Larger Critical Shoulder Angle Research Articles

Scapular morphology does not predict supraspinatus tendon tear propagation following an individualised exercise therapy programme.

To determine whether scapular morphology could predict isolated supraspinatus tendon tear propagation after exercise therapy. We hypothesised that a larger critical shoulder angle (CSA) and type III acromial morphology predict a positive change in tear size. Fifty-nine individuals aged 40-70 years with isolated symptomatic high-grade partial or full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears were included. Individuals participated in a structured, individualised 12-week exercise therapy programme and underwent ultrasound to measure tear size at baseline and 12 months following therapy. Computed tomography images were segmented to create three-dimensional subject-specific bone models and reviewed by three trained clinicians to measure CSA and to determine acromion morphology based on the Bigliani classification. A binary logistic regression was performed to determine the predictive value of CSA and acromion morphology on tear propagation. The CSA was 30.0 ± 5.4°. Thirty-one individuals (52.5%) had type II acromial morphology, followed by type III and type I morphologies (25.4% and 22.0%, respectively); 81.4% experienced no change in tear size, four (6.8%) individuals experienced tear propagation and seven (11.9%) individuals had a negative change in tear size. No significant difference in tear propagation rates based on CSA or acromion morphology (not significant [NS]) was observed. The model predicted tear size status in 81.4% of cases but only predicted tear propagation 8.3% of the time. Overall, CSA and acromion morphology only predicted 24.3% (R 2 = 0.243) of variance in tear propagation (NS). CSA and acromion morphology were NS predictors of tear propagation of the supraspinatus tendon 12 months following an individualised exercise therapy programme. II.

Secondary Rotator Cuff Insufficiency After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

» Secondary rotator cuff insufficiency is a challenging complication after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.» Acute tears may be amenable to open or arthroscopic repair in some instances.» Chronic attritional tears are best managed with revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, especially in the elderly.» Increased glenoid inclination, larger critical shoulder angle, oversized humeral components, thicker glenoid components, and rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration have all shown to contribute to tear risk.

Effect of critical shoulder angle on deltoid muscle strength reduction in patients with rotator cuff tears

To investigate the synergistic interaction between the deltoid muscle and the rotator cuff muscle group in patients with rotator cuff tears (RCT), as well as the impact of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) on deltoid muscle strength. A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 42 RCT patients who met the selection criteria and were treated between March 2022 and March 2023. There were 13 males and 29 females, with an age range of 42-77 years (mean, 60.5 years). Preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.0±1.6. CSA measurements were obtained from standard anteroposterior X-ray films before operation, and patients were divided into two groups based on CSA measurements: CSA>35° group (group A) and CSA≤35° group (group B). Handheld dynamometry was used to measure the muscle strength of various muscle group in the shoulder (including the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, and anterior, middle, and posterior bundles of the deltoid). The muscle strength of the unaffected side was compared to the affected side, and muscle imbalance indices were calculated. Muscle imbalance indices between male and female patients, dominant and non-dominant sides, and groups A and B were compared. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between muscle imbalance indices and CSA as well as VAS scores. Muscle strength in all muscle groups on the affected side was significantly lower than on the unaffected side ( P<0.05). The muscle imbalance indices for the supraspinatus, subscapularis, infraspinatus, and anterior, middle, and posterior bundles of the deltoid were 14.8%±24.4%, 5.9%±9.7%, 7.2% (0, 9.1%), 17.2% (5.9%, 26.9%), 8.3%±21.3%, and 10.2% (2.8%, 15.4%), respectively. The muscle imbalance indices of the anterior bundle of the deltoid, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus were significantly lower in male patients compared to female patients ( P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in muscle imbalance indices among other muscle groups between male and female patients or between the dominant and non-dominant sides ( P>0.05). There was a positive correlation between the muscle imbalance indices of infraspinatus and VAS score ( P<0.05), and a positive correlation between CSA and the muscle imbalance indices of middle bundle of deltoid ( P<0.05). There was no correlation between the muscle imbalance indices of other muscle groups and VAS score or CSA ( P>0.05). Preoperative CSA ranged from 17.6° to 39.4°, with a mean of 31.1°. There were 9 cases in group A and 33 cases in group B. The muscle imbalance indices of the anterior bundle of the deltoid was significantly lower in group A compared to group B ( P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in muscle imbalance indices among other muscle groups between group A and group B ( P>0.05). Patients with RCT have a phenomenon of deltoid muscle strength reduction, which is more pronounced in the population with a larger CSA.

