Laparoscopic Simulator Research Articles

Building and sustaining a laparoscopic simulation curriculum in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

PurposeAlthough laparoscopy has transformed surgical care in high-income countries, access remains limited in Africa. This calls for tailored laparoscopic education in such contexts to enable the training necessary to expand laparoscopic surgery. We aimed to describe the implementation, evaluation, and sustainability of a laparoscopic simulation lab in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.MethodsWe founded a laparoscopic simulation lab at Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) and implemented a simulation curriculum. We conducted a prospective curricular evaluation focusing on both process and outcome metrics.ResultsWe established laparoscopic simulation training at MUHAS. This entailed securing a dedicated space, equipping the laboratory, and training a lab manager to be a simulation educator. Fifty-one participants completed 1,909 h of laparoscopic training at the simulation lab and received 3,940 individual pieces of online feedback. Analysis of task completion times and performance showed improvement in all tasks in pre-test task videos compared to final task videos. Nine of 20 graduates responding to a questionnaire (45%) actively performed laparoscopic surgery within their institutions. Among these respondents, all felt that participating in LAPP was very helpful or essential to their practice.ConclusionsWe implemented a laparoscopic curriculum at a new simulation lab in Tanzania. Residents, fellows, and faculty from across Tanzania dedicated substantial time and effort over more than 18 months to complete the curriculum, improve their laparoscopic skills, and change their operative practices. This report may serve as a blueprint for those looking to implement, evaluate, and sustain curricula in similar settings.

Application of spaghetti knotting technology in single-hole laparoscopic suturing instructional program on the basis of multi-directional stitching technology: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundSpaghetti knotting technology is an emerging technique that can reduce the visual field restriction of the operator in laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) surgery. Multi-directional stitching technology has been proved to improve the accuracy of suturing in clinical application of LESS surgery. Therefore, we conducted a study to evaluate the teaching efficacy and the operation workload of spaghetti knotting technology and conventional knotting technology in LESS suture teaching based on the multi-directional stitching technology.MethodsWe selected forty junior residents to learn the skill of knot tying with single-hole laparoscopic simulators. The forty students were randomly and equally divided into control group and experimental group. The control group was trained by the conventional knotting method, and the experimental group was trained by the spaghetti knotting technology. The grades were calculated before and after the training program, including operation score of suturing time, trhead length, needle insertion accuracy, knotting stability, tissue integrity, tissue tightness and the cognitive workload score of mental, physical and temporal demands, performance, effort and frustration.ResultsThere was no significant difference between two groups before training. After training, knotting skills and workload were significantly improved. There were significant differences between the two groups in knotting time (p = 0.001), thread length (p = 0.01), and tissue integrity(p = 0.003). The experiment group took less time, left longer thread and had higher tissue integrity. The workload of the experiment group was also accurately reduced. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in needle insertion accuracy(p = 0.560), knotting stability(p = 0.059), and tissue tightness(p = 0.731).ConclusionIn LESS suture teaching based on the multi-directional stitching technology, the training of spaghetti knotting techniques significantly improved students’ learning efficacy and reduced their workload compared to training conventional knotting techniques. It suggested the combination of spaghetti knotting and multi-directional stitching technology could be a practicable method for laparoscopic skills teaching and a feasible clinical application value on spaghetti knotting technology in LESS surgery.

Validation study of synthetic models for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF): A simulation-based training in pediatric surgery

