Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Events Research Articles

Study on the time-point distribution characteristics of the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux

Objective: To investigate the characteristics of the time-point distribution of the occurrence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) by 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (24 h MII-pH) and to provide guidance for the development of individualized anti-reflux strategies for LPR patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 24 h MII-pH data from 408 patients [339 males and 69 females, aged 23-84 (55.08±11.08) years] attending the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery at the Sixth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from January 2013 to March 2020. The number of gas acid/weak-acid reflux, mixed gas-liquid acid/weak-acid reflux, liquid acid/weak-acid reflux and alkaline reflux events at different time points were recorded and statistically analyzed through SPSS 26.0 software. Results: A total of 408 patients were included. Based on the 24 h MII-pH, the total positive rate of LPR was 77.45% (316/408). The type of positive gaseous weak-acid reflux was significantly higher than the remaining types of LPR (χ2=297.12,P<0.001). Except the gaseous weak-acid reflux, the occurrence of the remaining types of LPR showed a tendency to increase after meals, especially after dinner. Liquid acid reflux events occurred mainly between after dinner and the following morning, and 47.11% (57/121) of them occurred within 3 h after dinner. There was a significant positive association between Reflux Symptom Index scores and gaseous weak-acid reflux(r=0.127,P<0.01), liquid acid reflux(r=0.205,P<0.01) and liquid weak-acid reflux(r=0.103,P<0.05)events. Conclusions: With the exception of gaseous weak-acid reflux events, the occurrence of the remaining types of LPR events has a tendency to increase after meals, especially after dinner. Gaseous weak-acid reflux events accounts for the largest proportion of all types of LPR events, but the pathogenic mechanisms of gaseous weak-acid reflux are needed to further investigate.

Increased Sensitivity of Cough Reflex is Not the Mechanism of Cough Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

In laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients acid reaches laryngopharyngeal area and stimulates/sensitizes respiratory nerve terminals mediating cough. We addressed several hypothesis: if stimulation of respiratory nerves is responsible for coughing then acidic LPR should correlate with coughing and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment should reduce both LPR and coughing. If sensitization of respiratory nerves is responsible for coughing then cough sensitivity should correlate with coughing and PPI should reduce both coughing and cough sensitivity. In this prospective single center study, patients with positive reflux symptom index (RSI > 13) and/or reflux finding score (RFS > 7) and ≥1 LPR episode/24 hours were enrolled. We evaluated LPR by dual channel 24-hour pH/impedance. We determined number of LPR events with pH drop at levels 6.0, 5.5, 5.0, 4.5, and 4.0. Cough reflex sensitivity was determined as lowest capsaicin concentration causing at least 2/5 coughs (C2/C5) by single breath capsaicin inhalation challenge. For statistical analysis C2/C5 values were -log transformed. Troublesome coughing was evaluated on the scale 0-5. We enrolled 27 LPR patients. The number of LPR events with pH 6.0, 5.5, 5.0, 4.5, and 4.0 was 14[8-23],4[2-6],1[1-3],1[0-2] and 0[0-1], respectively. There was no correlation between number of LPR episodes at any pH level and coughing (Pearson range -0.34 to 0.21, P = NS). There was no correlation between cough reflex sensitivity C2/C5 and coughing (R = -0.29 to 0.34, P = NS). Of patients that completed PPI treatment, 11 had RSI normalized (18.36 ± 2.75 vs. 7 ± 1.35, P < 0.01). There was no change in cough reflex sensitivity in PPI-responders. C2 threshold was 1.41 ± 0.19 vs. 1.2 ± 0.19 (P = 0.11) before and after PPI. No correlation between cough sensitivity and coughing and no change in cough sensitivity despite improvement of coughing by PPI argue that an increased cough reflex sensitivity is not mechanism of cough in LPR. We identified no simple relationship between LPR and coughing suggesting that this relationship is more complex.

