Combination Of Kinase Inhibitors Research Articles

953P Vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC): A promising prognostic predictor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immunotherapy combinations

953P Vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC): A promising prognostic predictor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immunotherapy combinations

A small secret of big rheumatology

Current recommendations for RA treatment determine the need to reduce the dose and duration of glucocorticoid(GC) use. This is due to the wide spectrum and high frequency (up to 100%) of serious adverse events (AE) during GC treatment. However, in real practice GCs in RA are used very often (in Russia, Western Europe and the USA they are used in about 50% of patients), and often in long-term courses. This is explained by the fact that the combination of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including biologics (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK), with GCs allows to achieve faster improvement of patients’ condition and therefore is very “convenient” for many patients and physicians.However, it is very difficult to ensure dose reduction and (especially!) complete discontinuation of GC administration afterwards. Clinical and observational studies show that 30–40% of patients manage to discontinue the use of GCs during treatment with bDMARDs and JAK. In addition, discontinuation of GCs may significantly increase the risk of RA flare, even with complex pathogenetic therapy.Nevertheless, prolonged use of GCs, including low doses (less than 7.5 mg/day of prednisolone) should be considered as an indicator of the severity of the disease course and inadequacy of the current therapy. Therefore, we should strive for personalization of RA therapy, selection of DMARDs based on the assessment of the disease phenotype and predictors of response to treatment with different drugs, achieving the main goal of therapy – remission/low disease activity and achievement of acceptable quality of life, without the use of GCs.

Treatment Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treated With Venetoclax and Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (BTKi) Combination Therapies

Treatment Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treated With Venetoclax and Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (BTKi) Combination Therapies

CLL-495 Treatment Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treated With Venetoclax and Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (BTKi) Combination Therapies

CLL-495 Treatment Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treated With Venetoclax and Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (BTKi) Combination Therapies

Comparative analysis of dual immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy versus immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor combination therapy for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis.

Whether immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus ICI combination therapy or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy is useful for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis (IVCTT) remains unclear. We retrospectively evaluated the therapeutic effects and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) associated with ICI-based combination therapy in 36 patients with advanced RCC with IVCTT. The median age at initiation of treatment was 71years; the IVCTT stages were cT3b in 22 patients and cT3c in 14. The ICI-ICI and ICI-TKI groups comprised 15 and 21 patients, respectively. Median tumor shrinkage at the best response showed that the primary tumor diameter decreased by 1.8cm (22%), and the IVCTT height decreased by 1.5cm (26%). A higher proportion of patients in the ICI-TKI group experienced tumor shrinkage than those in the ICI-ICI group (primary tumor, p = 0.0325; IVCTT, p = 0.0112). Approximately 27% of patients experienced an increase in the IVCTT height with ICI-ICI combination therapy. No significant difference was observed in the relative tumor shrinkage of IVCTT, primary or level-down staging of IVCTT, other treatment effects, incidence of TRAEs, surgical outcomes, or prognosis between the groups. ICI-based combination therapy is effective against IVCTT and primary RCC. Although ICI-ICI is associated with a higher probability of tumor growth compared with ICI-TKI in the frequency of tumor regression, both therapies may be almost equally effective against primary RCC with IVCTT.

