Plasma Concentrations Of Linezolid Research Articles

Clinical research for saliva-based therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid.

Linezolid is primarily used to treat of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis infections. Thrombocytopenia due to linezolid usage is a concern, and therapeutic drug monitoring has been reported to be effective in its prevention. Plasma concentrations provide valuable information for treatment decisions; however, collecting plasma samples can be burdensome for both patients and healthcare providers. Therefore, there is interest in saliva as an alternative for monitoring, considering its potential to replace plasma samples. Patients hospitalized at Hokkaido University Hospital and Hokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center between April 2022 and July 2024, who received oral or intravenous linezolid treatment, were enrolled. The concentrations of linezolid were simultaneously measured in plasma and saliva samples. We determined the concentration profiles of linezolid in the saliva and examined the correlation between saliva and plasma linezolid concentrations. Eighteen patients receiving linezolid were enrolled. The average of saliva/plasma (S/P) concentration ratios of linezolid were 1.018. A strong correlation was found between the salivary and plasma concentrations of linezolid (R= .833, P< .001). Notably, in patients receiving intravenous administration of linezolid, the correlation was even more pronounced (R= .885, P< .001). Additionally, when focusing on the S/P ratio of the trough concentrations in the morning and at night, the S/P ratios at night were much closer to 1.0. The concentrations of linezolid in plasma and saliva were similar, indicating their potential applicability in clinical settings. The monitoring of linezolid concentrations in saliva has been shown to be particularly suitable for patients receiving intravenous administration.

Evaluation and application of population pharmacokinetic models for optimising linezolid treatment in non-adherence multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients

BackgroundPopulation pharmacokinetic (popPK) models can optimise linezolid dosage regimens in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB); however, unknown cross-centre precision and poor adherence remain problematic. This study aimed to assess the predictive ability of published models and use the most suitable model to optimise dosage regimens and manage compliance. MethodsOne hundred fifty-eight linezolid plasma concentrations from 27 patients with MDR-TB were used to assess the predictive performance of published models. Prediction-based metrics and simulation-based visual predictive checks were conducted to evaluate predictive ability. Individualised remedial dosing regimens for various delayed scenarios were optimised using the most suitable model and Monte Carlo simulations. The influence of covariates, scheduled dosing intervals, and patient compliance were assessed. ResultsSeven popPK models were identified. Body weight and creatinine clearance were the most frequently identified covariates influencing linezolid clearance. The model with the best performance had a median prediction error (PE%) of -1.62 %, median absolute PE of 29.50 %, and percentages of PE within 20 % (F20, 36.97 %) and 30 % (F30, 51.26 %). Monte Carlo simulations indicated that a twice-daily 300 mg linezolid dose may be more efficient than 600 mg once daily. For the ‘typical’ patient treated with 300 mg twice daily, half the dosage should be taken after a delay of ≥ 3 h. ConclusionsMonte Carlo simulations based on popPK models can propose remedial regimens for delayed doses of linezolid in patients with MDR-TB. Model-based compliance management patterns are useful for balancing efficacy, adverse reactions, and resistance suppression.

Population pharmacokinetics and dosage optimization of linezolid in Chinese older patients.

To assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linezolid in a retrospective cohort of hospitalized Chinese older patients. Patients > 60years of age, who received intravenous linezolid (600mg), were included. A population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model was established using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The predictive performance of the final model was assessed using goodness-of-fit plots, bootstrap analyses, and visual predictive checks. Monte Carlo simulations were used to evaluate the achievement of a pharmacodynamics target for the area under the serum concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24/MIC). A total of 210 samples were collected from 120 patients. A one-compartment PPK model with linear elimination best predicted the linezolid plasma concentrations. Linezolid clearance (CL) was 4.22 L h-1 and volume of distribution (Vd) was 45.80 L; serum uric acid (SUA) was a significant covariate of CL. The results of this study indicated that the standard dose was associated with a risk of overexposure in older patients, particularly those with high SUA values; these patients would benefit from a lower dose (300mg every 12h).