Characteristics of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients of Different Genders and Ages

To investigate the differences in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) characteristics between gender and age groups based on the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS) scale and 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (HEMII-pH) monitoring. The enrolled were patients with LPR symptoms completed the 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring and divided into two gender groups (male and female) and elderly group (>60 years), middle-aged group (41-60 years) and young group (18-40 years). The total RSI and RFS scores of individuals were counted. Various potential differences as well as incidence of each type of LPR events between gender and age groups were analyzed. A total of 420 patients were included, with 333 (79.3%) diagnosed with LPR confirmed by 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring. Females (n=49) had a statistically higher LPR positivity (91.0% vs. 76.6%, P < 0.01) than males (n=342). Female patients with LPR had significantly higher RSI scores (14.08 ± 6.72 vs. 11.08 ± 4.82, P < 0.001) than male patients. The positive rate of LPR were 82.6%, 80.7% and 63.3% in the elderly, middle-aged and young groups. The Elderly group had significantly lower RSI scores (10.20 ± 4.06 vs. 12.80 ± 6.58, 12.24 ± 5.57, P < 0.001) but higher RFS scores (9.37 ± 3.25 vs. 8.16 ± 3.34, 8.57 ± 2.58, P < 0.05) than the other two groups. The number of acid hypopharyngeal-proximal reflux episodes (HREs) and distal esophageal acid reflux were significantly higher in elderly than in young patients. Except for non-acid gas HREs, the positive rates of other types of HREs were increasing from young to middle-aged to the elderly group (P < 0.05). Female patients with suspected LPR symptoms had a higher positive rate of LPR and RSI score than males. The prevalence of LPR and the number of acid reflux were progressively increasing with age, but the perception of reflux symptoms may diminish.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Can Mutually Influence

To investigate the mutually relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). All included patients completed simultaneous 24-hour hypopharyngeal intraluminal multichannel impedance pH monitoring (24h-MII-pH), Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). The LPRD diagnosis was based on the occurrence of ≥1 acid or non-acid hypopharyngeal proximal reflux episode(HRE), GERD was defined as a length of time >4.0% of the 24-hour recording spent below pH 4.0 or a DeMeester score >14.72. Patients with both positive LPRD and GERD were classified as LPRD & GERD group, patients with positive LPRD and negative GERD were classified as ILPRD group, patients with negative LPRD and positive GERD were classified as IGERD group, and patients with both negative LPRD and GERD were classified as N group. The differences in clinical characteristics of reflux between the groups were statistically analyzed. A total of 437 patients were included, including 248 (56.75%) in the ILPRD group, 98 (22.43%) in the LPRD & GERD group, 23 (5.26%) in the IGERD group, and 68 (15.56%) in the N group. There was no significant difference between the types of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with GERD. The number of weak acid/acid/gas/liquid HREs was significantly more in LPRD & GERD patients than in ILPRD patients (P < 0.01), and the number of distal acid reflux events and Longest distal acid clearance time were significantly higher in LPRD & GERD patients than in IGERD patients (P > 0.01). GERD and LPRD are not the same disease but can mutually influence. Combined GERD increased all types of laryngopharyngeal reflux events in patients with LPRD, whereas combined LPRD only increased acidic distal reflux events and acid clearance time in patients with GERD.

“Gas” laryngopharyngeal reflux cause unexplained chronic cough

Hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance (HMII) that can measure laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) events has supported the causal relationship between chronic cough (CC) and LPR containing liquid. However the role of “gas” LPR associated with CC has been poorly understood. We present two cases of patients with CC who had negative LPR containing liquid but had multiple episodes of “gas” LPR on HMII. The majority of “gas” LPR events had a minor pH drop at hypopharynx. Since any etiology of CC was excluded and medical therapy failed, both patients underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). Both of the patients had complete resolution of cough postoperatively. The present cases demonstrated successful outcome of LARS to treat the patients with CC who had documented “gas” LPR on HMII, thus suggesting the causal relationship between CC and “gas” LPR. The number of “gas” LPR events may need to be considered as an important diagnostic parameter.

The role of nonacid reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases.

To analyze the role of nonacid reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases (LPRD). From January 2014 to April 2019, 344 patients associated with LPRD underwent 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring, and their reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) were recorded. The numbers of acid, weakly acidic and alkaline reflux events in the laryngopharynx were counted, and the consistency analysis of the results with the results of the RSI and RFS was conducted. Among the 344 patients, nonacid reflux events accounted for 74.1% (1367/1845) of the all reflux events. There were 111 patients with ≥ 3 acid reflux events, 218 patients with ≥ 3 any kinds of reflux events, and 257 patients with positive results of RSI or RFS. Taking the results of the RSI andor RFS as a reference, the sensitivity, specificity and consistency test Kappa value for the diagnosis of LPRD according to the existence of ≥ 3 acid reflux events were 41.2%, 94.2% and 0.228, respectively.With the existence of three or more all kinds of reflux events as the standard, the sensitivity, specificity and consistency test Kappa value were 76.7%, 74.7% and 0.449, respectively. The nonacid reflux events account for the highest proportion of laryngopharyngeal reflux events, and the consistency of the results of RSI and orRFS with all reflux events is higher than that with only acid reflux events, that indicates nonacid reflux may play an important role in LPRD.

