KRAS Mutations Research Articles

Comparison of genomic profiling of patient-matched primary colorectal and surgical resected distant metastatic (stage IV) colorectal carcinoma for drug actionability

It is often difficult to obtain adequate tissue for genomic study from distant metastases for assessment of targeted therapy in colorectal carcinomas. The study aims to explore the genomic differences between matched distant metastatic colorectal carcinomas (mCRC) and primary carcinoma using surgical specimens of both with adequate tissue. Thirty-four paired primary and distant metastatic colorectal carcinoma samples (liver, ovary, and lung) were obtained from surgical excisions (not small biopsies) and are microsatellite stable. They were subjected to DNA sequencing using comprehensive next-generation sequencing. This included mutation concordance analysis and mutational signature analysis. The mutation concordance analysis showed 49.6% shared mutations between primary and metastatic tumours, with 23.0% mutations exclusive to primary tumours and 27.4% mutations exclusive to distant metastases. While many patients with KRAS/BRAF mutations had shared mutations, two cases had unique KRAS mutations in the primary tumours only. Additionally, TMB (tumour mutational burden) analysis revealed that half of the TMB-high (≥7.5 mutations/Mb) metastatic colorectal carcinomas had a low TMB (<7.5 mutations/Mb) in the primary tumours. The mutational signature analysis identified de novo signatures consistent with known single base substitution patterns such as SBS11 (alkylation agents) and SBS30 (base excision repair deficiency) post-chemotherapy. To conclude, this study demonstrates significant genomic variations in resected distant metastasis when compared to primary colorectal carcinomas when adequate tissue is available. This finding underscores the importance of considering these differences and selecting tissue for mutation analysis in planning targeted and effective treatment strategies for mCRC.

Correlation between common driver gene variations and clinicopathological typing in lung adenocarcinoma

Objective: To correlate the common driver gene variations in primary lung adenocarcinoma with their clinical characteristics and histopathological subtypes. Methods: There were 4 995 cases of primary lung adenocarcinoma diagnosed at Weifang People's Hospital of Shandong Province from January 2015 to December 2021 which were retrospectively analyzed. Among them 1 983 cases were evaluated for their histopathological subtype; 3 012 were analyzed for the correlation of their histopathological subtypes and corresponding driver gene variations, including invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA) and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA), and morphologically, poorly-differentiated, moderately-differentiated and well-differentiated adenocarcinomas. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect variations in EGFR, KRAS, ALK, RET, ROS1, MET, HER2, or BRAF driver genes. Results: There were 2 384 males and 2 611 females. EGFR and ALK variations were more commonly found in female patients aged 60 years or older, with EGFR mutation rate in clinical stage Ⅰ (25.80%) significantly higher than in other stages (P<0.05). KRAS mutations were more commonly detected in male smokers aged 60 years or older, HER2 mutations were more commonly in patients younger than 60 years, and RET mutations were more commonly in non-smokers (all P<0.05). No correlation was found between ROS1, MET, and BRAF gene variations and their clinical characteristics (P>0.05). For the histopathological subtypes, among the 1 899 cases of acinar adenocarcinoma, EGFR mutation rate was the highest (67.30%) compared to the other genes. Exon 21 L858R and exon 19 del were the main mutation sites in IMA and INMA, with a higher mutation rate at exon 20 T790M (11.63%) in micropapillary adenocarcinoma. In IMA, KRAS had the highest overall mutation rate (43.80%), with statistically significant difference in mutation rates of exon 2 G12D and exon 2 G12V in acinar adenocarcinoma, solid, and IMA (P<0.05). KRAS mutation at various sites were higher in poorly differentiated groups compared to moderately- and well-differentiated groups (P<0.05). HER2 mutations were more commonly observed in acinar adenocarcinoma, papillary, and micropapillary adenocarcinoma of INMA. BRAF mutation was higher in micropapillary adenocarcinoma compared with other types (P<0.05). Conclusions: Variations in EGFR, ALK, KRAS, HER2, and RET in primary lung adenocarcinoma are associated with patients' age, smoking history, and clinical stage, and driver gene mutations vary among different histopathological subtypes. EGFR mutations are predominant in INMA, while KRAS mutations are predominant in IMA.

Differential isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 mutation-related landscape in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are prone to recurrence and poor survival. Targeted therapy related to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is an extremely important treatment. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are generally thought to have similar effects on the tumor landscape. However, it is doubtful whether these 2 mutations have exactly the same effects on tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment. All collected tumor samples were subjected to simultaneous whole-exon sequencing and proteome sequencing. IDH1 mutations accounted for 12.2%, and IDH2 mutations accounted for 5.5%, all missense mutations. Tumors with IDH mutations had lower proportions of KRAS and TP53 mutations. Mutated genes were obviously enriched in the kinase pathway in the tumors with IDH2 mutations. The signaling pathways were mainly enriched in the activation of cellular metabolic activities and an increase of inhibitory immune cells in the tumors with IDH mutations. Moreover, tumors had unique enrichment in DNA repair in IDH1 mutants and secretion of biological molecules in IDH2 mutants. Inhibitory immune cells might be more prominent in IDH2 mutants, and the expression of immune checkpoints PVR and HLA-DQB1 was more prominent in IDH1 mutants. IDH mutants were more related to metabolism-related and inflammation-immune response clusters, and some belonged to the DNA replication and repair cluster. These results revealed the differential IDH1 and IDH2 mutation-related landscapes, and we have provided an important reference database to guide ICC treatment.