Computer Image-Guided Precise Acromioplasty for Reducing the Critical Shoulder Angle

The shoulders with critical shoulder angle (CSA) of greater than 33-35° are associated with rotator cuff tears, whereas a CSA of less than 30° is likely to be osteoarthritic. However, anterior acromioplasty or lateral acromioplasty could not reduce high CSAs to the desired range (30-33°), with satisfactory accuracy and efficacy. Thus, we introduce a computer image-guided precise acromioplasty (CIG-PAP) technique, an individualized treatment based on three-dimensional planning. We believe that the introduction of this technique will provide an alternative approach to reduce a large CSA to the desired range (30-33°).

The association between critical shoulder angle and revision following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a matched case-control study.

The concept of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) was introduced in 2013, with studies showing that larger CSA is associated with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and smaller CSA with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We hypothesized outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) would differ depending on CSA. We conducted a matched case-control study using Kaiser Permanente's Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry to identify patients who underwent primary elective anatomic TSA for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis from 2009-2018. Seventy-eight adult patients who underwent revision following the primary TSA due to glenoid component failure or rotator cuff tear comprised the case group. A control group of nonrevised patients were identified from the same source population. Two controls were matched to each case by age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgeon who performed the index TSA, and post-TSA follow-up time. The relationship between revision and CSA as measured on radiographs were analyzed as a 1:2 matched-pairs case-control study with use of multiple conditional multivariable logistic regression. Revised cases had a higher likelihood of a CSA ≥35° (odds ratio [OR] = 2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-4.59). A higher likelihood of CSA ≥35° was observed for those revised for glenoid loosening (OR = 4.58, 95% CI = 1.20-17.50) and revised for rotator cuff tear (OR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.18-4.92) compared with nonrevised controls. Every 5° increase in CSA had higher odds of overall revision (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.18-2.21), glenoid loosening (OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.27-4.92), and rotator cuff tear (OR=1.51, 95% CI = 1.07-2.14). In a matched case-control study of primary anatomic TSA, individuals who were revised for aseptic glenoid loosening and superior cuff failure had a higher CSA compared with nonrevised individuals. These data suggest that surgeons may consider using reverse arthroplasty in cases of primary shoulder arthritis with a CSA of 35° or greater.

Does critical shoulder angle predict abduction motion and acromion-tuberosity impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

BackgroundVirtual planning software for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has introduced the ability to optimize implant position in an effort to maximize bony impingement–free motion. Abduction impingement typically occurs between the glenoid and polyethylene or between the tuberosities and the acromion or coracoid. Acromion-tuberosity impingement has been considered less desirable, as it may create additional stress on the acromion. Patients with a large acromion overhang may have higher rates of acromion-tuberosity impingement. As the critical shoulder angle (CSA) represents a larger distance from the glenoid face to the acromion, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of implant selection and position on abduction motion and acromion-tuberosity impingement, with a focus on the association to CSA. We hypothesize that a larger CSA will be associated with less abduction motion and an increase in acromion-tuberosity impingement. MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort case series of 85 consecutive patients who underwent RSA from June 2020 to January 2021. Humeral and glenoid components were implanted virtually (SurgiCase) using a standard protocol for a single implant system (DJO AltiVate Short Stem Reverse) with an inset humeral component. Implant variables analyzed included baseplate location (central vs. inferior glenoid), glenosphere lateralization (10 mm vs. 6 mm), and humeral shell (standard vs. semiconstrained). The maximal degree of abduction and location of impingement were recorded at external rotation of 0°, 45°, and 90°. Implant combinations that resulted in no impingement and no motion were recorded. ResultsIncrease in CSA was associated with acromion-tuberosity impingement for nearly every combination at 0° and 45° external rotation; however, there were no significant associations between CSA and maximum abduction motion. Acromion-tuberosity impingement was associated with central glenosphere placement in all degrees of external rotation (P < .001), use of a 10 mm lateralized glenosphere for 0° (P < .001) and 45° (P = .076), and using a standard polyethylene shell for 0° (P = .032) and 45° external rotation (P = .007). Maximal abduction motion was associated with inferior placement (P < .001), and use of a 10 mm lateralized glenosphere (P < .001) in all positions of external rotation but was not influenced by the polyethylene type. ConclusionIncreased CSA is associated with acromion-tuberosity impingement and can be used to screen for patients at risk for bony impingement in abduction. Placement of the glenosphere centrally and use of a 10 mm lateralized glenosphere were associated with higher rates of acromion-tuberosity impingement. Maximal abduction can be achieved using a 10 mm lateralized glenosphere and inferior placement.

