Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Research Articles

Laparoscopic transabdominal vs. totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: outcomes, healthcare utilization, and cost differences.

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair utilizes either a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. The literature remains mixed on outcomes comparing TAPP versus TEP. The objective of our study was to assess outcomes, healthcare utilization, and cost differences between TAPP and TEP inguinal hernia repair. Adult patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively identified from our institution's electronic health record. Baseline characteristics and postoperative complications were compared using chi-squared test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the odds of experiencing a postoperative emergency department visit, readmission, and/or reoperation within 6months were surgery. Generalized linear models were used to investigate differences in cost between TAPP and TEP groups. 1086 patients underwent TAPP repair, while 1277 patients underwent TEP repair. TAPP patients had more than double the rates of readmissions (3.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.002) and reoperations (1.5% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.001) within 6months of surgery. On multivariable analysis, undergoing TAPP inguinal hernia repair was associated with higher odds of reoperations and/or readmissions within 6months of surgery (OR 2.8, CI [1.5, 5.1], p = 0.001). TAPP repair had a higher index surgery cost and higher costs associated with reoperations and readmissions compared to TEP repair. Although both approaches are very safe, TAPP inguinal hernia repair had higher rates of postoperative complications, increased healthcare utilization, and higher associated costs. Future studies should be directed toward decreasing postoperative healthcare utilization in order to decrease costs in inguinal hernia repair.

A retrospective nationwide comparison of laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair in children

BackgroundUtilization of the laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair has increased significantly over the past decade. The purpose of this study is to compare rates of second hernia operation and same side recurrence following open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a large national cohort. MethodsThis retrospective analysis utilized the Pediatric Health Information System database to identify children <18 years-old who underwent laparoscopic or open primary inguinal hernia repair from 2017-2021. Data were collected through 2022 to allow minimum one year follow-up. Second hernia operation rates, inclusive of same side recurrence and metachronous contralateral hernia, and same side recurrence rates were compared by multivariable mixed effects model controlling for confounders and institutional clustering. Misclassification rates were determined through data validation at four constituent institutions. Sensitivity analyses determined true outcome rates. ResultsWe identified 53,287 operations (15.6% laparoscopic). Rate of second hernia operation was greater following laparoscopic repair (2.9% vs 2.6%, p=0.04) with no difference on multivariable analysis (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.98-1.32). Same side recurrence rate was greater following laparoscopic repair (1.5% vs 0.4%, p<0.001) which persisted on multivariable analysis (OR 3.72, 95% CI 2.90-4.78). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated true laparoscopic and open repair rates of 14.2% and 85.8%, respectively. True rates of second hernia operation and same side recurrence were identical to those determined by PHIS. ConclusionLaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children has more than three times the odds of same side hernia recurrence than open repair which is balanced by a reduced rate of second operation for metachronous hernia. Level of EvidenceTreatment Study – Level III

Is the transection of the hernia sac during laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty safe and feasible? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is a debate over whether to transect or completely reduce the hernia sac during laparoscopic tension-free repair of inguinal hernia. This study endeavors to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of two approaches, namely transected sac (TS) and completely reduced sac (RS), in laparoscopic tension-free repair of inguinal hernia. Utilizing a meta-analysis methodology, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of these techniques. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify comparative studies focusing on laparoscopic tension-free repair of inguinal hernia, specifically comparing TS and RS techniques. The selected studies were subjected to meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 8 studies, involving 2995 patients with inguinal hernia, were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis results revealed that the TS group had a higher incidence of seroma compared to the RS group [OR = 1.74, 95% CI (1.35, 2.25), P < 0.0001], and a prolonged time to return to normal activity postoperatively [MD = 0.99, 95% CI (0.85, 1.14), P < 0.00001]. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operation time [MD = -1.75, 95% CI (- 8.72, 5.22), P = 0.62], incidence of postoperative pain [OR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.41, 2.44), P = 1.00], overall postoperative complication rate [OR = 0.98, 95% CI (0.43, 2.20), P = 0.95], and recurrence rate fOR = 2.53, 95% CI (0.61, 10.39), P = 0.20]. Transected sac in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is associated with an increased incidence of seroma and a longer recovery time for patients to return to normal activity. Clinical trial registration Registration number is INPLASY20223110070.

