Legal Protection Research Articles (Page 1)

The study aims to analyze whether the doctrine of trademark dilution has provided corrective justice or otherwise, so that the balance of rights for trademark owners can be fulfilled.The methods used in this study are normative or doctrinal legal research methods. The research approaches used are legislative, conceptual, case-based, and comparative approaches.The novelty of this research lies in the perspective of corrective justice in analyzing court decisions related to dilution actions. This research is expected to contribute to further research and policy recommendations for the government and judges to produce regulations and decisions that are fair to trademark owners.The results of the comparative law study show that anti-dilution regulations in the United States are comprehensively regulated, but there are shortcomings in the courts. Court decisions regarding well-known trademarks are considered detrimental and do not restore the rights that have been violated. In fact, the main purpose of dilution is to provide legal protection for well-known trademarks. Indonesia itself has not yet fully regulated anti-dilution regulations.The concluded findings of this comparative legal study serve as a lesson for Indonesia so that future regulations can take into account the balance of rights between well-known trademarks and other trademarks in order to avoid market monopoly.

The development of digital technology has encouraged the widespread use of photography to promote tourist destinations on social media. However, the ease of access and dissemination of visual content often leads to copyright infringement on photographers. This study aims to analyze the legal protection of photographic works in the context of tourist destination promotion in Jakarta, as well as to identify challenges and solutions. The method used is a normative-juridical approach, analyzing relevant laws and regulations, such as Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, as well as a case study of the use of tourist destination photos on social media by government agencies and tourism industry players. The results indicate that, normatively, photographic works are protected as creations with economic and moral value to their creators. However, the implementation of protection in the digital realm remains weak due to a lack of legal awareness, the difficulty of proving violations, and weak oversight of content on social media. Protection efforts can be strengthened through increased digital legal literacy, the implementation of open licenses (creative commons), and collaboration between the government, photographers, and tourist destination managers.

Guardianship has an important role in supervising minors, including the management of their parents' inherited property as stipulated in Article 51 paragraph (3) of the Marriage Law. However, the practice shows that there is an abuse of authority by the guardian, who controls and even transfers inheritance not for the benefit of the child. This research aims to examine the legal consequences of the transfer of the inheritance of minors to guardians as well as the forms of legal protection available, with a case study of the Banten High Court Decision Number 89/Pdt/2015/PT BTN. The method used is normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, analytical, and case approaches, and uses legal consequences theory from R. Soeroso and legal protection theory from Satjipto Rahardjo. The results of the study show that the control of property by the guardian can cause the loss or escape of the child's inheritance, especially if there is no strict supervision and regulation. Therefore, it is necessary to affirm the legal status of children's inheritances, regulate the authority of guardians more strictly, and apply effective legal sanctions to prevent abuse. The litigation route is an important instrument in legal protection so that children can regain their rights fairly. This research contributes to strengthening the guardianship legal system in Indonesia, especially in the context of protecting children's rights to inheritance.

This study explores the importance of protecting the Geographical Indication (GI) of Lamsi Tobacco from Temanggung to safeguard its authenticity and maintain product quality, in accordance with Law Number 20 of 2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications. Lamsi Tobacco is known for its distinctive taste, aroma, and quality, which are influenced by the geographical conditions of Temanggung as well as traditional cultivation practices passed down through generations. However, without legal protection, the authenticity and reputation of this product risk being diminished due to counterfeiting or unauthorized use of its name. The research method employed is normative juridical, which focuses on library research or secondary data by viewing law as a set of written norms enacted by authorized institutions. To strengthen the analysis, this study is also supported by a socio-legal approach that combines legal studies with social sciences so that law is understood not only as written norms but also as a practice that lives within society. The findings indicate that Lamsi Tobacco meets the criteria for Geographical Indication as stipulated in Law No. 20 of 2016 Protection through Geographical Indications not only plays a role in preserving the authenticity and quality of the product but also generates positive economic and social impacts for the community, particularly farmers. Nevertheless, several obstacles remain, such as low legal awareness, administrative difficulties, and the absence of a strong managing institution. Therefore, coordination between the central government, local government, farmer associations, and the community is necessary to realize effective legal protection. Through the registration and protection of Geographical Indications, Lamsi Tobacco is expected to maintain its reputation, increase competitiveness in the market, and make a tangible contribution to the welfare of the Temanggung community as well as the preservation of local culture.