BackgroundPediatric surgery is a highly specialised field, with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) posing greater technical challenges than conventional open surgery. Proficiency requires both in and out-of-operating-room training, with simulation playing a crucial role. The purpose of this study was to explore MIS perceptions, training experiences, and preferences regarding laparoscopic simulation training. Furthermore, we aimed to validate two synthetic EA/TEF models. MethodA questionnaire focused on the degree of adoption of MIS among paediatric surgeons was proposed online to participants at the 68th Czech and Slovak Pediatric Surgery Congress in Slovakia in 2024. All participants also had scheduled sessions to practice advanced laparoscopic skills on two synthetic EA/TEF models. The purpose of this study was to analyse experiences with paediatric MIS, the implementation of simulation training, and personal stances on integrating simulation training into training curricula. EA/TEF models were validated with a 5-point Likert scale. ResultsThirty-three paediatric surgeons from 14 centres in two countries completed the questionnaire. Six (18 %) were novices, 12 (36 %) intermediate trainees, and 15 (45 %) specialists with over 11 years of practice. Eight participants (18 %) declared weekly access to simulation training, while 49 % had none. Additionally, 15 individuals (45.5 %) strongly agree and 48.5 % agree that regular training on simulators enhances surgical skills in MIS procedures in the operating room. Twenty-six respondents (76 %) believe that simulator training should be part of the requirements for pediatric surgical trainees, with no significant difference according to the surgeons' experience (p = 0.290). Thirty surgeons validated the EA/TEF models. Highest ratings were for overall impression and tool usefulness in experienced surgeons' training (mean scores: 4.5 and 4.6). The working space received the lowest score (mean: 3.6 ± 0.8), with experienced surgeons rating it significantly lower (3.4) than the inexperienced group (4.1, p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed between models in Likert scale parameters. ConclusionSimulation training is essential for teaching MIS in paediatric surgery, improving skills, and should be part of specialisation preparation. Synthetic EA/TEF models received high ratings as effective training tools for thoracoscopic EA/TEF training. Further studies are needed to prove construct validity.

EDI&S SO07 Future of Low-Cost Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Simulation (LaChSi) Model: Integration of Segmentation-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Realism Enhancement in Simulation-Based Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Training in Lower-Middle-Income Countries

Abstract Background To introduce an approach of employing segmentation-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) models to meticulously isolate the silicon-based Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Simulation Model (LaChSi) model within the laparoscopic trainer box, thereby enhancing realism. To assess the effectiveness of the AI Model to track camera angles to seamlessly replace the background with a virtual environment reminiscent of authentic intra-operative intra-abdominal visuals. Method The proposed methodology integrates a sophisticated segmentation model that identifies and accurately delineates the LaChSi Model within the laparoscopic Trainer box. Simultaneously, the model exhibits the capability to segregate the background, while closely monitoring camera angles for real-time adjustment. Importantly, the model is trained to perform precise segmentation of surgical tools, ensuring a comprehensive and realistic representation of the laparoscopic environment. Results Implementation of the proposed method is thought to demonstrate a notable improvement in trainees’ adaptation to surgical scenarios. The visual transition experienced by trainees moving from simulation-based surgeries to actual surgical environments will significantly reduce disparities increasing the effectiveness of the Laparoscopic simulation training. This will further avoid the need to use sensors and wires on the LaChSi model to simulate the surgical settings. Conclusion As the visual representation in simulations often deviates substantially from the intricate nuances of actual surgical procedures. This study introduces an innovative AI-based model that will contribute to the augmentation of surgical realism within simulation-based training. By effectively integrating segmentation techniques, our approach will minimise visual discontinuities, providing trainees with a more authentic and immersive experience, and ultimately fostering a smoother transition to acute surgical settings.

Influence of Distraction Factors on Performance in Laparoscopic Surgery in Immersive Virtual Reality: Study Protocol of a Cross-Over Trial in Medical Students and Residents-DisLapVR.

