Source Of Legitimacy Research Articles

Sources of Legitimacy in Participatory Budgeting: A Scoping Review

This article conducts a scoping review to explore the key determinants of political legitimacy in participatory budgeting. The scoping review employs a comprehensive search of Scopus to select relevant studies. Three main sources of legitimacy emerge from this analysis: (1) institutions, (2) citizen participation, and (3) deliberation. The findings reveal that participatory budgeting can significantly affect political legitimacy through these mechanisms. In addition, the study highlights the relevance of legitimacy, as it relates to participatory budgeting, in both democratic and non-democratic contexts, with particular attention to participatory budgeting practices in China.

La influencia del dinero negro en las pymes. Puebla, México

The objective of this research is to understand the influence of black money on SMEs, to outline solutions to prevent and combat these illegal practices contributing to the strengthening of business responsibility and ethics. The methodology used is qualitative, based on the hypothetical deductive method applied in the field: the capital of the state of Puebla. The object of study is the influence of black money on SMEs. We consider black money to be money obtained illegally (drug trafficking, floor collection, clandestine marketing of fuels or any illicit activity) that comes from a legitimate source with the aim of “laundering” it, that is, disguising large amounts of cash as legal, which allows criminals to maintain control over their profits. The main finding is: 81% of SME owners are prone to use black money for the operation of their business.

‘I think my body knew what it was before I did’: Affirming women’s embodied experiences as a conduit to knowing

This paper focuses on ignorance within the phenomenon of women who experience female ejaculation. Based on ethnographic research, I show how the experience of the phenomenon in the absence of propositional knowledge about it results in what I term ‘experiential ignorance.’ This type of ignorance is caused by the cultural positioning of propositional knowledge as the most valid and reliable form of knowledge about the body. Experiential ignorance can be manifested in many different ways, such as an inability to categorize and validate subjective bodily experiences, resulting in feelings of doubt, shame, and can even lead to somatic effects. Nevertheless, some women challenge this knowledge hierarchy by valuing their bodily sensations as legitimate sources of information. The paper concludes that reconceptualizing ignorance to include experiential dimensions reveals the power dynamics inherent in knowledge production and provides opportunities for women to reclaim authority over their bodies and pleasurable experiences. This framework has broader implications for understanding embodied knowledge and ignorance across diverse sociocultural contexts.

A Health Media Literacy Intervention Increases Skepticism of Both Inaccurate and Accurate Cancer News Among U.S. Adults.

Inaccurate cancer news can have adverse effects on patients and families. One potential way to minimize this is through media literacy training-ideally, training tailored specifically to the evaluation of health-related media coverage. We test whether an abbreviated health-focused media literacy intervention improves accuracy discernment or sharing discernment for cancer news headlines and also examine how these outcomes compare to the effects of a generic media literacy intervention. We employ a survey experiment conducted using a nationally representative sample of Americans (N = 1,200). Respondents were assigned to either a health-focused media literacy intervention, a previously tested generic media literacy intervention, or the control. They were also randomly assigned to rate either perceived accuracy of headlines or sharing intentions. Intervention effects on accurate and inaccurate headline ratings were tested using OLS regressions at the item-response level, with standard errors clustered on the respondent and with headline fixed effects. We find that the health-focused media literacy intervention increased skepticism of both inaccurate (a 5.6% decrease in endorsement, 95% CI [0.1%, 10.7%]) and accurate (a 7.6% decrease, 95% CI [2.4%, 12.8%]) news headlines, and accordingly did not improve discernment between the two. The health-focused media literacy intervention also did not significantly improve sharing discernment. Meanwhile, the generic media literacy intervention had little effect on perceived accuracy outcomes, but did significantly improve sharing discernment. These results suggest further intervention development and refinement are needed before scaling up similarly targeted health information literacy tools, particularly focusing on building trust in legitimate sources and accurate content.

Experiences of integrating social prescribing link workers into primary care in England: Bolting on, fitting in or belonging.