Navigating hernia sac management in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: to abandon or to reduce? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair has become increasingly accepted, demonstrating superior outcomes over open procedures in postoperative complications. However, certain postoperative complications, such as seroma, remain a dilemma, with many attributing it to the management of the hernia sac. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the reduction versus abandonment of the hernia sac during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane, Scopus, SciELO, and PubMed were searched for studies comparing reduction and abandonment of the hernia sac. Our primary outcome was seroma. Secondary outcomes were overall complications, postoperative pain, surgical site infection, recurrence, hospital length of stay (LOS), and operative time. We performed a subgroup analysis of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques. Statistical analysis was performed with R Studio. 2388 studies were screened, and seven studies were included, comprising 3153 patients, of which 916 (29%) were in the abandonment group. We found higher seroma rates for the abandonment group (RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.89; P < 0.001). No differences were found in overall complications (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.42; P = 0.61), postoperative pain (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.46 to 2.87; P = 0.76), recurrence (RR 2.67; 95% CI 0.51 to 14.05; P = 0.25), operative time (MD -4.45 min; 95% CI -12.77 to 3.86; P = 0.29), and LOS (MD -0.06 days; 95% CI -0.14 to 0.02; P = 0.14) between both groups. Subgroup analysis of seroma showed no differences between the groups when analyzing TAPP (19.3% vs. 13%; RR 1.65; 95% CI 0.91 to 2.99; P = 0.1) and TEP (9% vs. 4.3%; RR 1.69; 95% CI 0.62 to 4.6; P = 0.3) procedures. Our systematic review and meta-analysis support that hernia sac abandonment may be associated with increased early seroma rates following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, but limited data are available for technique-specific analyses.

Single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The evolution of minimally invasive surgery has transformed inguinal hernia repair (IHR). The innovative single-port technique reduces the number of surgical incisions. However, the benefits of single-port IHR remain controversial. Our systematic review and network meta-analysis assess the efficacy and clinical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (SPL-IHR), multi-port laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (MPL-IHR), single-port robotic inguinal hernia repair (SPR-IHR), and multi-port robotic inguinal hernia repair (MPR-IHR). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Ovid for articles published before January 2024, focusing on complication rates, recurrence, seroma, hematoma, operative time, post-operative pain, and cosmetic outcomes of laparoscopic or robotic IHR. Both extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal (TAPP) approaches were analyzed using MetaInsight. MPL-TAPP was used as the standard for comparison. Thirty-seven studies, including 5,038 patients, 36.92% (1,860 patients) underwent MPL-TEP, 23.64% (1,191 patients) SPL-TEP, 22.23% (1,120 patients) MPR-TAPP, 10.08% (508 patients) MPL-TAPP, 5.40% (272 patients) SPL-TAPP, and 1.73% (87 patients) SPR-TAPP. There were no significant differences in the rates of post-operative complications, hernia recurrence, hematoma, or seroma among the techniques when compared to MPL-TAPP. For secondary outcomes, MPR-TAPP significantly increased the operative time for unilateral hernia repair by a mean difference (MD) of 10.60 min [95% CI: 2.16-19.04]. Conversely, for bilateral hernia repair, there was no significant difference. Post-operative pain was significantly higher for MPL-TEP and SPL-TEP, with MDs of 1.44 [95% CI: 0.43 to 2.44] and 1.22 [95% CI: 0.18 to 2.26], respectively. SPL-TEP was significantly favored in cosmetic outcomes over MPL-TEP, with an MD of 0.65 [95% CI: 0.07 to 1.24]. In our network meta-analysis, the risk of post-operative complications, including recurrence, hematoma, and seroma, does not significantly vary among single-port and multi-port laparoscopic or robotic techniques. This suggests that surgical technique selection can rely on surgeon expertise and resource availability, without compromising outcomes.

A Data-Driven Approach to Inguinal Hernia Repairs in Infants and Children.

Introduction: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become increasingly popular in children. The laparoscopic technique inherently assesses the contralateral processus vaginalis, reducing the risk of metachronous contralateral hernias. We hypothesized that primary laparoscopic repair would be associated with lower rates of subsequent hernia repair in the youngest patients, in whom metachronous contralateral hernias are most common. Materials and Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patients 0-15 years old, who underwent inguinal hernia repair between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the need for subsequent hernia repair. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and ICD-10 procedure codes were used to determine laparoscopic versus open repair. Patients were excluded if the only recorded code was for recurrent hernia or if both laparoscopic and open codes were present for the same procedure. Results: A total of 109,456 patients were included in the study, with 20,338 patients (18.58%), undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair initially, and 2535 patients (2.32%) requiring a second hernia repair. Patients 6 months old and younger undergoing unilateral laparoscopic repair were less likely to require subsequent surgery (OR 0.82, 95% CI = 0.69-0.96). Across all ages, open bilateral repair less often required subsequent repairs (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.48-2.51). Conclusion: Laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair decreases the need for subsequent surgical repair in infants 6 months and younger. No difference was detected in older patients. Open repair of bilateral hernias decreases the need for a second hernia operation in all age groups, suggesting that open repair is more durable.

