Lipoprotein Apheresis Sessions Research Articles

Lipoprotein Apheresis Alleviates Treatment-Resistant Peripheral Artery Disease Despite the Normal Range of Atherogenic Lipoproteins: The LETS-PAD Study.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) severely impairs patient prognosis and quality of life (QOL). Although lipoprotein apheresis (LA) has been applied to patients with PAD and elevated serum atherogenic lipoproteins, we hypothesized that LA can be effective for treating PAD even in patients with controlled serum lipoproteins through pleiotropic anti-atherosclerotic effects beyond lipoprotein removal. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LA in patients with treatment-resistant PAD and controlled serum lipoproteins focusing on QOL. In a single-arm prospective study, 30 patients with refractory PAD who had controlled serum lipoproteins underwent sequential LA sessions using dextran sulfate adsorption columns, aiming to complete 10 sessions. The ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI) and vascular QOL (VascuQOL) score were evaluated as the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and biological antioxidant potential (BAP) as an endothelial function test and serum antioxidative-capacity evaluation, respectively. ABI significantly increased after LA sessions (pre-treatment 0.60±0.09 vs. post-treatment 0.65±0.13, p=0.023). Total VascuQOL score (3.7±1.1 vs 4.6±1.1, p＜0.001) and RHI (1.70±0.74 vs 2.34±1.76, p=0.023) significantly improved after the LA sessions. BAP tended to increase after the LA sessions, and the change reached statistical significance 3 months after treatment. ABI and QOL improved after a series of LA sessions in conventional treatment-resistant PAD patients with controlled serum lipoprotein levels. Increased antioxidative capacity and ameliorated endothelial function were observed after the LA treatment.

The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry-Summary of the eleventh annual report

BackgroundIn 2012, the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR) was launched. Real-world data on lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment are now available for a time period of 11 years. All patients received the maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy, which included statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and either proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) antibodies or antisense therapy. Methods and ResultsDuring the time period from 2012 to 2022, 92 German apheresis centers collected retrospective and prospective observational data of a total of 2,301 patients undergoing regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment of hypercholesterolemia or/and Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia suffering from progressive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), with complete data sets of 1.125 patients, who were the subject of this analysis. More than 61,500 LA sessions are documented in the database. In 2022, all patients treated with LA demonstrated a significant immediate median reduction rate of LDL-C (68.8 %) and Lp(a) (72.9 %). Patient data were analyzed for the incidence rate of major coronary events (MACE) 1 and 2 years before the beginning of LA treatment (y-2 and y-1) and prospectively up to eleven years on LA treatment (y+1 to y+11). During the first two years of LA treatment (y+1 and y+2), a MACE reduction of 73 % was observed and continued to be low during y+3 to y+11, when all LA patients were analyzed. LA patients with only increased Lp(a) levels (Lp(a) ≥ 60 mg/dl (≥120 nmol/l) and an LDL-C < 100 mg/dl (<2.6 mmol/l)) had a higher MACE reduction (85 %; n = 443) in the first two years of LA treatment compared to LA patients with only increased LDL-C-levels (LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dl (≥2.6 mmol/l); Lp(a) < 60 mg/dl (<120 nmol/l)) (53 %; n = 171). Adverse events of LA remained low (about 5 %) over the eleven years and mainly represented puncture problems (1.0 %). No side effects resulted in termination of LA therapy. ConclusionsThe current analysis of GLAR data indicates that regular LA leads to very low incidence rates of cardiovascular events in patients with high LDL-C and/or high Lp(a) levels, progressive ASCVD, and maximally tolerated lipid-lowering medication, including proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition. Additionally, LA was safe with a low rate of adverse effects over an 11-year period. The number of enrolled patients and the duration of observation establish GLAR as the largest LA registry worldwide.