Critical shoulder angle and failure of conservative treatment in patients with atraumatic full thickness rotator cuff tears

BackgroundAtraumatic full thickness rotator cuff tears (AFTRCT) are common lesions whose incidence increases with age. Physical therapy is an effective conservative treatment in these patients with a reported success rate near 85% within 12 weeks of treatment. The critical shoulder angle (CSA) is a radiographic metric that relates the glenoid inclination with the lateral extension of the acromion in the coronal plane. A larger CSA has been associated with higher incidence of AFTRCT and a higher re-tear rate after surgical treatment. However, no study has yet described an association between a larger CSA and failure of conservatory treatment in ARCT. The main objective of this study is to determine whether there is an association between CSA and failure of physical therapy in patients with AFTRCT.MethodsWe reviewed the imaging and clinical records of 48 patients (53 shoulders), 60% female, with a mean age of 63.2 years (95% CI ± 10.4 years); treated for AFTRCT who also underwent a true anteroposterior radiograph of the shoulder within a year of diagnosis of the tear. We recorded demographic (age, sex, type of work), clinical (comorbidities), and imaging data (CSA, size and location of the tear). We divided the patients into two groups according to success or failure of conservative treatment (indication for surgery), so 21 shoulders (39.6%) required surgery and were classified as failure of conservative treatment.Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to detect predictors of failure of conservative treatment.ResultsThe median CSA was 35.5º with no differences between those with failure (median 35.5º, range 29º to 48.2º) and success of conservative treatment (median 35.45º, range 30.2º to 40.3º), p = 0.978.The multivariate analysis showed a younger age in patients with failure of conservative treatment (56.14 ± 9.2 vs 67.8 ± 8.4, p < 0.001) and that male gender was also associated with failure of conservative treatment (57% of men required surgery vs 28% of women, p = 0.035).ConclusionsIt is still unclear if CSA does predict failure of conservative treatment. A lower age and male gender both could predicted failure of conservative treatment in AFTRCT. Further research is needed to better address this subject.

Anteroposterior and Lateral Coverage of the Acromion: Prediction of the Rotator Cuff Tear and Tear Size.

The aim of this study was to assess whether the anteroposterior coverage of the acromion reflecting acromial morphology affects the rotator cuff tear (RCT) and tear size, in addition to the lateral coverage. Medical records of 356 patients with RCTs, concentric osteoarthritis, and calcific tendinitis identified using three-dimensional computed tomography between January 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group A (those with RCTs) and group B (those with concentric osteoarthritis or calcific tendinitis). Subsequently, group A was subdivided into three categories according to the size of RCTs: small-to-medium, large, and massive. The lateral coverage was measured through the lateral acromial angle (LAA) and critical shoulder angle (CSA), whereas the anteroposterior coverage was measured via the acromial tilt (AT), acromiohumeral interval (AHI) in the sagittal view, and anteroposterior coverage index (APCI) as a new radiologic parameter. Between groups A and B, CSA (34.5° ± 3.4° and 30.8° ± 3.4°, respectively), APCI (0.83 ± 0.10 and 0.75 ± 0.08, respectively), and AHI (6.3 ± 2.0 mm and 7.8 ± 1.8 mm, respectively) were significantly different (all p < 0.001), whereas LAA and AT did not show a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.089 and p = 0.665, respectively). The independent predictive radiologic parameters of the RCT were the CSA, APCI, and AHI (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.043, respectively); among these, the APCI showed the highest regression coefficient (odds ratio = 2.82). The parameters associated with the size of RCTs were CSA (p = 0.022) and AHI, of which AHI, in particular, had the most significant effect on both small-to-medium and large tears (all p < 0.001). Large CSA, high APCI, and low AHI were predictors of RCTs, with the APCI showing the strongest correlation. In addition to the large CSA, low AHI also correlated with the size of RCTs and affected the entire size groups. We suggest that both the lateral coverage and anteroposterior coverage of the acromion should be considered essential factors for predicting the presence of RCTs and tear size.