Effect of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repairs on Inflammatory Factors, Oxidative Stress Levels and Postoperative Recovery.

To unravel the effects of different laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs (IHRs) on inflammatory factors, oxidative stress, and postoperative recovery of inguinal hernia (IH) patients. A total of 88 patients for laparoscopic treatment of IH were studied in a retrospective cohort, and were randomized into the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair group (n = 44) and the total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair group (n = 44) according to the method of treatment. Patients in the TAPP group underwent laparoscopic TAPP IHR, while patients in the TEP group underwent laparoscopic TEP IHR. Visual analogue scores (VAS) were measured at 1, 3, and 7 d after repair. Gastrin (GAS), motilin (MTL), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) was tested by spectrophotometry and malondialdehyde (MDA) and β-endorphin (β-EP) were examined by radioimmunoprecipitation. Total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) was evaluated by chemical colorimetry, quality of life was evaluated by SF-36, and fibrinogen (FIB), C-reactive protein (CRP), antitrypsin (al-AT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were determined by immunoturbidimetry. Complications and postoperative recurrence were recorded. VAS scores in the TEP group were lower than those in the TAPP group. Operative time, hospital stay, time for postoperative activity out of bed, and time taken to exhaust were shorter in the TEP group than in the TAPP group. Intraoperative blood loss was less in the TEP group than in the TAPP group. GAS, MTL, SOD, and T-AOC were higher, and MDA, β-EP, CRP, FIB, alAT, IL-6, MMP-2, MMP-9, and TIMP-1 were lower in the TEP group than the TAPP group. Quality of life was improved in the TEP group compared with the TAPP group. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications and recurrence rates between both groups of patients. For IHs, laparoscopic TEP repair can effectively relieve pain, reduce inflammatory factors and oxidative stress indices, and facilitate postoperative recovery.

Risk factors and clinical impact of seroma formation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study

BackgroundAlthough laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) has advantages over open surgery, postoperative seroma formation remains an issue. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of seroma formation in patients undergoing LIHR.MethodsFrom January 2016 to March 2023, clinical data of patients who underwent LIHR were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who developed seroma and those who did not were classified into the seroma and non-seroma groups, respectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for variables of interest. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the risk factors of the binary logistic model, and the cutoff value for each risk factor was obtained.ResultsData of 128 patients were evaluated. Compared with patients in the non-seroma group, those in the seroma group had a higher body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001), more direct hernias (P < 0.001), larger hernial orifice size (P < 0.001), more laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP) (P < 0.001), more frequent reduction of hernial sac (P = 0.011), and lower preoperative serum albumin level (PSAL) (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses performed on these variables showed that high BMI (P = 0.005), large hernial orifice (P = 0.001), TEP (P = 0.033), and low PSAL (P = 0.009) were risk factors for seroma formation. Compared with the non-seroma group, the seroma group exhibited a higher numerical rating scale score for postoperative pain (P < 0.001), and longer hospital stays (P = 0.032).ConclusionsBMI (> 24.5 kg/m2), hernial orifice size (> 2.5 cm), TEP, and PSAL (< 32.5 g/L) were independent risk factors of postoperative seroma formation in patients who underwent LIHR. Although most seromas resolve spontaneously without surgical intervention, seroma formation results in increased patient pain and prolonged hospital stay.

A nomogram prediction model for postoperative seroma/hematoma in elderly subjects after TAPP.