Following the 2019 NHS Long-Term Plan, link workers (LWs) have been employed across primary care in England to deliver social prescribing (SP). To understand and explain how the LW role is being implemented in primary care in England. Realist evaluation undertaken in England. Focused ethnographies around seven LWs from different parts of England. As part of this, we interviewed 61 patients and 93 professionals from healthcare and the voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector. We reinterviewed 41 patients, seven LWs and a LW manager 9-12 months after their first interview. We developed four concepts around how LWs are integrated (or not) within primary care: Centralising or diffusing power; Forging an identity in general practice; Demonstrating effect; Building a facilitative infrastructure. These concepts informed the development of a programme theory around a continuum of integration of LWs into primary care - from being 'bolted on' to existing provision, without much consideration, to 'fitting in', shaping what is delivered to be accommodating, through to 'belonging', whereby they are accepted as a legitimate source of support, making a valued contribution to patients' broader well-being. SP was introduced into primary care to promote greater attention to the full range of factors affecting patients' health and well-being, beyond biomedicine. For that to happen, our analysis highlights the need for a whole system approach to defining, delivering and maintaining this new part of practice.

An Ideological Divide? Political Parties’ Discourse in Italy’s Migration Cooperation with Libya and Albania

ABSTRACT Italy’s migration agreements with Libya in 2017 and Albania in 2023 serve as crucial cases for investigating how political parties in Europe position themselves on immigration policy. By comparing parties across the Italian political spectrum, this research assesses whether they have articulated distinct stances on the externalisation of migration in the two selected cases. A qualitative analysis of parliamentary debates reveals two dominant logics in party discourse: a security logic and a rights-oriented logic. These two logics can cut across party lines, particularly in times of crisis, with frequent references to the European Union (EU) as both an arena for Italy’s influence and a source of legitimacy.

"I Just Wouldn't Like Him to go Through What I Went Through as a Kid": A Qualitative Study on the Mitigating Effects of Positive Childhood Experiences in Mothers with a History of Adverse Childhood Experiences in an Irish Population.

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are increasingly being acknowledged as a major risk factor for instigating and sustaining cycles of trauma between mother and child. Recently, the concept of Benevolent Childhood Experiences (BCEs) has been introduced to ACEs research as a buffer against the transmission of ACEs between generations. Positive childhood experiences such as attachment to caregivers, positive peer relations and positive sense of self have been found to counteract the effects of adverse childhood experiences. The emergence of positive childhood experiences as an adaptive capacity against ACEs should be explored as a tool for psychological change, to help break the cycle of inherited trauma between generations. The present study aims to examine the lived experiences of mothers with a history of ACEs, if they consider their positive childhood experiences when parenting, and how they use these positive experiences to break the cycle of intergenerational trauma. Three women residing in a low-support service for parenting were recruited for this study. Participants were all low-income, first-time single mothers in their early thirties. A qualitative approach was designed for the study. ACEs and BCEs questionnaires were administered to participants and scores were taken into account to contextualise participant interviews. A semi-structured interview was designed in accordance with IPA guidelines. Questions were directed towards phenomenological material, focusing on participants' understanding of their experiences as mothers. Analysis of the interview data revealed three superordinate themes (replicating positive experiences, creating new positive experiences and protecting children from intergenerational trauma) related to participants' BCEs, their children's BCEs and their desire to break the cycle of intergenerational trauma. The findings of this study, namely that participants intentionally tried to create positive experiences with their own children through drawing on their own positive experiences in childhood, supports the idea that BCEs are a legitimate source of adaptive capacity for mothers with ACEs. Parenting interventions for parents with ACEs should be developed taking into account ACE and BCE scores.

Palestinian Lone Assailants, 2015–2023: Suicide, Legitimacy Communities and Duped Attackers

The article explores the main social, political and technological drivers that shaped the phenomenon of Palestinian lone assailants from 2015 to early 2023. The unprecedented number of attacks during this period provides a wealth of evidence based on Palestinian and Israeli media sources as well as new archival materials that allows for a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon. The evidenced drivers include the emergence of a young generation with new social and political perspectives; the impact of social media on the assailants’ sources of legitimacy and modes of operation; the notable prominence of personal motivations, and; the covert strategies Palestinian organizations are utilizing to deal with these shifts.