Study on laryngopharyngeal and esophageal reflux characteristics using 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy volunteers.

We aimed to analyze the results of 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-monitoring (MII-pH) of the laryngopharynx and esophagus in asymptomatic volunteers. Moreover, we also aimed to gain insight into and establish a baseline for laryngopharyngeal reflux in the healthy population by quantitatively and qualitatively comparing the reflux and pH distribution in both the laryngopharynx and the esophagus. Healthy volunteers were recruited and observed; they underwent 24-h ambulatory combined MII-pH monitoring. The proximal sensor (pH1) was positioned approximately 1cm above the upper esophageal sphincter with the aid of a solid-state high-resolution esophageal manometer. Laryngopharyngeal reflux events were detected and characterized by the incidence and property of reflux both in the laryngopharynx and the esophagus. Thirty-eight asymptomatic volunteers who completed all the examinations were included in this study. The median pH detected by the proximal sensor was 6.6 (6.2, 7.0), with an average of 6.58 ± 0.74. A total of 814 laryngopharyngeal reflux events were detected, including 722 (89%) in the upright position and 92 (11%) in the supine position with incidence (0%) in the liquid state, 44 (5%) in the mixture, and 769 (95%) in the gaseous state. Furthermore, 5 incidences (1%) of acid reflux and 809 incidences of non-acid reflux (99%) were noted. A total of 5779 esophageal reflux events were detected, including 5020 (87%) in the upright position, 759 (13%) in the supine position, with 2051 (36%) in the liquid state, 2050 (35%) in the mixed condition, and 1678 (29%) in the gaseous state; adding up to 805 incidences (14%) of acid reflux and 4974 incidences (86%) of non-acid reflux. Non-acid reflux in the upright position is characteristic of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Acid reflux is almost undetectable in healthy subjects. Hence, the diagnostic indicators of gastroesophageal reflux disease are not suitable for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Feasibility analysis of pepsin strip test in diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of pepsin strip test in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Methods: From August 2017 to September 2018,80 patients in Department of Otorhniolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital-Six Medical Centre, underwent pepsin strip test and 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance(MII)-pH monitoring. The results of the two methods were analyzed for consistency,and 24-hour MII-pH monitoring was used as a statistical reference for the sensitivity and specificity of pepsin strip test in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Data were analyzed by SPSS 19.0 software. Results: There were 57 patients with positive pepsin test strip and 23 patients with negative pepsin test strip. The score of reflux symptoms and signs, and the positive rate of laryngopharyngeal reflux events in patients with positive pepsin strip test were significantly higher than those in patients with negative pepsin test strip. If there was one or more throat reflux events (including acid reflux,weak acid reflux and alkali reflux) as the positive results of 24-hour MII-pH monitoring,the consistency between the results of pepsin strip and 24-hour MII-pH was moderate (Kappa=0.614). The sensitivity and specificity of pepsin strip were 86.9% (53/61) and 78.9% (15/19) respectively. Conclusions: Pepsin strip detection has the advantages of non-invasive,cheap and easy to operate.As an objective method for early diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux, pepsin strip detectionis feasible,but can not be the final diagnosis for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance leads to the promising outcome of antireflux surgery in Japanese population with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms.