PDP1 promotes KRAS mutant colorectal cancer progression by serving as a scaffold for BRAF and MEK1

The oncogenic role of KRAS in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression is well-established. Despite this, identifying effective therapeutic targets for KRAS-mutated CRC remains a significant challenge. This study identifies pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase catalytic subunit 1 (PDP1) as a previously unrecognized yet crucial regulator in the progression of KRAS mutant CRC. A substantial upregulation of PDP1 expression is observed in KRAS mutant CRC cells and tissues compared to wild-type KRAS samples, which correlates with poorer prognosis. Functional experiments elucidate that PDP1 accelerates the malignance of KRAS mutant CRC cells, both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, PDP1 acts as a scaffold, enhancing BRAF and MEK1 interaction and activating the MAPK signaling, thereby promoting CRC progression. Additionally, transcription factor KLF5 is identified as the key regulator for PDP1 upregulation in KRAS mutant CRC. Crucially, targeting PDP1 combined with MAPK inhibitors exhibits an obvious inhibitory effect on KRAS mutant CRC. Overall, PDP1 is underscored as a vital oncogenic driver and promising therapeutic target for KRAS mutant CRC.

Identification of Early Events in Serrated Pathway Colorectal Tumorigenesis by Using Digital Spatial Profiling.

The colorectal serrated pathway involves precursor lesions known as sessile serrated lesions (SSL) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSA). Mutations in BRAF or KRAS are crucial early events in this pathway. Additional genetic and epigenetic changes contribute to the progression of these lesions into high-grade lesions and, eventually, invasive carcinoma. We employed digital spatial profiling to investigate the transcriptional changes associated with SSL and TSA. The genes identified are confirmed by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines with CEACAM6 overexpression and knockdown were established to study the roles of CEACAM6 on tumorigenesis of CRC. Ten genes were upregulated in SSL and TSA, and seven were upregulated in both types of lesions. IHC staining confirmed overexpression of CEACAM6, LCN2, KRT19, and lysozyme in SSL and TSA. CEACAM6 expression is an early event in the serrated pathway but a late event in the conventional pathway. Using cell line models, we confirmed that CEACAM6 promotes CRC cells' proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities. These results highlight that the transcriptional changes in the early stages of tumorigenesis exhibit relative uniformity. Identifying these early events may hold significant promise in elucidating the mechanisms behind tumor initiation.

PROMER technology: a new real-time PCR tool enabling multiplex detection of point mutation with high specificity and sensitivity

Abstract Real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) is a powerful tool for the precise quantification of nucleic acids in various applications. In cancer management, the monitoring of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from liquid biopsies can provide valuable information for precision care, including treatment selection and monitoring, prognosis, and early detection. However, the rare and heterogeneous nature of ctDNA has made its precise detection and quantification challenging, particularly for ctDNA containing hotspot mutations. We have developed a new real-time PCR tool, PROMER technology, which enables the precise and sensitive detection of ctDNA containing cancer-driven single point mutations. The PROMER functions as both a PRObe and priMER, providing enhanced detection specificity. We validated PROMER technology using synthetic templates with known KRAS point mutations and demonstrated its sensitivity and linearity of quantification. Using genomic DNA from human cancer cells with mutant and wildtype KRAS, we confirmed that PROMER PCR can detect mutant DNA. Furthermore, we demonstrated the ability of PROMER technology to efficiently detect mutation-carrying ctDNA from the plasma of mice with human cancers. Our results suggest that PROMER technology represents a promising new tool for the precise detection and quantification of DNA containing point mutations in the presence of a large excess of wildtype counterpart.

PDAC heterogeneity resolved spatially at the single-cell level: new biological answers, new questions on optimal translation†.

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive disease. Developing new strategies and using powerful methodologies for its early detection, coupled with in-depth comprehension of the mechanisms governing subtype evolution, will not only help to stratify PDAC patients' prognosis but also prevent unfavourable subtype plasticity upon treatment with chemotherapy. Michiels et al have developed a new approach to better capture PDAC heterogeneity at the single tumour duct spatial resolution level, leveraging detection of transcripts for mutant KRAS and multiple subtype markers. Their study sheds light on the association of mutant KRAS and PDAC phenotypic heterogeneity. The findings support functional cooperation of plastic tumour cells and opens new challenges towards PDAC patient stratification and therapeutic intervention. Pathology-based tools will be of prime importance to address these issues in a clinically meaningful manner. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Lead Identification of Novel Naphthyridine Derivatives as Potent SOS1 Inhibitors.