Validation of a quantitative liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for linezolid in cerebrospinal fluid and its application to patients with HIV-associated TB-meningitis

Tuberculous meningitis treatment outcomes are poor and alternative regimens are under investigation. Reliable methods to measure drug concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid are required to evaluate distribution into the cerebrospinal fluid. A simple and quick method was developed and validated to analyse linezolid in human cerebrospinal fluid. Samples were prepared by protein precipitation followed by isocratic liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. The run time was 3.5 min. Accuracy and precision were assessed in three independent validation batches with a calibration range of 0.100–20.0 μg/mL. The method was used to analyse cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with tuberculous meningitis enrolled in a clinical trial. Potentially infective patient samples could be decontaminated using Nanosep® nylon and Costar® nylon filter tubes under biosafety level 3 conditions before analysis. The filtration process did not significantly affect the quantification of linezolid. Linezolid concentration in cerebrospinal fluid obtained from tuberculous meningitis patients ranged from 0.197 μg/mL to 15.0 μg/mL. The ratio between average CSF and plasma linezolid concentrations varied with time, reaching a maximum of 0.9 at 6 h after dosing.

Rifampicin reduces plasma concentration of linezolid in patients with infective endocarditis.

Linezolid in combination with rifampicin has been used in treatment of infective endocarditis especially for patients infected with staphylococci. Because rifampicin has been reported to reduce the plasma concentration of linezolid, the present study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of linezolid for the purpose of quantifying an effect of rifampicin cotreatment. In addition, the possibility of compensation by dosage adjustments was evaluated. Pharmacokinetic measurements were performed in 62 patients treated with linezolid for left-sided infective endocarditis in the Partial Oral Endocarditis Treatment (POET) trial. Fifteen patients were cotreated with rifampicin. A total of 437 linezolid plasma concentrations were obtained. The pharmacokinetic data were adequately described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination. We demonstrated a substantial increase of linezolid clearance by 150% (95% CI: 78%-251%), when combined with rifampicin. The final model was evaluated by goodness-of-fit plots showing an acceptable fit, and a visual predictive check validated the model. Model-based dosing simulations showed that rifampicin cotreatment decreased the PTA of linezolid from 94.3% to 34.9% and from 52.7% to 3.5% for MICs of 2 mg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively. A substantial interaction between linezolid and rifampicin was detected in patients with infective endocarditis, and the interaction was stronger than previously reported. Model-based simulations showed that increasing the linezolid dose might compensate without increasing the risk of adverse effects to the same degree.

Model-informed precision dosing of antimicrobial drugs in pediatrics: experiences from a pilot scale program.

Antibiotics are among the most utilized drugs in pediatrics. Nonetheless, there is a lack in pharmacokinetics information for this population, and dosing criteria may vary between healthcare centers. Physiological variability associated with maturation in pediatrics makes it challenging to reach a consensus on adequate dosing, which is further accentuated in more vulnerable groups, such as critically ill or oncology patients. Model-informed precision dosing is a useful practice that allows dose optimization and attainment of antibiotic-specific pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. The aim of this study was to evaluate the needs of model-informed precision dosing of antibiotics in a pediatrics unit, at a pilot scale. Pediatric patients under antibiotic treatment were monitored with either a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic optimized sampling scheme or through opportunistic sampling. Clindamycin, fluconazole, linezolid, meropenem, metronidazole, piperacillin, and vancomycin plasma concentrations were quantified through a liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a Bayesian approach to verify pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment. A total of 23 pediatric patients aged 2 to 16years were included, and 43 dosing regimens were evaluated; 27 (63%) of them required adjustments as follows: 14 patients were underdosed, 4 were overdosed, and 9 patients needed infusion rate adjustments. Infusion rate adjustments were mostly recommended for piperacillin and meropenem; daily doses were augmented for vancomycin and metronidazole, meanwhile linezolid was adjusted for under- and overdosing. Clindamycin and fluconazole regimens were not adjusted at all. Conclusion: Results showcase a lack of antibiotic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment (particularly for linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, and piperacillin), and the need for model-informed precision dosing in pediatrics. This study provides pharmacokinetic evidence which can further improve antibiotic dosing practices. What is Known: • Model-informed precision dosing is performed in pediatrics to optimize the treatment of antimicrobial drugs such as vancomycin and aminoglycosides, while its usefulness is debated for other groups (beta-lactams, macrolides, etc.). What is New: • Vulnerable pediatric subpopulations, such as critically ill or oncology patients, can benefit the most from model-informed precision dosing of antibiotics. • Model-informed precision dosing of linezolid, meropenem, piperacillin, and vancomycin is particularly useful in pediatrics, and further research mayimprove dosing practices altogether.