Clinical characteristics of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in Japanese population remain unclear, and its treatment outcome is suboptimal. The objectives of this study were to evaluate Japanese patients with LPR symptoms using hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance (HMII) and to assess the outcome of antireflux surgery (ARS). Subjects included patients who had LPR symptoms for > 12 weeks or laryngoscopic findings suggestive of LPR and underwent laryngoscopy and esophageal testing including HMII. Abnormal proximal exposure (APE) was defined as LPR ≥ 1/day and/or full column reflux (FCR) (reflux 2cm distal to the upper esophageal sphincter) ≥ 5/day on HMII. Patients with APE were offered ARS and the outcome of ARS was objectively assessed using Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). From July 2015 to September 2016, 52 patients with LPR symptoms (28 men, 24 women, median BMI 22.3) underwent HMII, and 38 patients (73%) had APE. Of them, 29 (76%) patients were not obese (BMI < 25) and 19 (50%) patients had a negative DeMeester score. Approximately one-third of LPR and FCR events were non-acid in the distal esophagus. A positive symptom-association probability was seen only in 18 patients (35%). Mild esophagitis and hiatal hernia were found in 5 (10%) and 23 (48%) patients, respectively. All 12 patients (100%) who had undergone ARS were able to discontinue PPI and had a significant improvement in the RSI scores postoperatively (22.9 ± 10.0 vs. 6.8 ± 6.8, p <.001). APE was frequently observed in Japanese patients with LPR symptoms. Obesity and esophagitis were uncommon in this population. Since a large number of patients with APE had negative DeMeester score and proximal reflux events were often non-acid, a conventional pH monitoring is insufficient. HMII is crucial to evaluate patients with LPR symptoms as the documentation of APE is a key for successful outcome of ARS.

Comparison of Characteristics According to Reflux Type in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Objectives To analyze laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) as an acidic, nonacidic, or mixed type according to 24-hour multi-channel intraluminal impedance (MII) pH monitoring and the clinical characteristics of each type.Methods Ninety patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent 24-hour MII pH monitoring as a diagnostic tool. Eighty-three patients were diagnosed with LPR. The patients were classified into three groups according to the pH of the hypopharyngeal probe: the acid reflux group, nonacid reflux group, and mixed reflux group. Subjective symptoms and objective findings were evaluated based on patients’ responses to the Short Form 12 Survey (SF-12), LPR health-related quality of life (LPR-HRQOL), reflux symptom index, and reflux finding score.Results The results of each group were compared. As a result, 34 patients were classified into the nonacid reflux group and 49 into the mixed reflux group. There were no patients classified as having acid reflux alone. There was no significant difference between the two groups when comparing the reflux symptom index, reflux finding score, LPR-HRQOL, or the mental component score of the SF-12. However, the physical component score of the SF-12 was higher in the nonacid reflux group (P=0.018). The DeMeester composite score (P=0.015) and total number of LPR events (P=0.001) were lower in the nonacid reflux group than in the mixed reflux group.Conclusion In conclusion, no LPR patient had only acid reflux. The nonacid reflux LPR patients showed similar clinical characteristics and findings compared to the mixed reflux group, but exhibited significantly fewer LPR episodes.

Do laryngoscopic findings reflect the characteristics of reflux in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux?

To analyse the association between 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24-h MII-pH) parameters and each item of the reflux finding score (RFS) to determine whether the laryngoscopic findings of the RFS could reflect the characteristics of reflux in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Prospective cohort study. Tertiary care referral medical centre. Patients complaining of LPR symptoms were evaluated via a 24-hour MII-pH. Among them, 99 patients whose LPR was confirmed via 24-hour MII-pH were enrolled in this study. Correlations between RFS ratings and 24-hour MII-pH parameters were evaluated and compared between patients with or without each laryngoscopic finding used in the RFS. Subglottic oedema had a statistically significant positive correlation with number of non-acid LPR and non-acid full column reflux events. Ventricular obliteration and posterior commissure hypertrophy showed a significant correlation with non-acid exposure time and total reflux exposure time. We also found a significant correlation between granuloma/granulation score and number of acid LPR events. The numbers of non-acid LPR and full column reflux events in patients with subglottic oedema were significantly higher than those without subglottic oedema. Among the laryngoscopic findings used in the RFS, subglottic oedema is specific for non-acid reflux episodes, and granuloma/granulation is specific for acid reflux episodes.

Preliminary application of Dx-pH monitoring system in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

Objective: To summarize the application and significance of Dx-pH monitoring system in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Methods: Fifty-four patients who had symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in our department from February to December in 2015 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All patients were evaluated with reflux symptoms index(RSI), flexible laryngoscope and reflux finding score(RFS), and larygopharygeal Dx-pH monitoring. Results: Among all 54 patients, there were 26 patients whose Ryan score were positive(48.2%). The positive Ryan score mainly emerged when the patients were upright(24/26, 92.3%). Among 22 patients whose symptoms could not alleviate well by 8 weeks proton pump inhibitors treatment, there were 13 patients(59.1%) with positive Ryan scores. The Ryan scores were not in good accordance with RSI and RFS(κ=-0.013). Conclusions: Although the results were not in good accordance with RSI/RFS, Dx-pH monitoring system could prove laryngopharyngeal reflux events in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and help physicians to diagnose.