Formation of seroma/hematoma is one of the most common postoperative complications following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with seroma/hematoma and construct a prediction model. Elderly subjects undergoing laparoscopic Transabdominal preperitoneal Patch Plasty (TAPP) were included in this study. The observation endpoint was set as the occurrence of seroma/hematoma within 3 months after TAPP surgery. Independent risk factors were identified through preliminary univariate screening and binary logistic regression analysis. These risk factors were then used to construct a nomogram predictive model using R software. A total of 330 patients were included in the analysis, of which 51 developed seroma/hematoma, resulting in an incidence rate of 15.5%. Obesity (OR: 3.54, 95%CI: 1.45-8.66, P = 0.006), antithrombotic drug use (OR: 2.73, 95%CI: 1.06-7.03, P = 0.037), C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 8 (OR: 2.72, 95%CI: 1.04-7.10, P = 0.041, albumin/fibrinogen ratio (AFR) < 7.85 (OR: 2.99, 95%CI: 1.28-7.00, P = 0.012), and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) < 4.05 (OR: 12.62, 95%CI: 5.69-28.01, P < 0.001) were five independent risk factors for seroma/hematoma. The nomogram model has well predictive value for seroma/hematoma, with an AUC of 0.879. The nomogram model based on obesity, antithrombotic drug, CRP, AFR, and LMR has a proved good predictive value and it has potential in clinical practice.

Ergonomic differences in mesh placement and mesh fixation between laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair with mesh.

General differences in surgeon ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repairs (LIHR vs. RIHR) have been previously studied. However, specific differences in the ergonomics of mesh placement (MP) and mesh fixation (MF) are undetermined. Our aim was to determine if there are differences in the ergonomics of MP and MF between the surgical approaches. We hypothesize that we will identify differences, with the potential for worse ergonomics during LIHR. Data was collected from fifteen LIHR and fifteen RIHR. All cases were elective, primary inguinal hernias completed by a fellowship-trained minimally invasive surgeon. Surface electromyography (EMG) of four upper extremity muscle groups, including the upper trapezius (UT), anterior deltoid (AD), flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and extensor digitorum (ED), was recorded bilaterally during MP and MF. Muscle activation as a percent of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVCRMS) and muscle fatigue denoted as the median frequency of muscle activations (Fmed) were calculated for each muscle. EMG analysis showed increased %MVCRMS in LIHR compared to RIHR cases, with significant findings in the left UT, right UT, ED, and FCR for MP and MF and the left FCR during MP. Muscle fatigue was decreased in LIHR compared to RIHR cases, with significant differences in left FCR and right ED and AD. Despite greater muscle activations during LIHR, RIHR had greater muscle fatigue. It is possible that short periods of high muscle activation are ergonomically protective during minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair. Identifying these differences may aid in development of procedure-specific interventions to improve ergonomics.

Prospective randomized study comparing mesh displacement in enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation.

In laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, it is thought that the mesh can be displaced more in the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique. The aim of this study was to compare eTEP and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques without mesh fixation in terms of mesh displacement and hernia recurrence. Between December 2022 and April 2023, 60 consecutive patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized into two groups; eTEP group (n = 30) and TEP group (n = 30). There was without mesh fixation in both groups. Study was registered at http://Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06070142). The mesh was marked with three radiopaque clips. Pelvic radiographs were performed to evaluate the displacement of the mesh. The primary outcome of this study was mesh displacement. In addition, this is the first study in the literature to compare eTEP and TEP techniques in terms of mesh displacement without fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of mesh displacement, recurrence, postoperative VAS scores, length of hospital stay, hematoma, and seroma formation. The operation time was higher in the eTEP group and was statistically significant. Without mesh fixation, the eTEP technique does not increase the risk of mesh displacement and recurrence. The eTEP technique can be safely applied without mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. ClinicalTrials number: NCT06070142.

Risk factors of conversion of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia

Background: Inguinal hernia occurs in 1 to 5% of the general population. The development of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair techniques as an alternative to conventional open surgery has improved results such as less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. This study was conducted to assess the risk factors of conversion of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. Method: A total of 200 patients who were scheduled to undergo TEP were enrolled. Complete demographic and clinical details of all the patients was obtained. A Performa was made and detailed intraoperative findings were evaluated. Baseline hemodynamic and biochemical profile was evaluated. Separate assessment of patients was done who were converted to open surgery. Comparison of patients was done among those with and without conversion. Various risk factors were evaluated which were responsible for conversion. All the results were recorded in Microsoft excel sheet and were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software. Results: Mean age of the patients was 49.2 years. 60.5 percent of the patients were of rural residence. Mean BMI of the patients was 24.8 Kg/m2. Incidence of conversion was 6.5 percent. Geriatric age, obesity, higher ASA grade, larger hernial defects, larger peritoneal tear and previous hernia surgery history was found to be significant risk factors for conversion. Conclusion: Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernia is an effective technique, but conversion to open surgery occurs in 6.5% of cases. Significant risk factors for conversion include geriatric age, obesity, higher ASA grade, larger hernial defects, larger peritoneal tear, and previous hernia surgery history. Identifying these risk factors can help optimize patient selection and improve outcomes for TEP repair.