Obstetricians are often confronted with medical malpractice lawsuits, even when they have acted in accordance with professional standards, medical service standards, operational procedures, and medical ethics. Medical malpractice is generally defined as negligence or deviation from professional standards that results in serious harm to patients (Fiscina, 1999). This study aims to examine the application of the concept of medical malpractice along with its legal implications and to analyze the forms of legal protection available to obstetricians under Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health, viewed from the perspective of the principle of justice. Using a normative juridical method with descriptive-analytical specifications, the research employed a literature study and qualitative deductive analysis. The results indicate that legal protection for obstetricians consists of two dimensions: preventive and repressive. Preventive protection includes the implementation of informed consent, proper medical records, and compliance with standard operating procedures. Repressive protection involves legal defense mechanisms and institutional or professional organizational support. However, this protection remains suboptimal, as the decisions of the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board (MKDKI) are not always taken into account by the courts (Rahman, 2022). From the perspective of Rawls’ principle of justice, protection for obstetricians should ensure a balanced recognition of both patients’ and doctors’ rights, thereby promoting fairness and equitable justice for all parties (Rawls, 1971).

Indonesian Migrant Workers (PMI) play a crucial role in the nation's economy, as shown by their participation in overseas employment and the remittances they send back. Nevertheless, PMI frequently encounter challenges such as abuse, exploitation, breaches of contracts, and limited access to legal protections. The comprehensive legal structure designed to ensure their inclusive safety before, during, and after their employment is laid out in Law No. 18 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers. This research aims to analyze the actual practice of legal protections available to PMI, in light of statutory requirements, and to highlight any obstacles encountered in its application. A normative legal research method is used in this study, employing both legislative and theoretical frameworks, and it is informed by relevant academic literature, laws, and judicial rulings. The findings reveal that while Law No. 18 of 2017 outlines thorough protection protocols, its real-world execution faces hurdles such as insufficient oversight, poor cooperation among agencies, and a general lack of legal knowledge among PMI. Consequently, it is essential to enhance institutions, elevate the quality of protective services, and maximize the effectiveness of Indonesian representatives abroad. This study aims to contribute to the development of more equitable and efficient regulations for the safeguarding of migrant workers.

The construction of toll roads in Indonesia often causes land acquisition disputes, especially related to compensation for remaining land that is no longer productive. Although Article 65A paragraph (1) of Government Regulation No. 39 of 2023 provides the right for the community to demand compensation for the remaining land, practice on the ground shows a discrepancy between normative rights and the realization of compensation. This research uses a normative legal approach with legislative, conceptual, analytical, and case study methods, and refers to Dean G. Pruitt's Dispute Resolution Theory and Philipus M. Hadjon's Legal Protection Theory. The results of the study show that the non-litigation resolution mechanism (problem solving) is often ineffective due to the lack of education and facilitation from the authorities, so that people tend to take the path of litigation (contending) to fight for their rights. This condition reflects the weak legal protection for people affected by national strategic projects. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen legal education for the community and revise Government Regulation No. 39 of 2023 to include compensation for the remaining land that has lost its use value. This revision is important to ensure substantive justice and prevent the escalation of disputes. This research contributes to the development of a more responsive and equitable land acquisition policy, as well as encourages synergy between regulations, education, and effective dispute resolution mechanisms in the context of national infrastructure development.

The Indonesian capital market plays a pivotal role in mobilising long-term financing for corporations and providing investment opportunities to the public. However, persistent stock fraud cases undermine market integrity and investor confidence. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing legal framework for investor protection against stock fraud, analyse its practical implementation, and recommend measures to strengthen both preventive and repressive mechanisms. Employing a normative legal research design with a qualitative approach, the study integrates statute, conceptual, and case approaches, focusing on Law No. 8 of 1995 on Capital Markets, OJK regulations, the Criminal Code, and notable cases such as PT Hanson International Tbk. The findings reveal that while the legal framework normatively aligns with the Legal Protection Theory, Justice Theory, and Legal Effectiveness Theory, substantial gaps remain between regulation and enforcement. Weak supervisory coordination, delayed intervention, lengthy judicial processes, and low investor legal literacy reduce effectiveness. Recommended reforms include adopting regtech and suptech, enhancing cross-agency data integration, implementing AI-based surveillance, establishing a specialised capital market court, and strengthening investor education. The study concludes that combining regulatory improvements, adaptive enforcement, and public legal empowerment is essential to safeguard investors, maintain market integrity, and promote sustainable economic growth.