Monitoring Salivary Concentrations of Tedizolid and Linezolid Using Rats.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an effective tool for the management of patients who are administered linezolid. The use of saliva for TDM has potential advantages over the use of plasma; however, only a few reports have compared drug concentrations in the saliva and plasma. Moreover, there are no reports on the salivary concentration of tedizolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic similar to linezolid. In the present study, the concentrations of tedizolid and linezolid in rat submandibular saliva were compared with those measured in the plasma. Tedizolid (10 mg/kg, n=6) and linezolid (12 mg/kg, n=5) were administered via the rat tail vein. Submandibular saliva and plasma samples were collected for up to 8 h after the initiation of drug administration, and assayed for the concentrations of tedizolid and linezolid. A strong correlation was found between the saliva and plasma concentrations of tedizolid (r=0.964, p<0.001) and linezolid (r=0.936, p<0.001). The value of tedizolid maximum concentration of drug (Cmax) was 0.99 ± 0.08 µg/mL in the saliva and 14.46 ± 1.71 µg/mL in the plasma. Meanwhile, the Cmax of linezolid was 8.01 ± 1.42 µg/mL in the saliva and 13.00 ± 1.90 µg/mL in the plasma. According to these results, the saliva/plasma concentration ratios of tedizolid and linezolid in rats were 0.0513 ± 0.0080 and 0.6341 ± 0.0339, respectively. Considering the correlation between saliva and plasma concentrations of tedizolid and linezolid, as well as the characteristics of saliva, the results of this study suggest that saliva is a useful matrix for TDM.

Population pharmacokinetics and dose evaluations of linezolid in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Background: The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target derived from the hollow-fiber system model for linezolid for treatment of the multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) requires clinical validation. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a population PK model for linezolid when administered as part of a standardized treatment regimen, to identify the PK/PD threshold associated with successful treatment outcomes and to evaluate currently recommended linezolid doses. Method: This prospective multi-center cohort study of participants with laboratory-confirmed MDR-TB was conducted in five TB designated hospitals. The population PK model for linezolid was built using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling using data from 168 participants. Boosted classification and regression tree analyses (CART) were used to identify the ratio of 0- to 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24h) to the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) threshold using the BACTEC MGIT 960 method associated with successful treatment outcome and validated in multivariate analysis using data from a different and prospective cohort of 159 participants with MDR-TB. Furthermore, based on the identified thresholds, the recommended doses were evaluated by the probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis. Result: Linezolid plasma concentrations (1008 samples) from 168 subjects treated with linezolid, were best described by a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. An AUC0-24h/MIC > 125 was identified as a threshold for successful treatment outcome. Median time to sputum culture conversion between the group with AUC0-24h/MIC above and below 125 was 2 versus 24months; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 21.7; 95% confidence interval (CI), (6.4, 72.8). The boosted CART-derived threshold and its relevance to the final treatment outcome was comparable to the previously suggested target of AUC0-24h/MIC (119) using MGIT MICs in a hollow fiber infection model. Based on the threshold from the present study, at a standard linezolid dose of 600mg daily, PTA was simulated to achieve 100% at MGIT MICs of ≤ .25mg which included the majority (81.1%) of isolates in the study. Conclusion: We validated an AUC0-24h/MIC threshold which may serve as a target for dose adjustment to improve efficacy of linezolid in a bedaquiline-containing treatment. Linezolid exposures with the WHO-recommended dose (600mg daily) was sufficient for all the M. tb isolates with MIC ≤ .25mg/L.