Working in an operating room (OR) is physically and mentally challenging: the operation itself demands the surgeon's full attention, while time and cost efficiency constraints, daily planning, and emergency care interfere with the procedure. Thus, multitasking becomes an integral surgical competence. This study aims to examine the effect of disruptions during surgery in a highly immersive virtual reality (IVR) operation environment combined with a virtual reality (VR) laparoscopy simulator. This study aims to identify distractions in the OR and their importance in the clinical setting. An IVR environment was created using a high-resolution, stereoscopic 360° video of the OR. Different distractions were identified, classified as auditory, visual, or audio-visual, and recorded accordingly. The surrounding was combined with a VR laparoscopic simulator. Participants-medical students and surgical residents-received proficiency-based training in basic laparoscopic skills and were blinded to the aim of the experiment. Following a cross-over design, each participant received a unique order of virtual distraction factors while performing tasks on the laparoscopic simulator. During the experiment, subjective passing of time, stress, heart rate, and visually induced motion sickness are recorded. After the experiment, validated questionnaires for usability, immersion, and stress were completed, as well as subjective evaluation of the distractions. The questionnaires used included the system usability scale, Self-Assessment Manikin score, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index, and the immersion rating scale as described by Nichols. Performance in the laparoscopic tasks in relation to distractions will be evaluated by the Wilcoxon test and ANOVA for continuous variables. Subgroup analyses in regard to age, gender, and expertise (medical students vs surgical residents) are planned. The described trial started in August 2022 and is ongoing. By July 2024, a total of 30 medical students and 9 surgeons have completed the study. We present a study protocol aiming to identify the impact of different disruptions in OR during laparoscopic training in IVR. Hence, it may lead to an improved awareness of distractions and facilitate accommodations toward an improved work environment. Prior research leads to the hypothesis that the performance of a more experienced surgeon is less impacted by distractions than the performance of inexperienced surgeons and medical students. Furthermore, we investigate which type of distraction has the largest impact on performance. With this knowledge, specific multitasking training can be devised, which may be particularly useful in medical education, for which VR might play a leading role. Additionally, workplace surroundings in the OR can be optimized with this knowledge. German Registry for Clinical Trials DRKS00030033; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00030033. DERR1-10.2196/59014.

Optimizing modern surgical simulation through instructor feedback - insights from a retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital.

Laparoscopic surgery is associated with a prolonged learning curve for emerging surgeons, and simulation-based training (SBT) has become increasingly prominent in this context due to stringent working time regulations and heightened concerns regarding patient safety. While SBT offers a safe and ethical learning environment, the accuracy of simulators in the context of evaluating surgical skills remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the precision of a laparoscopic simulator with regard to evaluating surgical performance and to identify the instructor's role in SBT. This retrospective study focused on surgical residents in their 1st through 5th years at the Department of Surgery of Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The residents participated in a specially designed SBT program using the LapSim laparoscopic simulator. Following the training session, each resident was required to perform a laparoscopic procedure and received individualized feedback from an instructor. Both simulator and instructor evaluated trainees' performance on the LapSim, focusing on identifying correlations between the simulator's metrics and traditional assessments. Senior residents (n = 15), who employed more complex laparoscopic procedures, exhibited more significant improvements after receiving instructor feedback than did junior residents (n = 17). Notably, a stronger correlation between the simulator and instructor assessments was observed in the junior group (junior Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) adjusted R2 = 0.285, p = 0.016), while no such correlations were observed among the senior group. A well-designed, step-by-step SBT can be a valuable tool in laparoscopic surgical training. LapSim simulator has demonstrated its potential in assessing surgical performances during the early stages of surgical training. However, instructors must provide intuitive feedback to ensure appropriate learning in later stages.

Life-threatening event in laparoscopic hepatic surgery: Training curriculum on sudden hepatic artery haemorrhage

BackgroundExposure of the hepatic artery is a fundamental step in many surgeries, during which iatrogenic hepatic artery injury may occur. Although the incidence of hepatic artery haemorrhage is low, its occurrence can lead to life-threatening haemorrhage. It is difficult and dangerous to accumulate clinical experience in laparoscopic hepatic artery repair in actual patients, and simulation training models for laparoscopic hepatic artery repair are currently lacking. In this study, a 3D printed model was designed to simulate the training curriculum for sudden hepatic artery haemorrhage, but whether training with the 3D printed model could yield superior skill improvement for surgeons remained to be determined.MethodsA new 3D printed model was designed for this study. Surgeons from the General Surgery Department of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital participated in this simulation training. The surgical performance of each model was compared, and the authenticity of the model was evaluated and mechanically tested.ResultsExperienced surgeons performed better on the 3D printed model. After repeated training, inexperienced surgeons showed significant improvement of their laparoscopic hepatic artery repair skills. The authenticity of the model was generally satisfactory, but shortcomings persisted in the mechanical testing of artery wall tearing, necessitating further improvement.ConclusionsFew studies have investigated laparoscopic simulation training for sudden hepatic artery haemorrhage. This simulation model distinguishes surgeons with different levels of experience and allows those with less experience to improve their laparoscopic hepatic artery repair skills through training on the model.

