification with dose increase of GLP-1 RA, respectively. KM probability (95% CI) of GLP-1 RA persistence at 24 months was high in both cohorts: DU 0.82 (0.80-0.85) ; LIRA 0.75 (0.72-0.78) . In summary, the probabilities of no significant treatment change over 24 months were estimated as higher in the DU cohort than in the LIRA cohort in this non-comparative analysis, with good persistence in both cohorts. Disclosure F. Giorgino: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk. Consultant; Lilly Diabetes, Sanofi. Research Support; Lilly Diabetes, Roche Diabetes Care, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. B. Guerci: Advisory Panel; Amgen Inc., Medtronic. Board Member; Abbott Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk. L. Garcia-Perez: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Fuechtenbusch: Advisory Panel; Berlin-Chemie AG. Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp. Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk. J. Lebrec: Consultant; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Orsini Federici: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. A. Dib: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. E. Heitmann: None. M. Yu: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. K. Boye: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company.

738-P: The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES) : Final 24-Month Patient-Reported Outcomes

Data on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in people living with T2D who initiate injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) medication in routine clinical practice are limited. Here we present final PRO data from the TROPHIES 24-month, prospective, non-comparative, observational study of adult patients with T2D in France, Germany and Italy who started their first injectable GLP-1 RA with either once-weekly dulaglutide (DU) or once-daily liraglutide (LIRA) . Patients’ scores on PRO questionnaires were assessed every 6 months. We present scores at 24 months compared with baseline values before starting DU or LIRA treatment. For each PRO measure, higher scores reflect better outcomes. Baseline characteristics (previously published) for patients prescribed DU (N=1,014) or LIRA (N=991) were similar between groups. Mean changes from baseline to 24 months in PRO scores indicate improvements in health outcomes in patients initiating DU or LIRA (Table) . In summary, among those patients still evaluable at 24 months we observed improvements in PRO scores from baseline in both groups, but with a more pronounced trend of improvement in the DU cohort for EQ-5D-5L VAS, IW-SP, DTSQs total, and DPM life and work productivity scores. Disclosure M.Fuechtenbusch: Advisory Panel; Berlin-Chemie AG, Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp., Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk. K.Boye: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. B.Guerci: Advisory Panel; Amgen Inc., Medtronic, Board Member; Abbott Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk. F.Giorgino: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Consultant; Lilly Diabetes, Sanofi, Research Support; Lilly Diabetes, Roche Diabetes Care, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. L.Garcia-perez: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. E.Heitmann: None. J.Lebrec: Consultant; Eli Lilly and Company. A.Barrett: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. A.Dib: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. M.Orsini federici: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company.

726-P: The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES) : Final 24-Month Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Pattern Analyses

TROPHIES was a 24-month, prospective, non-comparative, observational study in adult patients with T2D initiating their first injectable glucose-lowering treatment with once-weekly dulaglutide (DU; N=1,014) or once-daily liraglutide (LIRA; N=991) in France, Germany, and Italy. Secondary objectives included assessments of HbA1c, body weight and treatment patterns. Clinical characteristics of the DU and LIRA cohorts at 24 months are described in the Table. Most patients receiving DU (856/1,014) initiated treatment at 1.5 mg/week and, among 286 patients with a significant treatment change, 237 were still receiving 1.5 mg/week. In the LIRA cohort, most patients (809/991) initiated at the starting dose 0.6 mg/day and 45% increased dose to 1.2 mg/day by Day 90; however, 17% of patients were already receiving 1.8 mg/day by Day 90. At the first significant treatment change 285/448 patients in the LIRA cohort were receiving 1.2 mg/day. Insulin was initiated by 79 and 97 patients in the DU and LIRA cohorts, respectively. Both treatments showed clinically meaningful effectiveness on HbA1c and weight, maintained over the 24-month study period. Disclosure B. Guerci: Advisory Panel; Amgen Inc., Medtronic. Board Member; Abbott Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk. F. Giorgino: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk. Consultant; Lilly Diabetes, Sanofi. Research Support; Lilly Diabetes, Roche Diabetes Care, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. K. Boye: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Fuechtenbusch: Advisory Panel; Berlin-Chemie AG. Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp. Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk. E. Heitmann: None. J. Lebrec: Consultant; Eli Lilly and Company. A. Dib: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Orsini Federici: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Yu: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. L. Garcia-Perez: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company.