Airway pH monitoring in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea using the Dx‐pH oropharyngeal probe: preliminary report of a prospective cohort study

To investigate the laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) episodes and pH values in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) using the Dx-pH oropharyngeal probe. Prospective cohort study. Tertiary medical centre. Forty patients with complaint of snoring or suspected OSA were prospectively enrolled to receive full nocturnal polysomnography (PSG). The patients were divided into 2 groups: a simple snorers group if the Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) was < 5 and an OSA group if the RDI was ≥ 5. The patients simultaneously received Dx-pH oropharyngeal probe monitoring for 12h from about 6pm to 6 am of the next day. The number of LPR events was recorded if the nadir of rapid pH drops was below pH 5.0 and 5.5. The difference of LPR events between the two groups and the difference of LPR events between awake and sleep periods in each group were analysed, respectively. There were 18 (45%) patients diagnosed as OSA with a mean RDI of 28.7, and 22 patients (55%) diagnosed as simple snorers. Between 2 groups, there were no significant differences in the LPR events and pH values during the awake period, sleep period or overall recording period. Comparison of the LPR events and minimum pH values between the awake period and the sleep period revealed there were no significant differences in either group. Using the new sensitive Dx-pH oropharyngeal probe with PSG, we found that OSA does not correlate with a higher incidence of LPR episodes.

Hypopharyngeal pepsin and Sep70 as diagnostic markers of laryngopharyngeal reflux: preliminary study.

The management of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) has been challenging. Hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance (HMII) has shown to increase the sensitivity in diagnosing LPR. The objective of this study is to investigate the potential use of pepsin and Sep70 as diagnostic tools for detection of LPR in combination with HMII. Tissue samples of hypopharynx, distal esophagus, and gastric cardia were collected from patients with LPR symptoms regardless of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) diagnosis and underwent HMII to detect LPR and high esophageal reflux (HER: reflux 2 cm distal to upper esophageal sphincter) events. Patients were classified into two groups based on the presence of abnormal proximal exposure (APE), which was defined as LPR ≥1/day and/or HER ≥5/day: (1) positive-APE and (2) negative-APE. Patients with typical GERD symptoms without LPR symptoms who did not undergo HMII were used as a "control" GERD group. Protein was isolated from tissue samples and Western blot analysis of pepsin and Sep70 was performed. Pepsinogen was used as a control to differentiate pepsin from pepsinogen. Relative quantitation was performed using Image Studio Lite Software with normalization against the internal actin of each blot. From October 2012 to September 2013, 55 patients underwent HMII. Of 55, 20 patients underwent biopsies from hypopharynx (17 positive-APE and 3 negative-APE). Ten patients with typical GERD symptoms were identified from tissue bank as a "control" GERD group. Pepsin was detected in distal esophagus and hypopharynx in all groups without significant difference among groups. However, Sep70 in distal esophagus and hypopharynx was significantly depleted in the positive-APE group compared to the other groups (p = 0.032 and 0.002, respectively). Depletion of Sep70 with the presence of pepsin in the hypopharynx may indicate cellular injury in laryngopharynx due to constant proximal reflux. However, the normative data for these markers have to be validated.

Role of laryngopharyngeal reflux on the pathogenesis of vocal cord leukoplakia and early glottic cancer

