Line Systemic Treatment Research Articles

ECOG-ACRIN LUNG-MAP S1900E substudy: A phase II study of sotorasib in participants (Pts) with previously treated stage IV or recurrent KRAS G12C mutant non-squamous (Non-sq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

TPS9143 Background: KRAS mutant NSCLC is further defined molecularly by specific mutation subtypes and co-mutations in tumor suppressor genes. Two targeted therapeutics, sotorasib and adagrasib, are currently approved for the treatment of previously treated advanced KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC. Sotorasib has also demonstrated superiority to docetaxel in the randomized phase III CodeBreaK 200 study ( de Langen et al Lancet. 2023 Feb 7 Epub). The impact of co-mutations in tumor suppressors, including TP53 and STK11, on the efficacy of first generation KRAS G12C inhibitors has been inconclusive. The S1900E substudy aims to prospectively understand, using rigorous biomarker testing/definitions, the impact of co-mutations on the clinical activity of sotorasib in pts with KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC. Methods: S1900E is a phase 2 open-label study of sotorasib in biomarker-defined cohorts for pts who have KRAS G12C stage IV/recurrent non-sq NSCLC, received at least one line of systemic treatment, and are naïve to KRAS G12C inhibitors. Pts are assigned to S1900E under the Lung-MAP screening protocol (NCT03851445) using FoundationOne F1CDx next generation sequencing assay on tissue (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA). S1900E cohorts include: #1) Presence of TP53 co-mutation AND Wild Type STK11, KEAP1, NFE2L2, CUL3; #2) Presence of STK11 co-mutation AND Wild Type TP53, KEAP1, NFE2L2, CUL3; 3) All pts not eligible for Cohorts 1 and 2 (e.g. dual co-mutations in STK11 and TP53; co-mutations in KEAP1, NFE2L2, CUL3, or others; or lack of any co-mutations). Pts with treated, clinically controlled, and asymptomatic brain metastases are eligible and with amendment 3 (Mar 20 2022), eligibility expanded to pts with asymptomatic untreated brain metastases. Sotorasib is dosed 960 mg oral daily. The primary objective is to evaluate the RECIST 1.1 response rate (ORR) per cohort. For cohorts 1 and 3, the target sample size is 40 eligible pts based on a design with 92% exact power to rule out a 14% ORR at the 1-sided 5% level, if the true ORR were 34%; ≥10 responses would rule out a 14% ORR. Cohort 2 has a target sample size of 25 eligible pts with 93% exact power to rule out a 14% ORR at the 1-sided 5% level, if the true ORR were 40%; ≥7 responses would rule out a 14% ORR. Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, duration of response, and toxicity. Circulating tumor DNA is being collected at day 1 of cycle 1, 2, and 3 and at progression. Enrollment started April 2 2021 with conservative accrual targets met, currently with 72% enrolled (84/116) as of Feb 14 2023, including 37, 16, and 31 pts, in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Clinical trial information: NCT04625647 .

Long-term survivors (LTSs) population of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): A Northern Italian comprehensive cancer center experience.

e15590 Background: mCRC patients (pts) have a median survival of 13-24 months with a 5-year survival rate of about 1%. LTSs are defined as pts with survival greater than or equal to 36 months after diagnosis of mCRC. Mutational status, new treatments, and surgery resection advances led to improved survival outcomes. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 106 consecutive CRC pts with synchronous or metachronous metastases diagnosed from the AUSL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 1st, 2017, and November 30, 2019. Clinical and pathological characteristics of pts were obtained from clinical records. Long-term survivors were defined as pts with survival > 36 months. Results: Out of 106 mCRC, 33 (31.1%) were LTSs with a median survival of 53 months (range, 36-129 months). At the data cut-off of November 30, 2022, 24 (72.7%) were still alive. Among all, 18 (54.5%) were men, the median age was 65 years (47-83), and 14 (42.4%) had a right tumor primary site. Synchronous metastases were found in 20 (60.6%), while 13 (39.4%) developed metachronous metastases; the most frequent site of metastases was the liver (63.6%), peritoneum and lymph nodes (21.2%), respectively. Surgical resections and systemic treatment regimens based on fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and/or irinotecan, cetuximab, bevacizumab, TAS-102, regorafenib, and others are listed in Table 1. Regarding biological status, 28 (84.8%) had an MSS, 18 (54.5%) RAS wild type, and 3 (9.1%) BRAF V600E mutated of which 2 (66.7%) underwent surgical resection of primary tumor and metastases, receiving up to 2 lines of systemic treatments. Conclusions: This study confirms that long-term survivors of mCRC pts are the results of intrinsic tumor biology, appropriate treatment timing including surgery, and the available pharmacological opportunities beyond chemotherapy. Further analysis including the role of liquid biopsy is under investigation to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers in order to improve survival outcomes. [Table: see text]