Acute Increase in Ocular Microcirculation Blood Flow Upon Cholesterol Removal. The Eyes Are the Window of the Heart

BackgroundLipoprotein apheresis acutely increases coronary microvascular blood flow. However, measurement techniques are time-consuming, costly, and invasive. The ocular vasculature may be an appropriate surrogate and an easily accessible window to investigate the microcirculation. Recent advances in ocular imaging techniques enable quick, noninvasive quantification of ocular microcirculation blood flow. The insights from these techniques represent a significant opportunity to study the short-term changes in optic disk blood flow after lipoprotein apheresis for inherited hypercholesterolemia. MethodsThis study was performed at the Italian Reference Center for Inherited Dyslipidemias in Tuscany. The study sample was comprised of 22 patients with inherited hypercholesterolemia who were previously studied for coronary microcirculation. Laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) was used to measure optic disk blood flow before and after lipoprotein apheresis. The main outcomes measures were average tissue blood flow (referred to as mean tissue) and arteriolar/venular average blood flow (referred to as mean vessel). Eyes were divided into 2 groups based on pre-lipoprotein apheresis optic disk blood flow values. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsAfter each lipoprotein apheresis treatment resulting in the reduction of plasma lipids, there was a concurrent increase in all optic disk microcirculatory parameters. The increase was statistically significant in eyes with lower pre-apheresis optic disk blood flow values (mean tissue +7.0%, P < .005; mean vessel +7.2%, P < .05). ConclusionsA single lipoprotein apheresis session resulted in a statistically significant short-term increase in optic disk blood flow. These findings together with previous coronary microcirculation data suggest a similar ocular and coronary blood flow response to lipoprotein apheresis. Ocular microcirculation may represent a versatile biomarker for evaluating systemic microcirculatory health, including coronary microcirculation. Hence, it is plausible that plasma lipoprotein levels may influence optic disk blood flow.

Volanesorsen: A New Era in the Treatment of Severe Hypertriglyceridemia.

Introduction: Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare inherited disease, mainly due to lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene mutations, leading to lipid abnormalities. Volanesorsen, a second-generation 2′-O-methoxyethyl (2′-MOE) chimeric antisense therapeutic oligonucleotide, can decrease plasma apolipoprotein C3 and triglycerides (TG) levels through LPL-independent pathways. The European Medicines Agency has approved volanesorsen as an adjunct to diet in adult FCS patients with an inadequate response to TG-lowering therapy. Areas covered: Available clinical data on volanesorsen efficacy and safety are presented. Furthermore, we discuss the yearly treatment with volanesorsen of a 21-year-old female FCS patient with LPL mutation. Volanesorsen was well-tolerated and decreased patient’s TG levels (from >5000 mg/dL (56 mmol/L) to 350–500 mg/dL (4–5.6 mmol/L)) at 12 months. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) was stopped and there were no episodes of pancreatitis or abdominal pain. Expert opinion: Severe hypertriglyceridemia can potentially be fatal. Until recently, there was no specific treatment for FCS, apart from hypotriglyceridemic diet, fibrates, omega-3 fatty acids, and LA sessions. Therefore, volanesorsen represents a promising therapeutic solution for these patients. The main side effect of volanesorsen therapy is thrombocytopenia, which should be monitored and treated accordingly. Increasing evidence will further elucidate the clinical implications of volanesorsen use in daily practice.

Is treating severe He FH so easy? A combined treatment between lipoprotein apheresis and PCSK9 inhibitors

Despite advance in pharmacotherapy of lipid disorders, many heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia patients do not achieve a desirable lipid target to significantly reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the interaction between Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) and PCSK9i in a small FH cohort in which the guidelines therapeutic target is not achieved.During one year, together with a complete adherence to PCSK9i therapy, we recorded a 3 to 5 LA sessions less per year in each patient. This therapeutic approach suggests: i) the possibility of increasing the number of patients treated with LA, ii) the improvement of their quality of life, and iii) the costs reduction for the single patient-treatment.

Oxidised LDL and Anti-Oxidised LDL Antibodies Are Reduced by Lipoprotein Apheresis in a Randomised Controlled Trial on Patients with Refractory Angina and Elevated Lipoprotein(a).