Influence of Radiographic Parameters on Reduction of the Critical Shoulder Angle With Arthroscopic Lateral Acromioplasty—A Mathematical Model

ObjectivesTo develop a mathematical model for the preoperative planning of arthroscopic lateral acromioplasty (ALA) and to evaluate the role of radiographic parameters with regards to the critical shoulder angle (CSA).MethodsAnteroposterior (AP) radiographs of patients who underwent rotator cuff surgery were screened to identify true AP radiographs. Radiographs were assessed for (1) native CSA, (2) CSA after simulated resection of a spur if present, (3) amount of ALA necessary to achieve a CSA of 34°, (4) CSA after 5-mm ALA, (5) lateral acromion angle, (6) acromion index, and (7) sclerosis of the greater tuberosity.ResultsA total of 1191 radiographs were screened. Of the 124 patients included, the native CSA was large (≥35°) in 56 patients (45%). In 30 patients (24%), a subacromial spur was detected and resection reduced the CSA by a median of 2°. Spur resection alone reduced the CSA to ≤34° in 19 patients (15.3%). Mean amount of ALA to achieve a CSA of 34° was 3.9 ± 1.8 mm, and this value strongly correlated with the CSA before ALA (R = 0.88, P < .001). The linear regression model to determine the amount of ALA to achieve a CSA of 34° was as follows: The multiple R2 for this model was 0.777. Mean reduction of CSA by 5-mm ALA was 3.8 ± 0.8° and 75% of large CSAs were reduced to a CSA of 30-34°. The acromion index had no significant independent influence on the model (P = .427), whereas lateral acromion angle was an independently significant predictor of required ALA to achieve a CSA of 34° (P = .019). Sclerosis of the greater tuberosity was significantly associated with a CSA of 35° or greater (P = .003).ConclusionsThe amount of ALA needed to reduce a large CSA to 34° correlates with the CSA before ALA and can preoperatively be planned with the use of a simple equation.Level of EvidenceLevel III; cross-sectional design; epidemiology study.

Effect of arthroscopic acromioplasty on reducing critical shoulder angle: a protocol for a prospective randomized clinical trial

BackgroundThe critical shoulder angle (CSA), which helps to predict patients who are at risk of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) with large degree and who are susceptible to osteoarthritis with low angle, has been identified as one of the most vital acromial parameters; anterolateral and lateral acromioplasties have been proven to be valid ways to reduce CSA. However, no study has compared the effect of different acromioplasties on the reduction of the large CSA (≥33°) clinically. Additionally, either anterolateral or lateral acromioplasty could not precisely correct large CSAs to a favorable range (30–33°) in each patient. Thus, we will propose a novel precise acromioplasty technique for the purpose of reducing CSA accurately and effectively, and compare the effectiveness of different acromioplasties on the reduction of the CSA.MethodsA total of 60 RCT patients who have indications for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and with pre-operative CSA ≥33° will be recruited in outpatient center of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to Group A (anterolateral acromioplasty), Group B (lateral acromioplasty) or Group C (precise acromioplasty) via a random, computer-generated number system. Three surgical plans will be made for each participant respectively by one professional surgeon according to the results of randomization allocation. The post-operative CSA will be measured 2 days post-operation. Follow-up will be maintained at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery including the visual analog scale score, the University of California at Los Angeles score, the Constant Shoulder Score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Shoulder Assessment Form. Finally, all outcomes will be assessed by two researchers who are blinded to the recruitment and allocation.DiscussionThis is the first clinical trial to evaluate the impact of different acromioplasties on the reduction of the CSA. Additionally, this study will provide a new precise acromioplasty technique, which is a novel precision and individualized treatment to prevent degenerative RCTs by reducing the CSA.Trial registrationChiCTR2000032343. Registered on April 26th, 2020.