SOS1, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), plays a critical role in catalyzing the conversion of KRAS from its GDP- to GTP-bound form, regardless of KRAS mutation status, and represents a promising new drug target to treat all KRAS-driven tumors. Herein, we employed a scaffold hopping strategy to design, synthesize, and optimize a series of novel binary ring derivatives as SOS1 inhibitors. Among them, compound 10f (HH0043) displayed potent activities in both biochemical and cellular assays and favorable pharmacokinetic profiles. Oral administration of HH0043 resulted in a significant tumor inhibitory effect in a subcutaneous KRAS G12C-mutated NCI-H358 (human lung cancer cell line) xenograft mouse model, and the tumor inhibitory effect of HH0043 was superior to that of BI-3406 at the same dose (total growth inhibition, TGI: 76% vs 49%). On the basis of these results, HH0043, with a novel 1,7-naphthyridine scaffold that is distinct from currently reported SOS1 inhibitors, is nominated as the lead compound for this discovery project.

Lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 suppresses nanoclustering and function of KRAS.

KRAS is frequently mutated in cancer, contributing to 20% of all human cancer especially pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancer. Signaling of the constitutively active KRAS oncogenic mutants is mostly compartmentalized to proteolipid nanoclusters on the plasma membrane (PM). Signaling nanoclusters of many KRAS mutants selectively enrich phosphatidylserine (PS) lipids with unsaturated sn-2 acyl chains, but not the fully saturated PS species. Thus, remodeling PS acyl chains may suppress KRAS oncogenesis. Lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferases (LPCATs) remodel sn-2 acyl chains of phospholipids, with LPCAT1 preferentially generating the fully saturated lipids. Here, we show that stable expression of LPCAT1 depletes major PS species with unsaturated sn-2 chains while decreasing minor phosphatidylcholine (PC) species with the corresponding acyl chains. LPCAT1 expression more effectively disrupts the nanoclustering of oncogenic GFP-KRASG12V, which is restored by acute addback of exogenous unsaturated PS. LPCAT1 expression compromises signaling and oncogenic activities of the KRAS-dependent pancreatic tumor lines. LPCAT1 expression sensitizes human pancreatic tumor MiaPaCa-2 cells to KRASG12C specific inhibitor, Sotorasib. Statistical analyses of patient data further reveal that pancreatic cancer patients with KRAS mutations express less LPCAT1. Higher LPCAT1 expression also improves survival probability of pancreatic and lung adenocarcinoma patients with KRAS mutations. Thus, PS acyl chain remodeling selectively suppresses KRAS oncogenesis.

Dose-dependent effects of Dnmt3a in an inducible murine model of KrasG12D-driven leukemia

DNMT3A mutations are frequently found in clonal hematopoiesis and a variety of hematologic malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia. An assortment of mouse models have been engineered to explore the tumorigenic potential and malignant lineage bias due to loss of function of DNMT3A in consort with commonly comutated genes in myeloid malignancies, such as Flt3, Nras, Kras, and c-Kit. We employed several tamoxifen-inducible Cre-ERT2 murine model systems to study the effects of constitutively active KrasG12D-driven myeloid leukemia (Kras) development together with heterozygous (3aHet) or homozygous Dnmt3a deletion (3aKO). Due to the rapid generation of diverse nonhematologic tumors appearing after tamoxifen induction, we employed a transplantation model. With pretransplant tamoxifen induction, most Kras mice died quickly of T-cell malignancies regardless of Dnmt3a status. Using posttransplant induction, we observed a dose-dependent effect of DNMT3A depletion that skewed the leukemic phenotype toward a myeloid lineage. Specifically, 64% of 3aKO/Kras mice had exclusively myeloid disease compared with 36% of 3aHet/Kras and only 13% of Kras mice. Here, 3aKO combined with Kras led to increased disease burden, multiorgan infiltration, and faster disease progression. DOT1L inhibition exerted profound antileukemic effects in malignant 3aKO/Kras cells, but not malignant cells with Kras mutation alone, consistent with the known sensitivity of DNMT3A-mutant leukemia to DOT1L inhibition. RNAseq from malignant myeloid cells revealed that biallelic Dnmt3a deletion was associated with loss of cell-cycle regulation, MYC activation, and TNF⍺ signaling. Overall, we developed a robust model system for mechanistic and preclinical investigations of acute myeloid leukemia with DNMT3A and Ras-pathway lesions.

Genetic Profiling and Survival Outcomes in Romanian Colorectal Cancer Patients.