Aims: An abundance of epidemiological evidence demonstrates that elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) represents a significant contributing risk factor towards the development of cardiovascular disease. In particular, raised Lp(a) may play a mechanistic role in patients with refractory angina. Studies have also shown a correlation between oxidised LDL (oxLDL) levels and atherosclerotic burden as well as rates of cardiovascular events. Antibodies against oxLDL (anti-oxLDL) are involved in the removal of oxLDL. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA), which removes lipoproteins using extra-corporeal processes, is an established means of reducing Lp(a), and thereby reduces cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of LA on oxLDL and anti-oxLDL levels amongst those with refractory angina in the context of raised Lp(a). Methods: We performed a sub-study within a randomised controlled crossover trial involving 20 patients with refractory angina and raised Lp(a) > 500 mg/L, comparing the effect of three months of blinded weekly LA or sham, followed by crossover to the opposite study arm. We utilized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to quantify oxLDL and IgG/ IgM anti-oxLDL antibody levels at baseline and following three months of active LA or sham sessions. Results: Following three months of LA, there was a 30% reduction in oxLDL from 0.37 ± 0.06 to 0.26 ± 0.04 with a mean drop of −0.11 units (U) (95% CI −0.13, −0.09) compared to no significant change with sham therapy (p < 0.0001 between treatment arms). LA also led to a 22% reduction in levels of IgG and IgM anti-oxLDL, again with no significant change demonstrated during sham (p = 0.0036 and p = 0.012, respectively, between treatment arms). Conclusion: Amongst patients with refractory angina in the context of elevated Lp(a), LA significantly lowers levels of oxLDL and anti-oxLDL antibodies, representing potential mechanisms by which LA yields symptomatic and prognostic benefits in this patient cohort.

Cardiovascular events in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and hyperlipoproteinaemia (a): Indications for lipoprotein apheresis in Poland.

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is a safe method of reducing atherogenic lipoproteins and improving cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. We aimed to assess the reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels in patients undergoing regular LA therapy and to evaluate its influence on the incidence rate of adverse cardiac and vascular events (ACVE) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). A longitudinal study in Poland evaluated the prospective and retrospective observational data of 23 patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia (a) [hyper-Lp(a)] and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), undergoing 1014 LA sessions between 2013 and 2020. Their pre- and post-apheresis LDL-C and Lp(a) levels were assessed to calculate the acute percent reductions. The time period used to evaluate annual rates of ACVE and MACE before and after initiation of LA was matched in each patient. The pre-apheresis LDL-C and Lp(a) concentrations were 155 (107-228) (mg/dL) (median and interquartile range) and 0.56 (0.14-1.37) (g/L), respectively. LA therapy resulted in a reduction of LDL-C to 50 (30-73.5) (mg/dL) and of Lp(a) to 0.13 (0.05-0.34) (g/L), representing a percent reduction of 70.0% and 72.7% for LDL-C and Lp(a), respectively. We found a significant reduction in the annual rate of ACVE (0.365[0.0-0.585] vs (0.0[0.0-0.265]; P=.047) and MACE (0.365[0.0-0.585] vs 0.0[0.0-0.265]; P=.031). The findings of our study indicate that LA treatment in patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia (a) and FH on maximally tolerated lipid lowering therapies leads to a substantial reduction in LDL-C and Lp(a) concentrations and lowers CV event rates in Polish patients.

The Impact of Lipoprotein Apheresis on Oxidative Stress Biomarkers and High-Density Lipoprotein Subfractions.

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment results in a substantial reduction of low-density lipoprotein- (LDL-) cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) concentrations, which consequently decreases the rate of cardiovascular events. The additional benefit of LA may be associated with its impact on the composition and quality of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles, inflammation, and oxidative stress condition. To verify the effects of LA procedure, the current study is aimed at analyzing the effect of a single apheresis procedure with direct hemadsorption (DALI) and cascade filtration (MONET) on oxidative stress markers and HDL-related parameters. The study included eleven patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and hyperlipoproteinemia(a) treated with regular LA (DALI or MONET). We investigated the pre- and postapheresis concentration of the lipid-related oxidative stress markers 8-isoPGF2, oxLDL, TBARS, and PON-1. We also tracked potential changes in the main HDL apolipoproteins (ApoA-I, ApoA-II) and cholesterol contained in HDL subfractions. A single session of LA with DALI or MONET techniques resulted in a similar reduction of lipid-related oxidative stress markers. Concentrations of 8-isoPGF2 and TBARS were reduced by ~60% and ~30%, respectively. LA resulted in a 67% decrease in oxLDL levels along with a ~19% reduction in the oxLDL/ApoB ratio. Concentrations of HDL cholesterol, ApoA-I, ApoA-II, and PON-1 activity were also reduced by LA sessions, with more noticeable effects seen in the MONET technique. The quantitative proportions between HDL2 and HDL3 cholesterol did not change significantly by both methods. In conclusion, LA treatment with MONET or DALI system has a small nonselective effect on lowering HDL particles without any changes in the protein composition of these particles. Significant reduction in the level of oxidative stress parameters and less oxidation of LDL particles may provide an additional benefit of LA therapy.