Scapular Morphologic Characteristics and Rotator Cuff Tear Pattern Are Independently Associated With Chronic Pseudoparalyis: A Matched-Pair Analysis of Patients With Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Background: It is unclear which structural parameters determine the development or the absence of chronic pseudoparalysis (PP) in patients with massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs). Purpose: To determine whether scapular morphologic characteristics and extent of rotator cuff tearing are independent factors associated with chronic PP. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 50 patients with chronic mRCT (≥2 fully detached tendons) and active scapular plane abduction less than 90° (PP group) were age- and sex-matched with a cohort of 50 patients with chronic mRCT and an active scapular plane abduction greater than 90° (non-PP; NPP group). Analysis of standardized, plain radiographs included measurement of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) and the acromiohumeral distance (ACHD) on anteroposterior views and measurement of posterior acromial tilt, anterior and posterior acromial coverage, and posterior acromial height on standardized outlet views. Measurements on magnetic resonance imaging included fatty muscle infiltration, anterior (subscapularis) and posterior (infraspinatus/teres minor) tear extension, and global tear extension (anterior + posterior tear extension) in the parasagittal plane. Results: Overall, no significant difference was found in patients’ demographic characteristics (P > .05). Univariate analyses confirmed significant differences between the PP and NPP groups in active scapular plane abduction (51°± 22° vs 135°± 29°; P < .001). Multivariate analyses revealed independent factors associated with PP compared with the NPP group: CSA (38.2°± 4.6° vs 35.2°± 3.7°; P = .001); ACHD (4.7 ± 2.2 vs 7.3 ± 2.6 mm; P < .001); posterior acromial height (22 ± 10 vs 17 ± 7 mm; P = .005); and anterior (–9°± 21° vs 25°± 12°; P < .001) and posterior (–18°± 14° vs 2°± 14°; P < .001) tear extension. The NPP group had significantly less involvement and fatty infiltration of the subscapularis (1.4 ± 0.6) compared with the PP group (2.2 ± 0.9) (P < .001). Conclusion: This study confirms that global RCT extension and the quality of the inferior half of the subscapularis are significantly associated with chronic pseudoparalysis. The study further shows that acromial morphologic characteristics are relevant in the development of pseudoparalysis. Patients with pseudoparalysis have a larger CSA, less ACHD, and a higher positioned acromion in the sagittal plane.

Position of the acromioclavicular joint and relation to the critical shoulder angle in shoulders with rotator cuff tears

ObjectiveTo evaluate the position of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) and relation to the critical shoulder angle (CSA) in shoulders with rotator cuff tears (RCT). MethodsIn a matched pair study including 75 shoulders with arthroscopically validated RCT and 75 controls (mean age 59.4 ± 7.9 years) the position of the ACJ in relation to the glenoid and the CSA were measured on true ap radiographs. ResultsThe CSA is larger (p = 0.0018) and the position of the ACJ is more lateral (p = 0.0016) in shoulders with RCT in comparison to matched controls. ConclusionThe more lateral position of the ACJ in shoulders with a large CSA might be an additional component in the multifactorial pathogenesis of RCT.

Definition and clinical progress of critical shoulder angle

Rotator cuff disease and degenerative osteoarthritis are caused by many factors. Several studies had shown that rotator cuff disease was related to lateral extension of the acromion and glenoid inclination. A new parameter, critical shoulder angle (CSA), which is defined as the angle between a line connecting the superior to the inferior margins of the glenoid and a line connecting the inferior margin of the glenoid to the inferolateral edge of the acromion measured on anteroposterior (AP) shoulder radiographs, is proposed to comprehensively reflect the relationship between abnormal anatomical structure and rotator cuff injury. There is a close relationship between CSA and the injury of rotator cuff and the osteoarthritis of glenohumeral joint: the injury of rotator cuff is often accompanied by a larger CSA (> 35 °), and a smaller CSA (< 30 °) is closely related to the occurrence of glenohumeral arthritis. Therefore, CSA is helpful for the diagnosis of rotator cuff injury and glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Correction of abnormal CSA by arthroscopic lateral acromial osteotomy also provides a new idea for the treatment of shoulder diseases. In this paper, we reviewed the research progress of the angle from five aspects: definition, measurement, biomechanical significance, treatment and ethnic differences.