58 Tumor immune microenvironment determinants of response to Lenvatinib and aPD-1 blockade in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Abstract Background Combinations of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and anti-angiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the mainstay of metastatic ccRCC front-line treatment, but heterogenous responses and lack of biomarkers strongly emphasizes the need to understand RCC-specific mechanisms of effective treatment-related anti-tumor immunity. Although prior work consistently highlights tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) in RCC prognosis and treatment response, TAM targeting has yet to experimentally assessed as a viable treatment sensitizer. Methods We therefore assessed the impact of TAM depletion using a clinical-grade colony stimulating factor receptor-1 inhibitor (CSF1Ri) on ICB or TKI sensitivity in a spontaneous mouse model of ccRCC with inducible kidney-specific Vhl, p53 and Rb1 deletions (KVpR). Mice were randomized to receive either no treatment, single agent Lenvatinib (TKI), aPD-1, or combinations with CSF1Ri. We longitudinally monitored a total of 307 tumors from 96 mice using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and collected responding and non-responding tumors for single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of response. Results Surprisingly we found that TAM depletion abolished aPD-1 response, with no effect on Lenvatinib response. ScRNAseq analyses suggest that CSF1R selectively depletes antigen presenting TAMs, leading to a striking loss of T cell infiltration. This suggests that TAMs, rather than dendritic cells as shown in other cancer types, may play a dominant role in eliciting T cells during aPD-1 therapy in RCC. On the other hand, Lenvatinib, which elicited a stronger T cell response than aPD-1, was associated with significant increases in cDC1 and plasma cells in responders, together suggesting that these two treatment modalities may operate through distinct antigen-presenting cells. Also unexpectedly, we found that both Lenvatinib and CSF1Ri induced severe intratumor hypoxia, which is typically associated with poor outcomes in most cancers. We identify a hypoxic niche-specific TAM subset that when abundant at baseline is predictive for poor response to ICB/TKI combos across multiple RCC trials, but post-treatment seems to capture hypoxia-mediated tumor cell death in responders in mouse and humans. We therefore wondered whether high levels of existing tumor hypoxia would exacerbate TKI-induced hypoxia leading to worst outcomes and found that in two novel RCC syngeneic models with high-baseline hypoxia, TKI indeed augments metastatic disease. Conclusions Our results offer mechanistic insight into the failure of CSF1R-based TAM depletion approaches in clinical trials and presents cautionary evidence against the use of hypoxia-inducing agents in tumors with high-baseline hypoxia. We show that TKI and ICB-induce distinct TME and hypoxia-related changes which require further study. More generally our study strongly emphasizes the importance of developing mechanism-guided clinical biomarkers. DOD CDMRP Funding: yes

37 Cost-effectiveness of treatment sequences with front-line nivolumab+ipilimumab therapy vs immuno-oncology+tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies in intermediate/poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Abstract Background Immuno-oncology (IO) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations have transformed the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the most cost-effective sequencing of these systemic therapies. This study aimed to assess the expected health and economic outcomes of various treatment sequences for newly diagnosed patients with intermediate/poor-risk RCC from a US payer perspective. Methods We developed a model using a continuous time micro-simulation framework. First-line treatment options included: nivolumab+ipilimumab, nivolumab+cabozantinib, pembrolizumab+lenvatinib, and pembrolizumab+axitinib. Second-line treatment options included: cabozantinib and everolimus+lenvatinib. In both lines, the source data for the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) distributions were obtained from the registrational randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of each therapy. The analysis included costs associated with drug acquisition in the US wholesale setting, drug administration and monitoring, management of treatment-related adverse events, disease management, and terminal care. Treatment duration for all first-line IO and TKI therapies was capped at 2 years. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated by multiplying time in each phase of the disease by phase-specific utility values estimated from the CheckMate 214 trial data using US tariffs. The analysis was run 1000 times for cohorts of 100 patients over a 20-year time horizon. All costs and health outcomes were discounted annually at a 3% rate. Results Average per-patient QALYs were estimated for each sequence of interest: nivolumab+ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib (3.59), nivolumab+ipilimumab followed by lenvatinib+everolimus (3.26), pembrolizumab+axitinib followed by cabozantinib (3.14), pembrolizumab+axitinib followed by lenvatinib+everolimus (2.97), pembrolizumab+lenvatinib followed by cabozantinib (3.51), and nivolumab+cabozantinib followed by lenvatinib+everolimus (2.99). Average per-patient costs were estimated for each sequence of interest: nivolumab+ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib ($468,856), nivolumab+ipilimumab followed by lenvatinib+everolimus ($491,259), pembrolizumab+axitinib followed by cabozantinib ($675,714), pembrolizumab+axitinib followed by lenvatinib+everolimus ($700,411), pembrolizumab+lenvatinib followed by cabozantinib ($837,888), nivolumab+cabozantinib followed by lenvatinib+everolimus ($873,377). First-line drug acquisition costs accounted for the majority of costs for all sequences. Conclusions Based upon our model using data from registrational RCTs, first-line nivolumab+ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib represents the dominant treatment strategy for intermediate/poor-risk mRCC patients in the US, offering estimated cost savings of up to 45% when compared to IO+TKI options. Additional studies are needed to elucidate whether these cost savings translate to the real-world setting.