A budget impact analysis of substituting sitagliptin with liraglutide in type 2 diabetes from a private health insurance perspective in Egypt

IntroductionType 2 diabetes mellitus causes a sizable burden globally from both health and economic points of view. This study aimed to assess the budget impact of substituting sitagliptin with liraglutide versus other glucose-lowering drugs from the private health insurance perspective in Egypt over a 3-year time horizon.MethodsTwo budget impact models were compared with the standard of care (metformin, pioglitazone, gliclazide, insulin glargine, repaglinide, and empagliflozin) administered in addition to liraglutide or sitagliptin versus the standard of care with placebo. A gradual market introduction of liraglutide or sitagliptin was assumed, and the existing market shares for the other glucose-lowering drugs were provided and validated by the Expert Panel. The event rates were extracted from the LEADER and TECOS trials. Direct and mortality costs were measured. Sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsThe estimated target population of 120,574 type 2 diabetic adult patients was associated with cardio vascular risk. The budget impact per patient per month for liraglutide is EGP29 ($6.7), EGP39 ($9), and EGP49 ($11.3) in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years, respectively. The budget impact per patient per month for sitagliptin is EGP11 ($2.5), EGP14 ($3.2), and EGP18 ($4.1) in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years, respectively. Furthermore, adoption of liraglutide resulted in 203 fewer deaths and 550 avoided hospitalizations, while sitagliptin resulted in 43 increased deaths and 14 avoided hospitalizations. The treatment costs of liraglutide use are mostly offset by substantial savings due to fewer cardiovascular-related events, avoided mortality and avoided hospitalizations over 3 years.ConclusionAdding liraglutide resulted in a modest budget impact, suggesting that the upfront drug costs were offset by budget savings due to fewer cardiovascular-related complications and deaths avoided compared to the standard of care. Sitagliptin resulted in a small budget impact but was associated with increased deaths and fewer hospitalizations avoided.

POSC359 The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide & Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES): Patient Reported Outcomes at 12-Months

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures provide information that complement clinical data. Studies assessing PRO measures in people living with T2D who initiate injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) medication in routine clinical practice are limited. To better understand the perspectives of people living with T2D regarding their overall health, treatment/device satisfaction, and quality of life and work, here we describe perspectives of participants at the 12-month time-point of TROPHIES.

Efficacy and safety of liraglutide in type 1 diabetes by baseline characteristics in the ADJUNCT ONE and ADJUNCT TWO randomized controlled trials

AimTo evaluate 26 weeks of liraglutide treatment in type 1 diabetes (T1D) by subgroups in the ADJUNCT ONE and ADJUNCT TWO trials.Materials and MethodsADJUNCT ONE and ADJUNCT TWO were randomized controlled phase 3 trials in 1398 and 835 participants with T1D treated with liraglutide (1.8, 1.2, or 0.6 mg) or placebo (adjuncts to insulin). This post hoc analysis evaluated treatment effects by subgroups: HbA1c (< or ≥8.5%), body mass index (BMI; < or ≥27 kg/m2), and insulin regimen (basal bolus or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion).ResultsIn both trials at week 26, reductions in HbA1c, body weight, and daily insulin dose did not differ significantly (P > .05) by baseline HbA1c or BMI. Risk of clinically significant hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia with ketosis did not differ significantly (P > .05) by baseline HbA1c, BMI, or insulin regimen. At week 26 in ADJUNCT ONE, these risks did not differ (P > .05) between treatment groups. Placebo‐adjusted reductions in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin dose (−0.30%‐points, −5.0 kg, and −12%, respectively, with liraglutide 1.8 mg), were significant (P < .05), greater than at week 52, and similar to those in ADJUNCT TWO (−0.35%, −4.8 kg, and −10%, respectively, with liraglutide 1.8 mg).ConclusionsIn ADJUNCT ONE and ADJUNCT TWO, the efficacy and glycaemic safety of liraglutide did not depend on subgroups, leaving residual beta‐cell function as the only identified variable impacting the effect of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) in T1D. These findings support a role for GLP‐1 RAs as adjuncts to insulin in T1D, warranting further study.