Lipoprotein Apheresis and Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A One Center Study.

We evaluated the lipid-lowering (LL) effect of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) treated with LL-drugs and lipoprotein apheresis (LA). The PCSK9i treatment (evolocumab 420 mg/4 weeks, alirocumab 150 mg/2 weeks, or alirocumab 75 mg/2 weeks: 9, 6, and 2 patients, respectively) was initiated in patients with HeFH (n = 17; aged 35-69 years, 10 men, previously treated with statins + ezetimibe ± colesevelam and LA sessions for 2-12 years). A lipid profile was obtained before and immediately after the LA session and before, 1 and 2 months after switching to PCSK9i treatment. The duration of PCSK9i therapy ranged from 3 to 18 months. Median total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) levels before LA were 268, 198, 46, and 126 mg/dL, respectively, and decreased (at the end of the LA session) to 117, 50, 40, and 51 mg/dL, respectively (P < .001 for TC and P = .001 for all other comparisons). The median time-averaged LDL-C levels following LA were 155 (121, 176; median [25th, 75th percentile]) mg/dL. Median TC, LDL-C, and TG levels before PCSK9i therapy were 269, 190, and 127 mg/dL and decreased to 152, 100, and 95 mg/dL, respectively (P = .002, P < .002, and P < .03, respectively). Steady LDL-C levels with PCSK9i treatment were significantly lower compared with time-averaged LDL-C levels following LA (median value: 100 vs 155 mg/dL; P = .008). With PCSK9i, from 13 patients with CHD, 6 (46.1%) patients achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and 2 patients (15.4%) achieved LDL-C <100 mg/dL. Lipoprotein apheresis was discontinued in all patients except for 2 who continued once monthly. PCSK9i can reduce LDL-C more consistently over time compared with a transient decrease following LA in HeFH patients. PCSK9i therapy may reduce the frequency of LA. Larger trials are required to establish the clinical implications of PCSK9i in patients previously on LA.

Why Some Patients Undergoing Lipoprotein Apheresis Therapy Develop New Cardiovascular Events?

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is an effective tool to reduce cardiovascular events (CVEs) in high-risk patients with elevations of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and/or Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)). All patients included into this retrospective analysis had experienced CVEs before the start of the LA therapy. We compared personal and lab data in two groups: CVEx/0 (n 60) with no new events during LA therapy, CVEx/1+ (n 48) with at least one new event. Patients of Group CVEx/1+ were about 5 years older when they had started the extracorporeal therapy, and they experienced more CVEs prior to that timepoint. There was a positive correlation between the number of CVEs before and during LA therapy. No differences were seen with respect to lipid concentrations, even after a correction of LDL-C concentrations for the LDL-C transported with Lp(a) particles. LA sessions effectively reduced both LDL-C and Lp(a). Lp(a) levels measured before LA sessions were lower than those measured initially. It appeared difficult to reach the target values for LDL-C published in the ESC/EAS Guideline in 2019, although all patients were maximally treated including drugs when tolerated. In conclusion, it will be important to initiate an LA therapy earlier, at least after a second CVE and at a younger age.

Flaxseed (Linum Usitatissimum L.) Supplementation in Patients Undergoing Lipoprotein Apheresis for Severe Hyperlipidemia-A Pilot Study.