This research is motivated by the importance of business licensing in the trade of goods and services sector as an instrument of legality, supervision, and legal protection; however, its implementation still faces gaps between normative regulations and practices in the field. The purpose of this study is to analyze the level of business actors’ compliance with licensing obligations, identify obstacles in the implementation of risk-based licensing policies, and evaluate their impact on compliance. The method used is library research with a normative juridical approach, through an examination of primary legal materials in the form of laws and related regulations, as well as secondary and tertiary legal materials from scientific literature. The results show that the effectiveness of risk-based licensing policies has not been optimally achieved due to low legal literacy, limited digital understanding, and the perception that licenses are merely a formality, causing many business actors to neglect administrative obligations. This condition illustrates the existence of a gap between regulatory objectives and implementation practices. These findings emphasize the need for procedural simplification, intensified socialization, and strengthened technical assistance so that licensing policies become more responsive to the needs of business actors, while simultaneously encouraging compliance and enhancing national economic competitiveness.

This study aims to analyze the application of the doctrine of vicarious liability in the liability of hospitals for medical malpractice lawsuits in Indonesia. The increasing number of medical disputes raises questions regarding the extent to which hospitals can be held responsible for the negligence of medical personnel working under their authority. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, by examining the Indonesian Civil Code, Law No. 44 of 2009 on Hospitals, Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, and relevant court decisions. The findings reveal that, normatively, hospitals can be held accountable under Article 1367 of the Civil Code, which aligns with the doctrine of vicarious liability (Black, 2019). However, judicial practice in Indonesia remains inconsistent: in some cases judges place liability on hospitals, while in others they hold individual doctors fully responsible (Budiman, Absori & Rizka, 2023; Vitrianingsih, Miarsa & Yahya, 2025). This inconsistency demonstrates a gap between normative regulation and juridical implementation. The novelty of this study lies in emphasizing the importance of the principle of justice in applying vicarious liability. Legal protection should not be limited to written norms but must also be substantive by balancing patients’ rights to safe and quality healthcare with the rights of medical personnel and hospitals to legal certainty. This is in line with Rawls’ (1971) concept of justice as fairness and Radbruch’s (2006) idea of balancing justice, legal certainty, and expediency.

The transfer of State-Owned Assets (BMN) in the form of land is a legal process that must comply with administrative and land law regulations. The issue of an authentic deed by a Land Deed Official (PPAT) is an essential instrument in the transfer of land rights. This study seeks to analyze the legal ramifications of conducting the process without a PPAT deed and to assess the importance of PPAT in validating property rights transfers, including BMN. The applied research methodology is normative juridical, utilizing a statutory and case study approach. The results demonstrate that the conveyance of land rights does not comply with the legal stipulations set forth by national land laws in the absence of a deed executed by a PPAT, which may lead to disputes and financial losses for the state. This report promotes the strengthening of regulations mandating PPAT involvement in all BMN land transfers to ensure legal certainty and protect state interest.

The rapid growth of financial technology (fintech) Peer-to-Peer Lending (P2PL) in Indonesia has created both opportunities and challenges, particularly regarding debt collection practices by third parties (debt collectors). Such practices often result in violations of consumer rights, including intimidation, harassment, and breaches of privacy. To address these issues, the Financial Services Authority of Indonesia (OJK) issued Regulation No. 22 of 2023 on Consumer and Public Protection in the Financial Services Sector, which establishes legal standards for protecting fintech P2PL consumers. This study aims to analyze the regulation of debt collection by third parties under OJK Regulation No. 22/2023, assess the forms of legal protection for consumers, and identify the obligations of fintech P2PL providers in managing collection practices. The research applies a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that OJK Regulation No. 22/2023 provides consumer protection through preventive mechanisms (mandatory transparency, prohibition of intimidation, and regulation of third-party involvement) and repressive mechanisms (complaint handling and administrative sanctions). However, challenges remain in implementation, such as low consumer literacy, outsourced collection practices, and weak on-site supervision. Therefore, stronger regulation, tighter controls by providers, and collaboration among regulators, law enforcement, and fintech associations are required to ensure optimal consumer protection.