Acceptance of Gig Economy as a Source of Halal Income Among Muslim Graduates

In the current landscape, recent university graduates face challenges in securing sustainable income to cover daily expenses and establish future financial reserves. The gig economy, known for its flexibility and alignment with academic pursuits, has gained significance in addressing this need. The objectives of this study are two-folds, namely: (a) to assess the acceptance of the gig economy as a legitimate source of halal income among Muslim graduates in Kelantan, and (b) to determine the factors influencing their choice of gig-type jobs. Utilizing qualitative methods, the research employs purposive sampling, conducting semi-structured interviews with nine Muslim graduates from diverse academic backgrounds. Findings reveal that not all research participants have a right understanding of halal income although all of them accept the gig economy as a source of halal income. The findings also indicate that factors impacting their engagement in the gig economy include the need to earn a living, flexibility in their work schedules and acquisition of new skills. In conclusion, the study illuminates the intricate interplay of economic considerations, religious values, and vocational decisions. It can be implied from this study that valuable insights for policymakers, educators, and industry stakeholders supporting the aspirations of Muslim graduates elsewhere amid the evolving landscape of work. Future work should focus on a comprehensive investigation including multiple states can be undertaken to obtain a more elucidating perspective on this issue.

Moving toward a fairer access to land fostering agroecological transition? A decade of legal change and reframing of debates around soil and climate in France

Although farmland concentration receives narrower media coverage than land grab, it goes hand in hand with impactful environmental and demographic consequences. This article examines the case of France, one of the European countries with the highest level of farmland market control. It questions to what extent the regulation of access to land is adapted to initiate an agroecological and food transition. Its objective is to analyze why and how land concentration has been reframed in the past decade, by which types of stakeholders, building on which sources of legitimacy, and with which legal strategies and results. The theoretical framework combines the sociology of controversies and agenda-setting with a land justice-based approach. This article builds on a textual hermeneutics of 3 documental corpora encompassing a press review with 172 items, 112 documents (press releases, opinion pages, reports, notes, interviews, public speeches, amendment proposals, draft bills, laws, and decisions), and 3,409 tweets (those mentioning loi foncière or the #LoiFoncière hashtag, and those quoting, retweeting, or replying (to) them). These data were contextualized using sporadic participant observation. Since 2013, and more specifically since 2018, 2 networks of left-wing politicians, left-wing farmers’ unions, and civil society nongovernmental organizations have brought land justice concerns up-to-date to put farmland concentration on the political agenda. However, only minor progress has been made. A major factor in this is the chronological gap between, on the one hand, the successive reframings of the issue (from soil quality and climate change mitigation lenses), the proposed legal devices, the degree of projected legal change and, on the other hand, the pace at which the window of opportunity for a new land law has opened and closed. Indeed, the land imaginaries of land commons that underpin the agroecological transition are not yet sufficiently socially legitimate to be enshrined in law.

The Influence of Theorie Von Stufenbau Der Rechtsordnung in the Indonesian Legal System

The aim of this research is to analyze the influence of Hans Kelsen's Theorie Von Stufenufbau Der Rechtsordnung on the Indonesian legal system. The research method employed is legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. Primary and secondary legal materials are analyzed using normative analysis. The findings reveal that Theorie Von Stufenufbau Der Rechtsordnung significantly impacts the Indonesian legal system. There are at least two main influences identified. First, the system of laws and regulations in Indonesia has been structured hierarchically since the enactment of the Temporary People's Consultative Assembly Decree No. XX/1966 up to the present day. However, this hierarchy is not absolute, especially concerning the positions of Perppu and People's Consultative Assembly Decrees. Second, there is a recognized mechanism for reviewing legal norms to ensure their validity, whether through judicial review, political review, or executive review. The hierarchical structure of Indonesia's legal system reflects Kelsen's theory, which posits that law consists of interrelated levels of norms. Each level derives its authority from the norm above it, with the basic norm at the apex, serving as the source of legitimacy for the entire legal system. In the Indonesian context, this basic norm can be identified as the UUD NRI 1945, which underpins all subordinate legislation. The review mechanism for legal norms also illustrates the influence of Kelsen's theory. Judicial review, conducted by the Constitutional Court, assesses whether a law aligns with the Constitution. Political review is undertaken by legislative bodies such as the DPR, which can evaluate and amend legislation. Executive review is carried out by executive bodies, such as the President or ministers, who have the authority to adjust or repeal regulations deemed inappropriate.