Explore the Effect and Target of Liraglutide on Islet Function in Type 2 Diabetic Rats by miRNA Omics Technology.

PurposeTo analyze the effect and potential therapeutic targets of liraglutide in type 2 diabetes through miRNA expression profiling.MethodsTen of 30 SPF Wistar rats, males at 4 weeks old, were randomly selected as the control group and given conventional feed, the other rats adopted high-sugar and high-fat diet combined with an intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin to establish a T2DM model. One unsuccessful rat was excluded, and the remaining rats were randomized to the model and the liraglutide group. Liraglutide group was subcutaneously injected with liraglutide 0.11 mg/kg for 8 weeks. The biochemical indicators and staining HE were detected. The expression of miRNA in pancreatic tissue was detected by miRNA sequencing. The intersection of miRNA difference was used to predict the target gene, then functional enrichment was performed to identify its possible biological functions and signal transduction paths. Finally, qRT-PCR was used to verify the results.ResultsCompared to the model group, the level of fasting blood glucose (FBG), glucagon and insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) in the liraglutide group were significantly decreased, fasting insulin (FINS) and insulin sensitivity index (ISI) were increased. Nine differential miRNAs (miR-135a-5p, miR-144-5p, miR-21-3p, miR-215, miR-451-5p, miR-486, miR-122-5p, miR-181d-5p and miR-345-5p) were identified at the intersection through two miRNA sequencing. A total of 3359 related target gene predictions were obtained. GO and pathway analyses demonstrated that differentially expressed genes were closely related to cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and proteolysis. Significant signaling pathways included PI signaling system, autophagy, FoxO and HIF-1 signaling pathway.ConclusionLiraglutide could improve islet function by regulating nine miRNAs, and the related signaling pathways included PI signaling system, autophagy, FoxO and HIF-1 signaling pathway. Our study provided the basis and direction for further exploring the molecular mechanism of liraglutide on T2DM.

672-P: The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES): Twelve-Month Data Analysis

TROPHIES is a 24-month, prospective, non-comparative, observational study in adult patients with T2D initiating their first injectable glucose-lowering treatment with once-weekly dulaglutide (DU) or once-daily liraglutide (LIRA) in France, Germany, and Italy. Patient disposition, clinical characteristics, and GLP-1 RA persistence at 12-months are described for 1112 DU and 1039 LIRA patients eligible for analysis. The 12-month mean HbA1c (SD) change from baseline was -1.2 (1.4)% (baseline, 8.2 (1.2)%) in the DU cohort and -1.2 (1.5)% (baseline, 8.3 (1.3)%) in the LIRA cohort. At 12-months, 35% DU and 29% LIRA patients reached their individualized HbA1c target set by the physician at baseline. The mean weight change for DU and LIRA from baseline to 12-months was -3.3 (5.5) kg and -3.4 (6.1) kg, respectively. Probability (95%CI) of GLP-1 RA persistence was high in both DU and LIRA cohorts at 12-months: DU, 0.88 (0.86-0.90); LIRA 0.82 (0.79-0.84); (Figure).In summary, these data show similar HbA1c and weight reductions for DU and LIRA at 12-months with good persistence, consistent with known clinical trial results.View largeDownload slideView largeDownload slide DisclosureB. Guerci: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Board Member; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. M. O. Orsini federici: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. F. Giorgino: Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly Diabetes, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, Research Support; Self; Lilly Diabetes, Roche Diabetes Care. L. Garcia: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. K. Boye: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Employee; Spouse/Partner; Eli Lilly and Company. K. Norrbacka: Employee; Self; Oy Eli Lilly Finland Ab, Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. H. Sapin: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. E. Heitmann: Employee; Self; Lilly Diabetes. J. Lebrec: Consultant; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. A. Dib: Advisory Panel; Spouse/Partner; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company.