The criminalization of environmental activists utilizing social media through Law Number 11 of 2008 has become a serious threat to public participation, demonstrably triggering inconsistencies in law enforcement. This research focuses on a critical analysis of the decisional disparity in the case of environmental activist Daniel Frits. Decision Number 14/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jpa issued a criminal conviction, which was subsequently annulled entirely by Decision Number 374/Pid.Sus/2024/PT Smg, dismissing all charges against the defendant. Using a normative legal research method that integrates a statute approach and a case approach, this study performs an in-depth deconstruction and comparison of the legal reasoning (ratio decidendi) of both decisions. The results indicate that this decisional disparity stems from a fundamental clash between two conflicting judicial paradigms. The formalistic-positivistic paradigm adopted by the lower court was proven to have failed in applying the Anti-SLAPP doctrine. Conversely, the progressive-substantive paradigm embraced by the appellate court correctly affirmed the supremacy of activist immunity by applying Article 66 of Law Number 32 of 2009 as a justification defense, which nullified the criminal nature of the act. This finding indicates a fragility in the legal certainty for environmental activists, which is highly dependent on judges’ insight and courage. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate an ideal legal protection framework that does not merely rely on normative strength. This formulation also demands harmonization through the strengthening of institutional capacity and a cultural shift in law enforcement toward a greater orientation on substantive and ecological justice.

The increasing influx of imported goods in Indonesia has intensified market competition and created complex challenges in protecting the rights of local trademark holders. Weak enforcement mechanisms and limited public awareness have facilitated imitation and unfair competition, threatening economic sustainability and consumer confidence. This study examines the adequacy of Indonesia’s trademark protection and reinterprets it through the ethical and normative framework of Islamic economic law. Using a normative juridical approach with statutory, conceptual, and comparative methods, the research analyzes Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications alongside Islamic legal principles such as maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah (objectives of Islamic law), hifẓ al-māl (protection of wealth), and maṣlaḥah ‘āmmah (public interest). This analytical synthesis evaluates the harmony between positive law and Islamic ethics in regulating fair competition. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s legal framework provides sufficient formal protection but remains ineffective due to weak implementation, inadequate sanctions, and the limited capacity of small and medium enterprises. Conversely, Islamic economic principles emphasize moral accountability, fairness, and transparency as essential to market justice. Integrating these ethical values into trademark regulation would not only strengthen compliance but also foster socially responsible trade practices. This study contributes to contextualized Islamic law by proposing an integrated model that harmonizes intellectual property protection with Islamic moral economy. It advances theoretical understanding by linking fiqh mu‘āmalah with modern IP law and offers policy recommendations for promoting ethical branding, fair competition, and sustainable economic protection for Indonesian industries

Legal problems in the land inheritance process often arise when inherited land has been registered in the name of another party. This study aims to examine the procedure for registering inherited land that has been issued a Certificate of Ownership (SHM) on behalf of other parties, as well as the form of legal protection for heirs. The research uses a normative juridical approach with a literature study method based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The approaches used include legislative, conceptual, analytical, and case approaches. The analysis of legal materials is carried out through grammatical, systematic interpretation, analogous construction, and legal refinement construction. The results of the study show that the registration of inherited land must be carried out by the entitled heirs, especially for land that has not been certified. Registration is carried out sporadically as a form of registration for the first time. Legal protection for heirs is obtained preventively through the land registration process, and repressively in the event of arbitrary actions from other parties or government agencies. This research emphasizes the importance of legal certainty in the process of registering inherited land and the protection of the rights of heirs so that they are not harmed by the existence of other parties' certificates. This effort is part of the fair and transparent enforcement of agrarian law in Indonesia.

Marriage is a physical and emotional bond between a man and a woman recognized by law and religion. In practice, issues often arise regarding the status of joint property acquired during marriage, especially in the event of divorce. To anticipate such disputes, a prenuptial agreement serves as a legal instrument that provides certainty and legal protection for both husband and wife in managing and dividing joint assets, either during the marriage or after divorce. This study aims to analyze the urgency of drafting a prenuptial agreement, identify the legal aspects that need to be included in the deed, and examine its juridical implications. This research employs a normative legal method with a conceptual and statutory approach, using descriptive-analytical techniques, secondary data sources, and qualitative analysis. The findings indicate that a prenuptial agreement has significant urgency in protecting the rights of both spouses in case of divorce. Furthermore, it holds binding legal force and creates juridical implications by clarifying the separation between personal and joint property, thereby ensuring legal certainty for both parties.