The increasing incidence of colorectal cancer is one of the most frequently addressed medical topics worldwide. It represents the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in both men and women globally, with significant implications for public health. Mortality for this type of malignancy remains high, second only to lung cancer. Given their clinical relevance, the identification and understanding of KRAS and BRAF mutations have become crucial components of personalized medicine approaches in colorectal cancer. Hence, our desire is to carry out a research that analyzes the impact of these mutations in terms of survival and mortality on patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. We conducted a retrospective study spanning from 2018 to 2022, which involved 118 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The patients were selected from the databases of the Oradea County Emergency Clinical Hospital and Pelican Oradea Hospital. Genetic testing was performed at the "Resident Laboratory" clinic. Subsequently, patients were divided into two groups of equal size based on the presence or absence of mutations. The survival rate one year after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer is 84.74% (N=50/59) for the mutant group versus 67.96% (N=40/59) for the wild-type group. The survival rate at five years from the diagnosis of colorectal cancer is 25.93% (N=15/59) for patients with wild-type tumors compared to 33.54% (N=20/59) for patients with tumors with mutant status (p=0.483, HR=1.153, CI 95% 0.7661-1.735). The five-year survival rate, depending on the mutation present, highlights the fact that the average overall survival for those with the KRAS mutation is 38.6 months (CI 95% 35.22-41.97) and for those with the BRAF mutation is 8.3 months (CI 95% 5.42-11.17) (p=0.039). The mortality rate for mutant KRAS is 44.89% (N=22/50), while for those with mutant BRAF, it is 100% (N=6/6). We observed no statistically significant difference in overall survival rate and disease-free interval between the two studied groups, but the overall survival was better for those with mutations present (38.64 months versus 31.07 months for wild-type tumors). The mortality rate is higher among tumors with wild-type status (p=0.005), in the first year after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The BRAF mutation confers a much worse prognosis than the KRAS mutation, from both the survival analysis and the mortality rate.

Clinical characteristic and survival outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC according to KRAS mutational status in the French real-life ESME cohort

The RAS/MEK signaling pathway is essential in carcinogenesis and frequently altered in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), notably by KRAS mutations (KRASm) that affect 25%-30% of non-squamous NSCLC. This study aims to explore the impact of KRASm subtypes on disease phenotype and survival outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics database for advanced or metastatic lung cancer from 2011 to 2021. Patient demographics, histology, KRASm status, treatment strategies, and outcomes were assessed. Of 10 177 assessable patients for KRAS status, 17.6% had KRAS p.G12C mutation, 22.6% had KRAS non-p.G12C mutation, and 59.8% were KRASwt. KRASm patients were more often smokers (96.3%) compared with KRASwt (85.8%). A higher proportion of programmed death-ligand 1 ≥50% was found for KRASm patients: 43.5% versus 38.0% (P < 0.01). KRASm correlated with poorer outcomes. First-line median progression-free survival was shorter in the KRASm than the KRASwt cohort: 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-4.3 months] versus 5.1 months (95% CI 4.8-5.3 months), P < 0.001. First-line overall survival was shorter for KRASm than KRASwt patients: 12.6 months (95% CI 11.6-13.6 months) versus 15.4 months (95% CI 14.6-16.2 months), P= 0.012. First-line chemoimmunotherapy offered better overall survival in KRAS p.G12C (48.8 months) compared with KRAS non-p.G12C (24.0 months) and KRASwt (22.5 months) patients. Second-line overall survival with immunotherapy was superior in the KRAS p.G12C subgroup: 12.6 months (95% CI 8.1-18.6 months) compared with 9.4 months (95% CI 8.0-11.4 months) for KRAS non-p.G12C and 9.6 months (8.4-11.0 months) for KRASwt patients. We highlighted distinct clinical profiles and survival outcomes according to KRASm subtypes. Notably KRAS p.G12C mutations may provide increased sensitivity to immunotherapy, suggesting potential therapeutic implications for sequencing or combination of therapies. Further research on the impact of emerging KRAS specific inhibitors are warranted in real-world cohorts.

Development of an arenavirus-based immunotherapy for treatment of KRAS mutant cancer.