Being rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids, flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) is thought to be able to decrease lipid levels and dampen inflammation. In this pilot study, we aimed to determine whether flaxseed supplementation could improve the profiles of lipids and inflammatory mediators in patients with severe hyperlipidemia resistant to conventional lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy and requiring lipoprotein apheresis. To this end, six patients received, blindly—in addition to their normal lipoprotein apheresis regimen—a 10-week dietary supplementation with flaxseed (28 g/d) administered in biscuits. This was followed by a 10-week washed out-period and a 10-week supplementation phase with whole wheat placebo. Blood samples were collected at the end of each phase, before the lipoprotein apheresis session. The primary endpoint was the lipid profile and the secondary endpoints were the concentrations of inflammatory mediators and tolerability. Flaxseed supplementation was well-tolerated and resulted in a consistent and significant decrease in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. The median (and range) percentage decrease was 11.5% (0–18.8) and 7.3% (4.4–26.6), for cholesterol (p = 0.015) and LDL-C (p = 0.003), respectively. On the other hand, there was no significant effect of flaxseed on lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) concentrations. These observations indicate that flaxseed can produce a cholesterol- and LDL-lowering effect in patients treated with lipoprotein apheresis. Thus, flaxseed supplementation may help to control cholesterol in this patient population. The flaxseed supplementation protocol applied may be of use for further adequately-powered studies to validate and extend our findings.

Dextran-Sulfate Plasma Adsorption Lipoprotein Apheresis in Drug Resistant Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Patients: Results From a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Intervention Study.

Background: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) causes end stage renal disease (ESRD) in significant proportion of patients worldwide. Primary FSGS carries poor prognosis and management of FSGS patients, refractory to standard treatments or resistant to steroids, remains a major challenge. Lipoprotein apheresis is a therapeutic approach for drug resistant primary FSGS and post-renal transplant primary FSGS recurrence.Objectives: To examine the safety and probable benefit at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24-months following completion of apheresis treatment using Liposorber® LA-15 system in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS), due to refractory primary FSGS or primary FSGS associated NS, in post renal transplant children.Material and Methods: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm intervention study using Liposorber® LA-15 system. Patients ≤21 years old with drug resistant or drug intolerant NS secondary to primary FSGS with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or post renal transplant patients ≤21 years old with primary FSGS associated NS were included in the study. Each patient had 12 dextran-sulfate plasma adsorption lipoprotein apheresis sessions over a period of 9 weeks. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24-months following completion of treatment.Results: Of 17 patients enrolled, six were excluded from the outcome analysis (protocol deviations). Of the remaining 11 patients, all but one have completed apheresis treatments. Three patients were lost to follow-up immediately after completion of apheresis and excluded from outcome analysis. At one-month follow-up, 1 of 7 patients (14.3%) attained partial remission of NS while 2 of 4 subjects (50%) and 2 of 3 subjects (66.7%) had partial/complete remission at 3- and 6-months follow-up, respectively. One of two patients followed up for 12 months had complete remission and one patient had partial remission of NS after 24 months. Improved or stable eGFR was noted in all patients over the follow-up period.Conclusion: The results of our multicenter study showed improvement in the response rates to steroid or immunosuppressive therapy and induced complete or partial remission of proteinuria in some of the patients with drug resistant primary FSGS. The main limitation of our study is the small number of subjects and high dropout rate.

Actual situation of lipoprotein apheresis in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) levels

An elevation of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an internationally recognized atherogenic risk factor, documented in epidemiological studies, in studies with Mendelian randomization and in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). At present, no drug is available to effectively reduce its concentration. In Germany, an elevation of Lp(a) associated with progressive cardiovascular diseases is officially recognized as an indication for a lipoprotein apheresis (LA). The number of patients who were treated with LA with this abnormality was steadily increasing in the years 2013–2016 – the official data are reported. In all new patients, who started to be treated at our LA center in 2017 (n = 20) the increased Lp(a) was a main indication for extracorporeal therapy, though some of them also showed clearly elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations despite being treated with a maximal tolerated lipid-lowering drug therapy. A diabetes mellitus was seen in 5 patients. The higher was the Lp(a) level before the first LA session, the higher was the cardiovascular risk. Lp(a) concentrations measured before LA sessions were usually about 20% lower than those before the start of the LA therapy. Acutely, Lp(a) levels were reduced by about 70%. Following LA sessions the Lp(a) levels increased and in the majority reach pre-session concentrations after one week. Thus a weekly interval is best for the patients, but a few may need two sessions per week to stop the progress of atherosclerosis. The interval mean values were about 39% lower than previous levels. Several papers had been published showing a higher efficiency of LA therapy on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with high Lp(a) values when comparing with hypercholesterolemic patients with normal Lp(a) concentrations. Russian specific anti-Lp(a) columns positively affected coronary atherosclerosis. PCSK9 inhibitors reduce Lp(a) concentrations in many patients and in this way have a positive impact on cardiovascular outcomes. In the future, an antisense oligonucleotide against apolipoprotein(a) may be an alternative therapeutic option, provided a clear-cut reduction of cardiovascular events will be demonstrated.