First-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of efficacy and safety

PurposeImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy is a standard systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although differential pharmacologic action between ICI+ICI and ICI+tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations may affect outcomes, comparative studies using real-world data are few. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the records of 447 mRCC patients treated with 1st-line ICI-based combinations at multiple institutions between January 2018 and August 2023, and selected 320 patients diagnosed with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) for further study. Cohorts were matched using one-to-one propensity scores based on IMDC risk classification. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TrAE) were compared. ResultsThe matching process yielded 228 metastatic ccRCC patients treated with ICI+ICI (n = 114) or ICI+TKI (n = 114). Median OS was 53 months (95%CI: 33–NA) in patients treated with ICI+ICI and was not reached (95%CI: 43–NA) with ICI+TKI (P = 0.24). Median PFS was significantly shorter for ICI+ICI (13 months, 95%CI: 7–25) than for ICI+TKI (25 months, 95%CI: 13–NA) (P = 0.047). There were no differences in second-line PFS for sequential therapy after 1st-line combinations of ICI+ICI or ICI+TKI (6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.6). There were no differences in ORR between the 2 groups (ICI+ICI: 51% vs. ICI+TKI: 55%, P = 0.8); the progressive disease (PD) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with the ICI+ICI combination (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.029). The rate of any grade TrAE was significantly higher in patients treated with ICI+TKI (71% vs. 85%, P = 0.016), but we found no differences in severe TrAE between the 2 groups (39% vs. 36%, P = 0.8). ConclusionsIn a matched cohort of real-world data, we confirmed comparable OS benefits between ICI+ICI and ICI+TKI combinations. However, differential clinical behaviors in terms of PFS, PD rates, and TrAE between ICI-based combinations may enrich clinical decision-making.

Toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations in solid tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022367416.

Immune effect and prognosis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

The combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has shown broad prospects in prolonging the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TACE and TKIs can affect the immune microenvironment in patients with HCC. To determine the overall effects and differences between TACE and different TKIs combinations on the immune microenvironment. Data and immune cell profile test results from 213 HCC patients treated with TACE combined with apatinib, lenvatinib, sorafenib, or donafenib before and after 3 wk of treatment were collected. Monocytes were co-cultured with LM3 liver cancer cells, and their ability to inhibit cancer cell growth was analyzed using the MTT method and a nude mouse subcutaneous tumorigenesis experiment. Simulated combined therapy was done using an in situ liver cancer C57BL/6 male mouse model, and the immune response of tumor tissues was analyzed using immunohistochemistry. Compared to before combination therapy, the proportion of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)+ mononuclear cells and the number of CD4+ T cells decreased in the TACE + apatinib group, while the number of absolute count of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells increased in the TACE + lenvatinib group. Furthermore, the number of regulatory cells decreased in the TACE + donafenib group, whereas the number of CD8+ T and natural killer cells increased. Additionally, monocytes in the TACE combined with donafenib or lenvatinib groups had a stronger ability to inhibit cancer cell growth than those in the other groups. Combining TACE with donafenib or lenvatinib increased CD8+ T cell infiltration into the tumor tissue. In addition, the proportion of PD-1+ in CD8+ cells, absolute CD8+ T lymphocyte count, and regulatory T cells proportion were independent prognostic factors affecting the survival time of patients with HCC. TACE, in combination with different TKIs, produces different immune responses. Specifically, TACE combined with donafenib or lenvatinib may induce strong anti-tumor immune responses.

Which factors help to determine the long-term response to first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A Turkish multi-centre study.