e14672 Background: Oncogenic mutations in KRAS are prevalent in more than 80% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), approximately 30% of colorectal cancer (CRC) and 15-20% of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). It has been demonstrated previously that CD8+ T cell responses specific for KRAS mutations can lead to tumor control and regression of metastasis. Replicating arenavirus vectors are currently evaluated in multiple clinical trials in infectious diseases and oncology and have demonstrated potent induction of target antigen specific CD8+ T cell responses of up to almost 50% of the total CD8+ T cell compartment in peripheral blood. To augment KRAS mutation specific CD8+ T cell responses in patients, we are using replicating arenavirus vectors targeting five prevalent KRAS mutations which are found in approximately 95% (PDAC), 74% (CRC), and 83% (LUAD) of the KRAS mutated tumors, representing a promising off-the-shelf immunotherapy for these indications. Here, we systematically investigate immune responses induced by mutant KRAS targeted arenavirus-vector-based cancer vaccines in HLA transgenic mice and characterize the efficiency of target cell killing of activated KRAS mutation specific CD8+ T cells. Methods: A transgene cassette consisting of peptide stretches including KRAS mutations G12D, G12V, G12C, G12R and G13D was generated by in silico aided antigen design. Vectors encoding peptide stretches of single KRAS mutations as well as the corresponding wildtype KRAS sequence served as controls in preclinical experiments. KRAS mutation specific CD8+ T cell expansion was evaluated in HLA transgenic mice and functionality of induced CD8+ T cells was evaluated by assessing CD8+ T cell mediated killing of mutant KRAS peptide loaded target cells in vivo. Results: All treatment regimens were well tolerated, and no mortalities or major adverse events were observed. Following vector administration, HLA I restricted antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses were detected against 4 encoded mutant KRAS epitopes in HLA-A*11:01 (KRAS G12D and G12V), or HLA-B*07:02 (KRAS G12C and G12R) transgenic mice. These cells did not cross-react with wildtype KRAS epitopes presented in the same HLA I molecules. Specific cytotoxicity against KRAS G12D/V or KRAS G12C/R pulsed target cells was observed in vivo in HLA transgenic animals, indicating functionality of the induced KRAS mutation specific T cells. No specific cytotoxicity towards target cells pulsed with KRAS WT peptides was observed in any of the groups. Conclusions: This study indicates efficient induction of KRAS mutation specific T cell responses in HLA transgenic mice using an arenavirus vector based vaccine. Expanded CD8+ T cells were capable of killing cells loaded with KRAS mutation specific epitopes in vivo indicating functionality of the induced T cell responses. Based on these results, initiation of a Phase I study for the treatment of KRAS mutated cancers is planned.

Development of custom amplicon-based test systems for detecting KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF gene mutations in colorectal cancer using next-generation sequencing (NGS).

e15061 Background: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based mutation diagnostics in colorectal cancer is widely available. However, PCR has limitations in identifying rare mutations and precise mutation coordinates. Targeted sequencing, though promising, often incurs high costs and longer research durations, demanding higher DNA sample quality. Our study demonstrates the benefits of using a customized amplicon test system for diagnosing somatic mutations in tumor tissue, including detecting rare mutations not captured by PCR, requiring less input biomaterial, and similar research costs. Methods: A targeted NGS assay system was developed using region-specific primers for KRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4), NRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4), and BRAF (exon 15). Library preparation involved a three-step PCR process: Target PCR incorporating Illumina overhang adapter sequences, Index PCR introducing multiplexing indices and sequencing adapters, and PCR cleanup using magnetic beads. Sequencing utilized MiSeq v2 reagents with paired 300‐bp reads, generating high-quality, full-length reads. Validation included re-testing known samples. Tumor cell percentages in FFPE specimens were determined, and DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit. Data analysis utilized proprietary software. Results: Out of 1234 samples, 1133 were tested, with mutations detected in 685 samples (60.45%). KRAS mutations were found in 548 (48.36%), NRAS mutations in 40 (3.5%), and BRAF mutations in 88 (7.7%) samples. Double mutations were observed in 9 samples (0.79%). Data on rare and double mutations are presented in the table. Conclusions: The developed test system accurately identifies essential mutations in colorectal cancer, including rare and potentially clinically significant variants. The required DNA amount ranged from 10 to 30 ng in 5 μl, nearly ten times less than well-known commercial PCR test systems like COBAS (Roche) and therascreen (QIAGEN). The cost of the study is comparable to PCR with a minimum study duration of 4 days. [Table: see text]

TRITON: Phase 3b study of tremelimumab (T) + durvalumab (D) vs pembrolizumab (P), in combination with chemotherapy (CT), in non-squamous (NSQ) metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) with STK11and/or KEAP1 and/or KRAS mutations.