P5365Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor (lomitapide) efficacy in the treatment of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia phenotype

Abstract Introduction The majority of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) phenotype are treated additionally to lipid lowering (LL) drugs (statin + ezetimibe ± colesevelam) with lipoprotein apheresis (LA) sessions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor (lomitapide) in HoFH patients. Patients and methods In 12 HoFH patients treated with LL drugs ± biweekly LA sessions (9 patients) the 5–40 mg daily of lomitapide was added. Lipid profile [total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)] before (LL drugs ± LA) and after lomitapide treatment were evaluated. Results The follow-up period of lomitapide treatment for 12 patients was 3–24 months (13.8±7.9). The median baseline LDL-C levels was 1000 mg/dL (339–1150). During LL drug therapy, patients showed a median LDL-C level of 383.5 mg/dL (Range: 214–866 mg/dL) and with LL drugs + Time-averaged levels (CAVG) the median was 288.1 mg/dL (Range: 183.69–716.65 mg/dL). The addition of lomitapide at the average dosage of 21.4 mg/day lowered LDL-C levels by 56.8% comparing to LL drugs alone therapy [mean reduction 262.12, 95% CI (105.53, 418.71), p=0.005] and by 54% [mean reduction −182.89, 95% CI (−342.35, −23.43), p=0.031] comparing to LL drugs + LA (CAVG). The CAVG of LDL-C in LL drugs + LA patients compared with LL drugs + lomitapide was 54% in favour of lomitapide (p=0.031). After lomitapide administration to LL drugs + LA treatment, 78% patients discontinued LA and 2 patients reduced their LA frequency by 50%. During follow-up, 2 patients (16.6%) reported side effects (transient diarrhea, 1 patient had liver transaminase &gt;5× ULN and had to decrease dose of lomitapide). Two patients stopped lomitapide due to diet and alcohol restrictions. Median and ranges of lipid and lipoprotein values before any intervention, after LL drugs, LL drugs plus LA, LL drugs plus LA (CAVG) and LL drugs plus lomitapide Total Cholesterol LDL-C HDL-C Triglycerides Before any intervention 1000 (339–1150) 900 (245–1070) 34.5 (25–50) 125 (87–314) After LL drugs 434 (278–915) 383.5 (214–866) 36 (27–51) 113 (62–198) LL drugs + LA (CAVG) 336.13 (248.57–784.16) 288.07 (183.69–716.65) 42.81 (25.84–46.68) 105.09 (55.79–166.68) LL drugs + Lomitapide 228.5 (118–554) 173.5 (74–515) 37.5 (29–50) 83.5 (23–316) LDL graph Conclusions Treatment with lomitapide in HoFH patients has beneficial effect with constant decrease of LDL-C by 57% compared with classical LL therapy and by 54% compared with classical LL therapy and CAVG and seems to be with good safety profile. Although, in some cases the hybrid (all availably drug treatment and LA) therapy may be needed.

Lipoprotein aferezi homozigot ailevi hiperkolesterolemi hastalarında ventriküler repolarizasyonu etkiler

Aim: Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) prone to experience premature cardiovascular disease and often die from sudden cardiac death (SCD) at a young age. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is the treatment of choice to prolong survival. Several mechanisms has been suggested to be responsible for the known short and long-term clinical benefits of this procedure. This study was conducted to assess the effect of single LA on ventricular repolarization parameters in patients with HoFH.Material and Methods: Eleven patients (mean age 30.1 ± 5.5 years, male 63.6%) with HoFH on chronic LA treatment were enrolled in this preliminary study. Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) was performed in all patients. To examine the effects of a single session of LA, on ventricular repolarization, the OT, QTc interval, the T peak-to-end (Tp-e) interval, Tp-e/QT and the Tp-e/QTc ratio were specifically calculated.Results: The single session of LA reduced total LDL (from 10.04 ± 1.91 to 4.16 ± 1.21 mmol/L, P&amp;lt;001). The heart rate did not change significantly after LA session. Plasma levels of calcium and magnesium was significantly decreased after the procedure. The QTc decreased from 443.8 ± 23.3 ms to 412.3 ± 20.0 ms (P &amp;lt;0.001). The Tp-e interval and the Tp-e/QTc ratio decreased significantly [85 (70-89) ms vs. 63 (58-71)ms; P =0.003, and 0.19 (0.16-0.20) vs 0.15 (0.13-0.16); P =0.003, respectively]. Conclusion: Our data suggest that even a single session of LA improved electrocardiographic repolarization indexes.

Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor (lomitapide) efficacy in the treatment of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor (lomitapide) in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. In 12 homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs ± biweekly lipoprotein apheresis sessions (nine patients), daily lomitapide was added. The lipid profile (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) before and after lomitapide treatment was evaluated. The follow-up period with lomitapide treatment was 3-24 months (13.8 ± 7.9). The median baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 900 mg/dl (348-1070), after lipid-lowering drugs therapy was 383.5 mg/dl (214-866) and after lipid-lowering drugs + time-averaged level was 288 mg/dl (183.7-716.6). The addition of lomitapide lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels further by 56.8% compared to lipid-lowering drugs alone (mean reduction 262, 95% confidence interval (105.5-418.7), p = 0.005) and by 54% (mean reduction 182.9, 95% confidence interval (-342 - -23), p = 0.031) comparing to lipid-lowering drugs + lipoprotein apheresis (time-averaged level). The time-averaged level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in lipid-lowering drugs + lipoprotein apheresis patients compared with lipid-lowering drugs + lomitapide was 54% in favour of lomitapide (p = 0.031). Treatment with lomitapide in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia patients has a beneficial effect with a constant decrease of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 57% compared with classical lipid-lowering therapy and by 54% compared with classical lipid-lowering therapy and time-averaged level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

The Relationship between the serum total bilirubin level and the severity of coronary artery disease in chronic stable angina patients

An elevation of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an internationally recognized atherogenic risk factor, documented in epidemiological studies, in studies with Mendelian randomization and in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). At present, no drug is available to effectively reduce its concentration. In Germany, an elevation of Lp(a) associated with progressive cardiovascular diseases is officially recognized as an indication for a lipoprotein apheresis (LA). The number of patients who were treated with LA with this abnormality was steadily increasing in the years 2013–2016 – the official data are reported. In all new patients, who started to be treated at our LA center in 2017 (n = 20) the increased Lp(a) was a main indication for extracorporeal therapy, though some of them also showed clearly elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations despite being treated with a maximal tolerated lipid-lowering drug therapy. A diabetes mellitus was seen in 5 patients. The higher was the Lp(a) level before the first LA session, the higher was the cardiovascular risk. Lp(a) concentrations measured before LA sessions were usually about 20% lower than those before the start of the LA therapy. Acutely, Lp(a) levels were reduced by about 70%. Following LA sessions the Lp(a) levels increased and in the majority reach pre-session concentrations after one week. Thus a weekly interval is best for the patients, but a few may need two sessions per week to stop the progress of atherosclerosis. The interval mean values were about 39% lower than previous levels. Several papers had been published showing a higher efficiency of LA therapy on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with high Lp(a) values when comparing with hypercholesterolemic patients with normal Lp(a) concentrations. Russian specific anti-Lp(a) columns positively affected coronary atherosclerosis. PCSK9 inhibitors reduce Lp(a) concentrations in many patients and in this way have a positive impact on cardiovascular outcomes. In the future, an antisense oligonucleotide against apolipoprotein(a) may be an alternative therapeutic option, provided a clear-cut reduction of cardiovascular events will be demonstrated.

NMR‐based lipoprotein analysis for patients with severe hypercholesterolemia undergoing lipoprotein apheresis or PCSK9‐inhibitor therapy (NAPALI‐Study)