Evaluation of immunotherapy response score (IRS) for predicting pembrolizumab (pembro) clinical benefit in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

e14646 Background: IRS is a multivariable biomarker algorithm combining tissue-based tumor mutation burden (TMB) with quantitative gene expression biomarkers, previously validated to predict anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monotherapy (mono) benefit in an observational clinical trial (PMID: 36750617). Herein, we evaluated IRS in pts with advanced solid tumors across the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) health system following a pre-specified statistical analysis plan. Methods: KPNC pts with valid IRS results (from 2018 – 2022; specimen collection years 2011-2021) and electronic health record (EHR) documented > 1st line systemic pembro mono treatment were included; pts with gliomas or previous immunotherapy were excluded. All oncologic treatments were obtained from the EHR and standardized to determine time to next treatment (TTNT) as a real-world progression free survival endpoint. A within-pt evaluation was performed, comparing pembro TTNT to the pt’s immediate prior therapy line (prior) TTNT. The primary objective was to determine if IRS status (-H vs. Low [-L]) predicts pembro clinical benefit in Cox proportional hazards models through testing for interaction between IRS status and pembro/prior therapy TTNT. Results: With a data cutoff of 06/15/2022, 211 KPNC pts (142 2nd line and 69 > 2nd line pembro) were eligible and included (from 24 solid tumor types). The median (m) pembro follow-up was 16.0 months. IRS-H pts (n = 77, 36%) had significantly longer pembro vs. prior TTNT (mTTNT 20.3 mo vs. 4.5 mo, log-rank p-value < 0.0001), whereas IRS-L pts (n = 134, 64%) did not (mTTNT 3.3 mo vs. 5.2 mo, log-rank p-value 0.75); the interaction between IRS status and pembro/prior treatment was significant (interaction test p-value < 0.0001). Conclusions: IRS predicted pan-solid tumor pembro mono benefit compared to prior therapy and may be a potential marker for pembro mono treatment decisions. Clinical trial information: NCT03061305 .

Afatinib in patients with recurrent/metastatic (RM) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) harboring alterations in the HER pathway: Results of the B1 cohort of the EORTC-HNCG-1559 trial (UPSTREAM).

6034 Background: Afatinib (A) is an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor that improved PFS in second line RM SCCHN after platinum (LUX-H&N1 trial). In a retrospective biomarker analysis, subgroups of pts with p16 negative, PTEN high or EGFR amplification SCCHN seem to benefit the most. Other studies suggest that A has activity in tumors with HER2 gene activation. Methods: The UPSTREAM trial is a biomarker-driven umbrella trial of targeted therapies and immunotherapy for RM SCCHN (post-platinum, ECOG 0-1, measurable disease). The B1 cohort was a phase II, randomized, open-label substudy evaluating the efficacy of afatinib (orally, 40mg/day) vs physician’s choice (ctrl) (2:1 ratio) in pts with p16 negative RM SCCHN harboring one of the following biomarkers (fresh biopsy): EGFR mutation(mut)/amplification(amp) or HER2 mut/amp or PTEN high by immunohistochemistry (IHC, H-score > 150). Only KRAS/ HRAS/ NRAS wild type tumors were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at 16 weeks after randomization. A 2-stage Simon optimal design was applied to arm A (H1 40%, H0 20%, 1-sided α 10%, power 90%) with 17 and 20 pts enrolled in the first and second stage respectively. Secondary endpoints included ORR, toxicity, PFS, and OS. Results: 59 RM SCCHN pts were included in the B1 cohort (A: n = 40, ctrl: n = 19). Out of the 59 patients, EGFR amp, HER2 amp and HER2 mut were found in 6 pts (10%), 1 pt (2%) and 1 pt (2%), respectively. PTEN (IHC) was high in 97%. 55 pts were evaluable (A: n = 38, ctrl: n = 17) (median age: 62, oral cavity: 29%, oropharynx: 36%, hypopharynx: 24%, larynx: 11%). 69% of pts had received ≥ 2 lines of systemic treatment for RM disease. 80% were pretreated with cetuximab. In arm A, 13/38 patients were alive and free of objective progression at 16 weeks (34.2%, 1-sided 90%CI, 23.9±inf), meeting the predefined criteria of success. The PFSR at 16W in ctrl arm was 29.4% (5/17). 4 objective responses were observed in arm A (3 PR and 1 CR) (ORR 11%, 95%CI 2.9-24.8%) and 1 PR in ctrl arm (6%). The median duration of response under A was 5.7 mo (range: 3.7-25.9 mo). All responding patients had previously been treated with cetuximab, were PTEN high but none had EGFR or HER2 alterations. The median PFS and OS were 2.2/2.4 mo and 7.2/5.0 mo in the A/ctrl arms, respectively. Grade ≥3 drug-related AEs were reported in 31% in arm A and 12% in ctrl arm. The most frequent drug-related AE with A were diarrhea (67%, G3:8%), rash (41%, G3: 3%), fatigue (31%, no G3) and mucositis (23%, G3: 3%). Conclusions: The B1 substudy met its primary endpoint of PFSR at 16 weeks. Responses were seen in cetuximab pre-treated pts. However, the clinical activity of A in this biomarker-selected population remains limited. Translational research is ongoing to better define potential biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT03088059 .

Phase 1 study of indenoisoquinoline LMP744 in adults with relapsed solid tumors and lymphomas.