Association between the Critical Shoulder Angle and Non-traumatic Rotator Cuff Tears

Background: Moor et al. developed a critical shoulder angle (CSA) as a radiological parameter for the development of rotator cuff injury and degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between CSA and the development of non-traumatic rotator cuff tears (RCTs) to further validate this study. Materials and Methods: The study was performed as an observational study dividing subjects into control and study groups, differing in the presence of non-traumatic RCT. The study group comprised 50 subjects with 40 subjects in the control group. All acceptable radiographs were evaluated, to measure the CSA in accordance with Moor et al. Results: The mean CSA of control subjects was 31.79° (± 1.89°), while that of study subjects were 37.85° (± 2.25°). The relative variability in the control group was about 6% and that in the study group was also 6%, indicating internal homogeneity of the study groups. Chi-square test applied to the distribution gave a P = 0.00001, representing an excellent association between the study groups and the CSA. Conclusion: There is a significant association between larger CSA and RCTs (P = 0.00001). Individual (quantitative) anatomical parameters may imply altered biomechanics, which are likely to induce RCTs, independent of trauma and degenerative glenohumeral joint disease.

Critical shoulder angle et angle tubérositaire en fonction du type de rupture partielle

BackgroundCurrent studies suggest that radiographic markers such as the critical shoulder angle (CSA) and the greater tuberosity angle (GTA), are associated with rotator cuff tears (RCTs). However, because the analysis of CSAs and GTAs according to the partial thickness rotator cuff tear patterns is limited, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship of CSAs and GTAs with partial thickness rotator cuff tear (PTRCT) patterns. MethodThis retrospective study included 1069 patients from 2013 to 2017. The subjects were divided into 4 groups: Group A, control group; Group B, articular-sided PTRCTs; Group C, bursal-sided PTRCTs; and Group D, full thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCTs). RCTs were diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging and the CSA and GTA were measured on simple radiographs. Multivariable analyses were used to clarify the potential risks for these pathologies. ResultsThe mean CSAs of articular-sided PTRCTs (34.2°±4.7°) and FTRCTs (34.7°±4.4°) were significantly larger than those of the control group (32.3°±4.3°) and the bursal-sided PTRCTs (31.5°±4.6°), (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis also showed that larger CSAs had a significantly increased risk of both articular-sided PTRCTs and FTRCTs, with odds ratios of 1.12 and 1.17 per degree, respectively. The mean GTAs of bursal-sided PTRCTs (73.2°±4.8°) and FTRCTs (72.3°±5.4°) were significantly larger than that of the control group (70.5°±5.1°) (P<0.001), although the mean GTA of articular-sided PTRCTs (71.5°±6.9°) did not show a significant difference when compared with the other groups. Multivariable analysis also showed that larger GTAs had a significantly increased risk of both bursal-sided PTRCTs and FTRCTs, with odds ratios of 1.13 and 1.07 per degree, respectively. ConclusionA large critical shoulder angle was associated more with articular-sided PTRCTs than bursal-sided PTRCTs. A large greater tuberosity angle was associated more with bursal-sided PTRCTs than with articular-sided PTRCTs. Both critical shoulder angle and greater tuberosity angle were positively associated with the occurrence of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Level of evidenceIV, Retrospective study.