Taking into account the discordance between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and LDL particle (LDL-P) number, cardiovascular risk more closely correlates with LDL-P in patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the number of lipid particles in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia treated with different lipid-lowering regimens. Four groups of patients differing with respect to lipid-lowering therapy were recruited from hypercholesterolemic outpatients and lipoprotein apheresis (LA) facilities, and were treated with statins alone (group A), with statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors (PCSK9i) (group B), with statins and LA (group C), or with statins, PCSK9i, and LA (group D). Cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-P number and size, HDL-P number and size were determined using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The lowest LDL-P number was achieved at the end of LA sessions in combination with statins or in combination with statins and a monoclonal PCSK9i (median; 25th and 75th percentile) (group C: 244 nmoL/L: 237, 244, P < 0.05; group D: 244 nmoL/L: 99, 307, P < 0.05). Comparing LDL-P number at the start of LA (group C: 978 nmoL/L: 728, 1404; group D: 954 nmoL/L: 677, 1521) to the other patient groups (groups A and B), the lowest LDL-P number was measured in patients treated with PCSK9i and a statin (group B): LDL-P (762 nmoL/L: 604, 1043, P < 0.05), large LDL-P (472 nmoL/L: 296, 574, P < 0.05), and small LDL-P (342 nmoL/L: 152, 494, P < 0.05). Very low-density lipoprotein and HDL particle sizes remained approximately the same in all groups. LA in combination with statins or in combination with statins and PCSK9i most reduced LDL-P numbers in hypercholesterolemic patients.

Apolipoprotein C-III Inhibition with Volanesorsen in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia (COMPASS): a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

An elevation of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an internationally recognized atherogenic risk factor, documented in epidemiological studies, in studies with Mendelian randomization and in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). At present, no drug is available to effectively reduce its concentration. In Germany, an elevation of Lp(a) associated with progressive cardiovascular diseases is officially recognized as an indication for a lipoprotein apheresis (LA). The number of patients who were treated with LA with this abnormality was steadily increasing in the years 2013–2016 – the official data are reported. In all new patients, who started to be treated at our LA center in 2017 (n = 20) the increased Lp(a) was a main indication for extracorporeal therapy, though some of them also showed clearly elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations despite being treated with a maximal tolerated lipid-lowering drug therapy. A diabetes mellitus was seen in 5 patients. The higher was the Lp(a) level before the first LA session, the higher was the cardiovascular risk. Lp(a) concentrations measured before LA sessions were usually about 20% lower than those before the start of the LA therapy. Acutely, Lp(a) levels were reduced by about 70%. Following LA sessions the Lp(a) levels increased and in the majority reach pre-session concentrations after one week. Thus a weekly interval is best for the patients, but a few may need two sessions per week to stop the progress of atherosclerosis. The interval mean values were about 39% lower than previous levels. Several papers had been published showing a higher efficiency of LA therapy on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with high Lp(a) values when comparing with hypercholesterolemic patients with normal Lp(a) concentrations. Russian specific anti-Lp(a) columns positively affected coronary atherosclerosis. PCSK9 inhibitors reduce Lp(a) concentrations in many patients and in this way have a positive impact on cardiovascular outcomes. In the future, an antisense oligonucleotide against apolipoprotein(a) may be an alternative therapeutic option, provided a clear-cut reduction of cardiovascular events will be demonstrated.

A nation-wide survey of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia phenotype undergoing LDL-apheresis in Turkey (A-HIT 1 registry)

Background and aimsHomozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a genetic condition characterized by lethally high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from birth, and requires rapid and aggressive intervention to prevent death due to coronary heart disease and/or atherosclerosis. Where available, lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is the mainstay of treatment to promote survival. MethodsA-HIT1 registry was conducted with the aim of providing insight to the real-life management of HoFH patients undergoing LA in Turkey, where LA procedures are fully reimbursed and widely available. Participating centers provided patient information, including family history, treatment patterns and relevant laboratory values, via a standard questionnaire. ResultsThe study evaluated 88 patients (mean age: 27 ± 11 years, 41 women) in 19 centers. All patients were receiving regular LA with a clinical diagnosis of HoFH. Mean age at first symptom disease was 10 ± 10 years, and at diagnosis it was 12 ± 11 years; 74.7% were diagnosed before age 15 years; and only 31% before the age of 7. First referral of most patients was to pediatricians. Early onset coronary artery disease was present in 57.8% of patients. Mean age at first LA was 21 ± 12 years. Only 11 (12.5%) patients were undergoing LA weekly. Mean frequency of apheresis sessions was 19 ± 13 days. For the last four LA sessions, LDL-C levels reached the target in only in 5.7% of patients. ConclusionsDiagnosis of HoFH is delayed, and LDL targets are not reached. LA frequencies are not optimal. Urgent attention is needed to support the survival of patients with HoFH.