Plasma and synovial fluid concentrations of linezolid in patients with knee osteoarthritis infected with Staphylococcus aureus

BackgroundLinezolid is a new oxazolidinone antibiotic used for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus and other species.Case presentationTwo cases of knee osteoarthritis with acute infection were successfully treated using linezolid. The plasma and synovial fluid concentrations of linezolid in two patients [women aged 69 and 73 years (cases 1 and 2)] with knee osteoarthritis infected with Staphylococcus aureus were measured after they were administered 600 mg twice daily by intravenous infusion. The plasma linezolid concentrations during knee surgery in case 1 at day 5 and in case 2 at day 2 were 19.6 and 15.6 μg/mL, respectively. The synovial fluid concentrations of linezolid in samples taken during surgery in case 1 and case 2 were 14.9 and 17.0 μg/mL, respectively; these values corresponded to ratios of synovial fluid/plasma of 76 and 109%. Possible metabolite 2-hydroxylated linezolid potentially mediated by cytochrome P450 2 J2 was not detected in the plasma or synovial fluid samples under the current clinical setting after multiple doses.ConclusionsThese results implied nearly equivalent concentrations of linezolid in plasma and synovial fluid of clinical patients with knee osteoarthritis acutely infected with Staphylococcus aureus.

Association Between Increased Linezolid Plasma Concentrations and the Development of Severe Toxicity in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment.

Treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis with linezolid is characterized by high rates of adverse events. Evidence on therapeutic drug monitoring to predict drug toxicity is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the association of linezolid trough concentrations with severe toxicity. We retrospectively assessed consecutive patients started on linezolid for MDR tuberculosis between 2011 and 2017. The primary outcome was severe mitochondrial toxicity (SMT) due to linezolid, defined as neurotoxicity or myelotoxicity leading to drug discontinuation. The impact of plasma linezolid trough concentrations >2 mg/L was assessed in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models including time-varying covariates. SMT occurred in 57 of 146 included patients (39%) at an incidence rate of 0.38 per person-year (95% confidence interval, .30-.49). A maximum linezolid trough concentration >2 mg/L was detected in 52 patients (35.6%), while the mean trough concentration was >2 mg/L in 22 (15%). The adjusted hazard ratio for SMT was 2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.38; P = .01) in patients with a mean trough concentration >2 mg/L and 2.63 (1.55-4.47; P < .01) for SMT after the first detection of a trough concentration >2 mg/L. In an exploratory analysis, higher maximum trough concentrations were dose-dependently associated with toxicity, while lowering elevated trough concentrations did not restore baseline risk. Linezolid trough concentrations >2 mg/L are strongly associated with the development of severe treatment-emergent toxicity in patients treated for MDR tuberculosis. Pending further prospective evidence, an individual risk-benefit assessment on the continuation of linezolid treatment is warranted in any patient with trough concentrations >2 mg/L.

Nafamostat mesilate inhibits linezolid metabolism via its antioxidant effects.

Patients who undergo renal replacement therapy often exhibit a high plasma linezolid concentration. Linezolid is metabolized via oxidation. Nafamostat mesilate has antioxidant effects and is frequently used as an anticoagulant during renal replacement therapy. We aimed to investigate the effect of nafamostat mesilate on plasma linezolid concentration. We examined whether the co-administration of linezolid and nafamostat had any effect on plasma linezolid concentration. Mice were randomly allocated to two groups (n = 18/group): linezolid (100 mg kg-1 , subcutaneous injection) + nafamostat (30 mg kg-1 , intraperitoneal injection) and linezolid + saline. At 5 hours, the linezolid concentration was significantly higher in the linezolid + nafamostat co-administration group than that in the linezolid + saline group (20.6 ± 9.8 vs 3.6 ± 1.2 μg/mL, respectively P < .001). The antioxidant effects of nafamostat may inhibit linezolid metabolism, resulting in the adverse event of high linezolid concentration if both are administered concurrently during renal replacement therapy.