To explore the significance of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients with vocal cord leukoplakia and early glottic cancer. Patients with vocal cord leukoplakia and early glottic cancer encountered in Nanfang Hospital between December 2012 to January 2014 were included in this study. Ambulatory 24 hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) was applied to obtain LPR and GER events, as well as the reflux properties of substances. Tobacco and alcohol history was also evaluated. Sixteen healthy volunteers were recruited as normal controls. There were 26.3% (5/19) LPR patients in glottic cancer group, 35.3% (6/17) LPR patients in vocal cord leukoplakia group and 12.5% (2/16) LPR volunteers in normal controls. There was no statistically significant difference in the positive rate of LPR between early glottic cancer patients and normal controls as well as between vocal cord leukoplakia patients and normal controls (P > 0.05). There was statistically significance in numbers of acid reflux events, time of acid exposure, and time of acid clearance between vocal cord leukoplakia patients and normal controls as well as between glottic cancer patients and normal controls (P < 0.05). GER was found in 26.3% (5/19) patients in glottic cancer group and 23.5% (4/17) patients in vocal cord leukoplakia group and 6.3% (1/16) volunteer in normal controls. There was no statistically significant difference in the positive rate of GER between early glottic cancer patients and normal controls as well as between vocal cord leukoplakia patients and normal controls (P > 0.05). However, there was statistically significance in DeMeester scores between glottic cancer patients and normal controls (P < 0.05), while no statistically significance between vocal cord leukoplakia patients and normal controls (P > 0.05). Reflux events were dominated by acid and weakly acidic reflux in upright position. Weakly alkaline reflux events in upright position, acid reflux events in supine position, and weakly alkaline reflux events in supine position in vocal cord leukoplakia patients were significantly more than those in normal controls (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference existed in positions and contents between early glottic cancer patients and normal controls (P > 0.05). There was also no statistically significant correlation between happening LPR and GER, smoking and drinking in patients with vocal cord leukoplakia and early glottic cancer (P > 0.05). Reflux events are more in vocal cord leukoplakia patients and early glottic cancer patients, however, the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux and canceration of the vocal cord is still needed to be investigated. The significance of mucosal injury induced by nonacid refluxes is needed to be further studies.

Esophageal dynamic and laryngopharyngeal reflux play a role in pathogenesis of vocal cord polyps

Through monitoring esophageal dynamic change, and detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR) and gastroesophageal reflux events,to discuss the relationship of vocal cord polyps with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Thirty-two patients with vocal cord polyps were diagnosed by electronic laryngoscopy in Nanfang Hospital between October 2011 to May 2012. This study applied high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and ambulatory 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) to obtain the upper esophageal sphincter(UES) and lower esophageal sphincter pressure, characteristics of sectional esophageal motility; laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)and gastroesophageal reflux events, as well as the reflux properties of substances. Sixteen healthy volunteers were recruited as normal controls. UES relaxation duration, duration of UES relaxation time, UES relaxation recovery time and mean length of LES were all shorter than those of the control group (t were 2.244, 2.624, 2.310 and -2.397, P < 0.05). There were 40.6% (13/32) LPR and 50.0% (16/32) gastroesophageal reflux found in vocal polyp patients. Median number (M [P25; P75]) of laryngopharyngeal acid reflux events were 0.5[0.0;3.5] and 0.0[0.0;0.0] in vocal polyp group and the controls, median mean time of laryngopharyngeal acid exposure 0.1[0.0;1.7] and 0.0[0.0;0.0] min, median clearance time of laryngopharyngeal acid were 3.5[0.0;53.5] and 0.0[0.0;0.0] s, median scores of DeMeester were 14.8[1.6;31.3] and 1.8[1.1;4.1] and median frequency of total liquid reflux episodes were 46.5[25.3;69.0] and 32.5[20.0;36.3], respectively. The median numbers of laryngopharyngeal acid reflux events, time of acid exposure, time of acid clearance, DeMeester scores and frequency of total liquid reflux episodes were increased or higher in vocal polyp group than those in the controls (z were 2.481, 2.767, 2.767, 2.344 and 1.980, P < 0.05). There are upper esophageal sphincter and Lower esophageal sphincter dismotility in vocal polyp patients with LPR. LPR events were dominated by acid reflux in upright position.Esophageal dynamic disfunction and LPR should be considered in the study of the pathogenesis of vocal cords polyps.

Role for Ion Transport in Porcine Vocal Fold Epithelial Defense to Acid Challenge

The vocal fold epithelium is routinely exposed to gastric contents, including acid and pepsin, during laryngopharyngeal reflux events. The epithelium may possess intrinsic defenses to reflux. The first objective of the current study was to examine whether vocal fold epithelial ion transport is one potential mechanism of defense to gastric contents. The second objective was to determine whether ion transport in response to gastric contents is associated with the secretion of bicarbonate. Prospective design in excised porcine larynges. Laboratory. Porcine vocal folds (N = 56) were exposed on the luminal surface to acid, pepsin, or sham challenges. Ion transport at baseline and following challenge exposure was measured using electrophysiological techniques. To examine specific ion transport mechanisms, vocal folds were pretreated with either a sodium channel blocker or bicarbonate channel blocker. Within 60 seconds of acid but not pepsin exposure, there was a significant increase in ion transport. This rapid increase in ion transport was transient and related to bicarbonate secretion. The current data suggest that porcine vocal folds immediately increase bicarbonate secretion following exposure to acid. Bicarbonate secretion may act to neutralize acid. These findings contribute to the identification of the mechanisms underlying vocal fold defense to reflux and offer implications for the development of treatments for reflux-induced vocal fold injury.