Is There a Place for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Realm of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Narrative Review

Is There a Place for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Realm of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Narrative Review

Is There a Place for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Realm of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Narrative Review

Is There a Place for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Realm of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Narrative Review

WP1.2 - Does intraoperative urinary catheterisation decrease postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Aims To evaluate comparative outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with and without use of intraoperative urinary catheterisation. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science and bibliographic reference lists were conducted. All comparative studies evaluating outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with and without use of intraoperative urinary catheterisation were included and their risk of bias were assessed using their risk of bias were assessed using ROBINS-I tool. Postoperative urinary retention was analysed as the primary outcome parameter and an odds ratio (OR) was determined using Random-effects modelling. Results We included 6 comparative studies reporting a total of 8,675 patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with (n=3,318) and without (n=5,357) use of intraoperative urinary catheterisation. There was no significant difference in postoperative urinary retention between the two groups (4.3% versus 3.7%, OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.55-1.58, p=0.80). There was significant heterogeneity among the included studies (I2: 75%, p=0.001). Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the results of the main analysis. Conclusions Meta-analysis of best available evidence (level 2a) demonstrated that use of intraoperative urinary catheter has no advantage in prevention of postoperative urinary retention following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Future randomised controlled trials are required to control for confounding factors that increases the risk of urinary retention.

SP1.1 - The effect of mesh fixation on post-operative pain and recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Abstract Aims To evaluate post-operative pain and inguinal hernia recurrence following laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) techniques. Secondly, in TAPP approach to compare outcomes with method of mesh fixation. Methods 545 patients underwent elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a single centre, between October 2015 and April 2023. Surgical approach and method of mesh fixation was obtained from operation note. Patients were contacted retrospectively via telephone call. Post-operative pain was assessed using a scale (1-10). Chronic pain defined as pain persisting beyond 3 months. Hernia recurrence defined as new groin lump at site of previous repair. Results 545 patients underwent surgery. 212 did not answer follow-up call, 43 declined to take part in study and 22 had died. 268 analysed; 167 underwent TEP and 101 TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Groups were similar in age and gender. Initial post-operative pain score in TEP group was 4.7 (range 1-10) as compared with 4.5 (range 1-10) in TAPP group.13.8% experienced chronic pain, score of 2.9 (range 2-5) in TEP group compared with 16.8%, score of 2.7 (range 2-5) in TAPP group. Hernia recurrences were similar between groups; 4.8% and 4% respectfully. Neither mesh-fixation or non-fixation techniques were found to affect post-operative chronic pain (p=0.8). Patients undergoing tacker fixation reported less hernia recurrence, 1.7% and 5.1% respectfully. No significant difference noted between absorbable and metallic tackers in terms of chronic post-operative pain and recurrence. Conclusion Mesh placement without fixation produced similar post-operative pain but a higher hernia recurrence than mesh-fixation techniques.

WP2.11 - Improving prescription of discharge medications for day case surgery patients using electronic patient records system (EPIC); a closed loop audit

Abstract Aim It is important to provide patients who have undergone day surgery with appropriate analgesia, antiemetics, and laxatives. Failure to do this can result in a poor patient experience, patient requests for advice, readmission and morbidity. This study audited our adherence to the GIRFT guidelines for day case discharge prescribing. Methods Data was collected retrospectively on the discharge medications for all patients undergoing elective, day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair at two district general hospitals in our trust over a five-week period. A pre-populated discharge medication order set was then created on the Trust's electronic health records system (EPIC) to improve adherence to the GIRFT guidelines. Discharge medications were observed over a subsequent four-week period. Results Prior to our intervention, adherence to GIRFT guidelines was poor with 25% of patients only received the correct discharge medications. Following introduction of the pre-populated order set, 83% of patients received the correct discharge medications. Conclusions This audit demonstrates that utilizing electronic systems effectively can improve efficiency, ensure patient safety and enhance patient care.