Staphylococcal meningitis therapy with linezolid in a young infant: efficacy, CSF levels and side effects

BackgroundLinezolid is a synthetic antibiotic which is active against most Gram-positive bacteria, especially on Staphylococcus aureus. Its administration can be required when the infection is due to staphylococcus strains, which are resistant to vancomycin. Although mostly well tolerated, some mild to moderate side effects have been reported.Case presentationThis case report describes an infant with multiloculated hydrocephalus, staphylococcal meningitis and prolonged linezolid therapy, in which we observed the association between linezolid administration and a lengthened QTc interval at the electrocardiogram (ECG). To rule out toxic levels during the therapy, plasma and cerebro-spinal fluid concentrations of linezolid were measured and reported.ConclusionsAlthough generally well tolerated in neonates and infants, linezolid prolonged administration seems be able to cause QTc interval prolongation. Therefore, its administration in such patients should be limited to cases of bacterial resistance to other antibiotics. In addition to well-known close monitoring of the platelet level, we suggest serial ECG controls before and during linezolid administration. In the case we report, linezolid plasma concentrations resulted within the therapeutic range during therapy, while cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations appeared lower than those considered effective.

Impact of high plasma concentrations of linezolid in Taiwanese adult patients— therapeutic drug monitoring in improving adverse drug reactions

Previous studies have shown that the development of thrombocytopenia was associated with the elevated plasma concentration of linezolid, but little is known about the relationship between other uncommon adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and plasma concentration. The appropriate dosing adjustment has remained controversial. This prospective observational study was conducted to investigate the association between the plasma concentration of linezolid, ADRs, and clinical outcomes. Adult patients on linezolid treatment undergoing at least one therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were enrolled. The association between linezolid concentrations and ADRs was examined by multivariate Cox regression model. Predictors of linezolid concentrations was determined by linear regression model. The cut-off point of linezolid concentration and the effect of dosing adjustments based on TDM was also explored. Of 50 patients enrolled in the study, plasma concentrations were 1.5-3 times higher than what was described in the prescribing information. The median minimum concentration (Cmin) was significantly higher in patients with thrombocytopenia compared to patients without thrombocytopenia (13.0 vs. 7.2μg/mL, P=0.0273), and a higher median maximum concentration was also observed in patients with lactic acidosis (33.0 vs. 27.5μg/mL, P=0.0420). The Cmin was elevated in patients with advanced age and severely impaired renal function. Dosing adjustment tailored by early TDM with the upper limit of Cmin 9μg/mL may improve platelet counts. Elevated linezolid concentrations were associated with thrombocytopenia and lactic acidosis. TDM-guided dosing adjustment could be considered as a pragmatic way to mitigate thrombocytopenia.

Linezolid Concentrations in Plasma and Subcutaneous Tissue are Reduced in Obese Patients, Resulting in a Higher Risk of Underdosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Controlled Clinical Pharmacokinetic Study.

Background: Linezolid is used for the treatment of soft tissue infections in critically ill patients. However, data for characterizing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and assessing whether effective concentrations are reached at the target site are lacking. We hypothesized that current dosing regimens do not lead to effective concentrations in the plasma and interstitial fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous tissue in obese patients. Methods: As a controlled clinical model, critically ill obese and non-obese patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery received 600 mg linezolid as a single infusion. Concentrations in the plasma and microdialysate from the ISF of subcutaneous tissue were determined up to 8 h after dosing. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by non-compartmental methods. As a therapeutic target, we used fAUC/MIC > 80. Results: Fifteen obese (BMI: 48.7 ± 11.2 kg/m2) and 15 non-obese (23.9 ± 2.1 kg/m2) patients were analyzed. AUC0–8 in ISF decreased by −1.69 mg*h/L (95% CI: −2.59 to −0.79, p < 0.001) for every 10 kg increase in weight. PK in obese patients were characterized by lower maximal plasma concentrations (median 3.8 vs. 8.3 mg/L, p < 0.001) and a higher volume of distribution (41.0 vs. 30.8 L, p < 0.001), and the therapeutic target was not reached for MIC ≥ 1 mg/L in ISF and ≥ 2 mg/L in plasma. Conclusions: Increasing the weight led to a decrease of linezolid concentrations in the plasma and subcutaneous tissue. The current dosing regimen does not seem to produce sufficient concentrations to kill bacteria with MIC ≥ 2 mg/L, especially as empirical antimicrobial therapy in critically ill obese patients.