The Position of Women and Women's Rights in Islamic Family Reform: A Comparison in Indonesia and Tunisia

This research was prepared with the aim of discussing the position and fight for women's rights in the Islamic Family reform (Comparison in Indonesia and Tunisia). Some women demand that their rights be taken away by male hegemony. This theme ultimately falls within the scope of the Holy Quran which is used as a source of legitimization of the relationship between men and women. The research method used in this study is the method of collecting data through library research. Data is collected by gathering information from various sources of literature, including books, magazines, journals, and others. From this research, it can be concluded that the reform of Islamic family law in Indonesia and Tunisia was carried out to answer the needs of the times and especially to raise the degree (status) of women, namely through nurturing, preserving and then fighting for women's rights. Although the minimum standards of marriage and polygamy differ in the two countries, they share a similar principle and goal: the protection of women's rights. Nonetheless, these rights are equivalent by nature in sharia (maqasyid ash-shari'ah), such as the right to mental and psychological health (equivalent to the nature of hifz an-nafs/maintaining the soul), then the right to maintain reproductive health (equivalent to the nature of hifdz al-nasl/maintaining offspring), Furthermore, the right to obtain equal opportunities in the field of education (commensurate with the nature of hifdz al-'aql / preserving the intellect) and the provisions of polygamy between the two countries also have commensurate goals and principles, namely to protect women's honor or human rights (commensurate with the principle of hifdz al-'ird).

Islamic Constitutionalism in Pakistan

Abstract This article questions the lumpy character of understanding Islamic constitutionalism through all-pervasive models operating across time and space and reliance on classical texts as the ultimate reference for jurisprudence. It focuses on conflict and compromise among stakeholders in individual Muslim countries. Pakistan represents a ‘differentiated social formation’ underscored by dichotomy between modernity and tradition. The former is defined by a secular legal-institutional mechanism of authority inherited from British India, which seeks to accommodate the latter’s Islamic agenda through ideological symbolism, legal formalism and — under Gen. Zia’s martial law — cultivation of a divine source of legitimacy to counter the constitutional source of legitimacy in the form of mass mandate. In the face of outcry from modernists, the ulema fell back on a defensive strategy to safeguard their gains.

Understanding of Hybrid Political System of Islamic Republic Iran: The Case Study of General Election 2024

The Islamic Republic of Iran possesses a hybrid political system. It encompasses both elements of democracy and Islamic theocracy. As a unique model of the Islamic governmental system, the political system in Iran rests on dual sources of legitimacy. The objective of this paper is to examine the voter behaviour and the result of the 2024 elections in the Islamic Republic of Iran as well as to study the impact of president death on the election schedule. This election recorded the lowest turnout in history. The voter behaviour, attitude, and concerns towards Iranian politics and electoral politics also studied. The factors that caused low turnout is also discussed. The data for conducting this research is collected from journals, articles, official websites, and other secondary sources. The study concluded that the hope of no political and social change in Iran exploits the voters and that’s the main reason of low turnout in elections 2024. This study recommends that Iran’s government should focus to make electoral process modern, and policies should be flexible.

العرف كمصدر تشريعي وأثره في إطار الشريعة الإسلامية والقانون الوضعي

This research aims to shed light on customs as a legislative source in both Islamic and statutory law. Customs are considered one of the legislative sources under the provisions of Islamic Sharia and statutory law, and they have an impact on both, in addition to the authority they hold as evidence. The research examines the advantages, pillars, and effects of customs. Islamic scholars have paid significant attention to customs, setting regulations for them, and considering them a legitimate source as long as they do not contradict a definitive text or legitimate evidence. Customs have also influenced secular laws and have been an important source for them. Unlike statutory law, customs in Islamic jurisprudence are subject to strict conditions, whereby the beneficial custom is approved, and the harmful one is annulled. However, secular law, which makes custom binding on individuals, may adopt both beneficial and harmful customs due to the lack of distinction between them, provided they are consistent with the law and do not contravene public order. Islamic jurisprudence requires the presence of the moral element in customs, without addressing the material element, unlike secular law which requires the presence of both material and moral elements. As a result of the variations in customs within a single country according to regions, the legal unity of customs is negated, contrary to the law. Additionally, some sections of the law do not align with customs, as is the case with penal law where there is no punishment except by text, whereas custom is considered in private, international, civil, administrative, and constitutional law. The study recommends examining examples and applications based on customary practices, since customs are not documented. It suggests that authorities responsible for issuing fatwas and judicial decisions document the prevailing and practiced customs among individuals to rely on them during judgments, fatwas, and dispute resolution.