3022 Background: Indenoisoquinolines (IIQ) are non-camptothecin inhibitors of topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) that have improved characteristics over camptothecin TOP1 inhibitors. IIQs demonstrate better chemical stability, produce more persistent DNA breaks induced by trapping DNA-TOP1 cleavage complexes, induce DNA breaks at different sites than camptothecins, and are not substrates for cellular export proteins. We present data from a trial of LMP744 (NSC 706744), which was the most efficacious IIQ in a canine lymphoma trial, designed to establish the safety, efficacy, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of LMP744. Methods: We conducted a multicenter phase 1 trial in adult patients (pts) with dose escalations following design 3 of the Simon accelerated titration designs. LMP744 was administered intravenously daily on d1-5 in 28-day cycles (C), starting at dose level (DL) 1 (6 mg/m2/d). Responses and adverse events (AEs) were defined by RECIST 1.1 and CTCAE v4.0, respectively. Plasma concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS with a validated assay over a range of 1-3,000 ng/mL. Paired biopsies (baseline and C1D2) were analyzed for DNA damage response markers (γH2AX, pNBS1, and Rad51) by IFA. Results: A total of 36 pts were enrolled, median age was 61 years (range 35-81), median prior lines of systemic treatment was 5 (range 2-10) and 26 pts (72%) had received prior TOP1 inhibitor therapy. One pt on DL6 (190 mg/m2/d) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 hypokalemia during C1, reverting the study to a 3+3 design. MTD was established at DL6. Of 24 patients evaluable for response, 1 pt with small cell lung cancer on DL6 achieved a partial response (PR), remaining on treatment for 7C. 17 pts had stable disease (including 1 pt with an unconfirmed PR), and 6 had progressive disease. Median duration of response among pts with SD was 4.5C (range 1-28). A total of 6 pts on DL6 with colorectal cancer (n=4, all had received prior irinotecan), mesothelioma (n=1), and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n=1) remained on study for >6C. Treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs included leukopenia (n=9), anemia (n=4), dehydration (n=2), neutropenia (n=2) and nausea (n=2). Pharmacokinetic (PK) data for the first 17 patients suggests dose-linear PK, best fit to a 2-compartment model. Approximate half-life, clearance, central and peripheral volume values were 30 h, 90 L/h, 200 L, and 2500 L, respectively. Induction of γH2AX and Rad51 was measured in the pt with PR. Conclusions: The MTD of LMP744 was established at 190 mg/m2/d on d1-5 in a 28d C. The single agent activity of LMP744 in this heavily pretreated population was limited; however, 4 colorectal cancer pts had prolonged stabilization of disease with prior progression on irinotecan. Analyses of secondary and exploratory correlatives are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03030417 .

A multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study of surufatinib plus toripalimab for patients with advanced endometrial cancer.

5609 Background: Several immunotherapy monotherapies, or combined with antiangiogenic inhibitors, have shown antitumor efficacy in endometrial cancer (EMC) and been approved by FDA. However, therapeutic options for EMC after failure of first-line treatment remain scarce in China. The open-label, multi-cohort, single-arm phase 2 study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of surufatinib (a small-molecule inhibitor of VEGFR 1-3, FGFR1 and CSF-1R) with toripalimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) for Chinese patients (pts) with EMC after failure of one or more prior lines of systemic treatment. Methods: Pts with EMC who progressed or were intolerable after at least one prior line of systemic antitumor therapy were eligible and enrolled. They received 21-day cycles of surufatinib 250 mg orally, QD, plus toripalimab 240 mg IV, Q3W, until disease progression or reaching the maximum treatment duration with toripalimab of 24 months, or other protocol-specified criteria. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Results: From August 2020 to March 2022, 28 pts were enrolled and received the combination treatment (median duration: 4.6 months). Median age was 58 years (range: 50-71), and 22 (78.6%) pts were endometrioid adenocarcinoma at diagnosis. 9 (32.1%) pts had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy. As of 28 Dec 2022, the median follow-up duration was 16.8 months. Microsatellite status was available in 25 pts. 20 with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) and 5 with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) were determined. All 28 pts were evaluable with at least one post-baseline tumor assessment. Efficacy results were: confirmed ORR, 28.6% (8 partial response [PRs]); DCR, 82.1%; mDoR, 5.7 months; mPFS (95%CI), 5.4 months (2.7, 8.3); 12-month OS rate, 71.0%. Among pts with pMMR, the confirmed ORR was 25.0%; DCR was 85.0%; mDoR was 4.2 months; mPFS (95%CI) was 4.0 months (2.7, 8.3); 12-month OS rate was 75.4%. All pts experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), and 19 (67.9%) of them reported grade ≥3 TEAEs. The most common (≥5% pts) grade ≥3 TEAEs were hypertension (28.6%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (14.3%), alanine aminotransferase increased (10.7%), proteinuria (7.1%), Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased (7.1%) and malignant neoplasm progression (7.1%). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: Surufatinib plus toripalimab had a promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with EMC after failure of one or more prior lines of systemic therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04169672 .

Profile of toxicities and quality of life in long-term survivors treated with immunotherapy: A prospective cross sectional trial.

6569 Background: Long-term cancer survivors (LTS) patients (pts) treated with immunotherapy (IT) represent a relatively new population whose characteristics, such as long-term toxicities, quality of life (QoL), and financial toxicities, need to be elucidated in a real-world setting. The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term toxicities in patients free of disease progression and treated with IT. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, multicentric study, involving ten Italian centres. Pts should have started IT (as monotherapy or combination, either in curative or adjuvant setting) more than 2 years before accrual and they needed to be progression free at last follow up (fup). Subjects who discontinued IT for disease progression or who started any subsequent line of systemic treatment were excluded. We retrieved baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the pts, as well as haematological and biochemical exams at the start of IT (baseline) and at the last fup. We also assessed the patient's toxicities (according to CTCAE v5.0) at last fup and we submitted to each patient three questionnaires: PRO-CTCAE (selection of questions), EORTC QLQ C30, and FITALY (for financial toxicities), which were analysed according to subdomains. Results: We enrolled 141 LTS pts treated with IT from 2013 to 2022. Median age was 69 years (35-88), most were male (72%), and still receiving IT at time of last fup (72%). Primary tumour was in lung (43%), genito-urinary tract (26%), or melanoma (14%). IT included pembrolizumab and nivolumab in 40% and 32% of cases, respectively. The median global health status of QoL was 83 (IQR 25). Any toxicities > G2 negatively impacted on individual functional scales (physical, p=0.02; role, p= 0.06; and social p=0.08). A higher baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index was associated with worse global health status (p=0.02) at last fup. Most frequent low grade adverse events were fatigue, dyspnoea, and insomnia; younger age (< 65 years) was associated with higher pain (p=0.04). PRO-CTCAE questionnaires showed that the prevalent complained symptoms were rheumatological and cutaneous, regardless of tumor site. The most affected domain of financial toxicities was financial stress, including costs for out of pocket medications and transports. Pts with melanoma (p=0.01), with skin toxicities (p=0.04), and younger than 65 years (p=0.01) were at higher risk of financial toxicities (global score). Conclusions: Overall QoL is well preserved in LTS treated with IT. At long term fup, the pts complained mostly about rheumatological and skin adverse events. Financial stress due to out of pocket costs was the most affected financial toxicity domain. Baseline comorbidities predicted a worse long-term global health status, while young age, skin toxicities and melanoma predicted higher financial toxicities.