Measurement of Linezolid and Its Metabolites PNU-142300 and PNU-142586 in Human Plasma Using Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method.

An ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) method was developed and validated for the quantification of linezolid, PNU-142300, and PNU-142586 in human plasma. After protein precipitation using acetonitrile, the protein-free supernatant was separated using reverse-phase chromatography using an ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column and monitored at 254 nm. p-Toluic acid was used as the internal standard. No interference peak was observed at the retention times of linezolid, PNU-142300, PNU-142586, and p-toluic acid from blank plasma. The calibration curve of linezolid was linear from 0.2 to 50.0 µg/mL (coefficient of determination (r2) > 0.9999) and those of PNU-142300 and PNU-142586 were linear from 0.2 to 20.0 µg/mL (r2 > 0.9996 and > 0.9998, respectively). The intra- and inter-assay accuracy (%) and precision (relative standard deviation (RSD) %) of the three components were confirmed to meet the criteria of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Tests confirmed the stability of linezolid, PNU-142300, and PNU-142586 in plasma during three freeze-thaw cycles and long-term storage of frozen plasma for up to 30 d; in extracts they were stable in the UPLC autosampler for over 48 h at 4°C. Furthermore, plasma concentrations of linezolid, PNU-142300 and PNU-142586 in patients treated with linezolid could be measured using the UPLC method developed in this study. This assay would be a powerful tool for therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses in the optimization of linezolid treatment.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Linezolid in Premature Infants.

The emergence of coagulase-negative staphylococci with reduced vancomycin susceptibility in some neonatal intensive care units has resulted in an increase of linezolid use. Linezolid pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in premature infants still need to be better established. This was a retrospective PK study. All infants who received intravenous linezolid and had linezolid plasma concentrations per standard of care were included. Linezolid concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. A population PK model was developed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Optimal dosing was determined based on achievement of the surrogate pharmacodynamics target for efficacy: a ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration >80. We assessed the occurrence of thrombocytopenia and lactic acidosis in relation with drug exposure. A total of 78 plasma concentrations were collected from 26 infants, with a median postnatal age (PNA) of 24 days (8-88) and weight of 1423 g (810-3256). A 1-compartment model described linezolid data well. The final model included PNA and weight on clearance and weight on volume of distribution. Considering an MIC90 of 1 mg/L, all infants reached an area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration > 80. Although thrombocytopenia and hyperlactatemia occurred frequently, they were not sustained and were not considered related to linezolid. and was well tolerated in critically ill premature infants. PNA was the main determinant of clearance.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of cycloserine and linezolid during anti-tuberculosis treatment in Beijing, China.

Plasma concentrations of cycloserine (CS) and linezolid (LZD) in tuberculosis (TB) patients are largely unknown. To measure the plasma concentrations of CS and LZD after drug ingestion in drug-resistant TB patients. Patients who received CS and LZD as part of their treatment between 1 July 2012 and 1 July 2016 were studied retrospectively. CS and LZD plasma levels were determined using high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma drug concentration, age, sex, liver disease, renal disease, administered doses and diabetes mellitus status were recorded. Based on 390 samples, CS plasma concentrations were below the lower limit of normal (54.87%, 214/390). There was a statistically significant difference between the low concentration group (14.0 ± 3.71 μg/ml) and the target concentration group (25.2 ± 3.73 μg/ml, P < 0.01). The mean plasma concentration of LZD was 15.6 ± 4.91 μg/ml, which was within the target concentration (12-26 μg/ml) in 65 patients. Variables that correlated with CS and LZD concentrations were not found in this retrospective study. Low plasma CS concentrations were common, while 83.1% (54/65) of plasma LZD concentrations were within the target range. Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential to maintain appropriate plasma drug concentrations in the era of precision medicine.