THE EFFECTS OF MIXED MARRIAGE LAWS ON THE DIVISION OF PROPERTY UNDER THE MARRIAGE LAW AND INTERNATIONAL CIVIL PRINCIPLES

Blended marriage alludes to a marriage connection between people of various identities. This outcomes in legitimate ramifications in regards to the division of joint resources. This exploration expects to investigate comprehension of blended relationships as per Regulation Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and according to the viewpoint of global confidential regulation, as well as the lawful results of partitioning joint resources in blended relationships. By utilizing optional legitimate sources, this exploration utilizes a Standardizing Juridical examination technique, in particular by checking out at speculations, legal guidelines and case regulation. As per Marriage Regulation Number 1 of 1974, blended relationships happen on the off chance that one accomplice is an Indonesian resident and the other isn't. This happens when two individuals whose regulations are not quite the same as Indonesian regulation wed in Indonesia. With regards to the authorization of the Marriage Regulation, there are two sorts of conjugal resources, in particular acquired resources (individual resources) and joint resources. All in all, blended relationships are managed in Regulation Number 1974 concerning Marriage and in Global Confidential Regulation applying the standard of lex loci festivities, which expresses that the law that applies to the marriage is the law where the marriage happens, and the division of joint property is directed as per law of each party.

Dreamscapes of Belonging : Draft, based on the presentation at the IAJS Conference 2023, work in progress

Jungian Art-Based Research (JABR) is a distinctive methodological framework that explores the intersection of analytical psychology and the arts. It primarily utilizes Jung's theories of the psyche, integrating these with artistic processes to investigate and express unconscious dynamics. Susan Rowland, a pivotal figure in this field, has significantly advanced the understanding of how Jungian theories can be applied within art-based research (Rowland, 2023). Her contributions elucidate how artistic expressions act as mediums through which the unconscious can be explored and articulated, thereby offering profound insights into both individual and collective unconscious processes. The objectives of Jungian Art-Based Research are manifold. Firstly, JABR aims to provide a methodological approach that allows researchers and practitioners to delve deeper into the symbolic and transformative potential of art. This is achieved through the engagement of the unconscious in the creation and interpretation of art, thereby fostering a holistic understanding of the psyche. Secondly, JABR seeks to expand the scope of psychological inquiry by incorporating artistic expressions as legitimate sources of psychological data. Lastly, it aspires to foster a dialogue between psychology and art, encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration that can enrich both fields. By integrating analytical psychology with artistic creativity, JABR contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the human experience, offering valuable perspectives that challenge conventional research paradigms. This paper presents a personal journey through the application of Jungian Art-Based Research (JABR), initiated by attending a course by Susan Rowlands. It delves into the transformative experience of exploring the multiverse of dreams and their impact on the author's professional and personal development. The exploration began with the author’s repetitive dreams, characterized by detailed urban landscapes, serving as the primary material for research. By physically mapping these dreamscapes and integrating various symbolic materials, the author engaged in a deep, introspective process, highlighting the non-linear and spiraling nature of JABR. This journey further intertwined with reflections on identity, homelessness, and the longing for a sense of belonging, amplified by historical and cultural dislocations. Through spontaneous dance and subsequent reflections, the author confronts the disillusionment with idealized spaces and faces the reality of changing perspectives and attachments. The paper concludes by pondering the broader implications of our attachment to the Earth, suggesting that our efforts to save it might be hindered by our need to name and possess, rather than embrace its intrinsic, unnamed existence. Through a Jungian lens, the author proposes a reevaluation of our relationship with the planet, advocating for a detachment from specific names to foster a more universal and sustainable connection.