Chronic Pharyngitis is Associated with Severe Acidic Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients with Reinke's Edema

We evaluated the association between pathological acidic laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) events and chronic pharyngitis in patients with Reinke's edema. We performed a prospective controlled study in 20 consecutive patients with Reinke's edema without pathological acidic LPR events (group A) and 40 consecutive patients with Reinke's edema with both clinical symptoms and 24-hour pH-metry suggesting acidic LPR (group B). The severity of acidic LPR was assessed by use of the Reflux Finding Score (RFS), the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), and dual antimony probe 24-hour pH-metry. The patients were evaluated for the presence of chronic pharyngitis by clinical examination and biopsy specimens taken from the posterior pharyngeal wall. The Chi2 test was used to compare the groups for the presence of pharyngitis. In group B, the RSI, the RFS, and the total duration and number of acidic LPR events on 24-hour pH-metry were compared between patients with and without concomitant pharyngitis by use of the Mann-Whitney test. Five patients of group A and 20 patients of group B had chronic pharyngitis. Therefore, more patients with Reinke's edema and clinical signs of LPR tended to have chronic pharyngitis than did those with Reinke's edema and no clinical signs of LPR, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.064; odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 9.8). Among group B patients, those with pharyngitis had significantly more acidic LPR events (p < 0.001) and a greater exposure time to gastric fluid (p = 0.008) than did those without pharyngitis. Their RFS and RSI did not differ significantly (p = 0.692 and p = 0.914, respectively). Only in the subgroup of patients with Reinke's edema and LPR was there a statistically significant correlation between the pH probe results and the incidence of clinical pharyngitis. Awareness should increase among physicians about addressing chronic pharyngitis in therapy for acidic LPR and/or Reinke's edema.

Antireflux Surgery Preserves Lung Function in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and End-stage Lung Disease Before and After Lung Transplantation

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in patients with end-stage lung disease (ESLD). GERD may cause obliterative bronchiolitis after lung transplantation (LTx), represented by a decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)). To identify the patterns of reflux in patients with ESLD and to determine whether antireflux surgery (ARS) positively impacts lung function. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Tertiary care university hospital. Forty-three patients with ESLD and documented GERD (pre-LTx, 19; post-LTx, 24). Antireflux surgery. Reflux patterns including laryngopharyngeal reflux as measured by esophageal impedance, and FEV(1), and episodes of pneumonia and acute rejection before and after ARS. Before ARS, 19 of 43 patients (44%) were minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic. Laryngopharyngeal reflux events, which occurred primarily in the upright position, were common in post-LTx (56%) and pre-LTx (31%) patients. At 1 year after ARS, FEV(1) significantly improved in 91% of the post-LTx patients (P < .01) and 85% of the pre-LTx patients (P = .02). Of patients with pre-ARS declining FEV(1), 92% of post-LTx and 88% of pre-LTx patients had a reversal of this trend. Episodes of pneumonia and acute rejection were significantly reduced in post-LTx patients (P = .03) or stablilized in pre-LTx patients (P = .09). There should be a low threshold for performing objective esophageal testing including esophageal impedance because GERD may be occult and ARS may improve or prolong allograft and native lung function.

Patterns of laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux

Double-probe, 24-hour pH monitoring remains the 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease, even though there is no consensus on how to interpret the data collected. Tetra-probe, 24-hour pH monitoring was performed in 56 patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux, in order to investigate patterns of laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux. The number of reflux episodes and the total and percentage time periods spent with pH < 4.0 were correlated with the distance of the probe from the lower oesophageal sphincter. The number of reflux episodes and the total and percentage time periods with pH < 4.0 were greater when patients were upright (i.e. during the daytime). There were few laryngopharyngeal reflux events recorded for pH levels of <4.0; however, there were a significant number of laryngopharyngeal reflux events recorded for pH levels of <5.0, a level capable of causing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. When a pH level of <5.0 was used, the number, total time and percentage time of laryngopharyngeal reflux episodes was greater during the supine period (i.e. during sleeping) in a quarter of the cases, compared with results when a pH of <4.0 was used. It is valid to use a pH level of 5.0 as indicative of laryngopharyngeal reflux in the hypopharynx.