Comparison of distance versus in-person laparoscopy training using a low-cost laparoscopy simulator—a randomized controlled multi-center trial

IntroductionSimulation training programs are essential for novice surgeons to acquire basic experience to master laparoscopic skills. However, current state-of-the-art laparoscopy simulators are still expensive, limiting the accessibility to practical training lessons. Furthermore, training is time intensive and requires extensive spatial capacity, limiting its availability to surgeons. New laparoscopic simulators offer a cost-effective alternative, which can be used to train in a digital environment, allowing flexible, digital and personalized laparoscopic training. This study investigates if training on low-cost simulators in a digital environment is comparable to in-person training formats.Materials and methodsFrom June 2023 to December 2023, 40 laparoscopic novices participated in this multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. All participants were randomized to either the ‟distance” (intervention) or the “in-person” (control) group. They were trained in a standardized laparoscopic training curriculum to reach a predefined level of proficiency. After completing the curriculum, participants performed four different laparoscopic tasks on the ForceSense system. Primary endpoints were overall task errors, the overall time for completion of the tasks, and force parameters.ResultsIn total, 40 laparoscopic novices completed digital or in-person training. Digital training showed no significant differences in developing basic laparoscopic skills compared to in-person training. There were no significant differences in median overall errors between both training groups for all exercises combined (intervention 3 vs. control 4; p value = 0.74). In contrast, the overall task completion time was significantly lower for the group trained digitally (intervention 827.92 s vs. control 993.42; p value = 0.015). The applied forces during the final assessment showed no significant differences between both groups for all exercises. Overall, over 90% of the participants rated the training as good or very good.ConclusionOur study shows that students that underwent digital laparoscopic training completed tasks with a similar number of errors but in a shorter time than students that underwent in-person training. Nevertheless, the best strategies to implement such digital training options need to be evaluated further to support surgeons’ personal preferences and expectations.

Surgeon stress, anxiety, and workload: a descriptive study of participant reported responses to fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery exercises

BackgroundStress while operating is an important contributor to surgeon health and burnout. Measuring stress is key to improving surgeon and patient outcomes, however biological responses to stress during surgery are variable and difficult to interpret. Participant reported measures of stress have been suggested as an alternative, but the most appropriate measure has not been defined. This study’s primary aim was to assess measures of anxiety, stress, and workload before and after surgical simulation and characterize the relationship between these measures.MethodsSurgeons completed three laparoscopic exercises from the fundamentals of laparoscopy program (peg transfer, pattern cutting, intracorporeal suturing) in a neutral environment and “stressed” environment (ergonomic, noise, or time pressure). State trait anxiety and self-reported stress on a visual analogue scale were collected prior to simulation and again immediately afterwards. The NASA task load index (TLX) was also administered post-simulation.ResultsOf the 26 participants from gynecological and general surgery specialties, state anxiety increased in 98/148 simulations (62%) with a significant mean increase during simulation (32.9 ± 7.9 vs 39.4 ± 10.2, p < .001). Self-reported stress increased in 107/148 simulations (72%), with a significant increase in mean scores during simulation (38.7 ± 22.5 vs 48.9 ± 23.7, p < .001). NASA-TLX scores immediately after simulation ranged from 40 to 118 (mean 60.5 ± 28.7). Greater anxiety and stress scores were reported in “stressed” simulations (43.6 ± 23.1 vs 54.2 ± 23.3; 68.7 ± 27.0 vs 52.4 ± 28.2 respectively) with a significant interaction effect of the “stressed” environment and type of exercise. Anxiety and stress were moderately positively correlated prior to simulation (r = .40) and strongly positively correlated post-simulation (r = .70), however only stress was strongly correlated to workload (r = .79).ConclusionStress and anxiety varied by type of laparoscopic exercise and simulation environment. Correlations between anxiety and stress are stronger post-simulation than prior to simulation. Stress, but not anxiety, is highly correlated with workload.Graphical

The Effect of External Distractions on Simulated Laparoscopic Performance.