Many developing countries lack access to recommended first-line treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or ICI-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations. As a result, predictive markers are necessary to identify patients who may benefit from single-agent TKIs for long-term response. This study aims to identify such parameters. This was a multi-centre, retrospective study of patients with mRCC who were undergoing first-line treatment with sunitinib or pazopanib. Patients who had been diagnosed with mRCC and had not experienced disease progression for 36 months or more were deemed to have achieved a long-term response. Predictive clinical and pathological characteristics of patients who did not experience long-term disease progression were investigated. A total of 320 patients from four hospitals were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 60 years (range 20-89 years). According to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification, 109 patients were classified as having favourable risk and 211 were in the intermediate-poor risk group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 12.5 months and 76.4 months, respectively. In the long-term responder's group, the median PFS was 78.4 months. Among all patients, prior nephrectomy, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) <1, and the absence of brain metastasis were predictive factors for long-term response. For patients in the favourable risk group, the lack of brain metastasis was a predictor of long-term response. In the intermediate-poor risk group, prior nephrectomy and ECOG PS <1 were predictive factors for long-term response. Some individuals with mRCC may experience a durable response to TKIs. The likelihood of a long-term response can be determined by factors such as nephrectomy, ECOG PS < 1, and the absence of brain metastases.

Importance of PTM of FLT3 in acute myeloid leukemia.

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is a receptor tyrosine kinase expressed in hematopoietic cells. Internal-tandem duplication domain (ITD) mutation and tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutation are the two most common mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of FLT3, such as glycosylation and ubiquitination, have been shown to impact various aspects of the protein in both wild-type (WT) and mutant forms of FLT3. In this review, we describe how the glycosylation status of FLT3 affects its subcellular localization, which significantly impacts the activation of downstream signaling, and the impact of specific ubiquitination on FLT3 function and stability, which may be associated with disease progression. Moreover, potential novel therapeutic strategies involving a combination of FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors and drugs targeting glycosylation or ubiquitination are discussed.

Combination of menin and kinase inhibitors as an effective treatment for leukemia with NUP98 translocations.

Chromosomal translocations of the nucleoporin 98 (NUP98) gene are found in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients leading to very poor outcomes. The oncogenic activity of NUP98 fusion proteins is dependent on the interaction between Mixed Lineage Leukemia 1 and menin. NUP98-rearranged (NUP98-r) leukemia cells also rely on specific kinases, including CDK6 and/or FLT3, suggesting that simultaneous targeting of these kinases and menin could overcome limited sensitivity to single agents. Here, we found that combinations of menin inhibitor, MI-3454, with kinase inhibitors targeting either CDK6 (Palbociclib) or FLT3 (Gilteritinib) strongly enhance the anti-leukemic effect of menin inhibition in NUP98-r leukemia models. We found strong synergistic effects of both combinations on cell growth, colony formation and differentiation in patient samples with NUP98 translocations. These combinations also markedly augmented anti-leukemic efficacy of menin inhibitor in Patient Derived Xenograft models of NUP98-r leukemia. Despite inhibiting two unrelated kinases, when Palbociclib or Gilteritinib were combined with the menin inhibitor, they affected similar pathways relevant to leukemogenesis, including cell cycle regulation, cell proliferation and differentiation. This study provides strong rationale for clinical translation of the combination of menin and kinase inhibitors as novel treatments for NUP98-r leukemia, supporting the unexplored combinations of epigenetic drugs with kinase inhibitors.

Efficacy and Safety of Immuno-Oncology Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as Late-Line Combination Therapy for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Background/Objectives: Immuno-oncology plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO+TKI) combination therapy is an essential first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, reports of its efficacy and safety as late-line therapy are lacking. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of IO+TKI combination therapy as a late-line therapy for patients with RCC. Methods: We retrospectively examined 17 patients with RCC who received IO+TKI combination therapy as a second-line therapy or beyond (pembrolizumab plus axitinib, n = 10; avelumab plus axitinib, n = 5; nivolumab plus cabozantinib, n = 2). Results: The overall response and disease control rates of IO+TKI combination therapy were 29.4% and 64.7%, respectively. The median overall survival was not attained. Progression-free survival was 552 days, and 94.1% of patients (n = 16) experienced adverse effects (AEs) of any grade; moreover, 41.2% of patients (n = 7) experienced grade ≥ 3 immuno-related AEs. Conclusions: IO+TKI combination therapy may be a late-line therapy option for RCC.