Safety and clinical efficacy of sintilimab in pediatric patients with advanced or recurrent malignancies in a phase I study.

e14601 Background: This is a first phase I study investigating the safety and efficacy of sintilimab in pediatric patients with advanced or recurrent malignancies. Methods: During dose escalation, patients received a single-dose intravenous infusion of sintilimab. The planned dosing groups were 1, 3 and 10 mg/kg. During dose expansion, patients received sintilimab every three weeks. Primary endpoints were determination of dose-limiting toxicities at the maximum administered dose, safety and tolerability, and the proportion of patients with objective response to sintilimab according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1. PD-L1 expression of tumor in subjects were identified by immunohistochemistry (DACO,22C3). Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed in 15 patients to characterize the mutational landscape and CNV status. Results: 29 patients were enrolled, including 10 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), 19 patients with other tumor types. Some special pathological types, including thymoma, choroid plexus carcinoma, and NK-T cell lymphoma are included. Patients were pretreated with a median of 3 prior lines of systemic treatment. Sintilimab was well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicity. By the safety data cutoff date, all patients experienced treatment related adverse events (TRAE) with most adverse events being grade 1 or 2, and ≥ grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 10%. Among all 27 subjects evaluated, 4 confirmed complete response (2HL, 1 NK/T lymphoma, 1 anaplastic ependymoma), 7 confirmed partial responses (4 HL, 1 Ewing sarcoma, 1 diffuse large-B lymphoma and 1 thymoma), and 7 stable disease were observed, for an objective response rate of 40.7%, and a disease control rate of 66.7%. Subjects with PD-L1-positive expression benefited more from sintilimab treatment than PD-L1-negative subjects (66.7% ORR versus 33.3% ORR, p=0.314) although statistically insignificant. The genomic profiling of WES indicatedpatients with a specific genomic mutation type predict the response of PD-1 therapy. Conclusions: Sintilimab was well tolerated and demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in pediatric HL. The completion of the current phase I study has led to the initiation of the first prospective anti-PD-1 registration trial in Asia focusing on pediatric patients and serve as the basis for its potential study in combinatorial regimens for childhood cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04400851 . [Table: see text]

GFH018, a small molecular inhibitor targeting TGF-βRI kinase, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Final results of the phase I study.

e15117 Background: TGF-β signaling pathway activation inhibits anti-tumor response, promoting tumor progression and metastasis. GFH018, a small molecule inhibiting TGF-βRI kinase, blocks TGF-β signaling transduction thus downregulates its pathway. GFH018 had significant growth inhibitory effects on several in vivo tumor models as monotherapy and demonstrated synergistic effects combined with anti-PD-1 antibody. This phase I study assessed safety, PK, and preliminary efficacy of GFH018 in pts with advanced solid tumors. Here we report the final results from the completed study. Methods: The study includes a modified 3 + 3 dose escalation and an expansion part. Adult pts with advanced solid tumors failed to standard treatments were enrolled. The starting dose was 5 mg and up to 8 cohorts were planned. In the escalation part, pts were administrated with GFH018 BID (14d-on/14d-off) two days after receiving single dose orally on C1D1. The subsequent cycle was 28 days. The safety of 85 mg BID 7d-on/7d-off was also explored. AEs were graded per NCI-CTCAE v5.0. PK was analyzed using a non-compartmental method. Efficacy was evaluated per RECIST 1.1. Blood samples were collected for biomarker analysis. Results: From Aug 1, 2019 to Aug 11, 2022, fifty pts (14d-on/14d-off: 5 mg [n = 4], 10 mg [n = 3], 20mg [n = 4], 30 mg [n = 7], 40 mg [n = 4], 50 mg [n = 4], 65 mg [n = 6] and 85 mg [n = 12]; 7d-on/7d-off: 85 mg [n = 6]) were enrolled. Thirty-seven pts (74.0%) had ≥3 prior systemic treatment lines. No DLT was observed, and the MTD was not reached. No significant cardiotoxicities or bleeding events were reported. Forty-three pts (86.0%) had at least one treatment related AE (TRAE), and 3 (6.0%) experienced ≥ G3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs (all G/≥G3) were proteinuria (26.0%/2.0%), AST increased (18.0%/0), anemia (14.0%/2.0%), ALT increased (12.0%/0), GGT increased, ALP increased, and LDH increased (all 10.0%/0). Common TRAEs (≥2 pts) for 7d-on/7d-off was lymphocyte decreased (2/6) with no ≥ G3 reported. No significant differences were observed between the two regimens in safety. GFH018 was absorbed rapidly with median Tmax of 0.50 ~0.96h and displayed a linear pharmacokinetic behavior with T1/2 of 4.08~10.92 h (5~85 mg). Nine pts achieved stable disease (SD), among whom a pt with thymic carcinoma receiving 65 mg achieved tumor shrinkage (maximum target lesion decreased by 18.4%). Results for 85 mg BID, 14d-on/14d-off showed a DCR of 25.0%. The RP2D was 85 mg BID, 14d-on/14d-off. Serum TGF-β1 level was not associated with clinical responses. Available pharmacodynamic data of SMAD2 phosphorylation levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were not reliable due to assay issues. Conclusions: GFH018 shows a favorable safety profile and preliminary anti-tumor activity. The clinical studies of GFH018 in combination with Toripalimab and with Toripalimab + concurrent chemoradiotherapy are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05051241 .