Is Bony Morphology and Morphometry Associated With Degenerative Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

To scope the scientific literature and analyze the influence of bony risk factors for degenerative full-thickness primary rotator cuff tear. A systematic review of databases PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed up to June 30, 2018. Meta-analysis was performed with mean difference (MD) or risk ratio for degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff injury, and when there were ≥3 studies for the considered potential risk factor. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We analyzed 34 studies comprising 5,916 shoulders (3,369 shoulders with rotator cuff tear and 2,546 controls) and identified 19 potential risk factors for degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears. There was moderate evidence that a higher critical shoulder angle (MD= 4.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.43 to 5.39), higher acromion index (MD= 0.06, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.09), and lower lateral acromion angles (MD=-7.11, 95% CI-8.32 to-5.90) were associated with degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears compared with controls. Moderate evidence showed that a type III acromion significantly increases the risk for full-thickness degenerative rotator cuff tear (risk ratio= 2.26, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.70). There is moderate evidence that larger critical shoulder angle, higher acromion index, lower lateral acromion angles, and a type III acromion are significantly associated with degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Other potential risk factors identified showed insufficient evidence. Level IV, systematic review of level II to IV studies.

Critical shoulder angle and greater tuberosity angle according to the partial thickness rotator cuff tear patterns

BackgroundCurrent studies suggest that radiographic markers such as the critical shoulder angle (CSA) and the greater tuberosity angle (GTA) are associated with rotator cuff tears (RCTs). However, because the analysis of CSAs and GTAs according to the partial thickness rotator cuff tear patterns is limited, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship of CSAs and GTAs with partial thickness rotator cuff tear (PTRCT) patterns. MethodThis retrospective study included 1,069 patients from 2013 to 2017. The subjects were divided into 4 groups: Group A, control group; Group B, articular-sided PTRCTs; Group C, bursal-sided PTRCTs; and Group D, full thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCTs). RCTs were diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging and the CSA and GTA were measured on simple radiographs. Multivariable analyses were used to clarify the potential risks for these pathologies. ResultsThe mean CSAs of articular-sided PTRCTs (34.2°±4.7°) and FTRCTs (34.7°±4.4°) were significantly larger than those of the control group (32.3°±4.3°) and the bursal-sided PTRCTs (31.5°±4.6°), (P<0.001). Multivariable analysis also showed that larger CSAs had a significantly increased risk of both articular-sided PTRCTs and FTRCTs, with odds ratios of 1.12 and 1.17 per degree, respectively. The mean GTAs of bursal-sided PTRCTs (73.2°±4.8°) and FTRCTs (72.3°±5.4°) were significantly larger than that of the control group (70.5°±5.1°) (P<0.001), although the mean GTA of articular-sided PTRCTs (71.5°±6.9°) did not show a significant difference when compared with the other groups. Multivariable analysis also showed that larger GTAs had a significantly increased risk of both bursal-sided PTRCTs and FTRCTs, with odds ratios of 1.13 and 1.07 per degree, respectively. ConclusionA large critical shoulder angle was associated more with articular-sided PTRCTs than bursal-sided PTRCTs. A large greater tuberosity angle was associated more with bursal-sided PTRCTs than with articular-sided PTRCTs. Both critical shoulder angle and greater tuberosity angle were positively associated with the occurrence of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Level of evidence: IV, Retrospective study.

Correlation of acromial morphology in association with rotator cuff tear: a retrospective study.

PurposeThere have been many studies that have attempted to correlate radiographic acromial characteristics with rotator cuff tears, but the results have not been conclusive. Rotator cuff tears (RCT) are the common aetiology of shoulder pain. We assessed the association of rotator cuff tears with commonly used radiographic parameters of acromial morphology and their different radiographic characteristics.Material and methodsFrom a retrospective study of 98 patients, we characterised acromial type and measured acromial thickness (AT), critical shoulder angle (CSA), lateral acromial angle (LAA), acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and acromion index (AI) on a 1.5T MRI, from 68 patients with partial or full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears and 30 controls without tears.ResultsOut the 68 patients with rotator cuff tear, supraspinatus was the most commonly affected tendon, with 86% (59) cases showing abnormalities. The average age of the patients was 45.11 ± 21.45 years with male dominance (80%). Partial tears of rotator cuff were more common than complete tears. Forty-eight cases showed partial tears in supraspinatus as compared to 11 cases of complete tears. The acromial type did not show any correlation with any particular cuff lesion. The AT and AI of controls were significantly smaller than cuff-tear patients. The LAA of cuff-tear patients was significantly different from that of control patients. The impingement patients demonstrated a significantly greater acromial thickness, larger CSA, decreased AHD, and decreased LAA than their control counterparts.ConclusionsA higher prevalence of rotator cuff tears and impingement associated with low lateral acromial angle, larger CSA and decreased AHD was observed. AT and AI have a direct correlation with rotator cuff tear.