Tislelizumab with anlotinib and chemotherapy for second-line treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A pilot study early result.

e16316 Background: Advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a malignant tumor with poor prognosis. At present, chemotherapy is still the standard treatment, however the efficacy is unsatisfied. The lack of second-line treatment options for pancreatic cancer results in progression-free survival often lasting less than 3 months. For pancreatic cancer is an immune desert type of tumor, immunotherapy has not brought breakthrough therapeutic regimen compared to the remarkable data in other tumors.There is still insufficient therapeutic evidence treated with PD1 antibody in pancreatic cancer. Anlotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with anti-tumor effects. It has been shown the combination of PD1 and multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors can increase immunotherapy efficacy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Tislelizumab combined with Anlotinib, as well as chemotherapy (the choice of the investigator) in second-line treatment of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods: In this single arm, phase II, prospective exploratory study, it was planned to recruit 30 adult patients with treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who have never received any PD (L) 1 and TKI. Eligible patients received Tislelizumab (iv, 200mg, Q3W), Anlotinib (PO, 10mg, QD), and chemotherapy (determined by the researchers) till disease progression or death. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS), the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival(mOS), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment safety profile. Results: 14 eligible patients were recruited till Jan 2024, 12 patients with PFS records were included. Median follow-up time was 208 days (104 days-504 days). mPFS was 106 days, OS is not reached, BOR (best of response) was stable disease. The 3-months DCR rate was 58.3%, 6-months DCR rate was 25%. One patient was observed to have a 20% tumor shrinkage after two cycles of treatment and is still being followed up. The most common treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs) was neutropenia with level ≤grade 3, observed in 8/14 patients. The immune-related adverse event of concern was hypothyroidism(grade 1/2), which occurred in two patients. Two patients experienced grade 4 obstructive jaundice caused by the progression of the disease. Conclusions: The second-line combination regimen of Tislelizumab with Anlotinib based on chemotherapy demonstrated survival improvement trend and no new safety signals identified in pancreatic cancer. These data suggest Tislelizumab + Anlotinib+Chemo may be a promising novel treatment option for patients with pancreatic cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT05681390 .

Postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with donafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma with solitary large tumor and microvascular invasion: A multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase II trial.

e16227 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with solitary large tumor (≥ 5 cm) and microvascular invasion (MVI) was associated with high 5-year recurrence rate and poor survival prognosis. Postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) was found to improve the recurrence-free survival (RFS) with acceptable safety profiles in HCC patients with MVI. However, the prognosis of HCC who received adjuvant HAIC after hepatectomy still remain far from satisfactory. Several studies have shown that the combination of HAIC and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) could exhibit a synergistic anticancer effect and improve the survival outcomes of advanced HCC. Thus, the present study was conducted to explore the efficacy and safety of adjuvant HAIC plus the novel multikinase inhibitor donafenib in HCC with solitary tumor ≥ 5 cm and MVI. Methods: This prospective, single-arm phase II study was conducted in three medical centers in China. HCC patients with both solitary tumor ≥ 5 cm and MVI, no evidence of recurrence at radiological follow-up at 4-8 weeks after hepatectomy, no previous treatment for HCC other than hepatectomy, Child-Pugh score A or B7 were enrolled. Eligible patients received one cycle of HAIC with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (HAIC-FOLFOX4), and followed by donafenib (200 mg orally twice daily) for up to 1 year until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was 1-year recurrence-free survival rate (1-year RFS rate). Secondary endpoints included RFS, overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: A total of 18 patients were included for analysis. The median age was 59 years (range, 28–75), the median maximum tumor size was 7.0 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 6.2–7.8), 88.9% had low-risk MVI, 61.1% had Edmondson-Steiner grade III-IV and 44.4% had incomplete tumour capsule. As of November 27, 2023, 4 of 18 patients (22.2%) recurrenced and no deaths occurred with a median follow-up of 15.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1–19.1). The 1-year RFS rate was 64.9% (95%CI, 39.2%–100%), and current immature median RFS was 14.3 months (95%CI, not available [NA], 11.2–NA). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hand-foot skin reaction (72.2%), diarrhea (38.9%), decreased platelet count (22.2%), hypoalbuminemia (22.2%), and alopecia (22.2%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 6 patients (33.3%), and no grade 4 or 5 TRAEs occurred. Conclusions: In this prospective study, the preliminary data indicated that HAIC combined with donafenib is an encouraging adjuvant therapy with well-tolerated safety profiles for HCC patients with solitary tumor ≥ 5 cm and MVI. Clinical trial information: NCT04962958 .