Background: Surgeons are exposed to unavoidable distractions while operating. Distractions can cause stress, and stress can impair cognition and motor skills to the detriment of surgeon performance. This study assessed the impact of distractions on surgeon stress levels and surgeon performance during simulated laparoscopic tasks. Methods: Twelve surgical trainees completed a peg-thread transfer task three times on a laparoscopic simulator in a neutral environment. Six trainees then completed the task three more times in an environment overlain with distractions commonly found in the operating theatre. Six others completed three more tasks in a neutral environment. Stress was measured by recording heart rate and by assessing responses to the NASA Task Load Index. Performance was measured using instrument tracking metrics and time to complete the task. Results: The distracted participants reported significantly higher effort, frustration, and physical demand than the neutral group, as measured by the NASA Task Load Index, (P = .001, .031, and .044, respectively). The neutral group completed their final task significantly faster compared with baseline (P = .049), while the distracted group failed to show this improvement. The distracted group showed higher hand discordance, suggesting reduced ambidexterity. Conclusion: Distraction negatively impacted some aspects of performance and resulted in subjective increased stress. In future, simulation may have a role in "stress inoculation," enabling surgeons to maintain performance, despite distractions.

FP5.2 - Skills-fade pilot study, inclusion of Return to Training Trainees in the ST3 General Surgical Bootcamp

Abstract Aims The concept of skills fade after time out of training is well recognised but there is a paucity of objective assessment of this in returning trainees. We sought to assess the utility of inclusion of returning trainees in a bootcamp by measuring performance and confidence. Methods In this pragmatic pilot study 8 General Surgery trainees returning from time out were offered a place on the ST3 Bootcamp of whom 3 agreed to participate. These trainees had been out of programme for a medical education fellowship, non-clinical research and parental leave respectively. Trainees received a 3 day period of intensive reskilling, covering open and laparoscopic skills, proctology, endoscopy, ward round managing the OP list and stressful environment. Their confidence and competence were assessed pre and post Bootcamp completion. Results Returning trainee confidence improved across the board. Trainees fed back that they found the open and laparoscopic simulation sessions most useful. All trainees objectively improved in laparoscopic skills although not in open skills or endoscopy and proctoscopy. The pressure of being assessed may have affected these finding or this may reflect a need for consistency of faculty and a more robust method of objectively assessing competence. Conclusion Inclusion of RTT trainees in surgical bootcamp improves confidence and enhances their return. Simulation should be included in a return to training programme. If objective assessment is used to evaluate their progress then this should be with predefined criteria or computer software to ensure that the evaluation is unbiased.

Simulation Education in Pediatric Surgery

Simulation education in pediatric surgery using laparoscopic simulators and virtual reality glasses Kyalio VR surgical training increases the efficiency of surgeon training, reduces the time of adaptation to real operations and improves the quality of medical care for children.

Replicating Visuo-Motor Remapping in the Laparoscopic Environment

Laparoscopy, a minimally invasive surgical technique, requires precise visuo-motor coordination. Because the surgical field is viewed through a camera which may need to be placed to one side of the would-be direct line of sight, rotational distortion is a concern. This study investigates adaptation to rotational distortions by replicating previous computerized two-dimensional perceptual-motor experiments, and measurement methods, using a non-virtual low-fidelity laparoscopic training simulator. This replication was chosen for the opportunity to observe the best-established adaptation mechanisms (gradual and axis-inversion) and carryover effects. To our knowledge, this is the first time that circular statistics are used to analyze directional error data collected in the laparoscopic environment. Results strongly indicated that gradual adaptation occurs with distortions below 90°, and there is leading evidence that axis-inversion occurs in distortions above 90°. This confirms previous observations of task performance decrement in the laparoscopic environment and provides clarification for new research directions.

Long Round-Trip Time Delay Effects on Performance of a Simulated Appendectomy Task.