Based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 46 PUU-VIII/2010, Article 43 Paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law states that a child born outside of marriage has a civil relationship with their mother and her family, as well as with the man as their father, which can be proven by science, technology, and/or other legal evidence. The child also has a blood relationship, including a civil relationship with the father's family. Inheritance for an illegitimate child through a will is allowed, but it often causes disputes as it is considered to harm the inheritance rights of legitimate children. This study aims to analyze the resolution of inheritance disputes between an illegitimate child who receives a will and a legitimate child according to civil law, as well as the legal protection of an illegitimate child in disputes with a legitimate child. The method used is normative juridical research with a literature study, using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The approaches used include the Statutory Approach, Conceptual Approach, Analytical Approach, and Case Approach. The research results show that the dispute resolution starts with a non-litigation route through deliberation, but if unsuccessful, the illegitimate child resorts to the contending method to defend their inheritance rights. The researcher recommends amendments to Article 874 of the Civil Code to grant the right to a will for an illegitimate child as long as it does not exceed the legitime portie, and to create codification related to marriage property law and wills.

This article explores the normative-institutional discrepancy between the declarative nature of Article 833 of the Indonesian Civil Code and the administrative practices of financial institutions in the execution of inheritance rights within Indonesia’s national legal system. Legally, heirs acquire their rights automatically upon the decedent’s death, without requiring court confirmation or formal recognition. In practice, however, banks often impose excessive procedural requirements, such as requesting additional documents or withholding funds without a clear legal basis. This study adopts a normative legal method, analyzing statutory provisions, doctrinal interpretations, and illustrative case studies. The findings highlight the urgent need for regulatory harmonization between inheritance law and financial administrative procedures in Indonesia. The article also emphasizes the strategic role of notaries as legal intermediaries who ensure the enforceability of inheritance rights through authentic documentation. It concludes that heirs’ legal protection must be strengthened by upholding the principles of legality and substantive justice within the financial sector.

In recent years, the economy in the border area between China and Myanmar has developed rapidly, attracting a large number of Myanmar workers to continuously pour into Yunnan Province, China. This study takes three Myanmar workers in Ruili City as cases and uses the in-depth interview method to systematically explore their living conditions, identity recognition, and adaptation strategies in China. The research results show that the Myanmar workers mainly engage in low-skilled jobs in the secondary labor market and face multiple challenges such as language barriers, insufficient legal rights protection, and limited social integration. Although they exhibit characteristics of cultural integration between China and Myanmar and have adapted to local life to a certain extent, their identity predicament and institutional restrictions still significantly affect their long-term development and cross-border mobility. This study aims to reveal the real survival picture of Myanmar workers in the border gap, provide empirical evidence for policy formulation, and promote further attention to the rights protection and social integration issues of cross-border labor groups.

This paper examines the frequently neglected public health consequences of constructing metro rail and highways on adjacent villages, considering Indian law. As India's cities grow quickly and its economy grows, infrastructure development is speeding up. This is bad for the ‎health of people living near construction sites. Air pollution, noise pollution, contaminated water, and the stress of having to move your ‎whole life are all possible risks. For instance, the Center for Science and Environment (2019) says that since PM2.5, there have been more ‎instances of asthma and bronchitis in the affected communities. Five levels at construction sites for the Delhi Metro were three to five times ‎higher than what the World Health Organization says is safe. ‎ ‎ But the current rules in India don't do enough to deal with the health problems that come with these kinds of big city projects, even though ‎they do have these effects.‎ The analysis includes a thorough look at Indian laws, pertinent case law, and environmental rules. It also compares the legal systems of ‎other countries, such as the US, the EU, Australia, and Canada. These countries use health impact assessments (HIAs), public involvement ‎methods, and strict monitoring systems to plan infrastructure. ‎ The results show that the Indian court system generally puts economic or environmental issues ahead of health concerns, rather than community health. Health impact assessments are not actually a part of the process of managing infrastructure. There have been no systemic ‎legal protections or enforceable health standards put in place for infrastructure projects, even though the courts play a big role in establishing ‎the right to health under Article 21. ‎ This study highlights the importance of health impact assessments (HIAs), public involvement, and post-approval monitoring in ensuring ‎proper accountability for health outcomes. This article highlights the imperative necessity for reform by juxtaposing India's policies and ‎regulations with those of other developed countries. It calls for health impact assessments to be a required part of environmental impact ‎assessments (EIAs), more community participation, and health audits after projects. Health departments, urban planners, and legal bodies ‎should work together, it says, to institutionalize development that is more holistic and preventative. ‎ Rather than relying on reactive legal frameworks, the report argues for proactive frameworks that address health concerns at every stage of ‎infrastructure development. Public health must be recognized as an essential ethical and legal issue if India's urban development is to be ‎inclusive, sustainable, and socially equal. Detailed legal and policy recommendations are offered in the paper to align the administration of ‎India's infrastructure with the country's constitutional guarantee of the right to health‎.