TPS8655 Background: Mutations in STK11 and KEAP1, present in approximately 20% and 15% of patients (pts) respectively with NSQ mNSCLC, lead to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and are associated with inferior clinical outcomes with anti-PD-(L)1 based chemo-immunotherapy, especially when co-mutated with KRAS. Pts with tumors bearing STK11, KEAP1and/or KRAS mutations may benefit from combinations with CTLA-4 inhibitors, aimed at increasing immune responses. In the phase 3 POSEIDON trial (NCT03164616), first-line (1L) T+D+CT significantly improved overall survival (OS; HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.65–0.92]; P=0.0030) vs CT. These results were maintained after a median follow-up of &gt;5 years. Subgroup analyses showed sustained OS improvement with T+D+CT vs CT in pts with mNSCLC with STK11 (NSQ), KEAP1(all histologies, due to small sample size), and KRAS (NSQ) mutations (HR [95% CI] 0.57 [0.32–1.04), 0.43 [0.16–1.25], and 0.55 [0.36–0.83], respectively). The TRITON study will further investigate the signal of efficacy observed in the POSEIDON subgroup analysis. The study will compare T+D+CT vs P+CT (a standard treatment for NSQ mNSCLC) in pts with STK11 and/or KEAP1 and/or KRASmutations. The results will help to inform clinical practice and to establish a biomarker-driven treatment strategy for these difficult-to-treat pts. Methods: TRITON (NCT06008093) is a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, 2-arm parallel randomized study. Eligible pts, aged ≥18 years, must have NSQ mNSCLC (no EGFR or ALK alterations), with STK11, KEAP1, or KRAS mutations/co-mutations, no prior systemic therapy for mNSCLC, and ECOG performance status of 0/1. Approximately 280 pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive either T+D+CT or P+CT. In the T+D+CT arm, pts will receive T (75 mg) + D (1500 mg) + carboplatin (AUC 5 or 6)/cisplatin (75 mg/m2) + pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 4 cycles (a fifth dose of T [75 mg] will be given in combination with D, post-platinum at week 16), followed by maintenance D (1500 mg) + pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) Q4W until disease progression (PD). In the P+CT arm, pts will receive P (200 mg) + carboplatin (AUC 5 or 6)/cisplatin (75 mg/m2) + pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) Q3W for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance P (200 mg) + pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) Q3W until PD, for up to 24 months. Randomization is stratified by mutation type ( KRAS [without STK11 or KEAP1] mutations are capped at 33% of the total sample) and tumor PD-L1 expression (≥1% vs &lt;1%). Primary endpoints are OS in all pts and in the subset with STK11 or KEAP1 mutations/co-mutations. Key secondary endpoints include OS rates at 12 and 24 months, progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response (all RECIST v1.1; investigator-assessed) and safety/tolerability (CTCAE v5.0). Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT06008093 .

Young adults (YA) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Snapshot of the oncogenic drivers and immune landscapes.

8538 Background: Approximately 5% of NSCLC occurs in patients 50 years or younger (median age:71) representing distinct clinicopathological features. Reports characterizing genomic alterations are scarce. Using a large real-world (RW) dataset, we characterize oncogenic drivers, and immune landscapes to better understand YA with NSCLC. Methods: 42,326 NSCLC specimens were analyzed using next-generation sequencing of DNA (DNA-592 panel or whole exome) or RNA (whole transcriptome) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). YA (&lt;=50 years) were categorized into three groups (years): 18-30 (A1, n=61), 31-40 (A2, n=277) &amp; 41-50 (A3, n=1,549); vs &gt;50 (A4, n=40,439). Composition of tumor microenvironment (TME) was estimated from bulk RNA sequencing using QuanTIseq method. RW survival on Osimertinib (Osi-OS) was obtained from insurance claims and calculated from initiation of Osi treatment to last contact and was compared between ages 18-50 and &gt;50 years. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Statistical significance was determined using Chi-square, Fisher’s Exact, Mann-Whitney U and log-rank tests and corrected for multiple comparisons where applicable (q&lt;0.05). Results: Consistent with previous reports, NSCLC in YA was more prevalent in females, non-smokers and was associated with adenocarcinoma histology. Among driver alterations, ALK(IHC+), ROS1, RET and NTRK1 fusion were enriched and KRAS mutations were reduced in YA. Interestingly, while the prevalence of KRASG12D from transition (non-smoker related) and EGFRE746_A750 decreased with age, KRASG12C from transversion increased with age in YA. YA were also associated with improved Osi-OS (HR: 0.79, median Osi-OS=37.4 months vs 32 months in &gt;50 years old, p=0.019). High tumor mutation burden (&gt;=10 mut/Mb), the prevalence of mutations in TP53, KMT2D, NF1, RBM10, NFE2L2 and NOTCH1 increased while GNAS decreased with age. The expression of immune checkpoint genes such as PDCD1LG2(A1/A4: 0.63, A3/A4: 0.89), LAG3(A2/A4: 0.73, A3/A4: 0.89) and IFNG (A1/A4: 0.32, A3/A4: 0.75) were reduced, while M2 macrophage (A2/A4: 1.2) and neutrophil (A2/A4: 1.2) were increased in YA (all q&lt;0.05). Conclusions: We report an increased prevalence of RET and NTRK1 fusions in YA and key differences in distributions of frequent KRAS and EGFR mutations in YA (vs A4) along with decreased expression of immune related genes in the tumor microenvironment. The implications are under active investigation. [Table: see text]

CASTOR1 phosphorylation as a predictor of survival in male patients with KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.