INTRODUCTION: No current astronauts have surgical training, and medical capabilities for future missions do not account for it. We sought to determine the effect of communication delays and text-based communication on emergency medicine physician (EMP) performance of a simulated surgical procedure and the ideal training paradigm for remote surgery.METHODS: In this study, 12 EMPs performed an appendectomy on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator after tutorial. EMPs were randomized into two groups: one (bedside) group performing with bedside directing from a surgeon and the second (remote) group performing with text-based communications relayed to the surgeon after a 210-s time delay. Both groups performed a second simulated surgery 7 mo later with 240-s delay. Collected data included time to completion, number of movements, path length, economy of motion, percentage of time with appropriate camera positioning, texts sent, and major complications.RESULTS: The remote group took significantly longer to complete the task, used more total movements, had longer path length, and had significantly worse economy of motion during the initial trial. At the 7-mo simulation, there were no significant differences between the two groups. There was a nonsignificant increase in critical errors in the remote group at follow-up (50% vs. 20% of trials).DISCUSSION: EMPs are technically able to perform a surgical operation with delayed just-in-time telementoring guidance via text-based communication. However, the ideal paradigm for training non-surgeons to perform surgical operations is unclear but is likely real-time bedside training rather than remote training.Kamine TH, Siu M, Stegemann S, Formanek A, Levin D. Long round-trip time delay effects on performance of a simulated appendectomy task. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(9):703-708.

A novel 3D-printed educational model for the training of laparoscopic bile duct Exploration:a pilot study for beginning trainees

BackgroundLaparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is a minimally invasive procedure for the removal of bile duct stones that is often performed by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons; beginners do not easily master this approach. AimTo investigate the effectiveness and practicality of a three-dimensional printed (3DP) anatomical model based on radiographic images in the training of LCBDE techniques and formulate standardized educational workflows. MethodsColored LCBDE training models were produced using 3DP technology. Twenty standardized training trainees were randomly divided into two groups: a 3DP model training group and a traditional laparoscopic simulation training group. Both groups received the same number of teaching hours. After a 4-weeks training course, the trainees’ subjective and objective progress in basic knowledge and manipulations were evaluated and compared. ResultsCompared with traditional laparoscopic simulation, 3DP model simulation training is of great significance in improving trainers' understanding of surgical procedures and cooperation during the operation. Trainees with 3DP models training demonstrated a significant improvement in their understanding of the key points of surgery (χ2 = 6.139, p = 0.013) and skills scores, especially in core procedural steps operation. More importantly, the trainees showed higher levels of satisfaction and self-confidence while assisting in the surgery. ConclusionWith the development of 3DP models, improvements in the learning effect for theoretical understanding and practical skills were significant. The present study is the initial educational experience with 3DP models to facilitate the operational capabilities of the trainees for LCBDE.

Current status of resident simulation training curricula: pearls and pitfalls.

Residency programs are required to incorporate simulation into their training program. Ideally, simulation provides a safe environment for a trainee to be exposed to both common and challenging clinical scenarios. The purpose of this review is to detail the current state of the most commonly used laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery simulation programs in general surgery residency education, including resources required for successful implementation and benchmarks for evaluation. Members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Resident and Fellow Task Force (RAFT) Committee performed a literature review using PubMed and training websites. Information regarding the components of the most commonly used laparoscopic, endoscopic, and/or robotic simulation curriculum, including both formal and informal benchmarks for evaluating training competence, were collected. Laparoscopic simulation revolves around the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). Proficiency-based as well as virtual simulation have been utilized for FLS training curricula. Challenges include less direct translation to the technical complexities that can arise in laparoscopic surgery. Endoscopic simulation focuses on the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery. There are virtual reality simulation platforms that can be used for skills assessment and training. Challenges include simulator types and access, as well as structured mentoring and feedback. Robotic simulation training curricula have not been standardized. Simulation includes one primary technology, which can be prohibitive based on cost and requirements for onboarding. While surgical simulation seems to be a fundamental and integrated part of surgical training, it requires a significant number of resources, which can be daunting for residency training programs. Regardless of the barriers outlined, the need for surgical simulation in laparoscopy, endoscopy, and robotics at surgical education training programs is clear.