FDA analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

8595 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-(L)1 in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The majority of these patients progress and there remains a high unmet medical need in the second-line setting given the limited FDA approved available therapies. The ICI plus vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF TKI) combination, successful across several tumor types, was studied in NSCLC as a potential treatment option. Methods: The FDA identified 3 randomized trials conducted between June 2019 and August 2023, comparing the combination regimen ICI plus VEGF TKI to docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC who had progressed on both platinum-based chemotherapy and an ICI. All 3 trials were publicly reported to have not met their primary endpoint. Topline results for key efficacy and safety outcomes from each of the 3 trials were provided by the commercial sponsors. Results: 1317 total patients across 3 trials (LEAP-008, SAPPHIRE and CONTACT-01) were randomized to receive either an ICI plus VEGF TKI or docetaxel. The results are presented (Table). Efficacy parameters demonstrated similar results across trials between arms. There was no clear signal that the combination is more effective than single agent docetaxel. Safety parameters across trials consistently demonstrated higher rates of toxicity with the combination. Conclusions: ICI plus oral VEGF TKI combinations have not demonstrated an advantage over docetaxel in randomized trials of patients with advanced NSCLC. In 2 of the 3 trials, response rate data did not demonstrate superior efficacy compared to docetaxel. Additionally, any observed PFS benefit was small in magnitude. The relatively low efficacy, in combination with the additive toxicity of the regimen, may curtail a potential OS benefit. There remains a high unmet medical need in this patient population and further analysis is necessary to explore potential NSCLC subgroups which may derive benefit. [Table: see text]

Partitioned overall survival: Comprehensive analysis of survival states over 4 years in CheckMate 9ER comparing first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).

4507 Background: Immunotherapy regimens can be associated with prolonged disease control after treatment discontinuation without the need for further anticancer therapy. An integrated, comprehensive partitioned survival analysis describes how patients spend overall survival (OS) time, on/off treatment, with/without toxicity. Previous analysis of first-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) for aRCC in CheckMate 214 showed treatment-free survival (TFS) twice as long vs sunitinib (SUN). TFS and survival states for immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination are of interest. Methods: Overall, 651 patients (pts) with aRCC were randomized to receive 1L NIVO + cabozantinib (CABO) or SUN in the CheckMate 9ER trial; treatment continued until progression or intolerance, NIVO for at most 24 months. Minimum follow-up was 4 years. We partitioned area under the Kaplan–Meier (KM) OS curve into 3 survival states, defined from randomization: time on 1L protocol therapy, TFS, and survival after subsequent systemic therapy (second line [2L]) initiation. TFS and protocol therapy were subdivided as mean times with/without reported grade 2+ treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Areas under and between KM curves were estimated by 48-month restricted mean times to event. Bootstrapped 95% CIs for between-group differences are reported. Results: At 4 years post randomization, KM estimates of OS were 49.2% vs 40.2% of pts assigned to NIVO+CABO vs SUN, respectively; 17.6% vs 4.7% of pts were surviving treatment-free, and 15.8% vs 8.2% were continuing on 1L protocol therapy. Over the 48-month period since randomization (Table), the mean TFS (95% CI) was 2.4 (0.8–3.9) months longer after treatment with NIVO+CABO than SUN. At least half of TFS was spent with toxicity in both treatment groups, resulting in difference in mean TFS (95% CI) without toxicity of 0.7 (−0.4 to 1.8) month. The NIVO+CABO group spent a mean (95% CI) of 8.5 (6.2–10.8) months more survival time on 1L protocol therapy, whereas the SUN group spent a mean (95% CI) of 6.5 (4.4–8.6) months more survival time after 2L therapy initiation. Conclusions: Over the 4-year period since initiation of 1L therapy for aRCC, the longer OS achieved with NIVO+CABO was accompanied by 1.5 times longer mean time surviving treatment-free before 2L therapy compared with SUN, a smaller difference than seen for NIVO + IPI vs SUN. [Table: see text]

Avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Final overall survival (OS) analysis from the JAVELIN Renal 101 phase 3 trial.

4508 Background: The JAVELIN Renal 101 (NCT02684006) phase 3 trial compared first-line treatment with avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib in aRCC. The trial previously met one of its primary objectives by showing significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) with avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib in pts with PD-L1+ tumors; longer PFS, higher objective response rate (ORR), and an acceptable safety profile were also observed in the overall population. OS data were immature. Here we report the final analysis. Methods: Pts with untreated aRCC (any IMDC risk score) were randomized 1:1 to avelumab + axitinib or sunitinib. OS and PFS (by blinded independent central review) in pts with PD-L1+ tumors (SP263 assay) were independent primary endpoints. OS and PFS in the overall population were key secondary endpoints; response and safety were also analyzed. Results: Of 886 pts randomized, 560 (63.2%) had PD-L1+ tumors. At data cutoff (August 31, 2023), median follow-up in the avelumab + axitinib and sunitinib arms was 73.7 and 73.6 months, respectively (≥68 months in all pts). Final efficacy data are shown in the Table. In the avelumab + axitinib and sunitinib arms, grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 66.8% vs 61.5%, respectively. Second-line therapy was received by 58.1% vs 69.4%, including a PD-(L)1 inhibitor in 18.8% vs 53.6%, respectively. Conclusions: The JAVELIN Renal 101 trial provides the longest follow-up for immune checkpoint inhibitor + tyrosine kinase inhibitor combination treatment from a phase 3 trial reported to date. OS analyses favored avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib but did not reach statistical significance. PFS was longer with avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib, and responses were durable in a subset of pts. Final analysis results confirm the long-term efficacy and manageable safety profile of avelumab + axitinib treatment in pts with aRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006 . [Table: see text]

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Beyond the Border of Advanced Stage Therapy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the deadliest emergent health issue around the globe. The stronger oncogenic effect, proteins, and weakened immune response are precisely linked with a significant prospect of developing HCC. Several conventional systemic therapies, antiangiogenic therapy, and immunotherapy techniques have significantly improved the outcomes for early-, intermediate-, and advanced-stage HCC patients, giving new hope for effective HCC management and prolonged survival rates. Innovative therapeutic approaches beyond conventional treatments have altered the landscape of managing HCC, particularly focusing on targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The advancement in HCC treatment suggested by the Food and Drug Administration is multidimensional treatment options, including multikinase inhibitors (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, ramucirumab, and cabozantinib) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, tremelimumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab), in monotherapy and in combination therapy to increase life expectancy of HCC patients. This review highlights the efficacy of multikinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in monotherapy and combination therapy through the analysis of phase II, and III clinical trials, targeting the key molecular pathways involved in cellular signaling and immune response for the prospective treatment of advanced and unresectable HCC and discusses the upcoming combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Finally, the hidden challenges with pharmacological therapy for HCC, feasible solutions for the future, and implications of possible presumptions to develop drugs for HCC treatment are reported.