A randomized controlled trial protocol of the cardiovascular safety and efficacy of liraglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Background:Recently, many clinical experiments have evaluated the influences of liraglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, the outcomes of these studies are inconsistent, and the number of high-quality prospective trials that conducted to assess the cardiovascular safety is limited. Hence, for this research, it was implemented for the assessment of the cardiovascular effectiveness and safety of liraglutide in type 2 diabetes patients.Methods:This research was a 26-week active controlled and randomized trial. Our research protocol follows the guidelines of Good Clinical Practice issued via the Helsinki Declaration and International Conference on Coordination. All the patients will receive the written informed consent in order to involve in our clinical experiment. The participants with type 2 diabetes aged from 18 years to 80 years, patients with 45.0 kg/m2 body-mass index or less, and with glycosylated hemoglobin of 7.5 to 10.0 percent, and received metformin (daily 1500 mg or more) for 3 months or longer were eligible. All the patients were randomized to 1 of 2 interventions (in the ratio of 1:1): liraglutide placebo once daily (blinded) and liraglutide once daily (blinded), respectively, both combined with the glimepiride and metformin (open-labeled). For the efficacy variable, the major endpoint was the baseline glycated hemoglobin change after treating for 26 weeks. The secondary end points involved: the percentage of participants who achieved the goals of postprandial blood glucose, fasting blood glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin; the changes of mean postprandial blood glucose, fasting blood glucose, and the body weight, pancreatic B-cell function index, and changes in blood pressure and insulin resistance assessed by homeostasis model.Conclusions:For this research, the limitations involve the short trial period and the limitation of glimepiride in some countries, thus excluding the maximum doses of glimepiride.Trial registration:This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6306).

PDB3 The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide & Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES): 6-Month Analysis Results

PDB3 The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide & Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES): 6-Month Analysis Results

The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES): Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes.

IntroductionAlthough patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures provide important information beyond clinical data, studies that assess the PROs of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients initiating injectable glucose-lowering medications in routine clinical practice are limited. We describe the perspectives of patients based on a diversified panel of generic and disease-specific PRO measures at the time of enrollment (baseline) in the TROPHIES study.MethodsTROPHIES is a 24-month prospective observational study performed in France, Germany, and Italy in patients with T2DM who initiated their first injectable glucose-lowering medication with once-weekly dulaglutide or once-daily liraglutide. To better understand the perspectives of these patients regarding their overall health, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life and work, the patients’ responses to the following questionnaires were collected at baseline before they initiated treatment with dulaglutide or liraglutide: EQ-5D-5L (scale: 0–1), EQ-VAS (visual analog scale: 0–100), Impact of Weight on Self-Perceptions Questionnaire (IW-SP; scale: 0–100), Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs; scale: 0–36), and Diabetes Productivity Measure (DPM; scale: 0–100). Analyses were descriptive in nature, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes.ResultsData from patients at the time of enrollment were analyzed. At baseline, patients initiating dulaglutide (N = 1130) or liraglutide (N = 1051) rated their quality of life in terms of mean EQ-5D-5L index as 0.84 and 0.83, and in terms of mean EQ-VAS as 67.5 and 67.5, respectively. The mean baseline scores in patients initiating dulaglutide or liraglutide were 59.8 and 61.3 for IW-SP, 24.6 and 25.8 for DTSQs, 78.6 and 79.5 for DPM Life Productivity, and 87.5 and 86.8 for DPM Work Productivity, respectively.ConclusionThe information from this varied panel of PRO instruments collected at baseline complements clinical outcomes data.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-020-00908-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effectiveness, Safety, and Patient Satisfaction of Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.