A regional approach to gynaecological laparoscopic simulation in Northern Ireland

A regional approach to gynaecological laparoscopic simulation in Northern Ireland

The Role of Interprofessional Education in Optimizing Laparoscopic Skills Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: This investigation evaluates the utility and benefits of integrating interprofessional education (IPE) into laparoscopic training, aiming to enrich medical education and skill acquisition methodologies. Methods: The study randomly allocated 36 participants of a 2023 laparoscopic training course into experimental and control groups, each comprising 18 individuals. The control group underwent traditional theory and practical training, whereas the experimental group additionally engaged in interdisciplinary instruction with nursing educators and participated in simulated laparoscopic surgery exercises. The effectiveness of this interdisciplinary approach was assessed by comparing laparoscopic theory and simulation performance, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores in animal-based training, and course satisfaction between the groups. Moreover, the impact on interdisciplinary collaborative competencies was measured through pre- and post-training self-evaluations using the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) in the experimental group. Results: The experimental group demonstrated superior performance in laparoscopic theory and simulation, as well as higher OSATS scores, compared with the control group. Satisfaction ratings regarding the skills practice mode, effects, and instructional quality were also significantly better in the experimental group (P < .05, P < .01). Furthermore, participants in the experimental group reported significant pre-to-post training enhancements in interprofessional communication, team collaboration, role perception, conflict management, and learning and feedback marked by statistically significant differences (P < .05, P < .01). Conclusion: The introduction of an IPE framework significantly boosts laparoscopic training efficiency and promotes team collaboration awareness. This model effectively bridges gaps between disciplines, illustrating substantial applicative value and expansion potential within medical education and skill training arenas.

Development and validation of a high-quality simulator with exchangeable peritoneum for transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Practical simulation training with proper haptic feedback and the fragility of the human body is required to overcome the long learning curve associated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). However, few hernia models accurately reflect the texture and fragility of the human body. Therefore, in this study, we developed a novel model for transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) LIHR training and evaluated its validity. We developed a high-quality mock peritoneum with a hydrated polyvinyl alcohol layer and a unique two-way crossing cellulose fiber layer. To complete the simulation, the peritoneum was adhered to a urethane foam inguinal base with surgical landmarks. Participants could perform all the procedures required for the TAPP LIHR. Twenty-four surgeons performed TAPP LIHR simulation using a novel simulator. Their opinions were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Additionally, 6 surgical residents and 10 surgical experts performed the procedure. Their performance was evaluated using the TAPP checklist score and procedure time. Most participants strongly agreed that the TAPP LIHR simulator with an exchangeable peritoneum model was useful. The participants agreed on the model fidelity for tactile sensation, forceps handling, and humanlike anatomy. In comparisons between surgical residents and experts, the experts had significantly higher scores (10.6 vs. 17.2, p < 0.05) and shorter procedure times (92.3 vs. 55.9 min; p < .05) than did surgical residents. We developed a high-quality exchangeable peritoneal model that mimics the human peritoneum's texture and fragility. This model enhances laparoscopic simulation training, potentially shortening TAPP LIHR learning curves.

476 Enhancing Surgical Education: Assessing the Impact of Laparoscopic Simulators in Learning Surgical Anatomy and Improving Surgical Skills

Abstract Aim We assessed laparoscopic simulators' efficacy in teaching surgical anatomy and enhancing surgical skills, offering insights into their role in shaping surgical education. Method 83 medical students and foundation year doctors were surveyed before and after a hands-on laparoscopic simulator session. Using a 5-point Likert scale, perceptions of the simulator's effectiveness in teaching surgical anatomy and the importance of laparoscopic simulator training for improving surgical skills were gauged. Attendees also rated the simulators’ effectiveness in providing information and exposure to Laparoscopic surgery. Scores underwent normality assessment via the Shapiro–Wilk test; a one-tailed T-test gauged statistical significance. Qualitative data was collected for deeper insights. Results Attendees exhibited a significant increase in belief in laparoscopic simulators as an effective means to learn surgical anatomy (mean before = 4.26, after = 4.49, p = 2.41 x 10-3). Agreement increased for the necessity of laparoscopic simulator training in medical education for improving surgical skills (mean pre-event = 4.36, after = 4.55, p = 3.31 x 10-3). Conclusions A notable surge in support for integrating laparoscopic simulators in medical education emerged, indicating a promising avenue for enhancing anatomical understanding in minimally invasive contexts. The positive shift underscores the increasing recognition of laparoscopic simulators as valuable tools for teaching surgical anatomy and skills. Future research should explore the impact of laparoscopic simulation training on long-term outcomes.