Influence of the site of acromioplasty on reduction of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) \u2013 an anatomical study

BackgroundA large critical shoulder angle (CSA) >35° is associated with the development of rotator cuff tearing. Lateral acromioplasty (AP) has the theoretical potential to prevent rotator cuff tearing and/ or to reduce the risk of re-tears after repair. It is, however unclear which part of the lateral acromion has to be reduced to obtain the desired CSA. It was the purpose of this study to determine which part of the lateral acromion has to be resected to achieve a desired reduction of the CSA in a given individual.MethodsFirst, the influence of the exact radiographic projection on the CSA was examined. Second, the influence of anterolateral versus strict lateral AP on the CSA was studied in eight scapulae with different anatomic characteristics. Differences in CSA reduction were investigated using paired t-test or Wilcoxon test.ResultsScapular rotation in the sagittal and axial plane had a marked influence on the radiologically measured CSA ranging from -6 to +16°. Overall, lateral AP of 5/10mm reduced the CSA significantly greater than anterolateral AP of 5mm/10mm [5mm: 2.3° (range: 0.7°-3.6°) SD±0.8° vs. 1.2° (range: 0°-3.3°) SD±1.1°, p=0.0002]/[10mm: 4.8° (range: 2.1°-7°) SD±1.3° vs. 2.7° (range: 0°-5.3°) SD±1.7°, p=0.0001]. Depending on scapular anatomy anterolateral AP did not alter CSA at all.ConclusionsFor comparison of pre- and postoperative CSA, the exact orientation of the X-ray and the spatial orientation of the scapula must be as identical as possible. Anterolateral AP may not sufficiently correct CSA in scapulae with great acromial slopes and smaller relative external rotation of the acromion as the critical acromial point (CAP) may be located too posteriorly and thus is not addressed by anterolateral acromioplasty. Consistent reduction of the CSA could be achieved by lateral AP in all eight scapulae.

Large Critical Shoulder Angle Has Higher Risk of Tendon Retear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Background: The critical shoulder angle (CSA) is the angle created between the superior and inferior bone margins of the glenoid and the most lateral border of the acromion. A few studies recently investigated the relation between CSA and functional outcomes after rotator cuff repair. However, there is a lack of research investigating the effect of CSA on postoperative tendon integrity after rotator cuff repair. Purpose: To assess the effects of the CSA on postoperative tendon integrity after rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients who underwent rotator cuff repair for full-thickness supraspinatus tears by 1 senior surgeon between January 2010 and January 2014 were included in this study. All patients had standardized anteroposterior shoulder radiographs the day before surgery. CSA and acromial index (AI) were measured. AI was derived by measuring the distance from the glenoid plane to the lateral border of the acromion and dividing it by the distance from the glenoid plane to the lateral aspect of the humeral head. Functional scores—including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder evaluation form, modified University of California at Los Angeles score, Constant-Murley score, and visual analog scale for pain—were used to evaluate shoulder function at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Meanwhile, magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed to evaluate rotator cuff integrity according to the Sugaya method and the signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of the rotator cuff tendon. Results: A total of 90 patients were included in this study: 42 patients with a single-row repair and 48 with a double-row repair. There was a significant positive correlation between CSA or AI and tendon SNQ. On the basis of CSA, the patients were divided into 2 groups: large CSA (>38°) and control (CSA ≤38°). At final follow-up, the large CSA group and the control CSA group demonstrated no significant differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California at Los Angeles, Constant, and visual analog scale scores. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed that the large CSA group had 9 cases of retear, with a significantly higher retear rate than the control group (15% vs 0%, P = .03). Furthermore, the tendon SNQ of the large CSA group was significantly greater than that of the control group. Conclusion: CSA did not appear to influence postoperative functional outcomes, while those in the large CSA group had poor tendon integrity after rotator cuff repair. These findings indicate that a large CSA is associated with an increased risk of rotator cuff tendon retear after repair.