e20015 Background: Lung cancer, a leading global cause of cancer-related mortality, necessitates enhanced prognostic markers for improved treatment outcomes. This study focuses on the predictive value of phosphorylated cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1 at S14 (pCASTOR1) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, specifically in males with KRAS mutations. Methods: This retrospective study, approved by University of Pittsburgh IRB, utilized formaline-fixed paraffin embedded primary tissues from two independent cohorts of patients who underwent thoracic surgical procedures at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) from 2002 to 2011. Comprehensive clinical, demographical and pathological information was obtained from UPMC Cancer Registry, with cases lacking incomplete information excluded from analysis. Study endpoints included overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). An antibody targeting pCASTOR1 was employed to analyze LUAD tumor and adjacent non-tumor lung tissues from both cohorts. A pathologist, blinded to patient information and survival outcomes, conducted scoring in 5% increments. Scores were categorized as low or high pCASTOR1 based on second or third quartile. Correlations between pCASTOR1 scores and OS/RFS were examined, stratifying by clinical, pathological, demographic, or genotype data. Univariate OS and RFS analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, while multivariate survival significance was assessed via Cox regression analysis. Additionally, unpaired T-tests were utilized to compare pCASTOR1 levels between non-tumor and tumor cells. A significance threshold of p &lt; 0.05 was applied for all analyses. Results: Tumor cells exhibited significantly elevated pCASTOR1 scores compared to non-tumor cells in both cohorts (P &lt; 0.05). High pCASTOR1 scores predicted poor OS (HR = 3.3, P = 0.0008) and RFS (HR = 3.0, P = 0.0035) in male patients with KRAS mutations in Cohort 1. pCASTOR1 remained an independent predictor for OS (HR = 4.1, P = 0.0047) and RFS (HR = 3.5, P = 0.0342) after controlling for other factors. Cohort 2, comprised solely of smokers with incomplete genotype information, validated these findings, with high pCASTOR1 scores correlating with worse OS (HR = 4.8, P = 0.0363). Notably, in early-stage LUAD, elevated pCASTOR1 scores were associated with significantly worse OS (HR = 3.3, P = 0.0176) and RFS (HR = 3.1, P = 0.0277) in male patients with KRAS mutations in Cohort 1, and worse OS (HR = 5.0, P = 0.0069) and RFS (HR = 5.0, P = 0.0069) in Cohort 2, akin to late-stage patients. Conclusions: Elevated pCASTOR1 score serves as a robust biomarker predicting poor OS and RFS in male LUAD patients with KRAS mutations, offering potential clinical utility in optimizing treatment strategies for this subgroup.

KRAS mutation subtypes responded differently to combination immunotherapy via disturbing myeloid-derived suppressor cells in non-small cell lung cancer.

8635 Background: The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy has shown high efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but further exploration of the predictive biomarkers is needed. KRAS is the most common driver oncogene in patients with NSCLC. However, the influence of different KRAS mutation subtypes on immunotherapy response remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the value of KRAS mutation subtypes for predicting response to immunotherapy in NSCLC patients and to further analyze the related tumor immune microenvironment (TiME) phenotypes. Methods: In this retrospective study, clinical data were extracted from the medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs and whose available molecular analysis included KRAS mutation information between January 2017 and December 2022. NSCLC tissue samples were collected for TiME analysis. Differences in immune cell subsets between different groups were analyzed using the Mann‒Whitney U test. Clinical characteristics, ICI treatment efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariate Cox models. Results: A total of 1913 eligible KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients were screened, and 137 patients who received systemic immunotherapy were enrolled (108 males vs 29 females), with a median age of 62 (range, 39-84) years. Among them, 126 (92.0%) patients had adenocarcinoma, 99 (72.3%) patients were systemic therapy naïve, and 124 (90.5%) patients received combined immunotherapy. Among the patients with KRAS mutations, 48 (35.0%) had G12C, 20 (14.6%) had G12V, 27 (19.7%) had G12D and 42 (30.7%) had other subtypes. PFS was significantly longer in the G12C subgroup than in the other mutation subgroup (median PFS: 11.3 vs 6.8 months, P = 0.001). The median PFS times in the G12C/G12V subgroup and the other groups were 11.1 months and 6.5 months, respectively ( P= 0.0005). Multivariate analysis of the immunotherapy cohort revealed that G12C/G12V was an independent predictor of PFS ( P = 0.003, hazard ratio (HR): 2.021, 95% CI: 1.265-3.227). Further TiME analysis suggested that the infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs, CD33+CD11b+) in the tumor and stromal areas in the G12C/G12V subgroup was significantly lower than that in the other subgroup (tumor area, P= 0.045; stroma area, P= 0.015). However, no significant difference in PD-L1 expression was found between the G12C/G12V group and the other groups. Conclusions: KRAS G12C and G12V were associated with favorable combined ICI treatment efficacy in patients with NSCLC. Patients with G12C or G12V mutations had longer PFS and lower infiltration of MDSCs. KRAS mutation subtypes are potential predictive biomarkers disturbed by MDSCs for combination therapy in NSCLC patients.