Celiac plexus radiosurgery for pain management in advanced cancer: An international phase II trial, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes.

e16293 Background: Upper abdominal / lower back pain characterizes celiac plexus involvement from pancreatic and other cancers which may impair HRQOL; its satisfactory treatment is an unmet clinical need. We hypothesized that ablative radiation delivered to the celiac plexus would decrease pain and improve HRQOL. Methods: An international single arm Phase II study included patients with an average pain level ≥ 5/11 on the brief pain inventory (BPI), ECOG 0-2, and anatomical involvement of the celiac axis. The intervention was a single fraction of 25Gy delivered to the celiac plexus. The primary endpoint was ‘complete or partial (≥2 points) pain response’ based upon the BPI ‘average pain’ 11-point scale. Changes in Health-related QOL at 3 & 6 weeks compared to baseline were secondary endpoints as measured by FACT-Hep, > 8 point change being the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Evaluable patients included eligible irradiated subjects, who had stable pain levels pre-treatment, and were alive 3 weeks’ post-treatment. The sample size was 90 evaluable patients, giving 90% power to show response rate ≥ 40%. Opioid usage was assessed using intravenous morphine equivalent dose. Sensitivity HRQOL analyses imputed worsened outcomes (-9 for total FACT-Hep) for missing data. Results: Between 2018 and 2022, 149 patients were enrolled, 90/125 who received treatment were evaluable. Median age was 65.5 years (range 28-88), 65% were female, 92% had pancreatic cancer, and 86% had metastatic disease. Median Zubrod PS was 1, median number of systemic treatment lines was 1 (range 0-5), and median baseline opioid use 31 mg/d. At 3 weeks, 48 (53.3%, 95% CI 42.5-63.9) had at least a partial pain, the BPI ‘average pain’ score decreased by a mean of 2.5 points at 3 weeks (86/90 reported) and 3.2 points at 6 weeks (67/90 reported), both p<0.001. Opioid usage decreased by 0.6 mg/d at 3 weeks (NS) and 16.9 mg/d at 6 weeks (p=0.005). The FACT-Hep total score increased by 7.8 points at 3 weeks (54/90 reported, NS diff. from 8) and 16.6 points at 6 weeks (45/90 reported, sig. > 8, p = 0.01), showing an improvement in patients’ HRQOL. Changes in FACT-Hep were especially noted in the Physical Well Being subscale. The Trial Outcome Index (sum of physical, functional & disease-specific concerns) increased markedly at 3 weeks (6.6 points, p=0.005) after treatment and even more after 6 weeks (14.5 points, p<0.). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated improvements in HRQOL at 3 and 6 weeks (1.1, 3.8), but these were less than MCID. Conclusions: Celiac plexus SBRT decreases pain and opioid use amongst patients with pancreatic cancer and other tumors invading the celiac axis. The treatment appears to improve HRQOL. Clinical trial information: NCT03323489 .

Comprehensive multigene profiling impact on clinical decisions in patients with advanced cancers: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.

e15163 Background: Comprehensive molecular profiling (CMP) via next generation sequencing (NGS) is currently applied in clinical practice and has enabled the detection of biomarkers of response to targeted treatment. Given the lack of the data about optimal range of analyzed alterations, the clinical usefulness of CMP has not been established. To address the challenges in incorporating genomics in treatment of oncology patients, we conducted a retrospective study. Methods: Preliminary analysis of NGS reports and clinical data of patients with advanced solid tumors was performed. CMP was conducted in 261 cancer patients (non-small cell lung cancer - 30,6%, colorectal cancer - 24,8%, pancreatic cancer - 7,4%, breast cancer- 6,2%; 59,3% were female, median number of prior systemic treatment lines was 2 (0-12)). In the present study, tumor molecular profile analysis was performed using 160 - 400 gene NGS panels, containing the majority of clinically significant genes for cancer treatment selection. We assessed the percentage of patients who were recommended to receive molecularly-matched therapy (MMT) after CMP, immunotherapy (IT) distribution of recommended therapies according to ESCAT tiers, median progression-free survival (PFS) – ratio ( = PFS after CMP / PFS before CMP, PFS2/PFS1), median PFS2. Results: MMT after CMP was recommended for 55 (21,1%) patients. ESCAT tiers could be assessed in 48 MMT patients (87%). For 31% of patients, administered therapy was considered as ESCAT I tier recommendation (data on mPFS2/1, mPFS2 not available). ESCAT tiers II, III, IV and IT administration were considered in 31, 8, 8 and 22% of patients respectively (detailed data is presented in Table 1). Most commonly altered genes were TP53 (53%), RAS (29%), APC (18%), CDKN2A/B (16%), PIK3CA(14%), NF1 (10%), BRCA1/2 (9%). Positive predictive factors for MMT after CMP were MSI-high status (HR 0,13, 95% CI 0,03 - 0,67), presence of EGFR alteration (HR 0,32, 95% CI 0,12 - 0,86). Presence of RAS mutation was considered a negative predictive factor (HR 2,78, 1,07 - 7,26). Conclusions: Available NGS panels offer a wide range of analyzed alterations that are not feasible in clinical practice. Most of the alterations that can cause impact on treatment plan can be detected with other methods than NGS. Further studies are needed to determine optimal range of alterations depending on tumor site. [Table: see text]

Phase II study on safety and efficacy of NMS-01940153E, an MPS1 inhibitor with first-in-class potential, in adult patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with systemic therapy.