Trends and predictors of laparoscopic compared with open emergent inguinal hernia repair

BackgroundLaparoscopic emergent inguinal hernia repair remains controversial despite studies suggesting it is safe and feasible. Variables associated with laparoscopic compared with open emergent inguinal hernia repair are currently not well described. This study aims to investigate patient characteristics and risk factors associated with laparoscopic emergent inguinal hernia repair. MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database was queried for adult patients (age ≥18 years) who had undergone emergent inguinal hernia repair between 2015 and 2021. The relationships between demographic variables and laparoscopic compared with open emergent inguinal hernia repair were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. ResultsA total of 8,215 patients were included in this analysis. Use of laparoscopic emergent inguinal hernia repair increased from 9% in 2015 to 23% in 2021. Female patients (odds ratio, 1.84, P < .001) and patients aged ≤65 years (odds ratio, 1.25, P = .005) were more likely to undergo laparoscopic repair. Black (odds ratio, 0.73, P = .003) and Hispanic (odds ratio, 0.72, P = .006) patients and patients with greater American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (odds ratio, 0.86, P = .037), ascites (odds ratio, 0.39, P = .039), and preoperative dialysis requirement (odds ratio, 0.45, P = .017) were less likely to undergo laparoscopic repair. Aside from a decreased likelihood of readmission in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio, 0.696, P = .024), there was no difference in other postoperative outcomes, despite a laparoscopic approach being associated with greater rates of concomitant procedures compared with an open approach (24% vs 18%, P < .001). ConclusionsFemale sex, younger age, and lower American Society of Anesthesiologists class were associated with a greater likelihood of laparoscopic surgery. Black and Hispanic patients and patients with ascites and dialysis requirements were less likely to undergo laparoscopic repair. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can be safely performed in an emergent setting.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Techniques in Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Study.

This study compared the clinical outcomes of two commonly used laparoscopic techniques, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair, in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias. This retrospective cohort study included 250 patients who underwent laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair using either the TEP or TAPP technique between May 2009 and May 2024. The patients were divided into two groups: 50 patients in the TEP group and 200 in the TAPP group. Data were collected from patient records, including demographics, type of hernia, surgical details, intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion rates, and early hernia recurrence. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups. Among the 250 patients included in the study, the mean age was 51.62 ± 8.79 years, and 94% (n=235) were male. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the TEP group (93.2 ± 13.0 minutes) than in the TAPP group (57.95 ± 7.5 minutes) (p <.001). The mean hospital stay was also longer in the TEP group (1.36 ± 0.48 days) compared to the TAPP group (1.07 ± 0.25 days) (p <.001). The TEP group had a higher rate of conversion to open surgery 18%(n=9) and conversion to TAPP 10% (5) than the TAPP group, which had no conversions (p <.0001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the TEP group, with urinary retention being significantly higher at 16%(n=8) than in the TAPP group at 2% (n=4) (p <.0004). Additionally, the TAPP group experienced two (1%) notable intraoperative complications that required reoperation: arterial injury and small bowel injury. The findings suggest that, while both TEP and TAPP effectively repair bilateral inguinal hernia, TAPP is associated with shorter operative times, shorter hospital stays, and fewer postoperative complications. However, the TAPP technique also presented notable intraoperative risks, including arterial and bowel injury. The choice between TEP and TAPP should be based on the surgeon's experience, patient characteristics, and the specific clinical context.

First Results of Pediatric Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair with the Senhance® Surgical System: A Matched Cohort Study.

Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is one of the most common procedures in pediatric surgery. In children, the application of robotic surgery is limited, meaning safety and efficacy is still to be assessed. This report is the first one worldwide that describes inguinal hernia repair in children using the Senhance® Surgical System (SSS®). The aim of this matched cohort study is to assess safety and feasibility of robot-assisted IHR (RIHR) in children, compared to conventional laparoscopic IHR (LIHR). This pilot study included 26 consecutive patients between 3 months and 8 years old who underwent RIHR (31 IH's) with the SSS® between 2020 and 2024. These cases were matched based on gender, age, and unilateral or bilateral IH, with 26 patients (32 IH's) who underwent conventional LIHR. There was a significant difference in total anesthesia time, which is most likely due to the extra time needed to dock the robot in the RIHR cases. No significant difference was seen in surgical time. One recurrence (3.2%) was diagnosed in both groups. One patient in the LIHR group was readmitted on the day of discharge due to a hemorrhage. No intervention was necessary, and the patient was discharged 1 day later. In this pilot study, the use of the robotic system was safe and feasible. More experience, further improvement of the system for use in very small children, and investigation in a larger sample size with long-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate efficacy.