Association between serum linezolid concentration and haematological toxic effects: a longitudinal study

Background: Linezolid is a commonly used antibiotic and reported various drug related adverse effects mainly haematological toxicity like thrombocytopenia, leukopenia and anaemia. But a significant association between linezolid plasma concentration and drug related adverse effects are not documented yet. This longitudinal observational study aims to study the incidence of drug related haematological toxicities and its association with serum Linezolid concentration and also evaluate the clinical outcome.Methods: After obtaining informed consent, each patient (18-50years) was given linezolid (600mg/12hourly), and evaluated for haematological (haemoglobin, platelets, WBCs), renal (as serum creatinine), and hepatic (as serum transaminases status), together with an assessment of drug C min values. These evaluations were repeated once a week or in concomitance with the development of an adverse event up to the end of linezolid therapy. The parametric dependent ‘t’ test was applied (p&lt;0.05) and normality of data were performed by Kolmogorov Smirnov test, follows normal distribution.Results: There was significant reduction in platelet count and haemoglobin value seen from baseline till end of treatment (p&lt;0.001) and there was 13% reduction in WBC count in all patients on day 14 when compared to baseline (p&lt;0.001) indicating haematological toxicity according to WHO toxicity grading scale. All the patients (n=8; 26.6%) who developed drug related haematological toxicity also showed comparable increase in plasma linezolid concentration (C min) &gt;10mg/L at the end of 14days.Conclusions: The capability to monitor plasma linezolid concentration (C min; trough value) once a week may lead to a significant improvement in clinical use of the drug both in terms of efficacy and tolerability as the study observed that there is association between linezolid concentration and risk of developing drug related haematological toxicity.

Linezolid for Treating Tuberculosis: A Delicate Balancing Act

Linezolid for Treating Tuberculosis: A Delicate Balancing Act

Pharmacokinetics of linezolid treatment using intravenous and oral administrations in extremely premature infants.

Vancomycin is the usual antibiotic treatment in coagulase-negative staphylococcus sepsis in premature infants but causes renal toxicity. As linezolid is effective in Gram-positive cocci infection, and devoid of renal side-effects, it has been used in Nantes neonatal intensive care units and linezolid plasma concentrations were monitored. The aims of this study are to report data on linezolid concentrations in premature infants, describe clinical and bacteriological evolution during treatment, and determine potential side effects. A retrospective observational study of premature infants treated with linezolid in Nantes Hospital from January 2008 through November 2011 was conducted. Linezolid plasma concentrations, possible side effects due to linezolid, and clinical response to linezolid treatment were collected from folder review. Twenty-four linezolid plasma concentrations were monitored in 16 premature patients, at steady state for continuous intravenous administration or 7 ± 1.5 h after last oral administration. Except for one case, linezolid plasma concentrations were ≥minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) for linezolid for both parenteral and oral administrations. We observed three cases of thrombocytopenia, two of leukopenia, three of neutropenia, and one of severe hyperlactacidemia, resolving after discontinuation of treatment. Clinical signs of infection resolved in 13/16 cases. Bacteria were coagulase-negative Staphylococci in 12/16 cases and were eradicated in 9/12 evaluable cases. This study reports an adequate linezolid plasma concentration with regard to the linezolid MIC in extremely premature infants. However, considering adverse events reported, its use should be cautious and may concern only oral administration during the late phase of infection, to limit paradoxical catheter use to treat nosocomial infections. Moreover, safe and efficient anti-Staphylococcus therapies should be identified to treat this vulnerable population.