TPS4185 Background: Monopolar Spindle 1 (MPS1) kinase regulates the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) which ensures proper division of chromosomes during mitosis. MPS1 is overexpressed in several tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), where it correlates with tumor features and poor overall and disease-free survival. NMS-01940153E is a novel, highly potent and selective small molecule inhibitor of MPS1 kinase with long residence time and strong preclinical anti-tumor activity in different tumor types. In HCC lines, specifically, NMS-01940153E showed ~2-Log higher anti-proliferative activity compared to sorafenib, lenvatinib, and regorafenib. In a previous open-label first-in-human (FIH) study, CL1-81694-001 (EudraCT 2014-002023-10), signs of activity in HCC were detected. Recently, the treatment paradigm for advanced HCC has changed, with immunotherapy combinations in first line and TKIs shifted in later lines. However, the overall prognosis of patients with advanced HCC remains poor, and there is a strong need of new drugs in this setting. NMS-01940153E novel mechanism of action, inhibiting the SAC and interfering with genomic stability in HCC, may offer a new therapeutic option in HCC. Based on the promising FIH results, a Phase I/II study, MPSA-153-001 (EudraCT 2020-001002-26), was initiated in patients with HCC previously treated with more than one systemic therapy. Methods: The Phase II part of the MPSA-293-001 trial is designed as a two-stage study with an interim analysis for futility and safety rules for unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective is to assess the antitumor activity of NMS-01940153E in adult patients with unresectable HCC previously treated with systemic therapy measured as objective response rate (ORR) by investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints are safety, PK, ORR as measured by investigator-assessed mRECIST, DoR, PFS and OS. Exploratory endpoints include biomarkers. NMS-01940153E is administered IV, on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks at the RP2D of 100 mg/m2/wk, which showed PK in a predicted active range. Key eligibility criteria are 1) diagnosis of HCC; 2) disease progression on standard-of-care treatment including an immune checkpoint inhibitor as first line and at least one TKI; 3) no more than 3 prior systemic treatment lines. Interim evaluation for futility will be undertaken as soon as the first 10 evaluable patients will be enrolled. If at least 1 responder is observed with no safety issues, enrollment will proceed up to 38 evaluable patients. Otherwise, the study will be terminated for futility. An independent DSMB will review the interim results and provide recommendation on the study progress. Recruitment is currently ongoing in Italy and Spain and an FDA “Study May Proceed Notification” was received in January 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05630937 .

Final survival analysis of the phase III OVHIPEC-1 trial of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer after ten year follow-up.

5509 Background: The randomized, phase 3 OVHIPEC-1 trial (NCT00426257) investigated the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer who were ineligible for primary cytoreduction. OVHIPEC-1 previously demonstrated improved recurrence-free and overall survival after 4.7 years of follow-up. Here, we report the final survival outcomes after ten years of follow-up. In addition, we report new data on the subsequent anti-cancer treatments given after disease progression. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive interval cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC, after receiving three cycles of neo-adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel. Randomization was performed at the time of surgery when either complete (no visible disease) or optimal cytoreduction (residual tumor measuring <10mm in diameter) was anticipated. All patients received an additional three cycles of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. We analyzed survival according to the intention-to-treat principle using stratified log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier methods. Subsequent lines of therapy were compared between arms. Results: At a median follow-up of 10.1 years, 114 of 123 patients (92.7%) who underwent surgery alone and 109 of 122 patients (89.3%) who had surgery-plus-HIPEC experienced recurrence, progression, or death from any cause. Median recurrence-free survival was 10.7 months in the surgery group compared to 14.3 months in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group (HR, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.83; stratified P<0.001). One hundred and eight patients (87.8%) in the surgery group have died as compared to 100 patients (82.0%) in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group. Median overall survival was 33.3 versus 44.9 months (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53-0.92; stratified P=0.011), respectively. Subsequent anti-cancer therapies, including chemotherapy (platinum and non-platinum based), secondary surgery, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and bevacizumab, were received by 104 patients (84.6%) in the surgery group and 100 patients (82.0%) in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group. The median number of subsequent systemic treatment lines was 2 (IQR 1-3) in both arms. Conclusions: This study provides the first long-term survival analysis of HIPEC in ovarian cancer and confirms the benefit of HIPEC in patients with primary stage III epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery. No imbalance in subsequent therapy after disease recurrence was found that could explain the improved overall survival after HIPEC. Clinical trial information: NCT00426257 .

Re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma: an analysis of prognostic factors for survival and predictors of radiation necrosis.

Recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) is a heterogeneous population, and the ideal patient selection for re-irradiation (re-RT) has yet to be established. This study aims to identify prognostic factors for rHGG patients treated with re-RT. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adults with rHGG who underwent re-RT from 2009 to 2020 from our institutional database. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included prognostic factors for early death (< 6months after re-RT) and predictors of radiation necrosis (RN). For the 79 patients identified, the median OS after re-RT was 9.9months (95% CI 8.3-11.6). On multivariate analyses, re-resection at progression (HR 0.56, p = 0.027), interval from primary treatment to first progression ≥ 16.3months (HR 0.61, p = 0.034), interval from primary treatment to re-RT ≥ 23.9months (HR 0.35, p < 0.001), and re-RT PTV volume < 112cc (HR 0.27, p < 0.001) were prognostic for improved OS. Patients who had unmethylated-MGMT tumours (OR 12.4, p = 0.034), ≥ 3 prior systemic treatment lines (OR 29.1, p = 0.022), interval to re-RT < 23.9months (OR 9.0, p = 0.039), and re-RT PTV volume ≥ 112cc (OR 17.8, p = 0.003) were more likely to die within 6months of re-RT. The cumulative incidence of RN was 11.4% (95% CI 4.3-18.5) at 12months. Concurrent bevacizumab use (HR < 0.001, p < 0.001) and cumulative equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions (EQD2, α/β = 2) < 99 Gy2 (HR < 0.001, p < 0.001) were independent protective factors against RN. Re-RT allowed for less corticosteroid dependency. Sixty-six percent of failures after re-RTwere in-field. We observe favorable OS rates following re-RT and identified prognostic factors, including methylation status, that can assist in patient selection and clinical trial design. Concurrent use of bevacizumab mitigated the risk of RN.

Efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: Russian multicenter observational study

Purpose: an assessment of efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in unselected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first and subsequent lines of therapy.Materials and methods. Russian multicenter observational study included 92 consecutive patients with morphologically verified metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with cabozantinib (60 mg/d) in 16 Russian centers. Median age of the patients was 56 (19-79) years, a male-to-female ratio - 3:1. At the start of cabozantinib therapy 27.2 % of patients had ECOG PS 2. Most common histological type of kidney cancer was clear-cell RCC (90.2 %). Most patients were diagnosed with synchronous (71.7 %) multiple metastases (60.9 %). Previous nephrectomy was performed in 87.0 % of cases. Prognosis according to International Metastatic Renal Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC) score was assessed as favorable in 5.4 %, intermediate - in 58.7 % and poor - in 35.9 % patients. Cabozantinib as the first-line therapy was administered in 9 (9.8 %), following 1-5 lines of systemic treatment - in 83 (90.2 %) cases. Median follow-up was 11 (2.3-44.5) months.Results. In patients, receiving cabozantinib as the first-line therapy, objective response rate was 66.7 %, tumor control was reached in 100 % of cases. Median time to the objective response was 2.6 (1.9-3.6) months, median objective response duration - 13.2 (6.2-21.5) months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, 6- and 12-months PFS was 77.8 % and 77.8 %, 6- and 12-months OS - 88.9 % and 88.9 % respectively. Cabozantinib as the second and subsequent lines of therapy provided objective response rate of 34.9 %, tumor control rate - 97.6 %. Median time to the objective response was 2.5 (1.8-4.1) months, median objective response duration - 12.6 (5.5-27.3) months. Median PFS was not reached (6- and 12-months PFS - 92.5 % and 73.1 % respectively), median OS was 32.6 months (6- and 12-months OS - 97.4 % and 80.8 % respectively). Any adverse events (AE) developed in 88.8 %, AE grade III-IV - in 32.6 % of cases. Most frequent AE grade III-IV included arterial hypertension (18.5 %), diarrhea (6.5 %) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (6.5 %). Unacceptable toxicity demanded treatment cancellation in 2.2 %, therapy interruption - in 16.3 % and dose reduction - in 30.4 % of patients.Conclusion. Cabozantinib as the first and subsequent lines of therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in the real world practice demonstrated high efficacy and better tolerability comparing with population assigned for cabozantinib monotherapy in the randomized phase II-III trials.

Abstract CT116: First-in-human study of AZD8853, an anti-growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic solid tumors

Abstract Background: The cytokine GDF15 is overexpressed in solid malignant tumors such as colorectal, lung and urothelial cancer, where it modulates T cells, dendritic cells (DCs) and myeloid-derived cells, driving the tumor microenvironment toward an immunosuppressive, tumor-promoting state. AZD8853 is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds to, and neutralizes, GDF15. Anti-GDF15 treatment increased T cell proliferation and DC activation, leading to an antitumor immune response in preclinical studies of anti-PD-L1 resistant models. In vitro and in vivo preclinical data support the potential antitumor activity of AZD8853 in pts with selected advanced/metastatic cancers. Methods: This Phase I/IIa, first-in-human, open-label study (NCT05397171) assesses the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy of AZD8853 in pts with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer (pMMR-CRC), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC). Up to 165 pts will be enrolled in 3 parts: Part A, dose escalation; Part B, pharmacodynamics expansion; and Part C, efficacy expansion. All pts receive AZD8853 IV. Eligible pts are ≥18 years old with ≥1 measurable target lesion per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0/1, life expectancy ≥12 weeks and adequate organ and bone marrow function. Pts with NSCLC must have had ≥1 prior line of systemic treatment in the advanced/metastatic setting, and no sensitizing EGFR or ALK aberrations. Pts with pMMR-CRC must have had ≥2 prior treatments in the advanced/metastatic setting. Pts with UC must have had ≥1 prior treatment in the advanced/metastatic setting including platinum-containing therapy and/or a PD-(L)1-inhibitor. Pts with Grade ≥2 unresolved toxicities from prior therapy, symptomatic CNS metastases or leptomeningeal disease, or prespecified active/ongoing infections are excluded. The primary objective is safety, including dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and AEs leading to AZD8853 discontinuation. The secondary objectives include assessment of efficacy (objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, percentage change from baseline in target lesion size, change from baseline in circulating tumor DNA, and progression-free and overall survival), PK and immunogenicity. Changes in GDF15 serum levels are measured in Parts A and B. Tumoral CD8+ T cell infiltration is measured in a subset of pts from Part B using PET/CT imaging and IHC of paired biopsies. The study is currently recruiting at centers in the USA and Canada with additional sites planned in the UK, France and Spain. Citation Format: Benedito A. Carneiro, Maria Diab, Brian A. Van Tine, Anthony F. Shields, Albiruni Abdul Razak, John F. Hilton, Rafael Santana-Davila, Elhan Sanai, Jorge Zeron-Medina, Veronique Bragulat, Kath Lowery, Arthur Lambert, John Hood, Rakesh Kumar, Duncan Jodrell, Patricia LoRusso. First-in-human study of AZD8853, an anti-growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT116.