Real-world impact of KRAS mutations on clinical outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine-tipiracil in the USA.

e15566 Background: Defining the impact of KRAS mutation status on outcomes to standard of care treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is of increasing clinical relevance. We interrogated a large real-world genomic database to further explore the association between KRAS mutations and benefit to trifluridine-tipiracil (FTD-TPI) in patients with mCRC. Methods: 19,364 patients with mCRC and known KRAS mutation status were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NextSeq, 592 Genes; NovaSeq, whole exome sequencing (WES)) at Caris Life Sciences. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) and time on treatment (ToT) was inferred from insurance claims data and calculated from time of start of treatment with FTD-TPI to last contact and time from first to last treatment with FTD-TPI with comparison done by the Kaplan-Meier test, respectively. Chi-square test was applied where appropriate, with p-value adjusted for multiple comparisons (p &lt; 0.05). Results: 764 of 10,571 (7.2%) patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS, 768 of 6,984 (11%) with KRAS G12 mutation, and 170 of 1,809 (9.4%) with KRAS G13 mutation received FTD-TPI. Age distribution was similar among groups. Sidedness of primary site was reported in 692 (40.3%) patients; an increased proportion of right-sided tumors was observed in KRAS G12 (53.4% vs. 28.3%, p &lt; 0.0001) and G13 (56% vs 28.3%, p &lt; 0.0001) groups compared to KRAS WT. An increased proportion of TP53 mutations in KRAS WT was observed compared to KRAS G12 mutation (87% vs. 70%, p &lt; 0.0001) and KRAS G13 mutation groups (87% vs. 75%, p &lt; 0.0001). KRAS G12 mutation was associated with shorter median rwOS compared to KRAS WT (7.33 vs. 8.43 months (mo), HR 1.13 (95% CI 1.11-1.42), p = 0.041). KRAS G13 mutation was associated with similar rwOS to KRAS WT. Median ToT was shorter in patients with KRAS G12 mutations than KRAS WT (1.8 vs. 2 mo, HR of 1.22 (95% CI 1.11-1.42), p &lt; 0.001). Median ToT was longer in patients with KRAS G13 versus KRAS G12 (2.3 vs. 1.8 mo, HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.98), p = 0.032). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest primarily US-based cohort of mCRC treated with FTD-TPI to be reported. KRAS G12 mutation, but not KRAS G13 mutation, was associated with shorter rwOS and ToT compared to KRAS WT, despite enrichment of TP53 and BRAF mutations in the KRAS WT group. This finding is consistent with previously published analyses of large randomized prospective trials of FTD-TPI in mCRC and further support KRAS mutation status as a predictive biomarker in this setting. [Table: see text]

Phase 1/2 trial of the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor in combination with docetaxel in previously treated, advanced KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

8597 Background: KRAS mutant NSCLC remains a therapeutic challenge. Although KRAS G12C inhibitors are now approved for cases harboring that specific mutation, their efficacy is modest and the G12C variant accounts for only 40% of KRAS mutations in NSCLC. To date, there are no approved targeted therapies for non-G12C KRAS mutant NSCLC. Selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) modulate cancer cell biology by retaining certain proteins—such as tumor suppressors—within the nucleus, where they remain physiologically active. The XPO1 inhibitor selinexor demonstrated efficacyinpreclinicalNSCLC models harboring various KRAS mutations. Methods: In this 3 + 3 dose-escalation phase 1/2 trial, patients with previously treated advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC received selinexor (dosed orally weekly) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV every three weeks (NCT03095612). Prior treatment with KRAS G12C inhibitors was permitted. Results: Among 40 enrolled patients, median age was 66 years, 22 (55%) were female, and 34 (85%) were white. KRAS mutation types included G12C (28%), G12V (23%), G12D (20%), G12A (13%), G12R (5%), G13C (5%), and one case each of G12S, G13D, Q61L, and K117N. Patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-4). The maximum tolerated dose of selinexor was 60 mg PO weekly combined with docetaxel. The most common adverse events (AE) were nausea (73%, Gr ≥3 8%), fatigue (70%, Gr ≥3 5%), neutropenia (65%, Gr ≥3 60%), diarrhea (58%, Gr ≥3 10%), anorexia (50%, Gr ≥3 0%), and vomiting (45%, Gr ≥3 5%). Of 32 patients evaluable for efficacy, 7 (22%) had partial response (PR) and 18 (56%) had stable disease (SD) as best response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.9-5 months); median overall survival (OS) was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.5-13.7 months). Clinical outcomes did not differ significantly among KRAS mutation types. However, TP53co-mutations (48%) were associated with significantly worse outcomes: disease control rate (PR + SD) 27% vs 92% ( P=0.006); median PFS 1.8 vs 7.4 months ( P&lt;0.001); median OS 5.8 vs 17 months ( P=0.006). Additional biomarker studies are ongoing. Conclusions: Selinexor plus docetaxel is tolerated with multi-agent supportive care. The combination shows moderate efficacy across KRAS mutation types, with promising activity in TP53 wild type cases. Clinical trial information: NCT03095612 .