Dreamscapes of Belonging

Jungian Art-Based Research (JABR) is a distinctive methodological framework that explores the intersection of analytical psychology and the arts. It primarily utilizes Jung's theories of the psyche, integrating these with artistic processes to investigate and express unconscious dynamics. Susan Rowland, a pivotal figure in this field, has significantly advanced the understanding of how Jungian theories can be applied within art-based research (Rowland, 2023). Her contributions elucidate how artistic expressions act as mediums through which the unconscious can be explored and articulated, thereby offering profound insights into both individual and collective unconscious processes. The objectives of Jungian Art-Based Research are manifold. Firstly, JABR aims to provide a methodological approach that allows researchers and practitioners to delve deeper into the symbolic and transformative potential of art. This is achieved through the engagement of the unconscious in the creation and interpretation of art, thereby fostering a holistic understanding of the psyche. Secondly, JABR seeks to expand the scope of psychological inquiry by incorporating artistic expressions as legitimate sources of psychological data. Lastly, it aspires to foster a dialogue between psychology and art, encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration that can enrich both fields. By integrating analytical psychology with artistic creativity, JABR contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the human experience, offering valuable perspectives that challenge conventional research paradigms. This paper presents a personal journey through the application of Jungian Art-Based Research (JABR), initiated by attending a course by Susan Rowlands. It delves into the transformative experience of exploring the multiverse of dreams and their impact on the author's professional and personal development. The exploration began with the author’s repetitive dreams, characterized by detailed urban landscapes, serving as the primary material for research. By physically mapping these dreamscapes and integrating various symbolic materials, the author engaged in a deep, introspective process, highlighting the non-linear and spiraling nature of JABR. This journey further intertwined with reflections on identity, homelessness, and the longing for a sense of belonging, amplified by historical and cultural dislocations. Through spontaneous dance and subsequent reflections, the author confronts the disillusionment with idealized spaces and faces the reality of changing perspectives and attachments. The paper concludes by pondering the broader implications of our attachment to the Earth, suggesting that our efforts to save it might be hindered by our need to name and possess, rather than embrace its intrinsic, unnamed existence. Through a Jungian lens, the author proposes a reevaluation of our relationship with the planet, advocating for a detachment from specific names to foster a more universal and sustainable connection.

Влияние явки избирателей на легитимность президентских выборов в мире

This paper reveals the impact of voter turnout on the legitimacy of presidential elections based on the materials of 20 largest states holding such elections in terms of the number of voters. In March 2024, presidential elections were held in Russia and in November elections are scheduled in the United States, the outcome of which will have an impact on the domestic and foreign policies of these states. The author has tested the hypothesis that in most cases, for the existing political regime in countries where subject and patriarchal political cultures are widespread, high voter turnout acts as a donor of legitimacy, therefore, the authorities seek to involve the maximum number of voters in conventional political participation in presidential elections and ensure victory for the person holding the office of president (incumbent). In countries where the political culture of participation has become more widespread, the competition of strong candidates is a source of legitimacy for political regimes that do not seek to mobilize all voters to participate in presidential elections and are most often unable to ensure the re-election of the incumbent. Based on the analysis of electoral statistics of presidential elections in the studied states, it was concluded that high electoral activity in countries with a predominance of national and patriarchal political cultures, even if there is no real competition between candidates, but with broad public recognition of the existing political regime, ensures the legitimacy of elections. In countries where political culture of participation has become more widespread, high turnout is a consequence of interest in elections, and not the result of the mobilization of the electorate by the political regime. Examples are Turkey and France, where the last presidential elections were held with high turnout and competition between the two most popular candidates; low electoral activity in the presidential elections is a prerequisite for the subsequent political crisis and dismantling of the political regime (Afghanistan, Nigeria). Acceptable level of voter turnout in the presidential elections, which can act as an indicator of their legitimacy, is about 60–66%.

VelogCPS: A safe blockchain network for cyber–physical systems leveraging block verifiers

Non-functional requirements related to safety, security, and timeliness have made cyber–physical systems (CPS) initially reluctant to their integration with blockchain technology. Despite the multiple advantages of blockchain like improved data security and traceability, the main reasons that have slowed down its adoption in CPS still remain. Examples of these are the inherent overhead of accessing the distributed ledger and the security incidents that a number of blockchain networks have suffered since its inception. This paper presents VelogCPS, a novel middleware that guarantees that logic and data managed by blockchain networks of cyber–physical systems are verified and generated by legitimate sources. Thus, VelogCPS avoids a kind of security incidents that impact the authenticity and integrity of the logic and data managed in blockchain networks. By authenticity we refer to provenance authenticity of the involved smart contracts, i.e., the perfect matching between the advertised source-code and the version deployed to the network. Our framework provides a safe blockchain network as it ensures that the entities that participate to a CPS use solely authentic logic. We do this by leveraging block verifier services and enforcing them through the operation workflow. As a result, the middleware guarantees that the participating entities use and share authentic logic. The proposed framework is validated through its implementation on a real blockchain network, employing actual smart contract verifier logic, and through the exhaustive analysis of the temporal behaviour and overhead of the major operations; the obtained results ensure its utility for time-sensitive sytems like CPS and IoT.