67 - Trends in the use of first line systemic anti-cancer treatment for NSCLC between 2012 and 2022

67 - Trends in the use of first line systemic anti-cancer treatment for NSCLC between 2012 and 2022

Apalutamide in the treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in an elderly patient with multiple comorbidities

Prostate cancer has been the most common malignant tumor in men in Poland since 2016 and is the second cause of death in this group of patients. The basic method of treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer is androgen deprivation therapy, however, over time, the tumor evolves into a castration-resistant form, which poses a significant threat to the patient's life. This article presents a case of an elderly patient with internal diseases, who in the castration-resistant stage, was treated with a new generation androgen receptor blocker – apalutamide – in the first line of systemic treatment.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the real-world evidence ESME cohort before the era of immunotherapy

BackgroundSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive entity of lung cancer with tendency toward early recurrence after first-line treatment. As per recently updated European Society for Medical Oncology recommendations, first-line treatment with up to 4 cycles of platinum-etoposide combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs)-targeting PD-L1, is now the standard of care. The purpose of the current analysis is to identify current patient profiles and treatment strategies in real life clinical practice, and report outcomes in Extensive Stage (ES)-SCLC. MethodsNon-interventional, retrospective, multicentre, comparative study was carried out to describe the outcome of ES-SCLC patients included in the Epidémiologie Stratégie Médico–Economique (ESME) data platform for advanced and metastatic lung cancer. Patients were selected from 34 health care facilities between January 2015 and December 2017, before the era of immunotherapy. Results1315 patients were identified, including 64% male and 78% under 70 year-old; 24% had at least 3 metastatic sites, mainly liver metastases (43%), bone metastases (36%), brain metastases (32%). 49% received only one line of systemic treatment; 30% and 21% received 2 and 3 lines or more, respectively. Carboplatin was more frequently used than cisplatin (71% and 29%, respectively). Prophylactic cranial irradiation was infrequent (4% of patients), but 16% of patients received thoracic radiation therapy, mainly after the completion of first-line chemotherapy (72% of patients); such strategies were more frequently applied in cisplatin/etoposide than carboplatin/etoposide patients (p = 0.006 and p = 0.015, respectively). After a median follow-up time of 21.8 (95% CI: 20.9–23.3) months, median real-world Progression-Free Survival (rw-PFS) was 6.2 (95% CI: 5.7; 6.9) and 6.1 (95% CI: 5.8; 6.3) months for cisplatin/etoposide and carboplatin/etoposide doublet regimens, respectively; 24-month rwPFS and Overall Survival were 3.2% (95% CI: 2.3; 4;2) and 22.2% (95% CI: 19.4; 25.1) in the whole population, respectively. ConclusionOur data provide with landmark reference findings on ES-SCLC before the immunotherapy era, and cover many aspects of the treatment strategy, while highlighting on the role of radiotherapy, subsequent lines of therapy, and the outcomes of patients. Generation of real-world data focusing on patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is under way.

The five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis results and treatment patterns in daily clinical practice in Slovenia in 1st line treatment of metastatic colorectal (mCRC) patients with RAS wild-type tumour (wtRAS) - a real- life data report 2013-2018.

We preformed a Phase IV non-interventional study to assess KRAS, NRAS and BRAF status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients suitable for 1st line treatment and to evaluate the decisions for 1st line treatment considering the treatment goals in the RAS wild type (wt) patients. The aim of our study was also to evaluate the influence of a waiting period for biomarkers analysis on the start of first-line treatment. Patients with histologically confirmed mCRC adenocarcinoma suitable for first-line treatment fulfilling all inclusion criteria were included in the study. The KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis was performed from tissue samples of primary tumor site or metastatic site. All included patients have given consent to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form. From April 2013 to March 2018 at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana 650 patients were included, 637 of them were treated with first- line systemic treatment according to RAS and BRAF status. Remaining 13 patients with mCRC did not receive systemic first-line treatment. The distribution of patients with KRAS mutated and wild-type tumors, was almost equal, 48.8% and 47.9% respectively, 89 % of the patients had wt NRAS tumours and 86.1% had wt BRAF tumours. The most frequently prescribed treatment was bevacizumab-based therapy (53.1%), either in combination with doublet chemotherapy or with mono-chemotherapy. EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab were prescribed in wt RAS mCRC patients (30.9%). The waiting period for biomarkers analysis was two weeks. Our real-world data, single centre 5-year analysis showed that the distribution between wild type and mutated type tumors of the patients with mCRC was approximately the same, as worldwide, so the Slovenian population with mCRC has the same ratio distribution of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF wild and mutated genes. We concluded that a two-week waiting period for biomarkers analysis did not influence the first line treatment decision, so it was in the accordance with the worldwide treatment guidelines based on evidence-based medicine.