Background and ObjectivesLiraglutide, an analog of human glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), has been approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Pakistan since 2016. It is a GLP-1 receptor agonist that has shown promising results in terms of not only glycemic control but also weight loss. Our study aimed to provide evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of liraglutide in Pakistan and to look at the adherence rate and treatment satisfaction of patients using liraglutide.MethodsThis is an observational retrospective study that recruited patients who were treated with liraglutide. Data were collected at the first visit and follow-up. Morisky Green Levine Adherence Scale and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) were used for the determination of adherence and satisfaction with the treatment.ResultsA total of 70 patients were recruited in the study, The mean difference in weight, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to follow-up was -5.36 kg, -2.14 kg/m2, -1.76%, -12.38 mmHg, and 5.55 mmHg, respectively. Nausea was the main side effect reported. TSQM-9 scores were compared from baseline, and it was found that patients are satisfied with the treatment and its effectiveness.ConclusionsOur study has demonstrated the effectiveness of liraglutide as a monotherapy or combination therapy in the Pakistani population. Liraglutide led to reduction in HbA1C and weight. This is associated with high treatment satisfaction rate and adherence rate. Thus, liraglutide remains an effective though expensive treatment option in a country like Pakistan.

Liraglutide as Adjunct to Insulin Treatment in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

A few Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) have evaluated the use of liraglutide in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). Through the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim at critically appraising and summarizing those RCTs, providing precise effect estimates. We searched major databases and grey literature from their inception to October 2018, for RCTs with a duration ≥ 12 weeks, comparing liraglutide with placebo or any other comparator as adjunct to insulin in patients with T1D, investigating major efficacy and safety endpoints. This review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included 5 trials with 2,445 randomized participants. Liraglutide provided modest reductions in HbA1c, with liraglutide 1.8 mg producing the greatest decrease (MD = -0.24%, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.16, I2=0%). Significant weight reduction, up to 4.87 kg with liraglutide 1.8 mg was also observed (95% CI -5.31 to -4.43, I2=0%). Decrease in total daily insulin dose, primarily driven by a decrease in bolus insulin requirements, was demonstrated. Liraglutide decreased non-significantly the odds for severe hypoglycemia (OR=0.80, 95% CI 0.57-1.14, I2=0%), while it increased significantly the odds for gastrointestinal adverse events (for nausea, OR=4.70, 95% CI 3.68-6.00, I2=37%, and for vomiting, OR=2.50, 95% CI 1.54-4.72, I2=27%). A significant increase in heart rate was also demonstrated. No association with diabetic ketoacidosis or malignancies was identified. In patients with T1D, liraglutide might prove be an adjunct to insulin, improving glycemic control, inducing body weight loss and decreasing exogenous insulin requirements and severe hypoglycemia.

Bone resorption is unchanged by liraglutide in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial.

Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has well known beneficial effects on glucose metabolism, and animal studies indicate that liraglutide also affects bone turnover by decreasing bone resorption. The primary objective of the study was to investigate the effect of liraglutide on bone turnover in patients with T2D. The study was a randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Sixty participants with T2D were randomized to treatment with liraglutide 1.8mg daily or placebo for 26weeks. The primary endpoint was change in p-collagen I cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide (p-CTX). P-CTX increased in patients treated with liraglutide by 0.07 (0.03; 0.10) μg/L (p<0.001) and in patients treated with placebo by 0.03 (0.00; 0.06) μg/L (p=0.04), however, changes were not different between the groups (p=0.16). Weight decreased in patients treated with liraglutide from baseline to week four (p<0.001) and remained stable thereafter. P-procollagen type 1N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) decreased in patients treated with liraglutide from baseline to week four (p<0.01), increased between weeks 4 and 13 (p=0.03), and remained elevated thereafter. Weight and p-P1NP did not change in patients treated with placebo. Hip bone mineral density (BMD) decreased in placebo treated patients from baseline to end of study, whereas no changes were seen in patients treated with liraglutide (p=0.01 difference between groups). Liraglutide treatment for 26weeks did not affect bone resorption and preserved hip BMD despite weight loss in patients with T2D, suggesting that liraglutide has some antiresorptive effect.

Effect of medication adherence on clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: analysis of the SIMPLE study

ObjectiveMedication adherence is impacted by regimen complexity. The SIMPLE (Simple basal Insulin titration, Metformin Plus Liraglutide for type 2 diabetes with very Elevated HbA1c) study compared GLP1RA plus basal insulin...